Giyilebilir Teknolojiler ve İnsan Bedenlerinin Kendilik Optimizasyonu: Akıllı Saat Örneği

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 1815 - 1834, 23.12.2024

Mediha Dilara Cılızoğlu , Çağatay Topal

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1512489

Öz

Akıllı saatler çoğunlukla sağlıkla ilgili veri üretmek amacıyla kullanılan giyilebilir teknolojilerdir. Bu makale akıllı saat kullanımına gözetim mekanizmaları açısından odaklanmaktadır. Makalede, akıllı saat örneği üzerinden kendilik denetiminde kullanılan giyilebilir teknolojilerin insan bedeninin kendilik optimizasyonu etkisine odaklanıyoruz. Bu amaçla, kendini izleme kültürü, nicelleştirme, kendilik yönetimi ve optimizasyonu kavramlarını kullanan çeşitli bilimsel çalışmalara atıfta bulunuyoruz. Metodolojik kaynaklarımızı operasyonel olarak örgütleyebilmek adına araştırma sorumuzu üç boyutta incelemeyi uygun gördük: niceliksel benlik, kendilik tanımları ve kendilik yönetimi. Analize temel olması açısından, toplamda 13 kişiyle kartopu örnekleme yöntemiyle derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirdik. Görüşmelerin ortalama süresi 30 dakika oldu. Görüşmeleri katılımcıların izniyle kaydettik. Akıllı saatin kullanımının alışkanlığı dönüşmesi belli bir süre gerektirdiğinden görüşme yapılacak kişilerin seçiminde en önemli kriter, saati beş ay ve daha fazla kullanma tecrübesine sahip olmalarıydı. Görüşülen kişilerin tamamı üniversite mezunu ve çoğunlukla beyaz yakalı olmak üzere gelir getirici bir meslek sahibiydi. Makale, bir nicelleştirme aracı olarak akıllı saatin, kullanıcıları kendi sağlıklarından sorumlu bireyler olmaları yönünde izlemeye teşvik ettiğini ileri sürmektedir. Bununla beraber, akıllı saat kullanımının kullanıcılar için doğrudan güçlendirici veya güçsüzleştirici sonuçlar üretmediğini de kabul ediyoruz. Akıllı saatin kullanımında daha ileri sosyolojik değerlendirmeler gerektiren ikici (dualistik) yönler vardır. Akıllı saat bir izleme aracı olarak görülse de farklı çağrışımlarının kullanıcılarla olan özel ilişkisi içinde anlaşılması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akıllı Saat, Kendilik Optimizasyonu, Nicelleştirme, Kendilik Tanımlama, Kendilik Yönetimi

Wearable Technologies and the Self-optimization of Human Bodies: The Case of Smartwatch

Öz

Smartwatches are wearable technologies mostly used to produce health-related data. This paper focuses on smartwatch uses in terms of surveillance mechanisms. We ask whether, in the example of smartwatch, wearable technologies used in self-regulation facilitate the self-optimization of human bodies. We refer to several scholarly works using the concepts of self-tracking culture, quantification, governance of self and self-optimization. We organize our literary and methodological sources in three dimensions to construct an operational analysis: quantified self, self-definition, and governance of the self. We conducted in-depth interviews with a total of thirteen people by using snowball sampling. The average duration of the interviews was 30 minutes. We recorded the interviews with the permission of the respondents. The most important criterion in choosing the people to be interviewed was that they had five months or more of experience using the watch since the smartwatch requires a certain amount of time to get used to it and develop a habit of use. All interviewees had university degrees and an income-generating profession, mostly white-collar. The paper argues that the smartwatch, as a tool of quantification, encourages users to monitor themselves in order to be responsible individuals for their own health. However, we also acknowledge that the use of smartwatch does not straightforwardly produce empowering or disempowering outcomes for the users. There are dualistic aspects in its use that require further sociological considerations. Although the smartwatch is a tool of monitoring, its different connotations must be understood in its specific relation to the users.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Smartwatch, Self-Optimization, Quantification, Self-Definition, Governance of Self

Kaynakça

• Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digital Health, 3, 1-18. doi: 10.1177/2055207616689509.
• Baker, D. A. (2020). Four ironies of self-quantification: Wearable technologies and the quantified self. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1477-1498. doi: 1 0.1007/s11948-020-00181-w.
• Clarke, A. E., Jeske, M., Shim, J. K. and Mamo, L. (2023). Biomedicalization revisited: Concepts and practices. In Handbook on the sociology of health and medicine, (pp. 91-109). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Conrad, P. (1975). The discovery of hyperkinesis: Notes on the medicalization of deviant behaviour. Social Problems, 23(1), 12-21. doi: 10.2307/799624
• Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
• Foucault, M. (2003a). Governmentality. In The essential Foucault, (pp. 229-245). New York: The New Press.
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, (pp. 16-49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
• Foucault, M. (2003b). The birth of biopolitics. In The essential Foucault, (pp. 202-207). New York: The New Press.
• Gabriels, K. and Coeckelbergh, M. (2019). Technologies of the self and other: How self-tracking technologies also shape the other. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(2), 119-127. doi: 10.1108/JICES-12-2018-0094.
• Giddens, A. (1996). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Gilmore, J. N. (2016). Everywear: The quantified self and wearable fitness technologies. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2524-2539. doi: 10.1177/1461444815588768.
• Jülicher, T. and Delisle, M. (2018). Step into “the circle”—A close look at wearables and quantified self. In Big data in context: Legal, social and technological insights, (pp. 81-91). Cham: Springer Open.
• Lupton, D. (2014, December). Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: The future of design, Conference OzcCHI (Computer-Human Interaction of Australia) 14, 77-86. doi: 10.1145/2686612.2686623. Lupton, D. (2016, 22 February). Interesting HCI research on self-tracking: A reading list. [Blog]. This sociological life: A blog by sociologist Deborah Lupton. https://simplysociology.wordpress.com/2016/02/15/interesting-hci-research-on-self-tracking-a-reading-list/ Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Cambridge: Polity Press. Lupton, D. (2017). Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2016.1228149.
• Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101-122. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726.
• Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Miller, P. and Rose N. (1993). Governing economic life. In Foucault’s New Domains, (pp. 75-105). London: Routledge.
• Neal-Joyce, M. (2022). The quotidian quantifier: Fitness tracking and the mundanity of surveillance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Sharon, T. (2017). Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 93-121. doi: 10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5. Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2(3), 93–118. doi: 10.3390/jpm2030093
• Tikkanen, H., Heinonen, K. and Ravald, A. (2023). Smart wearable technologies as resources for consumer agency in well-being. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(2-3), 136-150. doi: 10.1177/10949968221143351.
• Watch. Apple. (n.d.). https://www.apple.com/watch/
• Zampino, L. (2023). The time of the smartwatch: Taking care or wasting time?. Sociologica, 17(2), 131-147. doi: 10.6092/issn.1971-8853/14188.
• Zola, I. K. (1972). Medicine as an institution of social control. Sociological Review, 20(4), 487-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1972.tb00220.x