Effect of maturity stage on the potential nutritive value of canola (Brassica napus L.) hays

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of maturity stage on the chemical composition, gas production, organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolizable energy (ME) and relative feed value (RFV) content of canola hay (Brassica napus L.). Gas production were determined at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h and their kinetics were described using the equation y=a+b(1e-ct). Maturity had a significant effect on the chemical composition, gas production, OMD, ME and RFV content of canola hay. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADF) contents of canola hay increased with increasing maturity whereas the crude protein (CP), ME, OMS, DDM ve NYD contents decreased. As a result, it was concluded that canola hay will provide more CP, ME and OMD for ruminants when harvested at vegetative and flowering stage

Keywords

• Canola hay
• chemical composition
• nutritive value
• gas production
• relative feed value

Farklı olgunlaşma dönemlerinin kolza otunun (Brassica napus L.) potansiyel besleme değeri üzerine etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, farklı gelişme dönemlerinde hasat edilen kolza otlarının (Brassica napus L.) kimyasal bileşimleri, in vitro gaz üretimi, metabolik enerji (ME), organik madde sindirimi (OMS) ve nispi yem değerleri (NYD) üzerine olan etkilerinin saptanmasını amaçlamıştır. Gaz ölçümleri 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 ve 96 saat aralıklarla yapılmış ve gaz değerleri y=a+b (1-e-ct) eşitliği kullanılarak saptanmıştır. Kolza otunun olgunlaşması kimyasal bileşimleri, in vitro gaz üretimi, ME, OMS ve NYD üzerine önemli etkide bulunmuştur. Gelişme dönemine bağlı olarak kolza otlarının nötr deterjan lif (NDF), asit deterjan lif (ADF) ve asit deterjan lignin (ADL) içerikleri artarken, ham protein (HP), ME, OMS, KMS ve NYD ise azalmıştır. Sonuç olarak vejetatif ve çiçeklenme döneminde hasat edilen kolza kuru otlarının tohum bağlama dönemi ve saman dönemlerine göre daha yüksek HP, ME ve OMS sağlayacağı sonucuna varılmıştır

Keywords

• Kolza otu
• kimyasal bileşim
• besleme değeri
• gaz üretimi
• nispi yem değeri

References

1. Açıkgöz E (2001): Yem Bitkileri. III: Baskı. U.Ü. Güçlen- dirme Vakfı Yay. No: 182, VİPAŞ Yay. No: 58, s584.
2. Adesogan AT, Sollenberger LE, Moore JE (2006): Forage Quality. In: Florida forages handbook. (Ed. C.G. Chambliss and M. B. Adjei) Univ of Florida. Cooperative Extension Services.
3. AOAC (1990): Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Method of Analysis. 15th.ed. Washington, DC. USA, 66-88.
4. Balakhial A, Naserian AA, Heravi Moussavi A, Eftekhar Shahrodi F, Vali Zadeh R (2008): Changes in chemical composition and in vitro DM digestibility of urea and molasses treated whole crop canola silage. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 7, 1042-1044.
5. Ball DM, Hoveland CS, Lacefield GD (1996): Forage Quality. In: Southern Forages (2nd edition). 124-132. Potash & Phosphate Institute and Foundation for Agronomic Research, Norcross, GA.
6. Blümmel M, Ørskov ER (1993): Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting of food intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 40,109-119.
7. Bozkurt KA (2011): Determination of relative feed value of some legume hays harvested at flowering stage. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 6, 525-530.
8. Buxton DR (1996): Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 59, 37-49.

9. Canbolat O, Karaman Ş (2009): Bazı baklagil kaba yemlerinin in vitro gaz üretimi, organik madde sindirimi, nispi yem değeri ve metabolik enerji içeriklerinin karşılaştırılması. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. 15, 188-195.
10. Canbolat Ö, Sincik M (2007): Farklı olgunlaşma dönemlerinde hasat edilen kenaf çeşitlerinin (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) sindirim derecesi ve metabolik enerji değerlerinin in-vitro gaz tekniği ile belirlenmesi. IV. Ulusal Zootekni Bilim Kongresi. 6-8 Eylül 2007, Van.
11. Canbolat Ö (2012): Potential nutritive value of field binweed (convolvulus arvensis L) hay harvested at three different maturity stages. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 18, 331-335.
12. FAO (2012): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx, 2012. Erişim Tarihi: 09.07.2012.
13. Gizlenci Ş, Dok M (2003): Ham yağ açığına çözüm kanola. Ekin Dergisi, Yıl: 7. 23, 50-55.
14. Hertrampf JW, Pascual FP (2000): Handbook on ingredients for aquaculture feeds. Kluwer Academic Publis, Dordrecht, Boston, London, p. 573.
15. Kamalak A, Canbolat O (2010): Determination of nutritive value of wild narrow-leaved clover (Trifolium angustifolium) hay harvested at three maturity stages using chemical composition and in vitro gas production. Tropical Grasslands. 44, 128-133.
16. Kamalak A, Canbolat O, Gurbuz Y, Erol A, Ozay O (2005): Effect of maturity stage on chemical composition, in vitro and in situ dry matter degradation of tumbleweed hay (Gundelia Tournefortii L.), Small Ruminant Research. 58, 149-156.
17. Karabulut A, Canbolat O, Kamalak A (2006): Effect of maturity stage on the nutritive value of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L) hays. Lotus Newsletter. 36, 11-21.
18. Karabulut A, Canbolat O, Kalkan H, Gurbuzol F, Sucu E, Filya I (2007): Comparison of in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility and microbial protein production of some legume hays. Asian- Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 20, 517-522.
19. Khodaparast B, Doust Nobar RS, Sis NM, Ghorbani A, Salamat Azar M (2011): Determination of organic matter degradability of urea treated canola straw using nylon bag technique. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 10, 806-807.
20. Khodaparast B, Doust-Nobar RS, Maheri-Sis N, Salamatazar M, Amine PN, Goli S (2011): Determination of nutritive value of urea treated canola straw using in vitro gas production technique. Annals of Biological Research. 2, 218-223.
21. Kılıç Ü (2009): Ruminantların beslenmesinde kanola bitkisinin kaba yem kaynağı olarak kullanılması. Lalahan Hayvancılım Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi. 49,125-135.
22. Kirkegaard J (2007): Evaluating the potential for dual- purpose (graze/grain) canola in the mixed farming systems of southern Australia, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT. 2614, 33.
23. Larbi A, Smith JW, Kurdi IO, Raji AM, Ladipo DO (1998): Chemical composition rumen degradation and gas production characteristics of some multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs during wet and dry season in humid tropics. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 72, 81-96.
24. Lee MJ, Hwang SY, Chiou PWS (2000): Metabolizable energy of roughages in Taiwan. Small Ruminant Research. 36, 251-259.
25. Long RJ, Apori SO, Castro FB, Orskov ER (1991): Feed value of native forages of the tibetan plateau of China. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 80, 101- 113, 1991.
26. McCormick K, Stuchbery J, Victoria AD (2012): Canola hay: reduction the risk of canola production. http://www.australianoilseeds.com/data/assets/pdf_file/000 9/4203/canola_hay_Longerenong.pdf, 2012. Erişim Tarihi: 07.07.2012.
27. Menke KH, Steingass H (1988): Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development. 28, 7-55.
28. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W (1979): The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 93, 217-222.
29. Morrison JM (1980): Changes in the lignin and hemicellulose concentration of ten varieties of temperate grasses with increasing maturity. The Journal of British Grassland Society. 35, 287-293.
30. Neely C, Brown J, Hunt C, Davis J (2009): Increasing the value of winter canola crops by developing ensiling systems (canolage) to produce cattle feed. Alfalfa and Forage Conference, 3-4 February 2009, University of Idaho. Moscow.
31. Ørskov ER, McDonald P (1979): The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 92, 499-503.
32. Pritchard F, Jones D, McCaffery D, O’Keeffe K, Potter T, Burton W, McCormick K (2008): A bright future for canola and reducing risks in 2008. IREC Farmers’ Newsletter, No.178, Autumn. 14-17, 2008.
33. Rohweder DA, Barnes RF, Jorgensen N (1978): Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science, 47, 747-759.
34. Snedecor GW, Cochran W (1976): Statistical Methods. The Iowa State Univ. Pres. Amer. IA. USA.
35. Statistica (1993): Statistica for Windows (Release 4.3), Sat Soft, Inc. Tulsa. OK.
36. Terry RA, Tilley JMA (1964): The digestibility of leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. The Journal of British Grassland Society. 19, 363-372.
37. TÜİK (2012): Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Tahıllar ve Diğer Bitkisel Ürünler. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?tb_id=45&ust_id=13, 2012. Erişim Tarihi: 7.07.2012.
38. Van Soest PJ (1994): Nutritional ecology of the ruminant (2nd Ed.). p. 528. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, NY, 1994.
39. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74, 3583-3597.
40. Wilson JR, Deinum H, Engels EM (1991): Temperature effects on anatomy and digestibility of leaf and stem of tropical and temperate forage species. Netherlands-Journal of Agricultural Science. 39, 31-48.