JOHN STUART MILL ON JUSTICE IN PROPERTY

Year 2009, , 149 - 165, 01.03.2009

M. Erdem Özgür

https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002116

Abstract

Keywords

-

John Stuart Mill’de Adalet ve Mülkiyet

Abstract

Keywords

John Stuart Mill, adalet, fayda, mülkiyet, durağan evre

References

• ARCHIBALD, G.C. (1992), “Three Classical Economists on Trouble, Strife and the ‘Alienation’ of Labour,” The Canadian Journal of Economics, 25/1:60-75.
• BLAUG, Mark (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (First published in 1962).
• CANTERBERY, E. Ray (2003), The Making of Economics (Singapore: World Scientific).
• CLAEYS, Gregory (1987), “Justice, Independence, and Industrial Democracy: The Development of John Stuart Mill’s Views on Socialism,” The Journal of Politics, 49/1:122-147.
• DAVIS, Elynor G. (1985), “Mill, Socialism and the English Romantics: An Interpretation,” Economica, 52/207:345-358.
• DOME, Takuo (2004), The Political Economy of Public Finance in Britain 1767-1873 (New York: Routledge).
• DOWD, Douglas (2000), Capitalism and Its Economics: A Critical History (London: Pluto Press).
• EKELUND, Robert B. jr /TOLLISON, Robert D. (1976), “The New Political Economy of J.S. Mill: The Means to Social Justice,” The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 9/2:213-231.
• ELLIS, M. A. (1906), “Variations in the Editions of J.S. Mill’s Principles of Political Economy,” Economic Journal, 16:291-302.
• GRAY, John N. (1979), “John Stuart Mill: Traditional and Revisionist Interpretations,” Literature of Liberty, http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/ LtrLbrty/gryMTR.html.
• HUGHES, Patricia (1979), “The Reality versus the Ideal: J.S. Mill’s Treatment of Women, Workers, and Private Property,” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12/3:523-542.
• LEBACQZ, Karen (1986), Six Theories of Justice (Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House).
• LEVY, Michael B. (1981), “Mill’s Stationary State & the Transcendence of Liberalism,” Polity, 14/2: 273-293.
• MEDEARIS, John (2005), “Labor, Democracy, Utility, and Mill’s Critique of Private Property,” American Journal of Political Science, 49/1: 135-149.
• MILL, John Stuart (1957), Utilitarianism (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.) (First published in 1863).
• MILL, John Stuart (1967a), “Land Tenure Reform,” ROBSON, J. M. (ed.), Collected Works, Vol. 5 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 687-695
• MILL, John Stuart (1967b), “Property and Taxation” ROBSON, J. M. (ed.), Collected Works, Vol. 5 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 698-702.
• MILL, John Stuart (1967c), “Chapters on Socialism” ROBSON, J. M. (ed), Collected Works, Vol. 5 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 703-753.
• MILL, John Stuart (1985), On Liberty (London: Penguin Books) (First published in 1859).
• MILL, John Stuart (1989), Autobiography (London: Penguin Books) (First published in 1873).
• MILL, John Stuart (2004), Principles of Political Economy (Amherst: Prometheus Books) (First published in 1848).
• MILLER, Dale E. (2003), “Mill’s ‘Socialism’,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2: 213-238.
• RAWLS, John (1999), A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press) (First published in 1971).
• SARVASY, Wendy (1984), “J. S. Mill’s Theory of Democracy for a Period of Transition Between Capitalism and Socialism,” Polity, 19/4: 567-87.
• SARVASY, Wendy (1985), “A Reconsideration of the Development and Structure of John Stuart Mill’s Socialism,” The Western Political Quarterly, 38/2: 312-333.
• SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1994), History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press) (First published in 1954).
• SCHWARTZ, Pedro (1972), The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).
• SCREPANTI, Ernesto/ZAMAGNI, Stefano (2005), An Outline of the History of Economic Thought (New York: Oxford University Press).
• STIGLER, George J. (1955), “The Nature and Role of Originality in Scientific Progress,” Economica, 22/88: 293-302.