Büyüklenmeci ve Kırılgan Narsisizm Dalgalanma Ölçeği'nin (BKNDÖ) Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı büyüklenmeci ve kırılgan narsisizm arasındaki dalgalanmayı ölçmek üzere geliştirilmiş FLUX ve bu ölçeğin kısa formu g-FLUX’ı, Büyüklenmeci ve Kırılgan Narsisizm Dalgalanma Ölçeği (BKNDÖ) ve Büyüklenmeci ve Kırılgan Narsisizm Dalgalanma Ölçeği-Kısa Form (BKNDÖ-KF) adlarıyla Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve bu ölçeklerin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını gerçekleştirmektir. Araştırma, ölçeğin uzun ve kısa formlarını değerlendirmek üzere 18-65 yaş aralığındaki katılımcılarla yapılan iki ayrı çalışmadan oluşmaktadır; birinci çalışmaya 307, ikinci çalışmaya ise 378 katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Yakınsak geçerlik analizleri Beş Faktörlü Narsisizm Ölçeği-Kısa Formu, Temel Kişilik Özellikleri Ölçeği ve Duygulanım Değişkenliği Ölçeği kullanarak değerlendirilmiş; ayrıca, iç tutarlılık kat sayıları hesaplanmış ve açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri (AFA ve DFA) uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, BKNDÖ’nün üç faktörlü yapısının DFA’da beklenen düzeyde uyum göstermediğini ortaya koymuş, ancak ölçeğin yüksek iç tutarlılık ve anlamlı yakınsak geçerlik bulguları elde ettiği göz önünde bulundurularak bu uyumsuzluğun ölçeğin kuramsal yapısından çok, artan madde sayısı ve karmaşık ifade biçimlerinin yarattığı bilişsel yük gibi etmenlerden kaynaklanabileceği düşünülmüştür. Nitekim, ikinci çalışmada değerlendirilen BKNDÖ-KF, hem iç tutarlılık hem de yakınsak geçerlik açısından güçlü sonuçlar vermiş, ayrıca model uyumu bakımından da iyi uyum değerlerine ulaşarak bu yorumu desteklemiştir. Sonuç olarak, BKNDÖ-KF’nin Türk örnekleminde narsisistik dalgalanmayı değerlendirmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu kanıtlanmıştır ve araştırmacılara narsisizmi dinamik bir perspektiften araştırmak için kısa ve erişilebilir bir araç sunmaktadır. Diğer yandan BKNDÖ ise yapısal geçerlik açısından geliştirmeye açık olmakla birlikte, zengin madde havuzu sayesinde narsisistik dalgalanmayı ele alan gelecekteki ölçek geliştirme ve kuramsal modelleme çalışmalarına temel oluşturma potansiyeli taşımaktadır.

Keywords

• narsisizm
• kırılgan narsisizm
• büyüklenmeci narsisizm
• narsisistik dalgalanma
• kişilik

Ethical Statement

Etik onay İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu'ndan [29/05/2023] tarihinde [E-20292139-050.01.04-54536] karar numarası ile alınmıştır.

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism Fluctuation Scale

Abstract

The objective of this study was to adapt the FLUX and its short form g-FLUX, developed to measure fluctuations between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, into Turkish as the Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism Fluctuation Scale (GVNFS) and its short form (GVNFS-SF), and to examine their validity and reliability. Two studies were conducted with participants aged 18–65 years. Study 1 included 307 participants, and Study 2 included 378 participants. The Five Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form, the Basic Personality Traits Inventory, and the Affective Lability Scale were used to assess convergent validity. Internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. Findings revealed that the three-factor structure of the GVNFS did not show adequate model fit in CFA. However, considering the scale’s high internal consistency and significant correlations with related measures, this misfit may be attributed to factors such as the number of items and the cognitive complexity of their wording rather than theoretical shortcomings. In contrast, the short form (GVNFS-SF), tested in Study 2, demonstrated strong internal consistency, significant convergent validity, and good model fit. Thus, although the GVNFS requires refinement to improve structural validity, its comprehensive item pool offers potential advantages for future scale development and theoretical contributions in narcissism research. Importantly, the GVNFS-SF emerges as a valid and reliable measure of narcissistic fluctuation for Turkish samples. It provides a brief, accessible, and practical tool for research adopting a dynamic view of narcissism and is suitable for both empirical studies and clinical practice.

Keywords

• narcissism
• vulnerable narcissism
• grandiose narcissism
• narcissistic fluctuation
• personality

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was obtained from Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University Ethics Committee on [29/05/2023] with decision number [E-20292139-050.01.04-54536].

References

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
2. Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.006
3. Cooper, A. M. (1998). Further developments in the clinical diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. In E. F. Ronningstam (Ed.), Disorders of narcissism: Diagnostic, clinical, and empirical implications (1st ed., pp. 53–74). American Psychiatric Association.
4. Dickinson, K. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146
5. Doğan, U., & Çolak, T. S. (2020). Narsisistik Kişilik Envanteri-13 (NKE-13)’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(26), 4166-4184. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.635725
6. Edershile, E. A. (2019). Fluctuations in grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states: A momentary perspective [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Pittsburgh.
7. Edershile, E. A., Oltmanns, J. R., Widiger, T. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021). Predicting fluctuation in narcissistic states: An examination of the g-FLUX scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000967
8. Edershile, E. A., & Wright, A. G. C. (2021). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states in interpersonal situations. Self and Identity, 20(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1627241

9. Ekşi, F. (2016). The short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: Psychometric equivalence of the Turkish version. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(4), 1081-1096. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.4.0001
10. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011
11. Gençöz, T., & Öncül, Ö. (2012). Examination of personality characteristics in a Turkish sample: Development of Basic Personality Traits Inventory. Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 194–2216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686932
12. Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C.H. (2018). State narcissism. In Hermann, A., Brunell, A., Foster, J. (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism (1st ed., pp. 105–111). Springer.
13. Glover, N., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 500–512. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.670680
14. Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2016). Fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Personality Disorders, 7(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000181
15. Harvey, P. D., Greenberg, B. R., & Serper, M. R. (1989). The affective lability scales: Development, reliability, and validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(5), 786–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198909)45:5<786::aid-jclp2270450515>3.0.co;2-p
16. Henttonen, P., Salmi, J., Peräkylä, A., & Krusemark, E. A. (2022). Grandiosity, vulnerability, and narcissistic fluctuation: Examining reliability, measurement invariance, and construct validity of four brief narcissism measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 993663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993663
17. Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Volume 3: Social behavior and applications (2nd ed., pp. 1-51). Needham Heights.
18. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of Structural Equations Modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
19. Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609823
20. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
21. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428412
22. Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00492.x
23. Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B., Gaughan, E., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
24. Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Wilson, L., Gentile, B., Widiger, T. A., Mackillop, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2013). The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory (FFNI): A test of the convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of FFNI scores in clinical and community samples. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032536
25. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13(1), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244
26. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
27. Oliver, M. N. I., & Simons, J. S. (2004). The affective lability scales: Development of a short-form measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1279–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.013
28. Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Assessment of fluctuation between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: Development and initial validation of the FLUX scales. Psychological Assessment, 30(12), 1612–1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000616
29. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
30. Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E., Pimentel, C., Cain, N., Wright, A., & Levy, K. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016530
31. Pincus, A. L., & Roche, M. J. (2011). Narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. In W. K. Campbell, & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 31–40). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32. Rutten, E. A., Bachrach, N., van Balkom, A. J., Braeken, J., Ouwens, M. A., & Bekker, M. H. (2016). Anxiety, depression and autonomy-connectedness: The mediating role of alexithymia and assertiveness. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 89(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12083
33. Séguin, D., & Descôteaux, J. (2024). Validation de la version française du FLUX Scales, un questionnaire évaluant les variations entre des états narcissiques grandioses et vulnérables. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 56(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000367
34. Sherman, E. D., Miller, J. D., Few, L. R., Campbell, W. K., Widiger, T. A., Crego, C., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Development of a short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: The FFNISF. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000100
35. Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
36. Şen, G., & Barışkın, E. (2019). Patolojik Narsisizm Envanterinin Türkçe standardizasyonu, geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin sınanması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 30(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.5080/u23274
37. Şengül, B. Z., Ünal, E., Akça, S., Canbolat, F., Denizci, M., & Baştuğ, G. (2015). Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS). Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 28(3), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2015280306
38. Uygun, E., Gönüllü, O., Erkıran, M., & Erkoç, N. (2020). Bipolar bozuklukta duygulanım oynaklığı dürtüsellik ve agresyonla ilişkili mi? Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 23(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2020.30085
39. Weinberg, I., & Ronningstam, E. (2022). Narcissistic personality disorder: Progress in understanding and treatment. Focus, 20(4),368-377. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20220052
40. Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. M. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In K. H. Trzesniewski, M. B. Donnellan, & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (1st ed., pp. 39–61). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12350-000
41. Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590
42. Wright, F., O'Leary, J., & Balkin, J. (1989). Shame, guilt, narcissism, and depression: Correlates and sex differences. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 6(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.6.2.217