Letter to Editor

Entomopathogens in control of urban pests

Volume: 61 Number: 2 June 1, 2014
  • Abdullah İnci
  • Engin Kılıç
  • Ramazan Canhilal
EN TR

Entomopathogens in control of urban pests

Abstract

Entomopathogens including viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, rickettsia and nematodes are non-infective to vertebrates. There are lots of researches on their efficacy on urban pests. Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) is effective in controlling mosquitos and black flies, B. thuringiensis kurstaki and B. thuringiensis entomocidus controls Lepidoptera caterpillars. B. thuringiensis tenebrionis controls some beetle species. Most of viruses kill immature stages of Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera. Baculoviruses are specific to only a few pests of Lepidoptera and mosquitoes. Fungi have wide spectrum of hosts and the ability to enter via cuticle. They can infect many insects (Dictyoptera, Orthoptera, Dermoptera, Culicidae, Muscidae, Simulidae, Tabanidae, Cimicidae, Vespidae, Formicidae, Lepidoptera, Termitidae) and ticks (Ixodidae and Argasidae). The most common entomopathogenic fungus species are Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae. Protozoa are pathogenic for insect and some ticks. Nosema is the most common genus. However there is necessity to evaluate the potential of Nosema-Ixodidae and Nosema-Insect interactions for tick and insect bio-control. Rickettsias are obligatory intracellular organisms and some species affect ticks. Nematode species in the families of Steinernematidae (Steinernema spp., Neosteirnema spp.), Heterorhabditidae (Heterorhabditis spp.) and Mermithidae are effective on insects and ticks. Entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) carry the pathogenic bacteria (Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus spp.) in their intestines. These bacteria are able to kill the host within 24-48 hours. Some entomopathogens or microbial pathogens can be mass-produced, and suitable for commercial use. Current applications include control programs for agricultural, forest and urban pests. This review emphases on the potential of different entomopathogens for bio-control of urban pests and brief information about microbial control agents

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Azawi B, Jabbr L (1989): The effects of different concentrations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on house fly Musca domestica L. Bull End Dis, 30, 69-73.
  2. Ali FS, Abdel Moneim AA, el Dahtory TA, Ssfwat MS, Abdallah AR (1986): Microbiological control of ticks. Zentralbl Microbiol, 141, 67-70.
  3. Appel LF, Prout M, Abu-Shumays R, Hammonds A, Garbe JC, Fristrom D, Fristrom J (1993): The Drosophila stubble-stubbloid gene encodes an apparent transmembrane serine protease required for epithelial morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90, 4937-4941.
  4. Balashovys YS (1971): Interrelationships between bloodsucking arthropods and rickettsia. Parasitologia, 5, 347-56.
  5. Becnel JJ, White SE (2007): Mosquito pathogenic viruses - the Last 20 Years. J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 23, 36-49.
  6. Belton P, Rutherford TA, Trotter DB, Webster JM (1987): Heterorhabditis heliothidis: A potential biological control agent of house flies in caged-layer poultry barns. J Nematol, 19, 263-266.
  7. Bhattacharya PR (1998): Microbial control of mosquitoes with special emphasis on bacterial control. Indian J Malariol 35, 206-224.
  8. Brown RS, Reichelderfer CF, Anderson WR (1970): An endemic disease among laboratory population of Dermasentor andersoni (D. venustus) (acarina:ixodidae). J Intertebr Pathol, 16,142-143.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Authors

Abdullah İnci This is me

Engin Kılıç This is me

Ramazan Canhilal This is me

Publication Date

June 1, 2014

Submission Date

June 1, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Volume: 61 Number: 2

APA
İnci, A., Kılıç, E., & Canhilal, R. (2014). Entomopathogens in control of urban pests. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 61(2), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622
AMA
1.İnci A, Kılıç E, Canhilal R. Entomopathogens in control of urban pests. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;61(2):155-160. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622
Chicago
İnci, Abdullah, Engin Kılıç, and Ramazan Canhilal. 2014. “Entomopathogens in Control of Urban Pests”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 61 (2): 155-60. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622.
EndNote
İnci A, Kılıç E, Canhilal R (June 1, 2014) Entomopathogens in control of urban pests. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 61 2 155–160.
IEEE
[1]A. İnci, E. Kılıç, and R. Canhilal, “Entomopathogens in control of urban pests”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 155–160, June 2014, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622.
ISNAD
İnci, Abdullah - Kılıç, Engin - Canhilal, Ramazan. “Entomopathogens in Control of Urban Pests”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 61/2 (June 1, 2014): 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622.
JAMA
1.İnci A, Kılıç E, Canhilal R. Entomopathogens in control of urban pests. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;61:155–160.
MLA
İnci, Abdullah, et al. “Entomopathogens in Control of Urban Pests”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 61, no. 2, June 2014, pp. 155-60, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622.
Vancouver
1.Abdullah İnci, Engin Kılıç, Ramazan Canhilal. Entomopathogens in control of urban pests. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014 Jun. 1;61(2):155-60. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002622

Cited By