Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY

Year 2021, Issue: 60, 53 - 77, 25.12.2021

Abstract

References

  • Almond, Roncevert. “Trade, War and The South China Sea”, https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/trade-war-and-the-south-china-sea/ (Retrieved 15.11.2020)
  • Baviera, Aileen, “President Duterte’s Foreign Policy Challenges.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 38, no. 2, 2016, pp. 202–8.
  • Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.beltroad-initiative.com/belt-and-road/ (Retrieved: 19.04.2020)
  • Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. “Probing China’s Twenty-First-Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI): An Examination of MSRI Narratives”, Geopolitics, Vol 22, No 2.
  • Boon, Hoo Tiang. "The Origins of China’s Great-Power Identity." In China's Global Identity: Considering the Responsibilities of Great Power, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2018, p. 1-28.
  • Bowers, Ian. "Escalation at Sea: Stability and Instability in Maritime East Asia." Naval War College Review 71, no. 4, 2018, p. 45-66.
  • China State Council Information Office, The Diversified Employment of China’s Armed Forces, 2013, http://en.people.cn/90786/8209362.html (Retrieved 14.11.2020).
  • Cai, P. “Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2017, p. 2-26.

CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY

Year 2021, Issue: 60, 53 - 77, 25.12.2021

Abstract

The center of gravity of international relations has been shifting from the Atlantic towards Asia mainly due to economic, political and strategic changes in the world. In this context, regional conflicts such as Taiwan problem, the issues between People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Japan, North Korea's nuclear program will be of importance at global level. Additionally, overlapping claims and disputes in the South China Sea (SCS) involving PRC, Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Brunei are ongoing. The complexity and versatility of the problems arising from the SCS made it necessary to examine the subject in terms of empirical data, international law, and regional and global politics. As a result of the data revealed and the evaluation made, it is argued that it does not seem possible for PRC to take a step back in the SCS due to its assertive and dominant foreign policy with the Jinping administration and will not hesitate to resort to controlled tension. It is believed that Beijing's decisive stance is sourced from both United States of America (USA)'s lack of a long-term strategy for the region and its own growing military capacity when compared to its regional rivals. Within the scope of the study, these problems have been discussed in the context of China's rise and ambitious foreign policy and the containment policy of the USA with its regional allies, and the global and regional effects of the maritime security problems are emphasized. The main argument of this article is that it seems difficult for Beijing to soften its claims regarding the SCS within the framework of its maritime security and foreign policy approach. In fact, regional opponents of Beijing need political and military support from the USA, while lack of its long-term and consistent strategy for the region stands out.

References

  • Almond, Roncevert. “Trade, War and The South China Sea”, https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/trade-war-and-the-south-china-sea/ (Retrieved 15.11.2020)
  • Baviera, Aileen, “President Duterte’s Foreign Policy Challenges.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 38, no. 2, 2016, pp. 202–8.
  • Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.beltroad-initiative.com/belt-and-road/ (Retrieved: 19.04.2020)
  • Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. “Probing China’s Twenty-First-Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative (MSRI): An Examination of MSRI Narratives”, Geopolitics, Vol 22, No 2.
  • Boon, Hoo Tiang. "The Origins of China’s Great-Power Identity." In China's Global Identity: Considering the Responsibilities of Great Power, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2018, p. 1-28.
  • Bowers, Ian. "Escalation at Sea: Stability and Instability in Maritime East Asia." Naval War College Review 71, no. 4, 2018, p. 45-66.
  • China State Council Information Office, The Diversified Employment of China’s Armed Forces, 2013, http://en.people.cn/90786/8209362.html (Retrieved 14.11.2020).
  • Cai, P. “Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2017, p. 2-26.
There are 8 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects International Relations
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Burak Şakir Şeker This is me 0000-0002-8536-1790

Publication Date December 25, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 60

Cite

APA Şeker, B. Ş. (2021). CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY. Avrasya Etüdleri(60), 53-77.
AMA Şeker BŞ. CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY. Avrasya Etüdleri. December 2021;(60):53-77.
Chicago Şeker, Burak Şakir. “CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY”. Avrasya Etüdleri, no. 60 (December 2021): 53-77.
EndNote Şeker BŞ (December 1, 2021) CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY. Avrasya Etüdleri 60 53–77.
IEEE B. Ş. Şeker, “CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY”, Avrasya Etüdleri, no. 60, pp. 53–77, December 2021.
ISNAD Şeker, Burak Şakir. “CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY”. Avrasya Etüdleri 60 (December 2021), 53-77.
JAMA Şeker BŞ. CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY. Avrasya Etüdleri. 2021;:53–77.
MLA Şeker, Burak Şakir. “CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY”. Avrasya Etüdleri, no. 60, 2021, pp. 53-77.
Vancouver Şeker BŞ. CHINESE FOREIGN POLICY AND THE CHALLENGES OF MARITIME SECURITY. Avrasya Etüdleri. 2021(60):53-77.