FORENSİC ANTHROPOLOGİCAL APPROACH TO SKELETAL TRAUMAS IN CHILD ABUSE CASES

Abstract

Objective: Child abuse is an important issue frequently encountered in forensic cases. In this context, skeletal findings are also used in the evaluation of physical evidences. The involvement of forensic anthropologists in the analysis of physical evidence of child abuse also contributes to the work of other experts working in this field. For the examination of the findings of the abuse in the skeleton, forensic osteology knowledge which is one of the main sources of forensic anthropology is needed. This study aims to emphasize the importance of forensic anthropological perspectives in the evaluation of physical findings of child abuse. Material and Method: This study analyzes both preliminary and current research and reveals how forensic anthropological approaches can be used to evaluate physical child abuse findings. A compilation study was carried out by evaluating the available sources on the subject. Results and Conclusion: Forensic anthropologists specializing in bone development, trauma and fracture types define whether changes in the skeleton and damages are related to abuse. As in most areas, the use of interdisciplinary approaches in cases where child abuse is evaluated increases the reliability of the results obtained. Therefore, different disciplines including forensic anthropology should be used in child abuse researches.

Keywords

• Child Abuse,Forensic Anthropology,Human Osteology,Skeletal Traumas,Bone Fractures,Maltreatment

References

1. 1. Al-Mahroos, F., Al-Amer, E.A., Al-Hashimi, H.A., Rcsi, F., Abdulla, A.M., Hameed, N. 2011a. Abusive Head Trauma in Children: The Extent and Clinical Characteristics. Bahrain Med Bull; 33.
2. 2. Al-Mahroos, F., Al-Amer, E.A., Umesh, N.J., Alekri, A.I. 2011b. Pattern of Skeletal Injuries in Physically Abused Children. Bahrain Med Bull; 33(2).
3. 3. Bakwin, H. 1952. Roentgenologic changes in the bones following trauma in infants. J Newark Beth Isr Hosp; 3:17–25.
4. 4. Belfer, R.A., Klein, B.L., Orr, L. 2001. Use of the skeletal survey in the evaluation of child maltreatment. American Journal of Emergency Medicine; 19(2):122–4.
5. 5. Bilo, R.A.C., Robben, S.G.F., van Rijn, R.R. 2010. Forensic Aspects of Pediatric Fractures: Differentiating Accidental Trauma from Child Abuse. Springer.
6. 6. Brogdon, B.G., Shwayder, T., Elifritz, J. 2012.Child Abuse and its Mimics in Skin and Bone. CRC Press.
7. 7. Buchanan, M.F. 1985. The recognition of non-accidental injury in children. Practitioner; 229(1407): 815–19.
8. 8. Caffey, J. 1946. Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 56(2):163-73.

9. 9. Chauvin-Kimoff, L., Allard-Dansereau, C., Colbourne, M. 2018. The medical assessment of fractures in suspected child maltreatment: Infants and young children with skeletal injury. Paediatrics & Child Health; 23(2): 156–160. DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx131
10. 10. Conway, J.J., Collins, M., Tanz, R.R. 1993. Radkowski MA, Anandappa E, Hernandez R et al. The role of bone scintigraphy in detecting child abuse. Semin Nucl Med; 23: 321-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2998(05)80111-4 11. Day, F., Clegg, S., McPhillips, M., Mok, J.A. 2006. retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury. J Clin Forensic Med; 13(2):55-9.
11. 12. Holick, M., Hossein-Nezhad, A., Tabatabaei, F. 2017. Multiple fractures in infants who have Ehlers-Danlos/hypermobility syndrome and or vitamin D deficiency: A case series of 72 infants whose parents were accused of child abuse and neglect. Dermatoendocrinol; 9(1): e1279768. DOI: 10.1080/19381980.2017.1279768
12. 13. Kemp, A.M., Dunstan, F., Harrison, S., Morris, S., Mann, M., Rolfe, K., Datta et al. 2008. Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ; 337:a1518. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1518
13. 14. Kleinman, P.K., Rosenberg, A.E., Tsai, A. 2015. Skeletal trauma: General considerations. In: Kleinman P, ed. Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. pp. 23-52.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511862366.010
14. 15. Love, J.C., Derrick, S.M., Wiersema, J.M. 2011.Skeletal Atlas of Child Abuse (Springer’s Forensic Laboratory Science Series). Humana Press.
15. 16. Love, J.C., Soto Martinez, M.E. 2017. Theoretical foundation of child abuse. In: Boyd Jr CC, Boyd DC, eds. Forensic Anthropology: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis. Chapter 10. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119226529.ch10
16. 17. Manifold, B.M. 2012. A Probable Case of Child Abuse from Historic Gloucester. Bulletin - International Association for Paleodontology; 6(1).
17. 18. Militaru, M,, Martinovici, D. 2005. Our Experience in Pediatric Sepsis. Jurnalul Pediatrului; 8: 29-30.
18. 19. Ross, A.H., Juarez, C.A. 2014. A brief history of fatal child maltreatment and neglect. Forensic Sci Med Pathol;10: 413-22. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-014-9531-1 20. Ross, A.H., Juarez, C.A. 2016. Skeletal and radiological manifestations of child abuse: Implications for study in past populations. Clinical Anatomy; 29: 844-53. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22683
19. 21. Silverman, F.N. 1953. The roentgen manifestations of unrecognized skeletal trauma in infants. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 69: 413–427.
20. 22. Steyn, M. 2011. Case report: Forensic anthropological assessment in a suspected case of child abuse from South Africa. Forensic Sci Int; doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.01.023
21. 23. Swoboda, S.L., Feldman, K.W. 2013. Skeletal Trauma in Child Abuse. Pediatric Annals; 42: 236-43. DOI: 10.3928/00904481-20131022-11
22. 24. Taitz, L.S. 1991. ‘’Child abuse and metabolic bone disease: are they often confused?’’. BMJ; 302: 1244.
23. 25. Walker, P.L, Cook, D., Lambert, P. 1997. Skeletal Evidence for Child Abuse: A Physical Anthropological Perspective. J Forensic Sci; 42: 196-207. DOI: 10.1520/JFS14098J
24. 26. White, T.D., Black, M.T., Folkens, P.A. 2012. Forensic Case Study: Child Abuse, The Skeletal Perspective. In: Human Osteology. pp. 507-512. Academic Press.
25. 27. Worlock, T., Stower, M., Barbor, P. 1986. Patterns of fractures in accidental and non-accidental injury in children: A comparative study. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)