Letter to Editor

The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income

Volume: 54 Number: 3 September 1, 2007
  • Yavuz Cevger
  • Savaş Sarıözkan
  • Yılmaz Aral
EN TR

The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of marketing chicken carcasses after different cutting methods, on the enterprise income, taking into account seasonal price changes. The study was carried out in the Meat and Fish Organization Sincan Slaughtering Plant Poult Unit (Ankara-Turkey) between March 2002-May 2002. The research material included total 850 pieces broiler carcasses, which were cut up with conventional methods using a knife. In the research, 2 different conventional cutting methods were used. In the 1st method, the carcasses were cut-up into 7 parts as drumsticks, thighs, fillet (breast meat without bone and skin), wings, for soup (back), neck and bone. In the 2nd method the carcasses were cut-up into 4 parts as wings, legs (hindquarter), whole breast (with breast meat, back, bone and skin) and neck. In the 1st method, it was determined that there was an average increase of 4.03 % in the enterprise income with summer term prices; and an increase of 0.91 % with winter term prices. In the 2nd method, it was determined that respectively 13.18 and 3.35 % increases would be obtained in the income. It was found out that the 2nd method, in which the work force efficiency was high and the shrinkage rate was less, provided more net income increase to the enterprise

Keywords

References

  1. Acar N, Moran ET, Mulvaney DR (1993): Breast muscle development of commercial broilers from hatching to twelve weeks of age. Poult Sci, 72, 317-325.
  2. Benoff FH, Hamm D, Hudspeth JP, Lyon CE (1984): Meat yield comparisons of hot cut-up, noneviscerated versus eviscerated immersion-chilled broilers. Poult Sci, 63, 507-509.
  3. Bilgili SF, Moran ETJr, Acar N (1992): Strain cross response of heavy male broilers to dietary lysine in the finisher feed: live performance and further-processing yields. Poult Sci, 71, 850-858.
  4. Cevger Y, Sariozkan S, Guler H (2003): Impact of manual and mechanical cut-up of broiler carcasses on the enterprise income. Veterinarni Medicina-Czech, 48, 248-253.
  5. Cevger Y, Sariozkan S, Guler H (2004): The effect of the sale of whole or cut up chicken meat on enterprise income according to season. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 28, 399-402.
  6. Daniel WW (1987): Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. Fifth edition. Courier Companies, Inc USA, pp. 115-120.
  7. Giles T, Stansfield M (1995): The Farmer as Manager. Second edition. CAB International, pp. 136-138.
  8. Merkley JW, Weinland BT, Malone GW, Chaloupka GW (1980): Evaluation of five commercial broiler crosses: 2. eviscerated yield and component parts. Poult Sci, 59, 1755-1760.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Letter to Editor

Authors

Yavuz Cevger This is me

Savaş Sarıözkan This is me

Yılmaz Aral This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2007

Submission Date

January 1, 2007

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2007 Volume: 54 Number: 3

APA
Cevger, Y., Sarıözkan, S., & Aral, Y. (2007). The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(3), 211-214. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280
AMA
1.Cevger Y, Sarıözkan S, Aral Y. The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2007;54(3):211-214. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280
Chicago
Cevger, Yavuz, Savaş Sarıözkan, and Yılmaz Aral. 2007. “The Effect of Chicken Meat Marketing With Different Cutting Methods on Enterprise Income”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 54 (3): 211-14. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280.
EndNote
Cevger Y, Sarıözkan S, Aral Y (September 1, 2007) The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 54 3 211–214.
IEEE
[1]Y. Cevger, S. Sarıözkan, and Y. Aral, “The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 211–214, Sept. 2007, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280.
ISNAD
Cevger, Yavuz - Sarıözkan, Savaş - Aral, Yılmaz. “The Effect of Chicken Meat Marketing With Different Cutting Methods on Enterprise Income”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 54/3 (September 1, 2007): 211-214. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280.
JAMA
1.Cevger Y, Sarıözkan S, Aral Y. The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2007;54:211–214.
MLA
Cevger, Yavuz, et al. “The Effect of Chicken Meat Marketing With Different Cutting Methods on Enterprise Income”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 54, no. 3, Sept. 2007, pp. 211-4, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280.
Vancouver
1.Yavuz Cevger, Savaş Sarıözkan, Yılmaz Aral. The effect of chicken meat marketing with different cutting methods on enterprise income. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2007 Sep. 1;54(3):211-4. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000000280