EFL Learners’ Causal Attributions and Dimensionality Styles for Perceived Success and Failure

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 11 - 26, 15.06.2017

Ayşe Taşkıran Belgin Aydın

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.417235

Cited By: 3

Öz

 The main purpose of this study was to analyze English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ causal attributions about their perceived success and failure in language learning process at Anadolu University School of Foreign Languages (AUSFL). Their attributions were analyzed and compared in terms of perceived locus of causality, stability and controllability to find out whether causal dimensionality of the students was healthy or unhealthy. The sample consisted of 158 students. A self-administered questionnaire asked questions concerning the perceived causes of outcomes, perceived underlying dimensions of attributions. Each attribution was labeled and frequency percentages were calculated. For causal dimensionality, the number of the marks for yes/no questions that aimed to explore locus of causality, stability and controllability were calculated and frequency percentages were found. In order to explore possible differences between success and failure groups’ causal dimensionality profiles, chi-square analyses were done. The number of the students who perceived themselves as unsuccessful was slightly more than those who perceived themselves successful. Participants reported more causal attributions for failure than they did for success. Success-oriented students demonstrated significantly more internal, controllable, and relatively more stable attributional styles than failure-oriented students, a finding supported by literature on attribution theory. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attribution, Causal Dimensions, EFL, Motivation

Kaynakça

• Akbulut, E. (2006). Müzik eğitim anabilim dalı öğrencilerinin denetim odaklarına ilişkin algıları. G. Ü. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(3), 171-180.
• Alderman, M. K. (2013). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Routledge.
• Altan, Z. M. (2006). Beliefs about language learning of foreign language-major university students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 45-52. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2006v31n2.5
• Aydın, B. (1999). A study of sources of foreign language classroom anxiety in speaking and writing classes. Doctorate Thesis submitted to the Institute of Educational Sciences Anadolu University, Turkey.
• Brophy, J. E. (1998). Motivating students to learn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Brown, R. A., Gray, R. R. & Ferrara, M. S. (2005). Attributions for personal achievement outcomes among Japanese, Chinese, and Turkish university students. Information and Communication Studies, 33(1), 1-14.
• Can, B. (2005). An analysis of elementary school teachers’ causal attributions related to self-identified success and failure. MA Thesis submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences Boğaziçi University, Turkey.
• Ciabuca, A. & Gheorghe, L. (2014). Attribution for Success and Failure in Romanian Context. Theoretical Model that Accounts for Explaining Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 254-260.
• Cortes-Suarez, G. and Sandiford, J. R. (2008). Causal attributions for success or failure of students in college algebra. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 32, 325-346.
• Dandy, J., Nettelbeck, T.(2000). The model student? an investigation of chinese Australian students’ academic achievement, studying, and causal attributions for academic success and failure. Australian Psychologist,35(3), 208-215.
• Ersever, H. Ö. (1996). Karar Verme Becerileri Kazandırma Programının ve Etkileşim Grubu Deneyiminin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Karar Verme Stilleri Üzerindeki Etkileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Erten, İ. H. & Burden, R. L. (2014). The relationship between academic self-concept, attributions, and L2 achievement. System, 42, 391-401. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.006
• Försterling, F. (1985). Attribution retraining: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 495-512.
• Försterling, F. (1988). Attribution Theory in Clinical Psychology. New York: Wiley.
• Försterling, F. (2001) Attribution: An Introduction to Theories, Research, and Applications. Psychology Press, Hove, ISBN 0-86377-792-9.
• Gabillona, Z. (2013). Language learner beliefs from an attributional perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1697-1711.
• Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs forcing: Basic of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
• Gobel, P., Mori, S. (2007). Success and failurein the EFL classroom: Exploring students’ attributional beliefs in language learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 7, 149-169.
• Gobel, P., Mori, S., Thang, S. M., Kan, N. H., & Lee, K. W. (2011). The impact of culture on student attributions for performance: A comparative study of three groups of EFL/ESL learners. Journal of Institutional Research (South East Asia)(JIRSEA), 9(1), 27-43.
• Gobel, P., Thang, S. M., Sidhu, G. K., Oon, S. I., & Chan, Y. F. (2013). Attributions to success and failure in English language learning: A comparative study of urban and rural undergraduates in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(2), 53.
• Gonzalez, A. S. (2016). Attribution Theory: Dimensions of Causality, Stability and Controllability According to Learners. In New Directions in Language Learning Psychology (pp. 209-232). Springer International Publishing.
• Graham, S.J. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5-39.
• Graham, S.J. (2004). Giving up on modern foreign languages? Students’ perceptions of learning French. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 171- 191.
• Hassaskhah, J.,&Vahabi, M. (2010).An in-depth analysis of the relationship between age and attribution in EFL contexts. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2126–2132. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.425
• Hsieh, P. H. (2004). How college students explain their grades in a foreign language course: The interrelationship of attributions, self-Efficacy, language learning beliefs, and achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin.
• Hsieh, P. P. H., & Kang, H. S. (2010). Attribution and self‐efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606-627. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00570.x
• Hsieh, P. H. P., Schallert, D. L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 513- 532.
• Kalaja, P. (2015). A review of five studies on learner beliefs about second language learning and teaching: exploring the possibilities of narratives. AFinLAn vuosikirja–AFinLA Yearbook, (73), 21-38.
• Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., Aro, M., & Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2015). Key Issues Relevant to the Studies to Be Reported: Beliefs, Agency and Identity. In Beliefs, Agency and Identity in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching(pp. 8-24). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Kapıkıran, N.A.(2008). Başarı sorumluluğunun ve başarı kaygısının psikopatolojik belirtilerle ilişkisinin belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 23(1), 140-149.
• Kozminsky, E., Kozminsky, L. (2002). The dialogue page: Teacher and student dialogues to improve learning motivation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(2), 88-95
• Lim, H.Y. (2007). Effects of attributions and task values on foreign language use anxiety. Journal of Education and Human Development, 1(2).
• Little, A.W. (1985). The child’s understanding of the cause of academic success and failure: A case study of British school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55,11–23.
• Martinko, M. J. (1995). Atribution theory: An organizational perspective. St.Lucie Press. Retrieved from: http://books.google.co.uk/
• McClure, J., Meyer L. H., Garisch, J., Fischer, R., Weir, K. F., & Walkey, F. H. (2011). Students’ attributions for their best and worst marks: Do they relate to achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 71-81.
• McGroarty, M. (2001). Situating second language motivation. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language learning (p.69-90). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
• McLoughlin, D. (2004). The use of small-scale research studies as a means of investigating language learners’ causal attributions for failure. In J. Hull, J. Harris, & P. Darasawang (Eds.), Research in ELT: Proceedings of the International Conference, 9-11 April 2003 (pp. 94-104). School of Liberal Arts, King Mongkuts’ University of Technology, Thonburi, Thailand.
• McLoughlin, D (2007).Attribution theory and learner motivation: can students be guided towards making more adaptive causal attributions? Retrieved from: http://jaltcue-sig.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ1-1articles/2007OCJ1-1- McGloughlin-p30-p38.pdf
• Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 487-503.
• Mezulis, A. M., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the selfserving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711-747.
• Normandeau, S., Gobeil, A.(1998). A developmental perspective on children’s understanding of causal attributions in achievement-related situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(3), 611-632.
• Ormrod, J. E. (2006) Educational psychology: Developing learners. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
• Peacock, M. (2009). Attribution and learning English as a foreign language. ELT journal, ccp031.
• Perry, R. P., Hechter, F. J., Menec, V. H., Weinberg, L. E. (1993). Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: An attributional retraining perspective. Research in Higher Education, 34(6), 687- 723
• Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
• Pishghadam, R. &Zabihi, R. (2011). Foreign language attributions and achievement in foreign language classes. International Journal of Linguistics, 3, 1-11.
• Robertson, J. S. (2000). Is attribution training a worthwhile classroom intervention for K-12 students with learning difficulties?. Educational Psychology Review,12(1),111-134.
• Rui, Z., Liang, F. (2008). Survey of college non-English adult learners’ English learning motivation and its implications. US-China Foreign Language, 6(3), 47-53.
• Russell, D. (1982) The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137- 1145.
• Şahinkarakaş, S. (2011). Young students’ success and failure attributions in language learning. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 39(7), 879-885.
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Try harder? Motivational effects of effort attributional feedback. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, 4. ED479353.
• Schunk, D.H., Gunn, T.P. (1986). Self efficacy and skill development: influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 238-244.
• Sinha, S.P., Gupta, S.(2006). State self esteem and causal attribution in reattribution training amang self worth protective students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 145-151.
• Sivri, Ü., Gemlik, N., Sur, H. (2007). A comparative analysis of internal-external locus of control among hospital personnel in Turkey and its managerial implications on health sector. Humanity and Social Sciences Journal, 2(1), 51-62.
• Stipek, D.J. (1988). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Taskiran, A. (2010). Exploring EFL students causal attributions of perceived success and failure in language learning process. Unpublished MA thesis, Anadolu University.
• Thang, S. M., Gobel, P., Nor F. M. N., & Vijaya L. S. (2011). Students’ attributions for success and failure in the learning of English as a second language: A comparison of undergraduates from sixpublic universities in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 19(2), 459-474.
• Tremblay, P.F., Gardner, R.C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 505-518.
• Tse, L. (2000) Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 69-84
• Tulu, G. (2013). Boys’ and girls’ attribution of performance in learning english as a foreign language: The case of Adama high schools in Ethiopia. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(23), 2197-2211.
• Tümkaya, S.(2000) İlkokul öğretmenlerindeki denetim odağı ve tükenmişlikle ilişkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8, 1-8.
• Vispoel, W. P., Austin, J. R. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incident approach to understanding students’ attributional beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 377-412.
• Wang, H., & Yan, J. X. (2015). Learner Beliefs and Translation Learning. Meta: Journal destraducteursMeta:/Translators’ Journal, 60(2), 377-377.
• Watkins, D., Regmi, M. (1993). Attributing academic success and failure in Nepal, The Journal of Social Psychology, 134 (2), 241-242.
• Waugh, C. K. (2002). Raising self-expectations:the key to motivating students with disabilities. Academic Exchange Quarterly. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3325/is_2_6/ai_n28932373/
• Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.
• Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
• Weiner, B. (1984) Principles for a theory of student motivation and their application within an attributional framework. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in Education, 1, p. 15-37, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
• Weiner, B. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion, Springer Verlag, New York.
• Weiner, B. (1992) Human motivation: Metaphors, themes and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 2000.
• Weisz, J. R. & Stipek, D. J. (1982). Competence, contingency, and the development of perceived control. Human Development, 25(4), 250-281.
• Williams, M.,Burden, R. (1999). Students’ developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. Modern Language Journal, 83, 193–201.
• Williams, M., Burden, R. L., Al-Baharna, S. (2001). Making sense of success and failure: The role the individual in motivation theory. In Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (technical report #23, pp. 171-184).Honlulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
• Williams, M., Burden, R., Poulet, G., Maun, I. (2004). Learners’ perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 30,19–29.
• Yılmaz, C. (2012). An investigation into Turkish EFL students’ attributions in reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), 823-828.causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137- 1145 Zhong, Q. M. (2015). The nature of language learners’ beliefs: A half-told story. International Journal of English Studies, 15(2), 41-60.