ZAMAN YÖNELIMININ ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞINA ETKISI

Year 2024, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 1149 - 1173, 07.07.2024

Bahar Zeynep Barut Belkıs Özkara

https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1451803

Abstract

Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı çalışanların gönüllü olarak insiyatif alması, sorun çözmesi, yenilik yapmasıdır. Çalışanların neden bu tür gönüllü davranışları gösterdiklerini anlamak örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışının yaygınlaştırılması açısından önemlidir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, çalışanların geçmiş, şimdi ve gelecek zaman yöneliminin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına olan etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla Ankara'daki Teknopark çalışanları üzerinde bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Veriler anket yöntemiyle toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde korelasyon ve regresyon testleri yapılmış ve verilerin demografik özelliklere göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığına bakılmıştır. Bulgular tüm zaman yönelimleri ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Demografik değişkenler açısında yaş ve eğitim düzeyine göre örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışında bir farklılaşma olduğu da görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları örgütsel faktörlerden olduğu kadar bireysel faktörlerden de etkilenmektedir. Çalışanların zaman algısı ve zaman yöneliminin de örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını etkilediği söylenebilir.

Keywords

Zaman Yönelimi, Zaman Perspektifi, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı

THE EFFECT OF TIME ORIENTATION ON ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR

Abstract

Organizational citizenship behavior mean that employees voluntarily take initiative, solve problems and innovate. Understanding why employees show such voluntary behavior is important for disseminating organizational citizenship behavior. The main purpose of this research is to reveal the effect of employees' past, present and future time orientation on organizational citizenship behavior. For this purpose, a research was conducted on Technopark employees in Ankara. Data was collected by survey method. Correlation and regression tests were performed in the analysis of the data and it was examined whether the data differed according to demographic characteristics. Findings show that there is a significant and positive effect between all time orientations and organizational citizenship behavior. It has also been observed that there is a differentiation in organizational citizenship behavior according to age and education level in terms of demographic variables. As a result, organizational citizenship behaviors are affected by individual factors as well as organizational factors. It can be said that employees' time perception and time orientation also affect organizational citizenship behavior.

Keywords

Time Orientation, Time Perspective, Organizational Citizenship Behavior

References

• Akirmak, U. & Ayla, P. (2021). How is time perspective related to burnout and job satisfaction? a conservation of resources perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 109667.
• Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler. Detay Yayıncılık.
• Aquino, K. (1995). Relationships between pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 21-33.
• Bajec, B. (2018). Relationship between time perspective and job satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 18 (1-2), 145-165.
• Basım, H. N. & Şeşen, H. (2006). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği uyarlama ve karşılaştırma çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61 (4), 83-101.
• Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 587-595.
• Bird, B. J. (1992). The operation of intentions in time: the emergence of the new venture idea. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17 (1), 11-20.
• Bluedorn, A. C. & Denhardt, R. B. (1988). Time and organizations. Journal of Management, 14 (2), 299-320.
• Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F. & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? an introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. Academy of Management Perspectives, 6 (4), 17-26.
• Boinwell, I. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing one’s time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In A. P. Linley, S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice, (ss.165-178). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Personnel selection in organizations, (ss.71-98). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D. & Motowidlo, S. J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9 (1‐2), 52-69.
• Brief, A. P. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), 710-725.
• Brief, A. P. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), 710-725.
• Cernas Ortiz, D. A. & Davis, M. A. (2016). Future and past negative time perspective influences on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in Mexico and the United States. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 14 (3), 317-338.
• Deluga, R. W. (1995). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 315-326.
• Díaz-Morales, J. F. & Ferrari, J. R. (2015). Time perspective theory: review, research and application. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, W. van Beek (Eds.), More time to procrastinators: the role of time perspective, (ss.305-321).
• Dursun, Y. & Karagöz, E. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ve regresyon: karşılaştırmalı bir analiz. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 1-17.
• Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C. & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: a cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421–444.
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 218-226.
• Gupta, R., Hershey, D. A. & Gaur, J. (2012). Time perspective and procrastination in the workplace: an empirical investigation. Current Psychology, 31, 195-211.
• Güler-Edwards, A. (2008). Relationship between future time orientation, adaptive self-regulation, and well-being: self-type and age-related differences. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). ODTÜ, Ankara.
• İmamoğlu, E. O. & Güler-Edwards, A. (2007). Geleceğe ilişkin yönelimlerde benlik tipine bağlı farklılıklar. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 22 (60), 115-132.
• Jiang, M., Wang, H. & Li, M. (2019). Linking empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior toward environment: the role of psychological ownership and future time perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 487133.
• Karande, S., Kulkarni, M., Joshi, P. & Patwardhan, B. (2011). Childhood adversity and its relationship with depression and self-esteem in adolescent boys and girls. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 78 (5), 547-551.
• Kasser, T. & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (3), 280-287.
• Kemery, E. R., Bedeian, A. G. & Zacur, S. R. (1996). Expectancy-based job cognitions and job affects as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 635–651.
• Konovsky, M. A. & Organ, D. W. (1996a). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17 (3), 253-266.
• Konovsky, M. A. & Organ, D. W. (1996b). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17 (3), 253-266.
• Kweon, Y. & Park, H. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and self-efficacy, self-regulation, and procrastination. Social Behavior and Personality, 40 (6), 941-950.
• Lennings, C. J. & Burns, A. M. (1998). Time perspective: temporal extension, time extension and impulsivity. Journal of Psychology, 132, 367–380.
• Merchant, H., Harrington, D. L. & Meck, W. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 313-336.
• Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perception influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 845-855.
• Moorman, R. H. & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism‐collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16 (2), 127-142.
• Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: the importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (6), 1543-1567.
• Motowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (4), 475-480.
• Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S. & Joungtrakul, J. (2021). An empirical study on the model of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior transmitted through employee engagement, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the thai automobile parts manufacturing industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 7 (3), 170.
• Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S. & Joungtrakul, J. (2021). The relationship between self-efficacy, job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior among nurses in Thailand. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 25 (3), 423-435.
• Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43–72.
• Organ, D. W. & Lingl, A. (1995). Personality, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135 (3), 339–350.
• Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. A. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors or organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48 (4), 775–802.
• Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: it’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10 (2), 85-97.
• Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M. & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents and consequences. Sage Publications.
• Organ, D. W. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior: it's construct clean-up time. Psychology Press.
• Organ, D. W. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior: recent trends and developments. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1 (1), 295-306.
• Organ, D. W. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior: recent trends and developments. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 80, 295-306.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18 (2), 113-130.
• Öztürk, A. (2020). Zaman perspektifinin proaktif çalışma davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Paine, J. B. & Organ, D. W. (2000). The cultural matrix of organizational citizenship behavior: some preliminary conceptual and empirical observations. Human Resource Management Review, 10 (1), 45-59.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H. & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1 (2), 107-142.
• Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (2), 262-270.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.
• Pradhan, R. K., Jena, L. K. & Bhattacharya, S. (2020). Influence of psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior and job satisfaction: a study on hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102399.
• Rioux, S. M. & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (6), 1306-1314.
• Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2001). Tuvalet kapısı yazıları ölçeği: cinsiyet ve statü bağlamında kuşaklararası karşılaştırma. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 4 (8), 71-84.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (4), 701-716.
• Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68 (4), 653-663.
• Spector, P. E. & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12 (2), 269-292.
• Spitzmuller, M., Van Dyne, L. & Ilies, R. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior: a review and extension of its nomological network. In J. Barling, C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior: volume ı - micro approaches, (ss.106-123). SAGE Publications.
• Taris, T. W. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Individual well-being and performance at work: a conceptual and theoretical overview. In M. van Veldhoven, R. Peccei (Eds.), Well-being and performance at work: the role of context, (ss.15-34). Psychology Press.
• Templer, K. J. (2012). Five‐factor model of personality and job satisfaction: the importance of agreeableness in a tight and collectivistic Asian society. Applied Psychology, 61 (1), 114-129.
• Thoms, P. & Greenberger, D. B. (1995). Temporal orientation and leadership in organizations: an application of the constructive functional theory of time. The Leadership Quarterly, 6 (1), 59-76.
• Udin, U. & Yuniawan, A. (2020). Effect of psychological capital and personality traits on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Business and Society, 21 (3), 1263-1276.
• Van Dyne, L. & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 108-119.
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (6), 1008-1022.
• Wei, L. Q. (2013). Person-organization fit, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover intention: a study on employees in the fast food industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 12 (1), 22-36.
• Weikamp, J. G. & Göritz, A. S. (2016). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in hotel employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55, 33-43.
• Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17 (3), 601-617.
• Yamaguchi, I. (2003). The relationship among individual differences, needs, and equity sensitivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 1054-1066.
• Zhang, Z. & Chen, M. (2013). Time perspective and self-regulated learning in online environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14 (4), 229-245.
• Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1271-1288.
• Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time that will change your life. Free Press.
• Zito, M., Cortese, C. G. & Colombo, L. (2019). The role of organizational citizenship behaviors and burnout in the relationship between job demands and job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (21), 4279.