Examination of the morphometric features and three-dimensional modelling of the skull in Van cats by using computed tomographic images

Abstract

This study was conducted to make the three-dimensional modelling of the skull in Van cats by using computed tomographic images and to determine the morphometric features between sexes. The skulls of 16 adult Van cats were used in the study. The skulls of the anesthetized animals were scanned by using a Computed Tomography (CT) device and their images were obtained. These images were converted to a three-dimensional structure using MIMICS 20.1 software and their morphometric measurements were calculated. It was determined in the study that total length of the skull (TLS), facial length (FCL), upper neurocranium length (UNCL), greatest length of the nasal (GLN), maximum zygomatic width (MZW), condylobasal length (CBL), basal length (BL), median palatal length (MPL), palatal length (PL), least palatal breadth (LPB), length of the cheek tooth row (LCR), greatest inner height of the orbit (GIHO), skull height (SH), and volumetric measurement values were statistically significantly higher in the male cats; whereas, breadth dorsal to the external auditory meatus (BEAM) and neurocranium length (NL) measurement values were statistically significantly higher in the female cats (P<0.05). In conclusion, the statistical differences between the sexes in terms of biometric values of skull of Van cats were determined. Present study would be beneficial to veterinary physicians in the surgical and clinical practice fields and to the studies in the field of zooarchaeology as well as being guiding for determining the typology of Van cats among the cat species and its differences from other species.

Keywords

• Computed tomography
• morphometry
• skull
• three - dimensional modeling
• Van cat

References

1. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333.
2. Brenton H, Hernandez J, Bello F, et al (2007): Using multimedia and web 3D to enhance anatomy teaching. Comput Educ, 49, 32-53.
3. Cak B (2017): Turkish Van cat and Turkish Angora cat: a review. J Agric Sci Technol A, 7, 151-159.
4. Dayan MO, Gürbüz İ, Demiraslan Y, et al (2017): Craniometric measurements of the male Eurasian Lynx from Turkey. Anim Vet Sci, 5, 15-20.
5. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG (2010): Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 32-99. 4th Edition, Saunders Elsevier Inc, Missouri, United States.
6. Farhadinia MS, Kaboli M, Karami M, et al (2014): Patterns of sexual dimorphism in the Persian Leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) and implications for sex differentiation. Zool Middle East, 60, 195-207.
7. Gordon CR, Marchant TW, Lodzinska J, et al (2018): Morphological variation of the caudal fossa of domestic cat skulls assessed with CT and geometric morphometrics analysis. J Feline Med Surg, 20, 752-758.
8. Gündemir O, Duro S, Jashari T, et al (2020): A study on morphology and morphometric parameters on skull of the Bardhoka autochthonous sheep breed in Kosovo. Anat Histol Embryol, 49, 365-371.

9. İnce NG, Demircioğlu İ, Yılmaz B, et al (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101.
10. Kahvecioğlu KO, Onar V, Alpak H, et al (2000): The morphometry of the foramen magnum in rabbits and its correlation with craniometric measurements. Folia Vet, 44, 62-69.
11. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al (2004): Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology, 230, 619-628.
12. Liebich HG, König HE (2007): Axial skeleton. 49-85. In: Veterinary Anatomy of Domestic Mammals: Text Book and Colour Atlas. 3rd Edition, Schattauer, Germany.
13. Mo G, Zotti A, Agnesi S, et al (2009): Age classes and sex differences in the skull of the Mediterranean monk seal, Monachus monachus (Hermann, 1779). A study based on bone shape and density. Anat Rec, 292, 544-556.
14. Moselhy AA, Mahdy EA (2019): Comparative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans and anatomical investigation of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and cat (Felis domestica) skull. Slov Vet Res, 56, 365-379.
15. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (2017): International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover.
16. Odabaşıoğlu F, Ateş CT (2000): Van Cats. 1st Edition, Selcuk University Printing Office, Konya, Turkey.
17. Ohlerth S, Scharf G (2007): Computed tomography in small animals-basic principles and state of the art applications. Open Vet J, 173, 254-271.
18. Olopade JO, Onwuka SK (2005): Morphometric study of the skull of the West African dwarf goat from South West Nigeria. Niger Vet J, 26, 18-21.
19. Olude MA, Olopade JO, Fatola IO, et al. (2009): Some aspects of the neurocraniometry of the African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus Waterhouse). Folia Morphol, 68, 224-227.
20. Onar V (1999): A morphometric study on the skull of the German shepherd dog (Alsatian). Anat Histol Embryol, 28, 253-256.
21. Onar V, Belli O, Owen PR (2005): Morphometric examination of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the Van-Yoncatepe Necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Int J Morphol, 23, 253-260.
22. Onar V, Güneş H (2003): On the variability of skull shape in German Shepherd (Alsatian) puppies. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol, 272, 460-466.
23. Onar V, Kahvecioğlu KO, Cebi V (2002): Computed tomographic analysis of the cranial cavity and neurocranium in the German shepherd dog (Alsatian) puppies. Vet Arh, 72, 57-66.
24. Onar V, Mutuş R, Kahvecioğlu KO (1997): Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in German shepherd dogs (Alsatians). Ann Anat, 179, 563-568.
25. Onar V, Ozcan S, Pazvant G (2001): Skull typology of adult male Kangal dogs. Anat Histol Embryol, 30, 41-48.
26. Özkadif S, Eken E (2016): Craniometric measurements of New Zealand rabbits skull from three-dimensional reconstruction images. ARC J Anim Vet Sci, 2, 9-14.
27. Özkan ZE (2007): Macro-anatomical investigations on the skeletons of mole-rat (Spalax leucodon Nordmann) III. Skeleton axiale. Vet Arh, 77, 281-289.
28. Papadopoulos MA, Jannowitz C, Boettcher P, et al (2005): Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses. J Cranio Maxill Surg, 33, 229-237.
29. Piechocki R (1990): Die Wildkatze Felis Silvestris - Die Neue Brehm Bücherei A. 232. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg.
30. Pitakarnnop T, Buddhacha K, Euppayo T, et al (2017): Feline (Felis catus) skull and pelvic morphology and morphometry: gender-related difference? Anat Histol Embryol, 46, 294-303.
31. Prokop M (2003): General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol, 45, S4-S10.
32. Raghina DT, Perlea P, Marinescu M (2017): Forensic anthropology from skeletal remains to CT scans: a review on sexual dimorphism of human skull. Rom J Leg Med, 25, 287-292.
33. Ramamoorthy B, Pai MM, Ullal S, et al (2020): Discriminant function analysis of craniometric traits for sexual dimorphism and its implication in forensic anthropology. J Anat Soc India, 68, 260-268.
34. Rooppakhun S, Surasith P, Vatanapatimakul N, et al (2010): Craniometric study of Thai skull based on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) data. J Med Assoc Thai, 93, 90-98.
35. Saber A, Cacec T, Gummow B, et al (2016): Morphometric studies on the skull of the Australian domestic cat (F. catus) and its clinical implications for regional anesthesia. J Vet Med, 9, 1-24.
36. Saber AS, Gummow B (2015): Skull morphometry of the lion (Panthera leo), dog (Canis lupus familiaris) and cat (Felis catus). J Vet Med, 8, 13-30.
37. Segura V (2015): A three-dimensional skull ontogeny in the bobcat (Lynx rufus) (Carnivora: Felidae): a comparison with other carnivores. Can J Zool, 93, 225-237.
38. Shukla BB, Kumar R, Upadhyay AK, et al (2003): Relationship of age with body weight in orphaned leopard cubs. Zoos Print J, 18, 1058.
39. Simoens P, Poels P, Lauwers H (1994): Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in Pekingese dogs. Am J Vet Res, 55, 34-39.
40. Travaini A, Juste J, Novaro AJ, et al (2000): Sexual dimorphism and sex identification in the South American culpeo fox, Pseudalopex culpaeus (Carnivora: Canidae). Wildlife Res, 27, 669-674.
41. Uddin M, Sarker MHR, Hossain ME, et al (2013): Morphometric investigation of neurocranium in domestic cat (Felis catus). Bangl J Vet Med, 11, 69-73.
42. Von Den Driesch A (1976): A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University.
43. Wehausen JD, Ramey RR (2000): Cranial morphometric and evolutionary relationships in the nothern range of Ovis canadensis. J Mammal, 81, 145-161.
44. Wisner ER, Zwingenberger AL (2015): Atlas of small animal CT and MRI. 55-68. Willey-Blackwell Publishing, USA.
45. Yahaya A, Olopade JO, Kwari HD (2013): Morphological analysis and osteometry of the foramen magnum of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anat Histol Embryol, 42, 155-159.
46. Yılmaz B, Demircioğlu İ, Bozkaya F, et al (2020): Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 67, 161-168.
47. Yilmaz O, Soyguder Z, Yavuz A, et al (2020): Three-dimensional computed tomographic examination of pelvic cavity in Van Cats and its morphometric investigation. Anat Histol Embryol, 49, 60-66.