Dölsüz tavuk germinal diskinin görünümü

Abstract

Sürü döllülüğü taze yumurtadaki germinal diskin farklı görünümüne göre belirlenebilir. Bu çalışmada; genç kahverengi yumurtacı sürüden elde edilen taze dölsüz yumurtalardaki germinal disk farklılıklarını ve dağılım frekanslarını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada toplam 354 yumurta incelenmiştir. Yumurtalar dölsüz germinal disk görünümüne göre A, B, C, D, E ve F olmak üzere 6 farklı şekilde sınıflandırılmıştır. Sonuç olarak toplam yumurtalar içinde en yüksek oranda A şekline (%31.9) ve en düşük oranda da C şekline (%6.5) rastlanmıştır

Keywords

• Tavuk
• dölsüz germinal disk
• görünüm

Gross appearance of the chicken unfertilized germinal disc

Abstract

Flock fertility could be determined by different appearances of germinal disc in fresh egg. The aim of this study was to determine the differences and the frequency of distributions in the appearance of germinal disc in fresh unfertile eggs coming from a young virgin brown layer flock. In this study a total of 354 eggs was examined. Six categories of unfertile germinal disc (UGD) were defined based on their appearance as A, B, C, D, E and F. As a conclusion, in total eggs, type A (31.9%) was the highest and type C was the lowest (6.5%) in frequency

Keywords

• Chicken
• unfertilized germinal disc
• gross appearance

References

1. Arora K, Kosin I (1966): Changes in the gross morphological appearance of chicken and turkey blastoderms during preincubation storage. Poult Sci, 45, 819-825.
2. Bakst MR, Gupta SK, Potts W, Akuffo V (1998): Gross appearance of the turkey blastoderm at ovi- position. Poult Sci, 77, 1228-1233.
3. Coleman M (1999): Quality control in the hatchery. The fresh egg breakout. Part 1. Mac Associates, In- cubator, Inc.
4. Eyal-Gladi H, Kochav S (1976): From cleavage to primitive streak formation: A complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the devel- opment of the chick 1. General morphology. Dev Biol, 49,321-337.
5. Fasenko GM (1998): Hatching egg breakout: Is it fertile? Poultry Research Centre News, 7, 1-2.
6. Gupta S, Bakst M (1993): Turkey embryo staging from cleavage through hypoblast formation. J Mor- phol, 217, 313-325.
7. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951): A series of normal stages in the development of the chick em- bryo. J Morphol, 88,49-92.
8. Sümbüloğlu K, Sümbüloğlu V (2000): Biyoista- tistik. 9. Baskı, Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, Şahin Matbaası, Ankara.

9. Wilson JL (1991): Hatching egg breakout methods are explained. Poult Digest, September, 20-25.
10. Wineland MJ, Fasenko GM (1999): What should a fertile chicken hatching egg look like? Poult Digest, October/November, 17-20. Geliş tarihi: 07.09.2005 / Kabul tarihi: 20.02.2006 Address for correspondence Dr. E. Ebru Onbaşılar Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ankara, 06110 Dışkapı-Ankara-Turkey. e-mail: [e-mail]