Kısa Deneyimsel Kaçınma Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği: Tanılar Üstü Bir Yapının Ölçülmesi

Year 2026, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 220 - 239, 31.01.2026

Gizem Gerdan , Yılmaz Orhun Gürlük

https://doi.org/10.31682/ayna.1756922

Abstract

Deneyimsel kaçınma, alanyazında sıkça vurgulanan tanılar üstü yapılardan biri olup, hem araştırma hem de uygulama alanlarında giderek daha fazla dikkat çekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, deneyimsel kaçınmayı kısa ve öz bir biçimde değerlendirmeyi amaçlayan Kısa Deneyimsel Kaçınma Ölçeği (KDKÖ) Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Çalışma, 18-64 yaş aralığında yer alan 356 gönüllü katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür. KDKÖ’nün geçerliği faktör analizleri ve korelasyon temelli yöntemlerle, güvenirliği ise iç tutarlık kapsamında incelenmiştir. Yapı geçerliği, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı analizlerin birlikte ele alındığı Açımlayıcı Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (AYEM) ile değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, madde ayırt edicilikleri Dereceli Tepki Modeli (DTM) aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. Geçerlik kapsamında, kaçınma, psikolojik sıkıntı (anksiyete ve depresyon) ve negatif duygulanım ölçümleri arasındaki ilişkiler analiz edilmiştir. AYEM sonuçları, ölçeğin orijinalindeki tek faktörlü yapıyı doğrulamıştır. KDKÖ, yüksek iç tutarlılık sergilemiştir (α = .889; ω = .892). DTM sonuçları, ölçek maddelerinin yeterli düzeyde ayırt edicilik sergilediğini ortaya koymuştur. KDKÖ, en güçlü ilişkileri kaçınma ile ilişkili ölçümlerle göstermiş; psikolojik belirtilerle beklenen düzeyde, negatif duygulanımla ise daha zayıf ilişkiler sergileyerek deneyimsel kaçınmaya özgüllüğü desteklemiştir. Bulgular, KDKÖ’nün Türkçe formunun deneyimsel kaçınmayı ölçmede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu desteklemekte olup, sonuçlar alanyazın ve gelecekteki araştırmalar bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

deneyimsel kaçınma , değerlendirme , Kısa Deneyimsel Kaçınma Ölçeği , Türkçe standardizasyon

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma, Helsinki Bildirgesi ilkelerine uygun olarak yürütülmüş ve İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Etik Kurulu tarafından uygulanması için onaylanmıştır (ID: 2025/0614).

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar, bu çalışma için herhangi bir finansal destek alınmadığını beyan etmektedir.

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire: Measuring A Transdiagnostic Construct

Abstract

Experiential avoidance is one of the most frequently emphasized transdiagnostic constructs in the literature and has been receiving increasing attention in both research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ), a scale designed to provide a concise assessment of experiential avoidance. The study was conducted with 356 voluntary participants aged 18 to 64. The validity of the BEAQ was examined using factor analyses and correlation-based methods, and its reliability was assessed through internal consistency. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), which combines exploratory and confirmatory methods. In addition, a Graded Response Model (GRM) analysis was conducted to evaluate item discrimination. For validity, associations with measures of avoidance, psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression), and negative affect were examined. ESEM results confirmed the original single-factor structure. The BEAQ demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .889; ω = .892). The GRM analysis revealed that the items demonstrated adequate levels of discrimination. The BEAQ demonstrated strong associations with avoidance-related measures, moderate relationships with psychological symptoms, and weaker links with negative affect, supporting its specificity to experiential avoidance. The findings supported the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BEAQ as a measure of experiential avoidance and were discussed in the context of the literature and future research.

Keywords

experiential avoidance , assessment , Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire , Turkish standardization

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved for implementation by the İzmir Democracy University Social Sciences Ethics Committee (ID: 2025/0614)

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

• Akbari, M., Seydavi, M., Hosseini, Z. S., Krafft, J., & Levin, M. E. (2022). Experiential avoidance in depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive related, and posttraumatic stress disorders: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 24, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.03.007
• Allen, M. T. (2021). An exploration of the relationships of experiential avoidance (as measured by the AAQ-II and MEAQ) with negative affect, perceived stress, and avoidant coping styles. PeerJ, 9, e11033. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11033
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Computationally efficient estimation of multilevel high-dimensional latent variable models. In Proceedings of the 2007 JSM meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah: Section on Statistics in Epidemiology (pp. 2531–2535). American Statistical Association.
• Aydemir, Ö., Güvenir, T., Küey, L., & Kültür, S. (1997). Hastane Anksiyete ve Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8(4), 280-287.
• Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (1st ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
• Bardeen, J. R (2015). Short‑term pain for long‑term gain: The role of experiential avoidance in the relation between anxiety sensitivity and emotional distress. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 30, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.12.013
• Berghoff, C. R., Tull, M. T., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T., & Gratz, K. L. (2017). The role of experiential avoidance in the relation between anxiety disorder diagnoses and future physical health symptoms in a community sample of young adult women. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.11.002
• Blakey, S. M., Jacoby, R. J., Reuman, L., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2016). The relative contributions of experiential avoidance and distress tolerance to OC symptoms. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44(4), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465815000703
• Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Front Public Health, 6(149). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
• Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1057–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057
• Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
• Booth, T. & Hughes, D. J. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data. Assessment, 21(3), 260–271. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114528029
• Cao, H., Mak, Y. W., Li, H. Y., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2021). Chinese validation of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in college students. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.01.004
• Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-329. http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.j06
• Chiu, W., Rodriguez, F. M., & Won, D. (2016). Revisiting the leadership scale for sport: Examining factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Reports, 119(2), 435–449. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116662880
• Den Ouden, L., Tiego, J., Lee, R. S. C., Albertella, L., Greenwood, L. M., Fontenelle, L., Yücel, M., & Segrave, R. (2020). The role of experiential avoidance in transdiagnostic compulsive behavior: A structural model analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 108, 106464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106464
• Edelsbrunner, P. A., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2025). The cronbach’s alpha of domain-specific knowledge tests before and after learning: A meta-analysis of published studies. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09982-y
• Ekşi, H., Kaya, Ç., & Kuşçu, B. (2018, May 9–11). Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire-30: Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Turkish version [Conference session]. 8th International Conference on Research in Education (ICRE), Manisa, Turkey.
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists (1st ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Er, E., Wagener, A., Étienne, A. M., & Vander Haegen, M. (2024). The Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire: Validation of the French version in non-clinical adults. Psychologica Belgica, 64(1), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1256
• Fernández-Rodríguez, C., Paz-Caballero, D., González-Fernández, S., & Pérez-Álvarez, M. (2018). Activation vs. experiential avoidance as a transdiagnostic condition of emotional distress: An empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1618. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01618
• Fledderus, M., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Pieterse, M. E. (2010). Does experiential avoidance mediate the effects of maladaptive coping styles on psychopathology and mental health? Behavior Modification, 34(6), 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445510378379
• Fresno, A., Arias, V., Núñez, D., Spencer, R., Ramos, N., Espinoza, C., Bravo, P., Arriagada, J., & Brunet, A. (2020). Using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to examine the internal structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23, 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.46
• Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., & Ruggero, C. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023242
• Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., Suzuki, N., & Watson, D. (2014). The Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire: Development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034473
• Gençöz, T. (2000). Pozitif ve negatif duygu ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(46), 19-26.
• Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
• Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Forsyth, J. P., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395492
• Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152
• Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Kingston, J., Clarke, S., & Remington, B. (2010). Experiential avoidance and problem behavior: A mediational analysis. Behavior Modification, 34(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445510362575
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Li, C. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
• Lo, H. H. M., Powell, C. L. Y. M., Chan, S. H. W., Leung, B. F. H., Tsang, E. Y. H., & Leung, S. S. M. (2023). Validating an adapted version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45(1), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10020-w
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
• McManus, F., Shafran, R., & Cooper, Z. (2010). What does a transdiagnostic approach have to offer the treatment of anxiety disorders? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 491-505. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509x476567
• Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Padilla, M. A., & Divers, J. (2015). A comparison of composite reliability estimators: Coefficient omega confidence intervals in the current literature. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415593776
• Papachristou, H., Theodorou, M., Neophytou, K., & Panayiotou, G. (2018). Community sample evidence on the relations among behavioural inhibition system, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and social anxiety in adolescents. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 8, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.03.001
• Prokofieva, M., Zarate, D., Parker, A., Palikara, O., & Stavropoulos, V. (2023). Exploratory structural equation modeling: A streamlined step‑by‑step approach using the R Project software. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), Article 546. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05028-9
• Rochefort, C., Baldwin, A. S., & Chmielewski, M. (2018). Experiential avoidance: An examination of the construct validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ. Behavior Therapy, 49(3), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008
• Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P., & Scrucca, L. (2016). Using genetic algorithms in a large nationally representative American sample to abbreviate the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00189
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4, Pt. 2), 100.
• Schaeuffele, C., Knaevelsrud, C., Renneberg, B., & Boettcher, J. (2021). Psychometric properties of the German Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ). Assessment, 29(7), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211010955
• Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measuremet, 80(3), 421-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
• The jamovi project (2025). Jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer Software].
• Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L. (2019). The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.09.005
• van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage.
• Vázquez-Morejón Jiménez, R., León Rubio, J. M., Martín Rodríguez, A., & Vázquez Morejón, A. J. (2019). Validation of a Spanish version of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in clinical population. Psicothema, 31(3), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.60
• Wardęszkiewicz, J., & Holas, P. (2024). Validation of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in a representative Polish sample. Psychiatria Polska, 58(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/162165
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
• Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 831–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.002
• Yavuz, F., Ulusoy, S., Iskin, M., Esen, F. B., Burhan, H. S., Karadere, M. E., & Yavuz, N. (2016). Turkish version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and validity analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni / Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 26(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20160223124107
• Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x