Does acoustic trauma occur in pointers due to firearm noise? A prospective study on 50 hunting dogs

Abstract

This study investigates the possibility of acoustic trauma occurence in hunting dogs exposed to high noise with pure
stimulant such as firearms. Ten puppies (Control Group-CG) were used to establish reference for Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response
(BAER) and tympanometry records. BAER and tympanograms were collected from the 40 cases in active hunting group (Acoustic
Trauma Group-ATG). The severities of trauma of which the cases were exposed to were determined by field study. While
tympanometric pressure values of ATG cases were higher than that in CG, they were found to be in normal range (ATG left:
35,63±38,79/right: 34,00±38,25; CG left: -23,90±44,30/ right: -29,20±36,87 daPa). BAER records were saved using both click and
tone burst stimuli. Records were taken at the frequencies of 0,5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8-kHz with tone burst stimulus. Wave I latency values
obtained with click stimulus were only found to be significant in right ear at 30 dB intensity. Wave V was observed to be the last
disappearing and the most observed wave among the waves obtained with high frequency stimulus. Based on this study, it was
concluded that dogs experience acoustic trauma due to firearm noise, as revealed by a substantial decline in amplitude values in BAER
records obtained with click stimulus. It can be said that the use of products developed for dogs and raising awareness in hunters may
also be beneficial to prevent harmful effects of acoustic trauma.  

Keywords

• Acoustic trauma
• BAER
• hearing loss
• hunting dog
• tympanogram.

References

1. 1. Bapat U, Tolley N (2006): Temporary threshold shift due to recreational firearm use. J Laryngol Otol, 121, 927-931.
2. 2. Bodenhamer RD, Hunter JF, Luttgen PJ (1985): Brain stem auditory evoked responses in the dog. Am J Vet Res, 46, 1787-1792.
3. 3. Borg E, Bergkvist C, Sjöback DB (2008): Effect on directional hearing in hunters using amplifying (level dependent) hearing protectors. Otol Neurotol, 29, 579-585.
4. 4. Cole LK, Podell M, Kwochka KW (2000): Impedance audiometric measurements in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res, 61, 442-445.
5. 5. Cox C (2002): Investigation of hearing loss in dogs. In Practice, 24, 494-501
6. 6. Dewey CW, Ducote, JM (2008): Neurodiagnostics. In, Dewey CW (ed), A Practical Guide to Canine & Feline Neurology. Wiley-Blackwell.
7. 7. Flamme GA, Stewart M, Meinke D, Lankford J, Rasmussen P (2011): Auditory risk to unprotected bystanders exposed to firearm noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 93-103.
8. 8. Haar G, Venker-van Haagen AJ, van den Brom WE, van Slujis FJ, Smoorenburg GF (2008): Effects of aging on brainstem responses to toneburst auditory stimuli: a crosssectional and longitudinal study in dogs. J Vet Intern Med, 22, 937-945.

9. 9. Lauer AM, El-Sharkawy AM, Kraitchman DL, Edelstein WA (2012): MRI acoustic noise can harm experimental and companion animals. J Magn Reson Imaging, 36, 743-747.
10. 10. Meij BP, Venker-van Haagen AJ, van den Brom WE (1992): Relationship between latency of brainstem auditoryevoked potentials and head size in dogs. Vet Q, 14, 121-6.
11. 11. Munro KJ, Shiu JN, Cox CL (1997): The effect of head size on the auditory brainstem response for two breeds of dog. Br J Audiol, 31, 309-314.
12. 12. Poncelet L, Deltenre P, Coppens A, Michaux C, Coussart E (2006): Brain stem auditory potentials evoked by cliques in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs. Res Vet Sci, 80, 167-174.
13. 13. Radlinksy MC, Mason DE (2005): Diseases of the Ear. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC (eds). Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Elsevier Saunders.
14. 14. Knowles KE, Cash WC, Blauch BS (1988): Auditoryevoked responses of dogs with different hearing abilitie. Can J Vet Res 1988; 52: 394-397.
15. 15. Rasmussen P, Flamme G, Stewart M, Meinke D, Lankford J. (2009): Measuring recreational firearm noise, Sound & Vibration, http://www.sandv.com/downloads/ 0908rasm.pdf. Access to date: 10.11.2013.
16. 16. Shanks J, Shohet J (2001): Tympanometry in clinical practice. In, Katz J Mishawaka (ed), Hand Book of Clinical Audiology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
17. 17. Sims MH (1988): Electrodiagnostic evaluation of auditory function. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 18, 913-943.
18. 18. Srenk P, Flühmann G, Muhle A, Bergamasco L, Jaggy A (2010): Electrodiagnostics. In, Jaggy A, Platt SR (eds), Small Animal Neurology, Hannover, Schlütersche, 161-163.
19. 19. Stamper GC, Johnson TA (2015): Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears. Ear Hear, 36, 172-184.
20. 20. Stewart M (2017): Recreational firearm noise exposure, Audiology Information Series ASHA. http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/AIS-RecreationalFirearm-Noise-Exposure.pdf. Access to Date: 01.02.2013.
21. 21. Strain GM (1999): Congenital deafness in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 29, 895-907.
22. 22. Waghmare S (2015): Evaluation of brainstem auditory evoked potential in noise induced deafness. Int J Bioassays, 4, 4171-4173