Research Article
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Cite

Bazı önemli dış mekan süs bitkilerine ait yeşil çeliklerin köklenme performansları

Year 2020, Volume 9, Issue 2, 373 - 380, 30.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.724665

Abstract

Erguvan (Cercis siliquastrum), manolya (Magnolia soulangeana), söğüt yapraklı ispir (Spiraea salicifolia), Japon ayvası (Chaenomeles japonica ), filbahri (Philadelphus coronarius saxifragaceae), leylak (Syringa vulgaris), oya ağacı (Lagerstroemia indica) ve gülhatmiden (Alcea rosea) alınan yeşil çeliklerin köklenme performansı üzerine IBA uygulamasının etkisi incelenmiştir. Erguvan çeliklerine 8000 diğer türlerden alınan çeliklere ise 2000 ppm IBA uygulaması yapılmıştır. Erguvan çelikleri hem kontrol hem de 8000 ppm IBA uygulamasında düşük oranda ( % 6 ve % 10) bir köklenme başarısı göstermiştir. Japon ayvasında da IBA uygulamasına rağmen düşük ( %33) oranından köklenme olmuştur. 2000 ppm IBA uygulaması ile manolyada % 100, söğüt yapraklı ispirde % 97.7, filbahride % 67.7, leylakta % 73.7, oya ağacından % 61 oranında köklenme elde edilmiştir. Gülhatmi çelikleri ise hem hormon uygulamasında hem de kontrol uygulamasından % 100 oranında köklenme başarısı gözlenmiştir. IBA uygulamaları manolya, Japon ayvası, filbahri, leylak ve oya ağacı çeliklerinde kök sayısından önemli artışlara neden olurken, gülhatmi çeliklerinde kök sayısını azaltmıştır

References

  • Albrecht, H.J., Schulze, G. 1980. Vermehrungvon Ziergeholzendurch Steckholz in Plastfolienzelten. Gartenbau, 27: 122–124
  • Anonim, 2007. Mesleki Eğitim ve Öğretim Sisteminin Güçlendirilmesi Projesi (MEGEP), Bahçecilik, Dış Mekan Bitkileri, Ankara 35 s.
  • Anonim, 2012. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı: Bitkisel Üretim Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Süs Bitkileri Alt Komisyon Raporu. Ankara: DPT, 2001. (DPT. 2645 - ÖİK. 653) ISBN 975-19-2909-1.
  • Ay, S. 2009. Süs bitkileri ihracatı, sorunları ve çözüm öneriler. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (3) .423-443
  • Cameron, R.,Harrison-Murray, R., Fordham, M., Judd, H., Ford, Y., Marks, T., Edmondson, R. 2003. Rooting cuttings of Syringa vulgaris cv. Charles Joly and Corylusavellana cv. Aurea: the influence of stock plant pruning and shoot growth. Trees, 17:451-462.
  • Cengiz, B., Keçecioğlu Dağlı, P., Yiğittekin, S. 2017. Peyzaj ekonomisi açısından peyzaj ve süs bitkileri fidanlık işletmelerine yönelik sektörel bir analiz. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry. 19:50-62.
  • Dirr, MA., Heuser, CW. 1987. Thereferencemanual of Woody Plant Propagation Athens, GA:VarsityPress. 239 p.
  • Ford, Y.Y., Bonham, E.C., Cameron, R.W.F., Blake, P.S., Judd, H.L., Harrison-Murray, R.S. 2002. Adventitious rooting: examining the role of auxin in an easy-and a difficult to root plant. Plant Growth Regulation, 36: 149-159.
  • Hansen, J., Kristiansen, K 2000. Root formation, bud growth and survival of ornamental shrubs propagated by cuttings on different planting dates. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 75: 568-574.
  • Hartmann, HT., Kester, DE., Davies Jr, FT. 1990. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 657 pp. Howard, BH.1996. Relationships Between Shoot Growth and Rooting of Cuttings in Three Contrasting Species of Ornamental Shrub. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 71: 591-606.
  • Howard, B.H., Rridout, M.S. 1992. A mechanism to explain increased rooting in leafy cuttings of Syringa vulgaris ‘Madame Lemoine’ Following Dark-Treatment of the Stock plant. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 67: 103-114.
  • Ion, S. 2011. Propagation of some ornamental species (ligustrum ovalifolıum ask., spiraea salicifolia l., forsythia sp.) at the botanical garden “al. Buia” from Craiova. Analele Universităţii din Craiova, seria Agricultură – Montanologie – Cadastru Vol. XLI 2011/2
  • Karam, N.S., Gebre, G.H. 2004. Rotting of Cercis siliquastrum cuttings in fluenced by cutting position on the branch and indole-butyricacid. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 79:792- 796.
  • Kauppinen, S., Kviklys, D., Rumpunen, K., Stanys, V., Svensson, M. 2003. Propagation of Japanese quince (Chaenomeles japonica) plants. Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. ISBN:91-631-3765-8, s:81-98.
  • Kviklys, D. 1996. Genotype impact on propagation of Chaenomeles spp. by soft wood cuttings. In: Problems of fruit plant breeding. Jelgava, Lithuania 2: 135–139.
  • Kviklys, D. 1998. Investigation of quantitative character sand their in heritance within dwarf quince. Summary of doctoral dissertation. Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture, Babtai 28–39.
  • Kviklys D., Rumpunen K. 1996. Preliminary investigation on propagation of Chaenomelesspp. By soft wood cuttings. Report 1992–1994, Balsgård – Department of Horticultural Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 183–186.
  • Macdonald, B. 1986. Practical woody plant propagation for nursery growers.Vol. I. Portland, OR:Timber Press. 669 p
  • Marchant C., Sherlock J. 1984. A guide to selection and propagation of some native woody species for land rehabilitation in British Columbia. For. Res. Rep. RR-84007-HQ.Victoria, BC: Ministry of Forests. 117 p.
  • Martin, C.A ve Ingram, D.L. 1989. Rooting response of Magnolia grandiflora ‘glen st. Mary’ as a function of cutting harvest date and exogenously-applied hormones. Proceedings of the International Plant Propagator's Society, 39:361-367.
  • Ratomskyte, G. 1990. Svarainis (Chaenomeles). Retesnieji sodo augalai. Vilnius 41–47. (In Lithuanian)
  • Sağlık, A., Erduran, F., Sağlık, E. 2012. Bitkisel tasarımın karayolları trafik güvenliğinde önemi: Çanakkale örneği. 3. Karayolu Trafik Güvenliği Sempozyumu, Ankara, 16-18 Mayıs 2012 ss, 77-90 .
  • Sutton, R., Johnson, CW. 1974. Land scape plants from Utah’s mountains. EC-368. Logan: Utah State University. 137 pp.
  • Wells, J.S. 1961. Chaenomeles. Combined Proceedings. The International Plant Propagators Society 11: 119–123.

Year 2020, Volume 9, Issue 2, 373 - 380, 30.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.724665

Abstract

References

  • Albrecht, H.J., Schulze, G. 1980. Vermehrungvon Ziergeholzendurch Steckholz in Plastfolienzelten. Gartenbau, 27: 122–124
  • Anonim, 2007. Mesleki Eğitim ve Öğretim Sisteminin Güçlendirilmesi Projesi (MEGEP), Bahçecilik, Dış Mekan Bitkileri, Ankara 35 s.
  • Anonim, 2012. Sekizinci Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı: Bitkisel Üretim Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Süs Bitkileri Alt Komisyon Raporu. Ankara: DPT, 2001. (DPT. 2645 - ÖİK. 653) ISBN 975-19-2909-1.
  • Ay, S. 2009. Süs bitkileri ihracatı, sorunları ve çözüm öneriler. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (3) .423-443
  • Cameron, R.,Harrison-Murray, R., Fordham, M., Judd, H., Ford, Y., Marks, T., Edmondson, R. 2003. Rooting cuttings of Syringa vulgaris cv. Charles Joly and Corylusavellana cv. Aurea: the influence of stock plant pruning and shoot growth. Trees, 17:451-462.
  • Cengiz, B., Keçecioğlu Dağlı, P., Yiğittekin, S. 2017. Peyzaj ekonomisi açısından peyzaj ve süs bitkileri fidanlık işletmelerine yönelik sektörel bir analiz. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry. 19:50-62.
  • Dirr, MA., Heuser, CW. 1987. Thereferencemanual of Woody Plant Propagation Athens, GA:VarsityPress. 239 p.
  • Ford, Y.Y., Bonham, E.C., Cameron, R.W.F., Blake, P.S., Judd, H.L., Harrison-Murray, R.S. 2002. Adventitious rooting: examining the role of auxin in an easy-and a difficult to root plant. Plant Growth Regulation, 36: 149-159.
  • Hansen, J., Kristiansen, K 2000. Root formation, bud growth and survival of ornamental shrubs propagated by cuttings on different planting dates. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 75: 568-574.
  • Hartmann, HT., Kester, DE., Davies Jr, FT. 1990. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 657 pp. Howard, BH.1996. Relationships Between Shoot Growth and Rooting of Cuttings in Three Contrasting Species of Ornamental Shrub. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 71: 591-606.
  • Howard, B.H., Rridout, M.S. 1992. A mechanism to explain increased rooting in leafy cuttings of Syringa vulgaris ‘Madame Lemoine’ Following Dark-Treatment of the Stock plant. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 67: 103-114.
  • Ion, S. 2011. Propagation of some ornamental species (ligustrum ovalifolıum ask., spiraea salicifolia l., forsythia sp.) at the botanical garden “al. Buia” from Craiova. Analele Universităţii din Craiova, seria Agricultură – Montanologie – Cadastru Vol. XLI 2011/2
  • Karam, N.S., Gebre, G.H. 2004. Rotting of Cercis siliquastrum cuttings in fluenced by cutting position on the branch and indole-butyricacid. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 79:792- 796.
  • Kauppinen, S., Kviklys, D., Rumpunen, K., Stanys, V., Svensson, M. 2003. Propagation of Japanese quince (Chaenomeles japonica) plants. Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. ISBN:91-631-3765-8, s:81-98.
  • Kviklys, D. 1996. Genotype impact on propagation of Chaenomeles spp. by soft wood cuttings. In: Problems of fruit plant breeding. Jelgava, Lithuania 2: 135–139.
  • Kviklys, D. 1998. Investigation of quantitative character sand their in heritance within dwarf quince. Summary of doctoral dissertation. Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture, Babtai 28–39.
  • Kviklys D., Rumpunen K. 1996. Preliminary investigation on propagation of Chaenomelesspp. By soft wood cuttings. Report 1992–1994, Balsgård – Department of Horticultural Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 183–186.
  • Macdonald, B. 1986. Practical woody plant propagation for nursery growers.Vol. I. Portland, OR:Timber Press. 669 p
  • Marchant C., Sherlock J. 1984. A guide to selection and propagation of some native woody species for land rehabilitation in British Columbia. For. Res. Rep. RR-84007-HQ.Victoria, BC: Ministry of Forests. 117 p.
  • Martin, C.A ve Ingram, D.L. 1989. Rooting response of Magnolia grandiflora ‘glen st. Mary’ as a function of cutting harvest date and exogenously-applied hormones. Proceedings of the International Plant Propagator's Society, 39:361-367.
  • Ratomskyte, G. 1990. Svarainis (Chaenomeles). Retesnieji sodo augalai. Vilnius 41–47. (In Lithuanian)
  • Sağlık, A., Erduran, F., Sağlık, E. 2012. Bitkisel tasarımın karayolları trafik güvenliğinde önemi: Çanakkale örneği. 3. Karayolu Trafik Güvenliği Sempozyumu, Ankara, 16-18 Mayıs 2012 ss, 77-90 .
  • Sutton, R., Johnson, CW. 1974. Land scape plants from Utah’s mountains. EC-368. Logan: Utah State University. 137 pp.
  • Wells, J.S. 1961. Chaenomeles. Combined Proceedings. The International Plant Propagators Society 11: 119–123.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Horticulture
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Güzella YILMAZ This is me
Gaziosmanpaşa Universitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
0000-0002-9284-9698
Türkiye


Kenan YILDIZ (Primary Author)
Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
0000-0003-3455-5146
Andorra

Publication Date December 30, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020, Volume 9, Issue 2

Cite

APA Yılmaz, G. & Yıldız, K. (2020). Bazı önemli dış mekan süs bitkilerine ait yeşil çeliklerin köklenme performansları . Akademik Ziraat Dergisi , 9 (2) , 373-380 . DOI: 10.29278/azd.724665