Pankreatikobilyer Semptomları Olan Hastalarda İnsidental Olarak Saptanan Jukstapapiller Divertiküllerin MRCP Bulguları

Year 2010, , 79 - 84, 01.03.2010

Elif Peker Esra Özkavukcu Nuray Haliloğlu Ayşe Erden

https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000766

Abstract

Keywords

-

Pankreatikobilyer Semptomları Olan Hastalarda İnsidental Olarak Saptanan Jukstapapiller Divertiküllerin MRCP Bulguları

Abstract

Amaç: Pankreatikobilyer semptomları olan hastaların MRCP incelemelerinde insidental olarak saptanan
24 jukstapapiller divertikülün (JPD) MRCP bulgularının sunulması ve bunların pankreatik kanal,
safra yolları ve pankreas üzerine olan etkilerinin belirlenmesi.
Hastalar ve Yöntemler: 1-T MR ünitesinde elde edilen ve arşivlenmiş MRCP görüntüleri iki radyolog
tarafından tekrar değerlendirilmiştir. Saptanan JPD’lerin yerleşimi ve boyutları, safra kesesinde veya
koledokta taş varlığı, safra kanallarında veya pankreatik kanalda dilatasyon ve ana safra kanalında
JPD’ye bağlı olarak oluşan deviasyon not edilmiştir. İntrahepatik safra yolları, koledok, pankreatik
kanal, safra kesesi ve pankreas parankimi eşlik eden pankreatikobilyer hastalıklar yönünden değerlendirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Saptanan tüm JPD’ler (n=24) duodenum 2. bölümünün medial kesiminde yerleşimliydi.
JPD’lerin ortalama çapı 2.25 cm ölçülmüştür. Aksiyel T2-ağırlıklı FSE görüntülerde divertiküllerin
%95.8’inde (n=23/24) hava-sıvı seviyesi tespit edilmiştir. Kolesistektomi hikayesi olan 6 hasta de-
ğerlendirmeden çıkartıldığında hastaların %44.4’ünde (n=8/18) safra kesesinde taş tespit edilmiştir.
Hastaların %45.8’inde (n=11/24) koledokta dilatasyon, %58.3’ünde (n=14/24) intrahepatik safra yollarında
dilatasyon, %45.8’inde de (n=11/24) pankreatik kanalda dilatasyon saptanmıştır. Hastaların
%12.5’inde (n=3/24) koledokta deviasyon izlenmiştir. Üç olguda (%12.5, n=3/24) koledokolitiyazis
saptanmıştır.
Sonuç: JPD’lerin saptanmasında ve pankreatikobilyer sistem üzerine olan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesinde
MRCP faydalı bir radyolojik yöntemdir. Çalışmamızdaki olgu sayımız fazla olmasa da JPD’nin
pankreatikobilyer semptomlara yol açtığını öne sürmekteyiz.

Keywords

Kolanjiyopankreatografi, Manyetik Rezonans, Duodenum, Divertikül, Jukstapapiller Divertikül, Pankreatikobilyer Semptomlar

References

• Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY, Row- lands BJ. Periampullary diverticula and pancreaticobiliary disease. Br J Surg 1999; 86:588-597.
• Mazziotti S, Costa C, Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Pandolfo A, Blandino A. MR Cholangio- pancreatography Diagnosis of Juxtapapil- lary Duodenal Diverticulum Simulating a Cystic Lesion of the Pancreas: Usefulness of an Oral Negative Contrast Agent. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185:432-435.
• Tsitouridis I, Emmanouilidou M, Gout- saridou F, Kokozidis G, Kalambakas A, Pa- pastergiou C, Tsantiridis C. MR cholangi- ography in the evaluation of patients with duodenal periampullary diverticulum. Eur J Radiol 2003; 47:154-160.
• Boix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Ananos F, 9. Kennedy RH, Thompson MH. Are duo- Domenech E, Morillas RM, Gassull MA. Impact of Periampullary Duodenal Diverticula at Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Proposed Classification of Periampullary Duodenal Diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percu- tan Tech 2006; 16:208-211.
• Ackermann W. Diverticula and varia- tions of the duodenum. Ann Surg 1943; 117:403-413.
• Zoepf T, Zoepf DS, Arnold JC, Benz C, Riemann JF. The relationship between jux- tapapillary duodenal diverticula and disor- ders of the biliopancreatic system: analysis of 350 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:56-61.
• Tham TCK, Kelly M. Association of Peri- ampullary Duodenal Diverticula with Bile Duct Stones and with Technical Success of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopan- creatography. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1050- 1053.
• Lotveit T, Osnes M, Aune S, Larsen. Stud- ies of the choledochoduodenal sphincter in patients with and without juxta-papillary duodenal diverticula. Scand J Gastroen- terol 1980; 15:875-880. denal diverticula associated with choledo- cholitiasis? Gut 1988; 29:1003-1006.
• Skar V, Skar AG, Bratlie J, Osnes M. Beta- glucuronidase activity in the bile of gall- stone patients both with and without duo- denal diverticula. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989; 24:205-212 (abstract).
• Tazuma S. Epidemiology, pathogenesis and classification of biliary stones (Com- mon bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20:1075-83.
• Lotveit T, Foss OP, Osnes M. Biliary pig- ment and cholesterol calculi in patients with and without juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981; 16:241-244 (abstract).
• Kim M-H, Myung SJ, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim YS, Lee MH et al. Association of periampullary diverticula with primary choledocholitiasis but not with second- ary choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 1998; 30:601-604 (abstract).
• De Koster E, Denis P, Mante M, Otero J, Nyst J, Jonas C, et al. Juxtapapillary duo- denal diverticula: association with biliary stone disease. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1990; 53:338-343 (abstract).
• Miyazawa Y, Okinaga K, Nishida K, Okano T. Recurrent common bile duct stones associated with periampullary duo- denal diverticula and calcium bilirubinate stones. Int Surg 1995; 80:120-124 (ab- stract).
• Lotveit T, Osnes M, Larsen S. Recur- rent biliary calculi: duodenal diverticula as a predisposing factor. Ann Surg 1982; 196:30-32.
• Hall RI, Ingoldby CJH, Denyer ME. Periampullary diverticula predisposing to primary rather than secondary stones in the common bile duct. Endoscopy 1990; 22:127-128 (abstract).
• Hagege H, Berson A, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury A, Liguory C, Etienne JP. As- sociation of juxtapapillary diverticula with choledocholitiasis but not with cholecys- tolithiasis. Endoscopy 1992; 24:248-251 (abstract).
• Kirk AP, Summerfield JA. Incidence and significance of juxtapapillary diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrea- tography. Digestion 1980; 20:31-35 (ab- stract).
• Leinkram C, Roberts-Thomson IC, Kune GA. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula. Association with gallstones and pancreati- tis. Med J Aust 1980; 1:209-210 (abstract).
• Uomo G, Manes G, Ragozzino A, Ca- vallera A, Rabitti PG. Periampullary ex- traluminal duodenal diverticula and acute pancreatitis: an underestimated etiologi- cal association. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:1186-1188 (abstract).
• Leivonen MK, Halttunen JAA, Kivilaakso EO. Duodenal diverticulum at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography: analysis of 123 patients. Hepatogastroen- terology 1996; 43:961-966 (abstract).
• Kimura W, Nagai H, Kuroda A, Muto T. No significant correlation between histo- logic changes of the papilla of Vater and juxtapapillary diverticulum. Special ref- erence to the pathogenesis of gallstones. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992; 27:951-956.
• Novacek G, Walgram M, Bauer P, Schofl R, Gangl A, Potzi R. The relationship be- tween juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and biliary stone disease. Eur J Gastroen- terol Hepatol 1997; 9:375-379 (abstract).
• Egawa N, Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Sakaki N, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A. The role of juxta- papillary duodenal diverticulum in the for- mation of gallbladder stones. Hepatogas- troenterology 1998 ;45:917-20 (abstract).
• Shemesh E, Friedman E, Czerniak A, Bat L. The association of biliary and pancreatic anomalies with periampullary duodenal di- verticula. Correlation with clinic presenta- tions. Arch Surg 1987; 122:1055-1057.
• Osnes M, Lotveit T. Juxtaminopapillary diverticulum associated with chronic pan- creatitis. Endoscopy 1977; 8:106-108 (ab- stract).
• Carey LC. Pathophysiologic factors in re- current acute pancreatitis. Jpn J Surg 1985; 15:333-340 (abstract).
• Mortelé KJ, Wiesner W, Zou KH, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Asymptomatic nonspesific serum hyperamilasemia and hyperlipas- emia: spectrum of MRCP findings and clinical implications. Abdom Imaging 2004 ;29:109-14.
• Ono M, Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N. MRCP and ERCP in Lemmel Syndrome. J Pancreas 2005; 6:277-278.
• Macari M, Lazarus D, Israel G, Megibow A. Duodenal diverticula mimicking cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: CT and MR imaging findings in seven patients. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:195-199.