TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Abstract

Keywords

• -

TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ROLLERİ VE SİYASAL TUTUMLAR: SOSYAL PSİKOLOJİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Abstract

Keywords

• Siyasal tutumlar, cinsiyet ayrımı, toplumsal cinsiyet sosyalleşmesi, toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri, siyasal katılım

References

1. ALDRICH, D.,/KAGE, R. (2003), “Mars and Venus at Twilight: A Critical Investigation of Moralism, Age Effects, and Sex Differences,” Political Psychology, 24/1: 23-40.
2. ALOZIE, N.O./SIMON, J./MERRILL, B.D. (2003), “Gender and Political Orientation in Childhood,” The Social Science Journal, 40: 1-18.
3. ANSELMI, D.L./LAW, A.L. (1998), “Gender Identity Develoment,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 247-261.
4. BEM, S.L. (1998), Gender Schema Theory and Its Implications for Child Development: Raising Gender-ashematic Children in a Gender in a Gender-Schematic Society, ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 262-274.
5. BEM, S. L. (1985), “Androgyny and Gender Scheme Theory: A Conceptual and Empirical Integration” SOLDEREGGER, T.B. (ed.), Psychology and Gender Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1984 (Lincoln ve London: University of Nebraska Press).
6. BERNSTEIN, A.G. (2005), “Gendered Characteristics of Political Engagement in College Students,” Sex Roles, 52/5-6: 299-310.
7. BOLAK-BORATAV, H. (2001), “Feminist Psikoloji: Nedir, Nas×l GeliĂti, Psikolojiye Getirdiÿi Yeni Aç×O×mlar,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 4/7: 1-19.
8. BUSS, D. M. (1998), “Psycholojical Sex Differences: Origins Through Sexual Selection,” ANSELMI, D. L./LAW, A. L. (eds.), Questions of Gender: Perspektif and Paradoxes (A Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies): 139-145.

9. BUSSEY, K./BANDURA, A. (1999), “Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation,” Psychological Review, 106/4, 676-713.
10. CARNAGHAN, E./BAHRY, D. (1990), “Political Attitudes and the Gender Gap in the USSR,” Comparative Politics, 22/4: 379-399.
11. CHAFFINS, S./FORBES, M. (1995), “The Glass Ceilling : Are Women Where They Should Be?,” Education, 115/3: 380–388.
12. DALTON, R. J. (2006), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracie.( Washington, DC: A Division of Congressional Quarterly).
13. DEAUX, K./MAJOR, B. (1987), “Putting Gender Into Context: An Interactive Model of GenderRelated Behavior,” Psychological Review, 94/3: 369-389.
14. DIEKMAN, A.B./EAGLY, A.H./KULESA, P. (2002), “Accuracy and Bias in Stereotypes about the Social and Political Attitudes of Women and Men,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38: 268-282.
15. DIEKMEN, A.B./GOODFRIEND, W./GOODWIN, S. (2004), “Dynamic Stereotypes of Power: Perceived Change and Stability in Gender Hierarchies,” Sex Roles, 50/3-4: 201-215.
16. DOREEN, K. (2002), “Men and Women Display Patterns of Behavioral and Cognitive Differences that Reflect varying Hormonal Ānfluences on Brain Development,” Scientific American, 12/1: 32-39.
17. EAGLY, A. H./WOOD, W./DIEKMAN, A.B. (2000), “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal,” ECKES, T./ TRAUTHER, H. M. (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Publishers): 123-160.
18. FRANZOI, S.L. (1996), Social Psychology (Dubuque, IA: Brown ve Benchmark).
19. HOOGHE, M./STOLLE, D. (2004), “Good Girls Go to the Polling Booth, Bad Boys Go Everywhere: Gender Differences in Anticipated Political Partcipation Among American Fourteen Years Olds,” Women&Politics, 26/3-4: 1-23.
20. HOWELL, S.E./DAY, C.L. (2000), “Complexities of the Gender Gap,” The Journal of Politics, 62/3: 858-874.
21. JUHANNESEN-SCHMIDT, M.C./EAGLY, A.H. (2002), “Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing The Traditional Female Gender Role,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26: 322-328.
22. KITE, M.E. (1996), “Age, Gender and Occupotional Label: A Test of Social Role Theory,” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20: 361-374.
23. LEVIN, S. (2004), “Perceived Group Status Differences and the Effects of Gender, Ethnicity, and Religion on Social Dominance Orientation,” Political Psychology, 25/1: 31-48.
24. McGLEN, N.E./O’CONNOR, K. (1995), Woman, Politics, and American Society (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hill).
25. ONDERCIN, H.L. (2007), The Chang×ng Social Definitions of Men and Women and Their Effect on The Partisan Gender Gap, 1953-2003 (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of The Pennsylvania State).
26. ORUM, A.M./COHEN, R.S./GRASMUCK, S./ORUM, A.W. (1974), “Sex, Socialization and Politics,” American Socialogical Review, 39: 197-209.
27. OYÊWÙMI, O (2005), Gender and Politics: A not-so-Simple Correlation. Jenda: A Journal of Culture and African Women Studies, www.jendajournal.com/issue7/oyewumi . html.
28. PRATTO, F./STALLWORTH, L., M. (1997), “The Gender Gap: Differences in Political Attitudes and Social Dominance Orientation,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 49-68.
29. RUBINSTEIN, G. (1995), “Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Political Affiliation, Religiosity and Their Relation to Psychological Androgyny,” Sex Roles, 33/7-8: 569-586.
30. SAKALLI-UþURLU, N. (2003), “Cinsiyetçilik: Kad×nlara ve Erkeklere ĀliĂkin Tutumlar ve ÇeliĂik Duygulu Cinsiyetçilik Kuram×,” Türk Psikoloji Yaz×lar×, 6/11-12, 1-20.
31. SAPIRO, V. (2003), “Theorizing Gender in Political Psychology Research,” SEARS, David O./HUDDY, Leonie/JERVIS, Robert L. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press): 601-634
32. SCHMITT, D. P. (2003), “Are Men Universally More Dismissing than Women? Gender Differences in Romantic Across 62 Cultural Regions,” Personal Relationships, 10/3: 307-333.
33. SIDANIUS, J./EKEHAMMAR, B. (1983), “Sex, Political Party Preferences and Higher-Order Dimentions of Sociapolitical Ideology,” The Journal of Psychology, 115: 233-239.
34. SOULE, S./NAIRNE, J. (2006), “Are Girls Checking Out? Gender and Political Socialization in Transitioning Democracies (Chicago: A Paper presented at the Midwestern political Science Meting.
35. TOKSABAY-ESEN, A./MEMĀā2þLU, O. (2007), Siyasetin Cinsiyeti, http:// www.tepav.org.tr.
36. TOKSÖZ, G./ERDOþDU, S. (1998), Sendikac× Kad×n Kimliÿi (Ankara: Āmge Kitabevi).
37. WINTRINGHAM, J. (2005), Gender, Community Organizations and Development of Political Capita, http://www.cambellinstitude.org
38. www.forumgazetesi.com/yazar_detay.asp?yazar_id=57&haber_id=11230, 30/06/2007.
39. www.mahalli-idareler.gov.tr/Mahalli/Istatistiksel/KadinSecilmisSayi_ve_Oranlari.xls,12/01/2009.
40. www.psikologum.com/editor.asp?aid=52, 30 /06 /2007. www.toplumvesiyaset.com/yaziOku.php?id=270, 30/06/2007