Letter to Editor

Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey

Volume: 64 Number: 1 March 1, 2017
  • Berrin Şentürk
EN TR

Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey

Abstract

In this study, taxes for live animals applications of the country's economy, the livestock sector and their impact on growers operating in the sector were investigated. The historical record is used for this purpose, taxes for live animals that rate in the budget revenues year from the tax 1920-1961, revenue and share in the wealth tax and the revenue and collection rates of wealth tax and tax amounts subject to tax, animal productivity, animal product prices, market conditions and the period of application problems in tax were analyzed. The tax on cattle breeding has been found to be more sensitive. In conclusion, taxes for live animals policy application and people who is breeders of animals has been found contributed significantly of National Defence and the establishment of the Republic of Turkey; however, it has revealed that lead to significant negative socio-economic consequences on livestock producer

Keywords

References

  1. Alptekin M (2013): Kurtuluş Savaşının Mali Kaynakları, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara.
  2. Cihan D, Turan K, Öngeoğlu A (1982): Atatürk Dönemi Maliye Politikası I. Kitap Mondros’tan Cumhuriyet’e Mali ve Ekonomik Sorunlar, Ankara.
  3. DİE (1960-1962): İstatistik Yıllığı, Yayın No. 460.
  4. DİE (1963): Tarım İstatistikleri Özetleri, 1941– 1962 Yayın No. 447, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası, Ankara
  5. DİE (1970): 1927 Tarım Sayımı, Yayın No. 614, Devlet İs- tatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası, Ankara.
  6. Günay A (2007): Mali Disiplinin Sağlanmasında Anayasal Denk Bütçe Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği, Ma- liye Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme.
  7. İlkmen ŞN (1943): Türkiye Vergi Sisteminde Hayvanlar Vergisi, Ziraat Vekâleti Yüksek Ziraat Enstitüsü Çalışma- ları, Sayı:27 Yüksek Ziraat Enstitüsü Matbaası, Ankara.
  8. İstatistik Genel Müdürlüğü (1936): İstatistik Yıllığı 1935- 36, Cilt 8, Sayı: 88 Devlet Basımevi, İstanbul.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Authors

Berrin Şentürk This is me

Publication Date

March 1, 2017

Submission Date

March 1, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 64 Number: 1

APA
Şentürk, B. (2017). Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 64(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769
AMA
1.Şentürk B. Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017;64(1):25-30. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769
Chicago
Şentürk, Berrin. 2017. “Socio-Economic Analysis of the Tax Application Taken from Livestock in Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64 (1): 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769.
EndNote
Şentürk B (March 1, 2017) Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64 1 25–30.
IEEE
[1]B. Şentürk, “Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 25–30, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769.
ISNAD
Şentürk, Berrin. “Socio-Economic Analysis of the Tax Application Taken from Livestock in Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64/1 (March 1, 2017): 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769.
JAMA
1.Şentürk B. Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017;64:25–30.
MLA
Şentürk, Berrin. “Socio-Economic Analysis of the Tax Application Taken from Livestock in Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 1, Mar. 2017, pp. 25-30, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769.
Vancouver
1.Berrin Şentürk. Socio-economic analysis of the tax application taken from livestock in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017 Mar. 1;64(1):25-30. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002769