A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR

Serdar Diker

doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073

EN

A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR

Abstract

The application of micromodification of mercaptoethanol agglutination test to the serologic diagnosis qf Br. canis infection was evalZlated. The prevalence of antibodies to Br. canis and Br. abortııs in three different groups Of dogs was also inı'estigated. Sera were compared by AfA- TA T ( Mercaptoethanol Tube Agglııtination Test), ME-MAT (Mercaptoethanol MicroAgglutination Test) MA T (Micro Agglutination Test) for agglutinins to Br. canis alZd tested h)! MA T for agglııtinins to Br. abortus. A titer of i:200 in M E- TA T was considered as indicative of active Br. canis infection. This titer corresponded to i:40 in ME-MA T. All results of ME-MAT correlated well with those of Af E- TA T. MATfor Br. canis infection did not give reliable result. Of 222 sera examined, 14 (6.3 %) had a titer of 1:200 or more and these were considered as active Br. canis ilZfection. None of the military service dogs were positive for Br. canis whereas 15.6 % of stray dogs and 4.5 % of pets were positiDe. In AfA T for Br. abortus, afew of sera gave positive reaction at low titer, and these were considered as negative test result.

Keywords

References

Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Serdar Diker This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 1, 1987

Submission Date

January 1, 1987

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1987 Volume: 34 Number: 02

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA94DW39ME

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Diker, S. (1987). A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(02). https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073

AMA

1.Diker S. A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 1987;34(02). doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073

Chicago

Diker, Serdar. 1987. “A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 34 (02). https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073.

EndNote

Diker S (January 1, 1987) A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 34 02

IEEE

[1]S. Diker, “A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 34, no. 02, Jan. 1987, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073.

ISNAD

Diker, Serdar. “A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 34/02 (January 1, 1987). https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073.

JAMA

1.Diker S. A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 1987;34. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073.

MLA

Diker, Serdar. “A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 02, Jan. 1987, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073.

Vancouver

1.Serdar Diker. A SEROLOGIC SURVEY OF DOGS FOR. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 1987 Jan. 1;34(02). doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000001073

Cited By

A Comparison of the Performance of Exfoliative Cytopathology, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Culture and ELISA in the Detection of Brucella canis

Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.325735

Detection of Brucella canis infection in Pit Bull breed dogs in Turkey

Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias

https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e33304

Comparative assessment of brucellosis detection in dogs: In-house ELISA versus Rose Bengal Plate Test utilizing rough and smooth antigens

Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2024.102277