BibTex RIS Cite

TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Year 2009, , 97 - 116, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002114

Abstract

References

  • ALDRICH, D.,/KAGE, R. (2003), “Mars and Venus at Twilight: A Critical Investigation of Moralism, Age Effects, and Sex Differences,” Political Psychology, 24/1: 23-40.
  • ALOZIE, N.O./SIMON, J./MERRILL, B.D. (2003), “Gender and Political Orientation in Childhood,” The Social Science Journal, 40: 1-18.
  • ANSELMI, D.L./LAW, A.L. (1998), “Gender Identity Develoment,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 247-261.
  • BEM, S.L. (1998), Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-ashematic Children in a Gender in a Gender-Schematic Society, ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 262-274.
  • BEM, S. L. (1985), “Androgyny and Gender Scheme Theory: A Conceptual and Empirical Integration” SOLDEREGGER, T.B. (ed.), Psychology and Gender Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1984 (Lincoln ve London: University of Nebraska Press).
  • BERNSTEIN, A.G. (2005), “Gendered Characteristics of Political Engagement in College Students,” Sex Roles, 52/5-6: 299-310.
  • BOLAK-BORATAV, H. (2001), “Feminist Psikoloji: Nedir, Nas×l GeliĂti, Psikolojiye Getirdiÿi Yeni Aç×O×mlar,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 4/7: 1-19.
  • BUSS, D. M. (1998), “Psycholojical Sex Differences: Origins Through Sexual Selection,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 139-145.
  • BUSSEY, K./BANDURA, A. (1999), “Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation,” Psychological Review, 106/4, 676-713.
  • CARNAGHAN, E./BAHRY, D. (1990), “Political Attitudes and the Gender Gap in the USSR,” Comparative Politics, 22/4: 379-399.
  • CHAFFINS, S./FORBES, M. (1995), “The Glass Ceilling : Are Women Where They Should Be?,” Education, 115/3: 380–388.
  • DALTON, R. J. (2006), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracie.( Washington, DC: A Division of Congressional Quarterly).
  • DEAUX, K./MAJOR, B. (1987), “Putting Gender Into Context: An Interactive Model of GenderRelated Behavior,” Psychological Review, 94/3: 369-389.
  • DIEKMAN, A.B./EAGLY, A.H./KULESA, P. (2002), “Accuracy and Bias in Stereotypes about the Social and Political Attitudes of Women and Men,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 268-282.
  • DIEKMEN, A.B./GOODFRIEND, W./GOODWIN, S. (2004), “Dynamic Stereotypes of Power: Perceived Change and Stability in Gender Hierarchies,” Sex Roles, 50/3-4: 201-215.
  • DOREEN, K. (2002), “Men and Women Display Patterns of Behavioral and Cognitive Differences that Reflect varying Hormonal Ānfluences on Brain Development,” Scientific American, 12/1: 32-39.
  • EAGLY, A. H./WOOD, W./DIEKMAN, A.B. (2000), “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal,” ECKES, T./ TRAUTHER, H. M. (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Publishers): 123-160.
  • FRANZOI, S.L. (1996), Social Psychology (Dubuque, IA: Brown ve Benchmark).
  • HOOGHE, M./STOLLE, D. (2004), “Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere: Gender Differences in Anticipated Political Partcipation Among American Fourteen Years Olds,” Women&Politics, 26/3-4: 1-23.
  • HOWELL, S.E./DAY, C.L. (2000), “Complexities of the Gender Gap,” The Journal of Politics, 62/3: 858-874.
  • JUHANNESEN-SCHMIDT, M.C./EAGLY, A.H. (2002), “Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing The Traditional Female Gender Role,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26: 322-328.
  • KITE, M.E. (1996), “Age, Gender and Occupotional Label: A Test of Social Role Theory,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20: 361-374.
  • LEVIN, S. (2004), “Perceived Group Status Differences and the Effects of Gender, Ethnicity, and Religion on Social Dominance Orientation,” Political Psychology, 25/1: 31-48.
  • McGLEN, N.E./O’CONNOR, K. (1995), Woman, Politics, and American Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hill).
  • ONDERCIN, H.L. (2007), The Chang×ng Social Definitions of Men and Women and Their Effect on The Partisan Gender Gap, 1953-2003 (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of The Pennsylvania State).
  • ORUM, A.M./COHEN, R.S./GRASMUCK, S./ORUM, A.W. (1974), “Sex, Socialization and Politics,” American Socialogical Review, 39: 197-209.
  • OYÊWÙMI, O (2005), Gender and Politics: A not-so-Simple Correlation. Jenda: A Journal of Culture and African Women Studies, www.jendajournal.com/issue7/oyewumi . html.
  • PRATTO, F./STALLWORTH, L., M. (1997), “The Gender Gap: Differences in Political Attitudes and Social Dominance Orientation,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 49-68.
  • RUBINSTEIN, G. (1995), “Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Affiliation, Religiosity and Their Relation to Psychological Androgyny,” Sex Roles, 33/7-8: 569-586.
  • SAKALLI-UþURLU, N. (2003), “Cinsiyetçilik: Kad×nlara ve Erkeklere ĀliĂkin Tutumlar ve ÇeliĂik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Kuram×,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 6/11-12, 1-20.
  • SAPIRO, V. (2003), “Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research,” SEARS, David O./HUDDY, Leonie/JERVIS, Robert L. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press): 601-634
  • SCHMITT, D. P. (2003), “Are Men Universally More Dismissing than Women? Gender Differences in Romantic Across 62 Cultural Regions,” Personal Relationships, 10/3: 307-333.
  • SIDANIUS, J./EKEHAMMAR, B. (1983), “Sex, Political Party Preferences and Higher-Order Dimentions of Sociapolitical Ideology,” The Journal of Psychology, 115: 233-239.
  • SOULE, S./NAIRNE, J. (2006), “Are Girls Checking Out? Gender and Political Socialization in Transitioning Democracies (Chicago: A Paper presented at the Midwestern political Science Meting.
  • TOKSABAY-ESEN, A./MEMĀā2þLU, O. (2007), Siyasetin Cinsiyeti, http:// www.tepav.org.tr.
  • TOKSÖZ, G./ERDOþDU, S. (1998), Sendikac× Kad×n Kimliÿi (Ankara: Āmge Kitabevi).
  • WINTRINGHAM, J. (2005), Gender, Community Organizations and Development of Political Capita, http://www.cambellinstitude.org
  • www.forumgazetesi.com/yazar_detay.asp?yazar_id=57&haber_id=11230, 30/06/2007.
  • www.mahalli-idareler.gov.tr/Mahalli/Istatistiksel/KadinSecilmisSayi_ve_Oranlari.xls,12/01/2009.
  • www.psikologum.com/editor.asp?aid=52, 30 /06 /2007. www.toplumvesiyaset.com/yaziOku.php?id=270, 30/06/2007

TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Year 2009, , 97 - 116, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002114

Abstract

References

  • ALDRICH, D.,/KAGE, R. (2003), “Mars and Venus at Twilight: A Critical Investigation of Moralism, Age Effects, and Sex Differences,” Political Psychology, 24/1: 23-40.
  • ALOZIE, N.O./SIMON, J./MERRILL, B.D. (2003), “Gender and Political Orientation in Childhood,” The Social Science Journal, 40: 1-18.
  • ANSELMI, D.L./LAW, A.L. (1998), “Gender Identity Develoment,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 247-261.
  • BEM, S.L. (1998), Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-ashematic Children in a Gender in a Gender-Schematic Society, ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 262-274.
  • BEM, S. L. (1985), “Androgyny and Gender Scheme Theory: A Conceptual and Empirical Integration” SOLDEREGGER, T.B. (ed.), Psychology and Gender Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1984 (Lincoln ve London: University of Nebraska Press).
  • BERNSTEIN, A.G. (2005), “Gendered Characteristics of Political Engagement in College Students,” Sex Roles, 52/5-6: 299-310.
  • BOLAK-BORATAV, H. (2001), “Feminist Psikoloji: Nedir, Nas×l GeliĂti, Psikolojiye Getirdiÿi Yeni Aç×O×mlar,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 4/7: 1-19.
  • BUSS, D. M. (1998), “Psycholojical Sex Differences: Origins Through Sexual Selection,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 139-145.
  • BUSSEY, K./BANDURA, A. (1999), “Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation,” Psychological Review, 106/4, 676-713.
  • CARNAGHAN, E./BAHRY, D. (1990), “Political Attitudes and the Gender Gap in the USSR,” Comparative Politics, 22/4: 379-399.
  • CHAFFINS, S./FORBES, M. (1995), “The Glass Ceilling : Are Women Where They Should Be?,” Education, 115/3: 380–388.
  • DALTON, R. J. (2006), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracie.( Washington, DC: A Division of Congressional Quarterly).
  • DEAUX, K./MAJOR, B. (1987), “Putting Gender Into Context: An Interactive Model of GenderRelated Behavior,” Psychological Review, 94/3: 369-389.
  • DIEKMAN, A.B./EAGLY, A.H./KULESA, P. (2002), “Accuracy and Bias in Stereotypes about the Social and Political Attitudes of Women and Men,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 268-282.
  • DIEKMEN, A.B./GOODFRIEND, W./GOODWIN, S. (2004), “Dynamic Stereotypes of Power: Perceived Change and Stability in Gender Hierarchies,” Sex Roles, 50/3-4: 201-215.
  • DOREEN, K. (2002), “Men and Women Display Patterns of Behavioral and Cognitive Differences that Reflect varying Hormonal Ānfluences on Brain Development,” Scientific American, 12/1: 32-39.
  • EAGLY, A. H./WOOD, W./DIEKMAN, A.B. (2000), “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal,” ECKES, T./ TRAUTHER, H. M. (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Publishers): 123-160.
  • FRANZOI, S.L. (1996), Social Psychology (Dubuque, IA: Brown ve Benchmark).
  • HOOGHE, M./STOLLE, D. (2004), “Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere: Gender Differences in Anticipated Political Partcipation Among American Fourteen Years Olds,” Women&Politics, 26/3-4: 1-23.
  • HOWELL, S.E./DAY, C.L. (2000), “Complexities of the Gender Gap,” The Journal of Politics, 62/3: 858-874.
  • JUHANNESEN-SCHMIDT, M.C./EAGLY, A.H. (2002), “Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing The Traditional Female Gender Role,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26: 322-328.
  • KITE, M.E. (1996), “Age, Gender and Occupotional Label: A Test of Social Role Theory,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20: 361-374.
  • LEVIN, S. (2004), “Perceived Group Status Differences and the Effects of Gender, Ethnicity, and Religion on Social Dominance Orientation,” Political Psychology, 25/1: 31-48.
  • McGLEN, N.E./O’CONNOR, K. (1995), Woman, Politics, and American Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hill).
  • ONDERCIN, H.L. (2007), The Chang×ng Social Definitions of Men and Women and Their Effect on The Partisan Gender Gap, 1953-2003 (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of The Pennsylvania State).
  • ORUM, A.M./COHEN, R.S./GRASMUCK, S./ORUM, A.W. (1974), “Sex, Socialization and Politics,” American Socialogical Review, 39: 197-209.
  • OYÊWÙMI, O (2005), Gender and Politics: A not-so-Simple Correlation. Jenda: A Journal of Culture and African Women Studies, www.jendajournal.com/issue7/oyewumi . html.
  • PRATTO, F./STALLWORTH, L., M. (1997), “The Gender Gap: Differences in Political Attitudes and Social Dominance Orientation,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 49-68.
  • RUBINSTEIN, G. (1995), “Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Affiliation, Religiosity and Their Relation to Psychological Androgyny,” Sex Roles, 33/7-8: 569-586.
  • SAKALLI-UþURLU, N. (2003), “Cinsiyetçilik: Kad×nlara ve Erkeklere ĀliĂkin Tutumlar ve ÇeliĂik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Kuram×,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 6/11-12, 1-20.
  • SAPIRO, V. (2003), “Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research,” SEARS, David O./HUDDY, Leonie/JERVIS, Robert L. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press): 601-634
  • SCHMITT, D. P. (2003), “Are Men Universally More Dismissing than Women? Gender Differences in Romantic Across 62 Cultural Regions,” Personal Relationships, 10/3: 307-333.
  • SIDANIUS, J./EKEHAMMAR, B. (1983), “Sex, Political Party Preferences and Higher-Order Dimentions of Sociapolitical Ideology,” The Journal of Psychology, 115: 233-239.
  • SOULE, S./NAIRNE, J. (2006), “Are Girls Checking Out? Gender and Political Socialization in Transitioning Democracies (Chicago: A Paper presented at the Midwestern political Science Meting.
  • TOKSABAY-ESEN, A./MEMĀā2þLU, O. (2007), Siyasetin Cinsiyeti, http:// www.tepav.org.tr.
  • TOKSÖZ, G./ERDOþDU, S. (1998), Sendikac× Kad×n Kimliÿi (Ankara: Āmge Kitabevi).
  • WINTRINGHAM, J. (2005), Gender, Community Organizations and Development of Political Capita, http://www.cambellinstitude.org
  • www.forumgazetesi.com/yazar_detay.asp?yazar_id=57&haber_id=11230, 30/06/2007.
  • www.mahalli-idareler.gov.tr/Mahalli/Istatistiksel/KadinSecilmisSayi_ve_Oranlari.xls,12/01/2009.
  • www.psikologum.com/editor.asp?aid=52, 30 /06 /2007. www.toplumvesiyaset.com/yaziOku.php?id=270, 30/06/2007
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Özgür Güldü This is me

Müge Ersoy Kart This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2009
Submission Date July 31, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2009

Cite

APA Güldü, Ö., & Kart, M. E. (2009). TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(03), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002114
AMA Güldü Ö, Kart ME. TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. SBF Dergisi. March 2009;64(03):97-116. doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002114
Chicago Güldü, Özgür, and Müge Ersoy Kart. “TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64, no. 03 (March 2009): 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002114.
EndNote Güldü Ö, Kart ME (March 1, 2009) TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64 03 97–116.
IEEE Ö. Güldü and M. E. Kart, “TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”, SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, pp. 97–116, 2009, doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002114.
ISNAD Güldü, Özgür - Kart, Müge Ersoy. “TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64/03 (March 2009), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002114.
JAMA Güldü Ö, Kart ME. TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64:97–116.
MLA Güldü, Özgür and Müge Ersoy Kart. “TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, 2009, pp. 97-116, doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002114.
Vancouver Güldü Ö, Kart ME. TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64(03):97-116.

Cited By




Factors Influencing Gender Equality
Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry
https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1394700














Quo Vadis: AKP'de Kadın Temsili ve Kadın Kolları
Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33708/ktc.1156374