Research Article

Yield Characteristics and Nut Defects of ‘Karafındık’ Hazelnut Clones Grown in Fatsa (Ordu)

Volume: 12 Number: Özel Sayı October 29, 2023
EN TR

Yield Characteristics and Nut Defects of ‘Karafındık’ Hazelnut Clones Grown in Fatsa (Ordu)

Abstract

Objective: The main aim of this study to determine the yield characteristics, nut and kernel defects of 'Karafındık' hazelnut clones grown in Fatsa (Ordu) district. Materials and Methods: The plant material of the study was ‘Karafındık’ hazelnut clones grown in region. In the study, the cluster number, nuts per cluster, plant yield, yield efficiency, and yield fluctuation were determined as yield characteristics; good kernel, defective kernel, blank nut, shriveled kernel, twin kernel, abortive kernel, black tipped kernel, moldy kernel, and rotten kernel were determined as nut defects. Results: The differences between cluster number, nuts per cluster, plant yield, yield efficiency, and good kernel ratio were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). In the clones examined, the nuts per cluster was determined 2.30 (KF-53)-3.72 (KF-48), the plant yield was determined 93 g plant-1 (KF-53)-758 g plant-1 (KF-16), the yield efficiency was determined 2.03 g cm-2 (KF-53)-26.99 g cm-2 (KF-11), the good kernel was determined %60.9 (KF-23, KF-25)-%97.4 (KF-42), the defective kernel was determined %2.6 (KF-42)-%37.4 (KF-25), and the blank nut was determined %0.0 (in 16 different clones)-%14.4 (KF-23). Conclusion: It was determined that there were fluctuations in the yield amount of the clones from year to year, while KF-16, KF-20, KF-1, and KF-49 clones had the highest plant yield.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Ordu University Scientific Research Projects Unit (ODU-BAP)

Project Number

B-1822

Thanks

This study was supported by Ordu University Scientific Research Projects Unit (ODU-BAP) with the project numbered B-1822.

References

  1. Alasalvar, C., Amaral, J.S., & Shahidi, F. (2006). Functional Lipid Characteristics of Turkish Tombul Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(26), 10177–10183. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061702w
  2. Balik, H.I., Kayalak Balık, S., Beyhan, N., & Erdoğan, V. (2016). Fındık Çeşitleri (Hazelnut Cultivars). In Klasmat Matbaacılık (Vol. 96).
  3. Balta, M. F., Yaman, İ., Kırkaya, H., & Karakaya, O. (2021). Farklı bakım koşullarında yetiştirilen Çakıldak fındık çeşidinin verim ve meyve özelliklerinin değişimi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 10(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.909070
  4. Beyhan, N., & Demir, T. (2001). Performance of the local and standard hazelnut cultivars grown in Samsun province, Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, 556, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.556.32
  5. Bostan, S. Z. (1997). Türkiye fındık yetiştiriciliğinde sorunlar ve çözüm yolları. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 127–133.
  6. Bostan, S. Z. (2019). Fındıkta kabuklu ve iç meyve kusurları. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 8(Özel Sayı), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.644005
  7. Bostan, S.Z., & Günay, K. (2009). Variation of important quality characteristics in hazelnut at different years and correlations between husk number and nut and kernel traits. Acta Horticulturae, 845, 641–646.
  8. Botta, R., Molnar, T.J., Erdogan, V., Valentini, N., Torello Marinoni, D., & Mehlenbacher, S.A. (2019). Hazelnut (Corylus spp.) Breeding. In J. M. Al-Khayri, S. M. Jain, & D. V Johnson (Eds.), Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Nut and Beverage Crops: Volume 4 (pp. 157–219). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23112-5_6

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pomology and Treatment

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 29, 2023

Submission Date

September 13, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 2, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 12 Number: Özel Sayı

APA
Uzun, S., Balta, F., Karakaya, O., & Balta, M. F. (2023). Yield Characteristics and Nut Defects of ‘Karafındık’ Hazelnut Clones Grown in Fatsa (Ordu). Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 12(Özel Sayı), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.1359593