"Deprem 2024" UNDERSTANDING POST-EARTHQUAKE RISKS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE POSSIBLE MARMARA EARTHQUAKE

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 -Deprem Özel Sayısı-, 75 - 114, 22.02.2024

Muhammet Mustafa Akkan , Müşerref Arık

https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1412374

Cited By: 1

Öz

Earthquakes are a phenomenon that has a significant impact on Turkey from psychological, economic, demographic, social and environmental aspects at different times. The magnitude of the effects of earthquakes results from the interaction of many factors. The main purpose of this study is to determine the factors that affect the destructive effect of the earthquake and to make suggestions to reduce the risks that a possible Marmara earthquake may pose. Within the scope of the study, 272 academic studies indexed in the Web of Science database regarding the February 6, 2023 earthquake were examined and 10 criteria that were considered important specifically for the earthquake were determined. Relevant criteria were weighted using the Swara method and determinations and suggestions were made for each criterion.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Swara analysis, Survey method, Marmara earthquake, Kahramanmaraş earthquake

DEPREM SONRASI RİSKLERİ ANLAMAK: OLASI MARMARA DEPREMİNE YÖNELİK BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Depremler, Türkiye’yi farklı zamanlarda psikolojik, ekonomik, demografik, sosyal ve çevresel yönlerden önemli şekilde etkileyen bir olgu olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Depremlerin ortaya çıkaracağı etkilerin büyüklüğü ise pek çok faktörün karşılıklı etkileşiminden meydana gelmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, depremin yıkıcı etkisi üzerinde etkinlik gösteren unsurların belirlenmesi ve olası Marmara depreminin ortaya çıkarabileceği riskleri azaltmaya yönelik önerilerde bulunmaktır. Çalışma kapsamında 06 Şubat 2023 depremine dair Web of Science veri tabanında indekslenen 272 akademik çalışma incelenmiş ve deprem özelinde önemli görülen 10 kriter belirlenmiştir. İlgili kriterler Swara yöntemi kullanılarak ağırlıklandırılmış ve her bir kriter özelinde tespit ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Swara analizi, Anket yöntemi, Marmara depremi, Kahramanmaraş depremi

Kaynakça

• Adushkin, V. V., Spivak, A. A., Rybnov, Yu. S., & Tikhonova, A. V. (2023). The series of catastrophic earthquakes of february 6, 2023, in Turkey and variations in the geophysical fields. Doklady Earth Sciences, 510 (2), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23600287
• AFAD. (2019a). Çanakkale’de 127 toplanma alanı var, 10.12.2023, https://canakkale.afad.gov.tr/canakkalede-127-toplanma-alani-var
• AFAD. (2019b). Kocaeli toplanma alanları, 10.12.2023, https://kocaeli.afad.gov.tr/kocaeli-toplanma-alanlari
• Ahmed, S. K., Chandran, D., Hussein, S., Sv, P., Chakraborty, S., Islam, Md. R., & Dhama, K. (2023). Environmental health risks after the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake and salient mitigating strategies: a critical appraisal. Environmental Health Insights, 17, 11786302231200864. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302231200865
• Akdemir, Ş., Sahli, Z., Kougnigan, E., Tuna, K. E., Örtülü, M., Akinci, S., & Narci, G. (2023). Socio-economic impact of the earthquakes of february 2023 on agricultural production of Turkiye. 23 (2).
• Akhoondzadeh, M. (2023). Kalman Filter, ANN-MLP, LSTM and ACO methods showing anomalous gps-tec variations concerning Turkey’s powerful earthquake (6 February 2023). Remote Sensing, 15 (12), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123061
• Aktuna, G., & Bahar-Özvarış, Ş. (2023). Investigating the aftermath of the Türkiye 2023 earthquake: Exploring post-disaster uncertainty among Syrian migrants using social network analysis with public health approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1204589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204589
• Alam, I., & Ali, Y. (2023). Studying the effects of Türkiye earthquake disaster and its impact on real estate industry: A risk analysis based on input-output & non-linear optimization models. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 96, 103920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103920
• Aldamen, Y., & Hacimic, E. (2023). Positive determinism of twitter usage development in crisis communication: rescue and relief efforts after the 6 February 2023 earthquake in Turkiye as a case study. Social Sciences, 12 (8), 436. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080436
• Alfuqaha, O. A., Al-masarwah, U. M., Farah, R. I., Yasin, J. A., Alkuttob, L. A., Muslieh, N. I., Hammouri, M., Jawabreh, A. E., Aladwan, D. A., Barakat, R. O., & Alshubbak, N. H. (2023). The impact of Turkey and Syria earthquakes on university students: posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, meaning in life, and social support. Behavioral Sciences, 13 (7), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070587
• Alkan, H., Öztürk, S., & Akkaya, İ. (2023). Seismic hazard ımplications in and around the yedisu seismic gap (eastern Turkiye) based on coulomb stress changes, b-values, and s-wave velocity. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 180 (9), 3227–3248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03342-7
• An, Q., Feng, G., He, L., Xiong, Z., Lu, H., Wang, X., & Wei, J. (2023). Three-dimensional deformation of the 2023 Turkey mw 7.8 and mw 7.7 earthquake sequence obtained by fusing optical and sar images. Remote Sensing, 15 (10), 2656. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102656
• Atanasova-Zlatareva, M., Raykova, P., & Nikolov, H. (2023). Determining the deformations of the earth’s surface after the earthquakes in Turkey-Syria of 06 February 2023—initial results. Comptes Rendus Academie Bulgare Science, 76 (4). https://doi.org/10.7546/CRABS.2023.04.07
• Atmaca, E., Aktaş, E., & Öztürk, H. N. (2023). Evaluated post-disaster and emergency assembly areas using multi-criteria decision-making techniques: a case study of Turkey. Sustainability, 15 (10), 8350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108350
• Aykanat, B., Altunışık, A. C., & Aslan, M. E. (2023). Field investigation on reinforced concrete and masonry buildings damages after november 23 2022 Gölyaka (Düzce) earthquake, Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami. 17 (4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431123500100
• Aynur, S., & Atalay, H. M. (2023). Comparative analysis of existing reinforced concrete buildings damaged at different levels during past earthquakes using rapid assessment methods. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 85 (6). 793-808. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.85.6.793
• Aytaş, Z., Alpaslan, N., & Özçep, F. (2023). Evaluation of liquefaction potential by standard penetration test and shear wave velocity methods: A case study. Natural Hazards, 118 (3), 2377–2417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06093-9
• Baghersad Ranani, M., Varesi, H., & Taghvaei, M. (2019). An evaluation of large-scale commercial buildings architectural space ındicators with an approach to urban threats and risks. Journal of Urban Economics and Management, 7 (26), 1-14.
• Bagiya, M. S., Heki, K., & Gahalaut, V. K. (2023). Anisotropy of the near‐field coseismic ionospheric perturbation amplitudes reflecting the source process: the 2023 february Turkey earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 50 (14), e2023GL103931. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103931
• Balıkesirim. (2023). Balıkesir ve ilçelerindeki toplanma alanları nerede?, 10.12.2023. https://www.balikesirim.net/balikesir-ve-ilcelerindeki-toplanma-alanlari-nerede
• Baser, T., Nawaz, K., Chung, A., Faysal, S., & Numanoglu, O. A. (2023). Ground movement patterns and shallow foundation performance in Iskenderun coastline during the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 22 (4), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2205-9
• Bekircan, E., Usta, G., & Torpuş, K. (2023). The effect of psychological first aid intervention on stress and psychological resilience in volunteers participating in 2023 earthquakes centered in Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05239-z
• Bırni, G., Deniz, M. E., Karaağaç, Z. G., Erişen, Y., Kaya, Y., & Satıcı, S. A. (2023). Rebuilding wellbeing: understanding the role of self-criticism, anger rumination, and death distress after the February 6, 2023, Türkiye earthquake. Death Studies, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2241401
• Bursa Hakimiyet. (2019). Bursa’daki “acil toplanma alanı” sayısı belli oldu!, 10.12.2023. https://www.bursahakimiyet.com.tr/bursa/bursa-daki-acil-toplanma-alani-sayisi-belli-oldu-310814
• Cetin, K. O., Cakir, E., & Zarzour, M. (2023). Seismic site effect models for the Turkiye-Izmir-Bayrakli basin. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01774-z
• Dukkanci, O., Koberstein, A., & Kara, B. Y. (2023). Drones for relief logistics under uncertainty after an earthquake. European Journal of Operational Research, 310 (1), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.02.038
• Efendi, G. Y., Temeltürk, R. D., Çakmak, I. B., & Dinçer, M. (2023). Surviving the immediate aftermath of a disaster: a preliminary ınvestigation of adolescents’ acute stress reactions and mental health needs after the 2023 Turkey earthquakes. Children, 10 (9), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10091485
• Feng, F., Jia, N., & Lin, F. (2023). Quantifying the impact of Russia–Ukraine crisis on food security and trade pattern: Evidence from a structural general equilibrium trade model. China Agricultural Economic Review, 15 (2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-07-2022-0156
• Gastineau, R., Sabatier, P., Fabbri, S. C., Anselmetti, F. S., Roeser, P., Findling, N., Şahin, M., Gündüz, S., Arnaud, F., Franz, S. O., Ünsal, N. D., & De Sigoyer, J. (2023). Lateral variations in the signature of earthquake‐generated deposits in Lake Iznik, NW Turkey. The Depositional Record, https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.232
• Gokay, B., & Aybak, T. (2023). 2023 Elections in Turkey within global context: right wing populism in the era of global shift. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2258003
• Gök, M. (2023). Hospital crisis management after a disaster: From the epicenter of 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 29 (7). https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.44449
• Görener, A., & Alişarlı, E. (2021). SWARA metodu ile kriter önceliklendirme: Tedarikçi performansının değerlendirilmesi. Working Paper Series Dergisi, 2 (2), 32-39.
• Güler, E., Avcı, S., & Aladağ, Z. (2023). Earthquake risk prioritization via two-step cluster analysis and SWARA-ELECTRE methods. Sigma, 41 (2), 356-372. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2022.00105
• Gülkan, H. P., Akansel, V. H., & Kalkan, E. (2023). Response spectrum shapes implied by earthquakes in Turkey: Comparisons with design spectra. Journal of Seismology, 27 (4), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10155-7
• Gürü, S., Zaman, S., & Karamercan, M. A. (2023). Emergency response and clinical ınsights from a non-epicenter hospital during the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake: a retrospective analysis. Medical Science Monitor, 29. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.941226
• Harmanci Seren, A. K., & Dikeç, G. (2023). The earthquakes in Turkey and their effects on nursing and community health. International Nursing Review, 70 (3), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12851
• Hussain, E., Kalaycıoğlu, S., Milliner, C. W. D., & Çakir, Z. (2023). Preconditioning the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquake disaster. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4 (5), 287–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00411-2
• Işık, E. (2023a). A comparative analysis of seismic and structural parameters for historical period earthquakes in Turkiye. Earthquakes and Structures, 24 (5). 377-391. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2023.24.5.377
• Işık, E. (2023b). Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) Earthquakes. Applied Sciences, 13 (15), 8937. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158937
• Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., İzol, R., Hakan Arslan, M., Aksoylu, C., Harirchian, E., Eyisüren, O., Arkan, E., Şakir Güngür, M., Günay, M., & Ulutaş, H. (2023). Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023. Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405
• İlhan, B., Berikol, G. B., Eroğlu, O., & Deniz, T. (2023). Prevalence and associated risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors of the 2023 Turkey earthquake. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 72, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.07.026
• İlke Haber Ajansı (2023). Türkiye’de yaşanan büyük depremler, 10.12.2023, https://ilkha.com/gundem/turkiyede-yasanan-buyuk-depremler-345272
• Kahraman, S. (2023). A comprehensive health economic analysis of the 2023 Turkey earthquake. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 17, https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2023.160
• Karabacak, V., Özkaymak, Ç., Sözbilir, H., Tatar, O., Aktuğ, B., Özdağ, Ö. C., Çakir, R., Aksoy, E., Koçbulut, F., Softa, M., Akgün, E., Demir, A., & Arslan, G. (2023). The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) Earthquake (Mw: 7.7): Implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Journal of the Geological Society, 180 (3). https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-020
• Karakas, G., Kocaman, S., & Gokceoglu, C. (2023). A hybrid multi-hazard susceptibility assessment model for a basin in Elazig province, Türkiye. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14 (2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00477-y
• Kersuliene, V., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17 (4), 645-666. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.635718
• Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K. & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11 (2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
• Khan, Y. S., Khan, A. W., & Alabdulla, M. (2023). The psychological impact of the Turkey-Syria earthquake on children: Addressing the need for ongoing mental health support and global humanitarian response. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 14(2), 2249788. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2249788
• Kırkan, E., Akyüz, H. S., Basmenji, M., Dikbaş, A., Zabcı, C., Yazıcı, M., & Erturaç, M. K. (2023). Earthquake history of the Milas Fault: An active dextral fault in an extensional province (SW Anatolia, Türkiye). Natural Hazards. 116, 1639-1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05733-w
• Kısa, A. C. G., & Ayçin, E. (2019). OECD ülkelerinin lojistik performanslarının SWARA tabanlı EDAS yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.500320
• Kuran, F., Tanırcan, G., & Pashaei, E. (2023). Performance evaluation of machine learning techniques in predicting cumulative absolute velocity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 174, 108175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108175
• Levin, N. (2023). Using night lights from space to assess areas ımpacted by the 2023 Turkey earthquake. Remote Sensing, 15 (8), 2120. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15082120
• Li, S., Wang, X., Tao, T., Zhu, Y., Qu, X., Li, Z., Huang, J., & Song, S. (2023). Source model of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence ımaged by sentinel-1 and GPS measurements: Implications for heterogeneous fault behavior along the east anatolian fault zone. Remote Sensing, 15 (10), 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102618
• Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü (MTA) (2023). Türkiye’nin deprem potansiyeli, 11.12.2023, https://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/bilgi-merkezi/deprem_potansiyeli
• Maghsoodi, A. I., Maghsoodi, A., Parastou, P., Jurgita, A., & Turskis, Z. (2019). Dam construction material selection by implementing the integrated SWARA-CODAS approach with target-based attributes. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 19, 1194-1210.
• Maletckii, B., Astafyeva, E., Sanchez, S. A., Kherani, E. A., & De Paula, E. R. (2023). the 6 February 2023 Türkiye earthquake sequence as detected in the ionosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 128 (9), e2023JA031663. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031663
• Mavrouli, M., Mavroulis, S., Lekkas, E., & Tsakris, A. (2023). An emerging health crisis in Turkey and Syria after the earthquake disaster on 6 February 2023: Risk factors, prevention and management of infectious diseases. Healthcare, 11 (7), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071022
• Mavroulis, S., Mavrouli, M., Vassilakis, E., Argyropoulos, I., Carydis, P., & Lekkas, E. (2023). Debris management in Turkey provinces affected by the 6 February 2023 earthquakes: challenges during recovery and potential health and environmental risks. Applied Sciences, 13 (15), 8823. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158823
• Mercimek, Ö. (2023). Seismic failure modes of masonry structures exposed to Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and 7.6) on February 6, 2023. Engineering Failure Analysis, 151, 107422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107422
• Mertol, H. C., Tunç, G., Akış, T., Kantekin, Y., & Aydın, İ. C. (2023). Investigation of RC buildings after 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Türkiye earthquakes. Buildings, 13 (7), 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071789
• Mohammadi, S., Shi, G. (2023). Identification and ranking of risks caused by natural disasters in terms of sustainable development in the villages of the city. Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal, 11 (2), 1-10.
• Müller, J., van Laaten, M., Eulenfeld, T., & Wegler, U. (2023). Coseismic drop of seismic velocity caused by the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 234 (3), 2465–2472. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad242
• Okuwaki, R., Yagi, Y., Taymaz, T., & Hicks, S. P. (2023). Multi‐scale rupture growth with alternating directions in a complex fault network during the 2023 south‐eastern Türkiye and Syria earthquake doublet. Geophysical Research Letters, 50 (12), e2023GL103480. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103480
• Ozkula, G., Dowell, R. K., Baser, T., Lin, J.-L., Numanoglu, O. A., Ilhan, O., Olgun, C. G., Huang, C.-W., & Uludag, T. D. (2023). Field reconnaissance and observations from the February 6, 2023, Turkey earthquake sequence. Natural Hazards, 119 (1), 663–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06143-2
• Ozturk, M., Arslan, M. H., & Korkmaz, H. H. (2023). Effect on RC buildings of 6 February 2023 Turkey earthquake doublets and new doctrines for seismic design. Engineering Failure Analysis, 153, 107521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107521
• Özmen, A., Maraş, M. M., Ayaz, Y., & Sayın, E. (2023) . Assessments of masonry buildings and historical structures during the 2020 Sivrice-Elazığ Earthquake. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 67 (2), 530–544 https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.21442
• Özçelik, E., & Özçelik, M. (2023). Afet lojistiği üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (1), 11-27.
• Papazafeiropoulos, G., & Plevris, V. (2023). Kahramanmaraş—Gaziantep, Türkiye Mw 7.8 earthquake on 6 February 2023: Strong ground motion and building response estimations. Buildings, 13 (5), 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051194
• Portillo, A., & Moya, L. (2023). Seismic risk regularization for urban changes due to earthquakes: a case of study of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence. Remote Sensing, 15 (11), 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112754
• Pourghasemi, H. R., Gayen, A., Panahi, M., Rezaie, F., & Blaschke, T. (2019). Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 692, 556-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.203
• Rekapalli, R., & Gupta, H. K. (2023). How long the Mw ≥ 5 aftershocks of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Turkiye earthquake shall continue?, Natural Hazards, 117 (3), 3399–3402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05953-8
• Sagbas, G., Sheikhi Garjan, R., Sarikaya, K., & Deniz, D. (2023). Field reconnaissance on seismic performance and functionality of Turkish industrial facilities affected by the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 22, 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01741-8
• Sakariyahu, R., Lawal, R., Oyekola, O., Dosumu, O. E., & Adigun, R. (2023). Natural disasters, investor sentiments and stock market reactions: Evidence from Turkey–Syria earthquakes. Economics Letters, 228, 111153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111153
• Sakarya Yenihaber. (2019). İşte Sakarya’daki deprem toplanma alanları, 10.12.2023, https://www.sakaryayenihaber.com/haber/6780982/iste-sakaryadaki-deprem-toplanma-alanlari
• Sandıkkaya, A., Akkar, S., Kale, Ö., & Yenier, E. (2023). Correction to: A simulation‑based regional ground‑motion model for western Turkiye. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 21 (9), 4705–4705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01709-8
• Sarı, H., Özel, M., Akkoç, M. F., & Şen, A. (2023). First-Week Analysis after the Turkey earthquakes: demographic and clinical outcomes of Victims. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38 (3), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23000493
• Satir, O., Kemec, S., Yeler, O., Akin, A., Bostan, P., & Mirici, M. E. (2023). Simulating the impact of natural disasters on urban development in a sample of earthquake. Natural Hazards, 116 (3), 3839–3855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05838-w
• Serifoglu Yilmaz, C., Yilmaz, V., Tansey, K., & Aljehani, N. S. O. (2023). Automated detection of damaged buildings in post-disaster scenarios: A case study of Kahramanmaraş (Türkiye) earthquakes on February 6, 2023. Natural Hazards. 119, 1247-1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06154-z
• Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Engineering Economics, 26 (2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.2.8820
• Süleymanpaşa Kaymakamlığı. (2020). Afet toplanma alanları, 10.12.2023. http://www.suleymanpasa.gov.tr/afet-toplanma-alanlar0069
• Şeremet, M., Phua, V. C., Cihangir, E., Bayram-Öz, E., Okudum, R., & Alaeddinoğlu, F. (2023). Precarity and patriarchal bargain: women’s experiences in post-disaster recovery housing after the 2011 Van earthquake. Gender, Place & Culture, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2023.2229063
• Taftsoglou, M., Valkaniotis, S., Papathanassiou, G., & Karantanellis, E. (2023). Satellite imagery for rapid detection of liquefaction surface manifestations: the case study of Türkiye–Syria 2023 earthquakes. Remote Sensing, 15 (17), 4190. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174190
• Tanrıkulu, A. B., Kaya, H., Örüm, M. H., & Akyıldırım, S. (2023). Prevalence and determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with schizophrenia 2 years after an earthquake in Turkey. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 59 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00912174231180467
• Temel, S., & Durst, S. (2023). Community mobilisation and collaboration through innovative approaches to overcome significant disasters: An analysis of the biggest earthquake in Turkish history. European Journal of Innovation Management, 59 (1), https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0165
• Tikhotsky, S. A., Tatevosyan, R. E., Rebetsky, Yu. L., Ovsyuchenko, A. N., & Larkov, A. S. (2023). The 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Turkey: seismic movements along conjugated faults. Doklady Earth Sciences, 511 (2), 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X23600974
• Toguç, N., Kuşkaya, S., Magazzino, C., & Bilgili, F. (2023). The impact of natural disaster shocks on business confidence level and Istanbul Stock Exchange: A wavelet coherence approach. Geological Journal, 58 (12), 4610-4624. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4868
• Tunç, S., Tunç, B., Budakoğlu, E., Çaka, D., Nof, R. N., & Barış, Ş. (2023). Implementation of the EPIC earthquake early warning system in the Bursa province (Türkiye) and it’s surroundings. Applied Sciences, 13 (8), 4985. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084985
• Turunçtur, B., Eken, T., Chen, Y., Taymaz, T., Houseman, G. A., & Saygin, E. (2023). Crustal velocity images of northwestern Türkiye along the North Anatolian Fault Zone from transdimensional Bayesian ambient seismic noise tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 234 (1), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad082
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2023). 10.12.2023, https://data.tuik.gov.tr
• TRT Haber. (2021). İstanbul’da toplanma alanı sayısı 5 bin 599’a ulaştı, 10.12.2023, https://www.trthaber.com/haber/turkiye/istanbulda-toplanma-alani-sayisi-5-bin-599a-ulasti-573637.html
• Ulutaş, A. (2020). SWARA tabanlı CODAS yöntemi ile kargo şirketi seçimi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9 (3), 1640-1647. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.559351
• Utkucu, M., Kurnaz, T. F., & İnce, Y. (2023). The seismicity assessment and probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of the plateau containing large dams around the East Anatolian Fault Zone, eastern Türkiye. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82 (15), 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11065-0
• Wang, T., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, X., Lin, X., Wang, X., & Shang, Q. (2023). Preliminary investigation of building damage in Hatay under February 6, 2023 Turkey earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 22 (4), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2201-0
• Wang, Z., Zhang, W., Taymaz, T., He, Z., Xu, T., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Dynamic rupture process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake (SE Türkiye): variable rupture speed and implications for seismic hazard. Geophysical Research Letters, 50 (15), e2023GL104787. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104787
• Wu, F., Xie, J., An, Z., Lyu, C., Taymaz, T., Irmak, T. S., Li, X., Wen, Z., & Zhou, B. (2023). Pulse-like ground motion observed during the 6 February 2023 MW7.8 Pazarcık Earthquake (Kahramanmaraş, SE Türkiye). Earthquake Science, 36 (4), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.005
• Xu, C., Zhang, Y., Hua, S., Zhang, X., Xu, L., Chen, Y., & Taymaz, T. (2023). Rapid source inversions of the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquakes with teleseismic and strong-motion data. Earthquake Science, 36 (4), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.004
• Yalova Belediyesi. (2023). İşte Yalova’daki Toplanma Alanları, 10.12.2023, https://yalova.bel.tr/haberler/iste-yalovadaki-toplanma-alanlari
• Yılmaz, N., Akıllı, M., & Ak, M. (2023). Temporal evolution of entropy and chaos in low amplitude seismic wave prior to an earthquake. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 173, 113585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113585
• Yılmaz, S., Karakayali, O., Yilmaz, S., Çetin, M., Eroglu, S. E., Dikme, O., Özhasenekler, A., Orak, M., Yavaşi, Ö., Karbek Akarca, F., Günalp Eneyli, M., Erbil, B., & Akoğlu, H. (2023). Emergency medicine association of Turkey disaster committee summary of field observations of February 6th Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 38 (3), 415–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23000523
• Yuan, Y., Wang, C., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Ma, X., Li, W., Zhang, L., & Yu, B. (2023). The changes in nighttime lights caused by the Turkey–Syria earthquake using NOAA-20 VIIRS day/night band data. Remote Sensing, 15 (13), 3438. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133438
• Yurdoğlu, H., & Kundakçı, N. (2017). SWARA ve WASPAS yöntemleri ile sunucu seçimi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20 (38), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.645105
• Zhao, J.-J., Chen, Q., Yang, Y.-H., & Xu, Q. (2023). Coseismic faulting model and post-seismic surface motion of the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake doublet revealed by InSAR and GPS measurements. Remote Sensing, 15 (13), 3327. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133327
• Zolfani, S. H., & Saparauskas, J. (2013). New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system. Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.4526