A comparison of camelina meal and soybean meal degradation during incubation with rumen fluid as tested in vitro

Abstract

Camelina meal is a new by-product that remains after oil extraction for biodiesel production and might be considered as an alternative protein source to soybean meal in animal nutrition. The objective of the present study was to determine the chemical composition and in vitro degradation of camelina meal compared to soybean meal. Feed samples were collected from a commercial feed mill. To estimate ruminal digestion, in vitro nutrients disappearance of camelina meal and soybean meal was determined using ruminal fluid that was collected at a local slaughterhouse. In vitro disappearance at 4, 12 and 24 h of incubation showed significant differences between camelina meal and soybean meal. Soybean meal showed higher DM and NDF degradation compared to camelina meal. On the opposite, CP degradation of camelina meal exactly to increase. In conclusion, no differences were observed between nutrients and feed x time interaction of CP degradability of CM and soybean meal. Thereby, it’s concluded that, the CM might be used in ruminant feeds with soybean meal which is common used in rations

Keywords

• Ankom technology
• camelina meal
• incubation
• nutrient degradation

Ketencik küspesi ile soya küspesinin in vitro rumen yıkımlanabilirliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Ketencik küspesi, biyoyakıt üretimi sırasında yağın ekstraksiyonuyla arta kalan bir yan üründür ve hayvan beslemede soya küspesine alternatif bir protein kaynağı olarak düşünülebilmektedir. Bu çalışma, ketencik küspesinin besin madde bileşiminin ve in vitro yıkımlanabilirliğinin soya küspesi ile karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan yem örnekleri ticari bir yem fabrikasından temin edilmiştir ve ardından besin madde bileşimleri belirlenmiştir. Yem hammaddelerinin rumendeki yıkımlanabilirliklerinin belirlenmesi, yerel mezbahadan alına rumen sıvısının in vitro ortamda kullanılması suretiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. İnkubasyonun 4., 12. ve 24. saatlerinde gruplar arasında önemli farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Kuru madde ve NDF yıkımlanabilirliği soya küspesinde yüksek değere sahip iken, HP yıkımlanabilirliği ketencik küspesinde daha fazla bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak ketencik küspesinin ve soya küspesinin besin madde bileşimi ve yem x zaman etkileşimi açısından HP sindirilebilirlik düzeyleri arasında önemli bir farklılığın tespit edilmemiştir. Dolayısıyla, ketencik küspesinin rasyonlarda yaygın olarak yer alan soya küspesi ile birlikte protein kaynağı olarak kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir

Keywords

• Ankom teknolojisi
• besin madde yıkımlanabilirliği
• inkübasyon
• ketencik küspesi

References

1. 1. Acamovic T, Gilbert C, Lamb K, Walker KC (1999): Nutritive value of Camelina sativa meal for poultry. Brit Poultry Sci, 40, 27-41.
2. 2. Almeida FN, Htoo JK, Thomson J, Stein HH (2013): Amino acid digestibility in Camelina products fed to growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci, 93, 335-343.
3. 3. Ankom Technology (2005): In vitro true digestibility using the DAISYII incubator. [Online] Available: http://www.ankom.com/media/documents/IVDMD_0805_ D200.pdf [2015 Feb. 02].
4. 4. AOAC International (2000): Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.
5. 5. Aziza AE, Quezada N, Cherian G (2010): Antioxidative effect of dietary Camelina meal in fresh, stored, or cooked broiler chicken meat. Poultry Sci, 89, 2711-2718.
6. 6. Cappellozza BI, Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cherian G, Carroll JA (2012): Effects of Camelina meal supplementation on ruminal forage degradability, performance, and physiological responses of beef cattle. J Anim Sci, 90, 4042-4054.
7. 7. Colombini S, Glen Broderick A, Galasso I, Martinelli T, Rapetti L, Russoc R, Reggianic R (2014): Evaluation of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz meal as an alternative protein source in ruminant rations. J Sci Food Agric, 94, 736-743.
8. 8. Deckardt K, Metzler-Zebeli BU, Zebeli Q (2015): Processing barley grain with lactic and tannic acid ameliorates rumen microbial fermentation and degradation of dietary fibre in vitro. J Sci Food Agric, DOI:10.1002/jsfa.7085.

9. 9. Dixon RM, Hosking BJ (1992): Nutritional value of grain legumes forruminants. Nutr Res Rev, 5, 19-43.
10. 10. Gatlin DM, Barrows FT, Brown P, et al. (2007): Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review. Aquacult Res, 38, 551-579.
11. 11. Hall M, Mertens DR (2012): A ring test of in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility: Analytical variability and sample ranking. J Dairy Sci, 95, 1992-2003.
12. 12. Halleux H, Lassaux S, Renzoni R, Germain A (2008): Comparative life cycle assessment of two biofuels ethanol from sugar beet and rapeseed methyl ester. Int J Life Cycle Ass, 13, 184-190.
13. 13. Hurtaud C, Peyraud JL (2007): Effects of feeding Camelina (seeds or meal) on milk fatty acid composition and butter spreadability. J Dairy Sci, 90, 5134-5145.
14. 14. Klevenhusen F Deckardt K, Sizmaz Ö, Wimmer S, Muro-Reyes A, Khiaosa-Ard R, Chizzola R, Zebeli Q (2015): Effects of black seed oil and Ferula elaeochytris supplementation on ruminal fermentation as tested in vitro with the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) Anim Prod Sci - http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN13332
15. 15. Lardy GP, Kerley MS (1994): Effect of increasing the dietary level of rapeseed meal on intake by growing beef steers. J Anim Sci, 72, 1936-1942.
16. 16. Mertens DR (2002): Physical and chemical characteristics of fiber affecting dairy cow performance. Proc. 2002 Cornell Nutr. Conf. Dept. Anim. Sci. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. 124-144.
17. 17. National Research Council (1994): Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th rev ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
18. 18. Nozière P, Michalet-Doreau B (1996): Validation of in sacco method: influence of sampling site, nylon bag or rumen contents on fibrolytic activity ofsolid-associated microorganisms. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 57, 203-210.
19. 19. Paz HA, Klopfenstein TJ, Hostetler D, Fernando SC, Castillo-Lopez E, Kononoff PJ (2014): Ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in high-protein feedstuffs commonly used in dairy diets. J Dairy Sci, 97, 6485-6498.
20. 20. Pekel AY, Patterson PH, Hulet RM, Acar N, Cravener TL, Dowler DB, Hunter JM (2009): Dietary Camelina meal versus flaxseed with and without supplemental copper for broiler chickens: Live performance and processing yield. Poultry Sci, 88, 2392-2398.
21. 21. Peyrata J, Nozièrea P, Le Morvana A, Férardc A, Protinc PV, Baumont R (2014): Effects of ensiling maize and sample conditioning on in situ rumen degradation of dry matter, starch and fibre. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 196, 12-21.
22. 22. Putnam DH, Budin JT, Field LA, Breene WM (1993): Camelina: A promising low-input oilseed, in: Janick J, Simon, JE (Eds.), New Crops. Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 314-322.
23. 23. Quezada N, Cherian G (2012): Lipid characterization and antioxidant status of the seeds and meals of Camelina sativa and flax. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol, 114, 974-982.
24. 24. SAS Institute, SAS User’s Guide (2001): Statistics. Release 9.2 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC (USA).
25. 25. Schuster A, Friedt W (1998): Glucosinolate content and composition as parameters of quality of Camelina seed. Ind Crops Prod 7, 297-302.
26. 26. Sumbuloglu K, Sumbuloglu V (1995): Biyoistatistik. Özdemir Yayıncılık, 6. Baskı, Ankara.
27. 27. Thacker P, Widyaratne G (2012): Effects of expeller pressed Camelina meal and/or canola meal on digestibility, performance and fatty acid composition of broiler chickens fed wheat-soybean meal-based diets. Arch Anim Nutr, 66, 402-415.
28. 28. Türk Standartlari Enstitüsü (1991): Hayvan Yemleri - Metabolik (Çevrilebilir) Enerji Tayini (Kimyasal Metod). TSE No: 9610. TSE, Ankara.
29. 29. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 3583-3597.
30. 30. Vincent IC, Hill R, Williams HL (1988): Rapeseed meal in the diet of pubertal heifers during early pregnancy. Anim Prod, 47, 39-44.
31. 31. Yilmaz Y (2009): The effects of essential oil of oregano oil (origanum vulgare) and black seed oil (nigella sativa), on true digestibilty of dry matter, organic matter and ndf in barley, soybean meal and wheat straw. MSc Thesis, Department of Animal Science Institue of Naturel and Applied Sciences University of Cukurova.
32. 32. Zagorakis K, Liamadisa D, Milisb CH, Dotasa V, Dotasa D (2015): Nutrient digestibility and in situ degradability of alternatives to soybean meal protein sources for sheep. Small Rum Res, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.01.002.