Letter to Editor

Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey

Volume: 60 Number: 3 September 1, 2013
  • Şükrü Kırkan
  • Serap Savaşan
  • Göksel Erbaş
  • Uğur Parın
EN TR

Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey

Abstract

In this study, rickettsial infections in dogs living in rural and urban areas were evaluated in the Western Turkey. Dog sera has been tested indirect immunofluorescence test (IFA) by containing Rickettsia rickettsii antigen. Dog blood sera samples were obtained from 250 dogs (50 dogs from urban area and 200 dogs from rural area) covering the two-year period between March 2009 - March 2011. For each sera, the antigen reactive with Rickettsia rickettsii constitute the end point titers were determined. A total of 250 dogs sera samples were tested. Dog sera samples were found 54.0% (135/250) seropositive and 43.2% (108/250) were found seronegative for the Rickettsia rickettsii. However, of the 2.8% (7/250 dog sera samples were found to be suspicious for the Rickettsia rickettsii at ≥ 1:64 - 1:256 < titer. In this study, 7 (14.0%) dogs in urban areas were found to be seropositive and 128 (64.0%) dogs in rural areas were found to be seropositive in the ≥ 1:256 titer with the IFA test. In conclusion, titers of antibodies against Rickettsia rickettsii obtained from rural and urban dogs in Western Turkey appeared to be remarkable and more research needs to be done on this subject reveals

Keywords

References

  1. Angerami RN, Resende MR, Feltrin AF, Katz G, Nascimento EM, Stucchi RS, Silva LJ (2006): Brazilian spotted fever: a case series from an endemic area in southeastern Brazil: epidemiological aspects. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1078, 170–172.
  2. Bowman DD, Little SE, Lorentzen L, Shields J, Sullivan MP, Carlin EP (2009): Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: results of a national clinic-based serologic survey. Vet Parasitol, 160, 138–148.
  3. Calic SB, Barcellos-Rocha CM, Leite RC, Mafra CL (2005): Old and new human rickettsiosis in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1063, 356–357.
  4. Foley JE, Brown RN, Gabriel MW, Henn J, Drazenovich N, Kasten R, Green SL, Chomel BB (2007): Spatial analysis of the exposure of dogs in rural north-coastal California to vectorbornepathogens. Vet Rec, 161, 653–657.
  5. Guedes E, Leite RC, Prata MCA, Pacheco RC, Walker DH, Labruna MB (2005): Detection of Rickettsia rickettsii in the tick Amblyomma cajennense in a new Brazilian spotted feverendemic area in the state of Minas Gerais. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 100, 841–845.
  6. Hinrichsen VL, Whitworth UG, Breitsschwerdt EB, Heqarty BC, Mather TN (2001): Assessing the association between the geographic distribution of deer ticks and seropositivity rates to various tick-transmitted disease organisms in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 218, 1092–1097.
  7. Horta MC, Labruna MB, Pinter A, Linardi PM, Schumaker TTS (2007): Rickettsia infection in five areas of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 102, 793–801.
  8. Horta MC, Labruna MB, Sangioni LA (2004): Prevalence of antibodies to spotted fever group rickettsiae in humans and domestic animals in a Brazilian spotted fever endemic area in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: serological evidence for infection by Rickettsia rickettsii and another spotted fever group rickettsia. Amer J Trop Med Hyg,; 71, 93-97.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Authors

Şükrü Kırkan This is me

Serap Savaşan This is me

Göksel Erbaş This is me

Uğur Parın This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

Submission Date

September 1, 2013

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 60 Number: 3

APA
Kırkan, Ş., Savaşan, S., Erbaş, G., & Parın, U. (2013). Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 60(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572
AMA
1.Kırkan Ş, Savaşan S, Erbaş G, Parın U. Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013;60(3):165-169. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572
Chicago
Kırkan, Şükrü, Serap Savaşan, Göksel Erbaş, and Uğur Parın. 2013. “Prevalence of Rickettsia Rickettsii Infection in Dogs from the Urban and Rural Areas of Western Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60 (3): 165-69. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572.
EndNote
Kırkan Ş, Savaşan S, Erbaş G, Parın U (September 1, 2013) Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60 3 165–169.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Kırkan, S. Savaşan, G. Erbaş, and U. Parın, “Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 165–169, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572.
ISNAD
Kırkan, Şükrü - Savaşan, Serap - Erbaş, Göksel - Parın, Uğur. “Prevalence of Rickettsia Rickettsii Infection in Dogs from the Urban and Rural Areas of Western Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 60/3 (September 1, 2013): 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572.
JAMA
1.Kırkan Ş, Savaşan S, Erbaş G, Parın U. Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013;60:165–169.
MLA
Kırkan, Şükrü, et al. “Prevalence of Rickettsia Rickettsii Infection in Dogs from the Urban and Rural Areas of Western Turkey”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 60, no. 3, Sept. 2013, pp. 165-9, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572.
Vancouver
1.Şükrü Kırkan, Serap Savaşan, Göksel Erbaş, Uğur Parın. Prevalence of Rickettsia rickettsii infection in dogs from the urban and rural areas of western Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013 Sep. 1;60(3):165-9. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002572

Cited By