BibTex RIS Cite

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ'NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ'NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Year 2006, Volume: 61 Issue: 4, 121 - 143, 06.02.2015

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Avrupa Birliği Genelleştirilmiş Tercihler Sistemi'nin, az gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerin Avrupa Birliği'ne ihracatları üzerine etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde, Avrupa Birliği Genelleştirilmiş Tercihler Sistemi'nin temel özelikleri incelenmiştir. ikinci bölümde, Avrupa Birliği Genelleştirilmiş Tercihler Sistemi'nin az gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerin Avrupa Birliği'ne ihracatları üzerine etkilerini araştıran çalışmaların sonuçlarına yer verilmiştir. Son bölümde ise Avrupa Birliği Genelleştirilmiş Tercihler Sistemi'nin az gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerin Avrupa Birliği'ne ihracatları üzerine etkileri ile ilgili genel bir değerlendirme yapılmıştır.

References

  • BALDWIN, Richard / MURREY, Tracy (1977), "MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benelits Under the GSP," Economic Journal, 87: 30.46.
  • BRENTON, Paul (2003), "Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: The Current Impact of European Union Preferences Under Everything But Arms," Journal of World Trade, 37/3: 623.646.
  • BROWN, Drusilla K. (1988), "Trade Preferences for Developing Countries: A Survey of Results," Journal of Development Studies, 24/3: 335.363.
  • BROWN, Drusilla K. (1989), "Trade and Welfare Effects of the European Schemes of the Generalised System of Preferences," Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37/4: 757.776.
  • CERNAT, Lucian / LAIRD, Sam / MONGE-ROFFERALLO, Luca / TURRINI, Alessandro (2003), The EU's Everything but Arms Initiative and the Least Developed Countries, World Institute for Development Economics Research (Wider), Discussion Paper No: 2003/47 (Helsinki).
  • COOPER, Richard N. (1972), "The European Community's System of Generalized TariH Preferences: A Critique," Journalaf Development Studies, 8/4: 379-394.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1990). Commission Guidelines Concerning the EEC Generalised System of Preferenees in Favor of the Third World until the YeQr 2000, Europe Documents, No: 1643, 3 Ağustos 1990.
  • GRILll, Enzo R. (1993), The EuropeQn Community and the Developing Countries, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • HOWSE, Robert i TREBILCOCK, Michael J. (1999), The Regulation of International Trade (NewYork: Routledge).
  • JACKSON, John. H. (1969), World Trade and the LQW of the GATT (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs. Merrill).
  • KARSENTY, Guy i LAIRD, Sam (1987), "The GSP, Policy Options and the New Round," Weltwirtsehaftliehes Archiv, 123/2: 262.296.
  • KIMUNGUYI, Patrick (2005), "The European Union and Developing Countries: The Challanges of Trade Liberalisation in the Cotonou Process," mimeo, http.llwwwsoc.niLac.jp/eusa. japan/download/eusa_ap/paper_PatrikKimunguyi.pdf Erişim tarihi: 28.1.2006.
  • MACPHEE, Craig R. i ROSENBAUM, David ı. (1989). "Has the European Community GSP Increased LDC Exports?," Applied Economies, 21/6: 823-841.
  • McQUEEN, Matthew (2002). "EU Preferential Market Access Conditions for the Least Developed Countries," Intereconomies, 3712: 101-109.
  • MURREY, Tracy (1973). "How Helpful is the Generalised System of Preferences to Developing Countries?," Ecanomie Journal, 83/330: 449-455.
  • NILSSON, Lars (2002), "Trading Relations: Is the Road Map from Lome to Cotonou Correct?," Applied Economies, 34/4: 439.452.
  • PAGE, Sheila i HEWITI, Adrian (2002), "The New European Trade Preferences: Does Everything But Arms (EBA) Help the Poor?," Development Policy Review, 20/1: 91-102.
  • PANAGARIYA, Arvind (2002), "EU Preferential Trade Arrangements and Developing Countries," World Eeonomy, 25/10: 1415-1432.
  • PANAGARIYA, Arvind (2003), "Ai d Through Trade: An Effective Option?," mimeo.
  • PEERS, Steve (1995), "Reform of the European Community's Generalized System of Preferences," JournQI of World TrQde, 29/6: 79-96.
  • PREBISCH, RauL. (1964), Towards Q New Trade Policy for Development (New York: United Nations for UNCTAD).
  • SANTOS, Norma Breda dos i FARIAS, Rogerio i CUNHA, Raphael (2005), "Generalized System of Preferences in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization: History and Current Issues," JournQI of World Trade, 39/4: 637-670.
  • STAIGER, Robert W. (1999), The Economics of GATI, Reporter Online, National Bureau of Economjc Research, New York, http://www .nber. orgl reporter Ispring991 staiger. html Erişim tarihi: 9.11.2005
  • STEVENS, Christopher i KENNAN, Jane (2001), The Impact of the EU's Everything but Arms Proposal: A Report to Oxfam (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
  • TRUEBLOOD, Michael i SOMWARU, Agapi (2002), "Trade Liberalisation and the Least Developed Countries: Modeling the EU's Everything but Arms Initiative," paper presented at the Global Economic Analysis Conference in Taipei-Taiwan at 5-7 June 2002.
  • UNCTAD (2001). Dutyand Quota Free Market Access for LDCs: An AnQlysis of Quad Initiatives (London and Geneva: United Nations Conferences on Trade and Development and the Commonwealth Secretariat, UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/Misc. 7).
  • UNCTAD (2002), Handbook on the Scheme of the European Community Generalised System of Preferences, (New York and Geneva: UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.25/Rev.2, United Nations).
  • WHALLEY, John (1990), "Non-discriminatory Discrimination: Special and Differential Treatment under the GATT for Developing Countries," Economic Journal, 100/403: 1318-1328.
  • YU, Wusheng i JENSEN, Trine Vig (2005), "Tariff Preferences, WTO Negotiations and the LDCs: the Case of the Everything but Arms Initiative," World Economy, 28/3: 375-405.
  • Council Regulation No 3281/1994, O.J. L. 348, 31.12.1994.
  • Council Regulation No 1256/1996, O.J. L. 160, 29.6.1996.
  • Council Regulation No 2820/1998, O.J. L. 357, 30.12.1998.
  • Council Regulation No 2501/2001, O.J. L. 346, 31.12.2001.
  • Council Regulation No 980/2005, O.J. L. 169, 30.6.2005.
  • Council Regulation No 41612001, O.J. L. 060,1.3.2001.
  • Council Regulation No 416/2001, O.J. L. 060,1.3.2001.
  • http://www.agoa.gov/ Erişim tarihi: 31.1.2006.
  • http://europa.eu. int!comm/taxation_customs/dds/enl qotcei. htm Erişim tarihi: 17.1.2006.
  • http://www.bananalink.org.uk/trade_war/trade_war.htm Erişim tarihi: 3.2.2006.
Year 2006, Volume: 61 Issue: 4, 121 - 143, 06.02.2015

Abstract

References

  • BALDWIN, Richard / MURREY, Tracy (1977), "MFN Tariff Reductions and Developing Country Trade Benelits Under the GSP," Economic Journal, 87: 30.46.
  • BRENTON, Paul (2003), "Integrating the Least Developed Countries into the World Trading System: The Current Impact of European Union Preferences Under Everything But Arms," Journal of World Trade, 37/3: 623.646.
  • BROWN, Drusilla K. (1988), "Trade Preferences for Developing Countries: A Survey of Results," Journal of Development Studies, 24/3: 335.363.
  • BROWN, Drusilla K. (1989), "Trade and Welfare Effects of the European Schemes of the Generalised System of Preferences," Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37/4: 757.776.
  • CERNAT, Lucian / LAIRD, Sam / MONGE-ROFFERALLO, Luca / TURRINI, Alessandro (2003), The EU's Everything but Arms Initiative and the Least Developed Countries, World Institute for Development Economics Research (Wider), Discussion Paper No: 2003/47 (Helsinki).
  • COOPER, Richard N. (1972), "The European Community's System of Generalized TariH Preferences: A Critique," Journalaf Development Studies, 8/4: 379-394.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1990). Commission Guidelines Concerning the EEC Generalised System of Preferenees in Favor of the Third World until the YeQr 2000, Europe Documents, No: 1643, 3 Ağustos 1990.
  • GRILll, Enzo R. (1993), The EuropeQn Community and the Developing Countries, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • HOWSE, Robert i TREBILCOCK, Michael J. (1999), The Regulation of International Trade (NewYork: Routledge).
  • JACKSON, John. H. (1969), World Trade and the LQW of the GATT (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs. Merrill).
  • KARSENTY, Guy i LAIRD, Sam (1987), "The GSP, Policy Options and the New Round," Weltwirtsehaftliehes Archiv, 123/2: 262.296.
  • KIMUNGUYI, Patrick (2005), "The European Union and Developing Countries: The Challanges of Trade Liberalisation in the Cotonou Process," mimeo, http.llwwwsoc.niLac.jp/eusa. japan/download/eusa_ap/paper_PatrikKimunguyi.pdf Erişim tarihi: 28.1.2006.
  • MACPHEE, Craig R. i ROSENBAUM, David ı. (1989). "Has the European Community GSP Increased LDC Exports?," Applied Economies, 21/6: 823-841.
  • McQUEEN, Matthew (2002). "EU Preferential Market Access Conditions for the Least Developed Countries," Intereconomies, 3712: 101-109.
  • MURREY, Tracy (1973). "How Helpful is the Generalised System of Preferences to Developing Countries?," Ecanomie Journal, 83/330: 449-455.
  • NILSSON, Lars (2002), "Trading Relations: Is the Road Map from Lome to Cotonou Correct?," Applied Economies, 34/4: 439.452.
  • PAGE, Sheila i HEWITI, Adrian (2002), "The New European Trade Preferences: Does Everything But Arms (EBA) Help the Poor?," Development Policy Review, 20/1: 91-102.
  • PANAGARIYA, Arvind (2002), "EU Preferential Trade Arrangements and Developing Countries," World Eeonomy, 25/10: 1415-1432.
  • PANAGARIYA, Arvind (2003), "Ai d Through Trade: An Effective Option?," mimeo.
  • PEERS, Steve (1995), "Reform of the European Community's Generalized System of Preferences," JournQI of World TrQde, 29/6: 79-96.
  • PREBISCH, RauL. (1964), Towards Q New Trade Policy for Development (New York: United Nations for UNCTAD).
  • SANTOS, Norma Breda dos i FARIAS, Rogerio i CUNHA, Raphael (2005), "Generalized System of Preferences in General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization: History and Current Issues," JournQI of World Trade, 39/4: 637-670.
  • STAIGER, Robert W. (1999), The Economics of GATI, Reporter Online, National Bureau of Economjc Research, New York, http://www .nber. orgl reporter Ispring991 staiger. html Erişim tarihi: 9.11.2005
  • STEVENS, Christopher i KENNAN, Jane (2001), The Impact of the EU's Everything but Arms Proposal: A Report to Oxfam (Sussex: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
  • TRUEBLOOD, Michael i SOMWARU, Agapi (2002), "Trade Liberalisation and the Least Developed Countries: Modeling the EU's Everything but Arms Initiative," paper presented at the Global Economic Analysis Conference in Taipei-Taiwan at 5-7 June 2002.
  • UNCTAD (2001). Dutyand Quota Free Market Access for LDCs: An AnQlysis of Quad Initiatives (London and Geneva: United Nations Conferences on Trade and Development and the Commonwealth Secretariat, UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/Misc. 7).
  • UNCTAD (2002), Handbook on the Scheme of the European Community Generalised System of Preferences, (New York and Geneva: UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.25/Rev.2, United Nations).
  • WHALLEY, John (1990), "Non-discriminatory Discrimination: Special and Differential Treatment under the GATT for Developing Countries," Economic Journal, 100/403: 1318-1328.
  • YU, Wusheng i JENSEN, Trine Vig (2005), "Tariff Preferences, WTO Negotiations and the LDCs: the Case of the Everything but Arms Initiative," World Economy, 28/3: 375-405.
  • Council Regulation No 3281/1994, O.J. L. 348, 31.12.1994.
  • Council Regulation No 1256/1996, O.J. L. 160, 29.6.1996.
  • Council Regulation No 2820/1998, O.J. L. 357, 30.12.1998.
  • Council Regulation No 2501/2001, O.J. L. 346, 31.12.2001.
  • Council Regulation No 980/2005, O.J. L. 169, 30.6.2005.
  • Council Regulation No 41612001, O.J. L. 060,1.3.2001.
  • Council Regulation No 416/2001, O.J. L. 060,1.3.2001.
  • http://www.agoa.gov/ Erişim tarihi: 31.1.2006.
  • http://europa.eu. int!comm/taxation_customs/dds/enl qotcei. htm Erişim tarihi: 17.1.2006.
  • http://www.bananalink.org.uk/trade_war/trade_war.htm Erişim tarihi: 3.2.2006.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Elif Uçkan Dağdemir This is me

Publication Date February 6, 2015
Submission Date February 6, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 61 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Uçkan Dağdemir, E. (2015). AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 121-143.
AMA Uçkan Dağdemir E. AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ. SBF Dergisi. February 2015;61(4):121-143.
Chicago Uçkan Dağdemir, Elif. “AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 61, no. 4 (February 2015): 121-43.
EndNote Uçkan Dağdemir E (February 1, 2015) AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 61 4 121–143.
IEEE E. Uçkan Dağdemir, “AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ”, SBF Dergisi, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 121–143, 2015.
ISNAD Uçkan Dağdemir, Elif. “AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 61/4 (February 2015), 121-143.
JAMA Uçkan Dağdemir E. AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ. SBF Dergisi. 2015;61:121–143.
MLA Uçkan Dağdemir, Elif. “AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol. 61, no. 4, 2015, pp. 121-43.
Vancouver Uçkan Dağdemir E. AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ GENELLEŞTİRİLMİŞ TERCİHLER SİSTEMİ’NİN AZ GELİŞMİŞ VE GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE İHRACATLARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ. SBF Dergisi. 2015;61(4):121-43.