Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Ergenlerin Instagram Bağımlılık Düzeyleri ile Psikolojik İhtiyaçları Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2022, , 8 - 21, 31.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.955243

Öz

Amaç: Ergenler sosyal medya uygulamalarını kullanmaktadır. Instagram da bu sosyal medya uygulamalarından biridir. Bu nedenle yapılan bu araştırma ergenlerin Instagram bağımlılıkları ve temel psikolojik ihtiyaçları arasında ilişki olup olmadığının belirlenebilmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Yöntem: Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmaya 12-15 yaş arasında bulunan 198 ergen gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri kişisel bilgi formu, Instagram Bağımlılık Ölçeği ve Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar Ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilmiştir
Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan ergenlerin ekran karşısında çok fazla zaman geçirdikleri belirlenmiştir. Ergenlerin en çok kullandıkları sosyal medya uygulamaları WhatsApp ve Instagram olmasına karşın yapılan incelemede Instagram bağımlılık düzeylerinin orta altı düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Ergenlerin genel olarak temel psikolojik ihtiyaçları düzeyinin orta üstü düzeyde olduğu ve Instagram bağımlılık düzeyleri ile temel psikolojik ihtiyaçları arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Sonuç: Ergenlerin Instagram Bağımlılığı Ölçeği sonuçlarının yaş ve ekran kullanım süresine göre; Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlar Ölçeği sonuçlarının da sınıf düzeyine göre farklılık gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Instagram APKs. APKMirror. https://apkmirror.com/apk/instagram/instagram-instagram/, 2021
  • 2. Statista. Instagram - Statistics & Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/, 2021.
  • 3. Omnicore. Instagram by the numbers 2019: Stats, demographics & Fun facts. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagramstatistics/, 2019
  • 4. Alhabash S, Ma M. (). A tale of four platforms: motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media+ Society 2017; 3(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117691544
  • 5. Kemp S. Digital 2021: Turkey. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-turkey, 2021
  • 6. We Are Social. We are social Turkey 2021. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2021, 2021.
  • 7. Napoleoncat. Instagram users in Turkey. https://napoleoncat.com/stats/instagram-users-in-turkey/2021/05, 2021.
  • 8. Moqbel M, Kock N. Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction. Information & Management, 2018; 55(1): 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.001
  • 9. Kuss D, Griffiths M. Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017; 14(3): 311-328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311
  • 10. Serenko A, Turel O. Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of Facebook users. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 2015; 1(2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00002
  • 11. Brailovskaia J, Margraf J, Köllner V. Addicted to Facebook? Relationship between Facebook Addiction Disorder, duration of Facebook use and narcissism in an inpatient sample. Psychiatry Research 2019; 273: 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.016
  • 12. Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B, Nikbin D, Hyun SS. Shyness, self-esteem, and loneliness as causes of FA: The moderating effect of low self-control. Current Psycholog, 2019; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00465-w
  • 13. Foroughi B, Iranmanesh M, Nikbin D, Hyun SS. Are depression and social anxiety the missing link between Facebook addiction and life satisfaction? The interactive effect of needs and self-regulation. Telematics and Informatics 2019; 43: 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101247
  • 14. Kircaburu, K, Griffiths MD. Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: The mediating role of self-liking. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2018; 7(1): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.15
  • 15. Al-Yafi K, El-Masri M, Tsai R. The effects of using social network sites on academic performance: the case of Qatar. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2018; 31(3): 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2017-0118
  • 16. Satici SA. Facebook addiction and subjective well-being: A study of the mediating role of shyness and loneliness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2019; 17(1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9862-8
  • 17. Blachnio A, Przepiorka A, Pantic I. Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 55: 701–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026
  • 18. Dhir A, Tsai CC. Understanding the relationship between intensity and gratifications of Facebook use among adolescents and young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 2017; 34(4): 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.017
  • 19. Park N, Lee S. College students’ motivations for Facebook use and psychological outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2014; 58(4): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966355
  • 20. Sun T, Zhong B, Zhang J. Uses and gratifications of Chinese online gamers. China Media Research 2006; 2(2): 58–63.
  • 21. Alhabash S, Chiang Y, Huang K. MAM & U&G in Taiwan: Differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 35: 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.033
  • 22. Annamalai N, Foroughi B, Iranmanesh M, Buathong S. Needs and Facebook addiction: How important are psychological well-being and performance-approach goals? Current Psychology 2019; 39: 1942–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00516-2
  • 23. Sofiah S, Omar SZ, Bolong J, Osman MN. Facebook addiction among female university students. Revista De Administratie Publica Si Politici Sociale, 2011; 3(7): 95-110.
  • 24. Floros G, Siomos K. The relationship between optimal parenting, Internet addiction and motives for social networking in adolescence. Psychiatry Research 2013; 209(3): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.010
  • 25. Chen HT, Kim Y. Problematic use of social network sites: The interactive relationship between gratifications sought and privacy concerns. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013; 16(11): 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0608
  • 26. Kırcaburun K. Effects of gender and personality differences on twitter addiction among Turkish undergraduates. Journal of Education and Practice 2016; 7(24): 33-42.
  • 27. Cüceloğlu, D. İnsan ve davranışı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1992.
  • 28. Kuzgun Y. Edwards kişisel tercih envanterinin Türkiye'de güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 1984; 17(1): 69-85.
  • 29. Choi SB, Lim MS. Effects of social and technology overload on psychological well-being in young South Korean adults: The mediatory role of social network service addiction. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 61: 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.032
  • 30. Huppert FA. Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well, 2009.
  • 31. Casale S, Lecchi S, Fioravanti G. The association between psychological wellbeing and problematic use of Internet communicative services among young people. The Journal of Psychology 2015; 149(5): 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.905432
  • 32. Büyüköztürk Ş, Özcan Akgün E, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F, Kılıç Çakmak E. Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, 2019.
  • 33. Kavaklı M, İnan E. Psychometric properties of the Turkish Version of Instagram Addiction Scale (IAS). Journal of Clinical Psychology Research 2021; 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5455/kpd.26024438m000037
  • 34. Kesici Ş, Üre Ö. Bozgeyikli H, Sünbül AM. Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği, VII. Ulusal PDR Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, Malatya, 2003.
  • 35. Graham M. Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019.
  • 36. Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD. Sinatra, M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J. Behav. Addict, 2017; 6(2):178–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.023
  • 37. Griffiths M, Kuss DJ, Billieux J, Pontes HM. The evolution of Internet addiction: A global perspective. Addict. Behav 2016; 53: 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.001
  • 38. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. Uzaktan eğitim sürecinin detayları. http://www.meb.gov.tr/uzaktan-egitim-surecinin-detaylari/haber/21990/tr, 2020.
  • 39. Umaç EH, Aydın A. COVID-19 salgınında ergenlerin sağlığının korunması ve sürdürülmesi: Annelerin perspektifinden. Çocuk Dergisi 2021; 21(1): 68-73.
  • 40. Pietrobelli A, Pecoraro L, Ferruzzi A, Heo M, Faith M, Zoller T. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on lifestyle behaviors in children with obesity living in Verona, Italy: A longitudinal study. Obesity 2020; 28(8): 1382-1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22861
  • 41. Xiang M, Zhang Z, Kuwahara K. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents’ lifestyle behavior larger than expected. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 63(4): 531-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013
  • 42. Anderson EL, Steen E, Stavropoulos V. Internet use and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of longitu- dinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 2017; 22(4): 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716
  • 43. Chen JL, Kennedy C. Cultural variations in children's coping behavior, TV viewing and family functioning. International Nursing Review 2005; 52(3): 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2005.00419.x
  • 44. Üstündağ A. Çocuk ve ekran. Dijital medya ve çocuk gelişimi. Ankara: eğiten kitap, 2020.
  • 45. Courage ML, Setliff AE. When babies watch television: Attention-getting, attention-holding, and the implications for learning from video material. Dev Rev 2010; 30(2): 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.003
  • 46. Balcı Ş, Karaman SY. Social media usage, self-presentation, narcissism, and self-esteem as predictors of ınstagram addiction: An ıntercultural comparison. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 2020; 7(2): 1213-1239.
  • 47. Tay L, Diener E. Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011; 101(2): 354–365.
  • 48. Bulut Y. Tokat ilinden öğrenim görmekte olan lise öğrencilerinde duygusal ve davranışsal sorun prevalansı ve ilişkili faktörler. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, Tokat: Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Halk Sağlığı ABD, 2016.
  • 49. Doğan KA. Oyun bağımlılığı müdahale programının ergenlerin oyun bağımlılığı ve oyun motivasyonu ile duygusal davranışsal sorunlarına ve annelerinin düşüncelerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.
  • 50. Canoğulları Ö, Güçray SS. İnternet bağımlılık düzeyleri farklı ergenlerin cinsiyetlerine göre psikolojik ihtiyaçları, sosyal kaygıları ve anne baba tutum algılarının incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2014; 26(1): 42-57.
  • 51. Yurdagül C, Kircaburun K, Emirtekin E, Wang P, Griffiths MD. Psychopathological consequences related to problematic Instagram use among adolescents: The mediating role of body ımage dissatisfaction and moderating role of gender. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2019; 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00071-8.

The Relationship Between Adolescents' Instagram Addiction Levels and Psychological Needs

Yıl 2022, , 8 - 21, 31.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.955243

Öz

Objective: Adolescents use social media applications. Instagram is one of these social media applications. For this reason, this research was conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between Instagram addictions and basic psychological needs of adolescents.
Method: The research was carried out using the correlational method, one of the quantitative research methods. 198 adolescents between the ages of 12-15 participated in the study voluntarily. The data of the study were obtained by using the personal information form, the Instagram Addiction Scale, and the Basic Psychological Needs Scale.
Results: The adolescents participating in the study spent a lot of time in front of the screen. Although the most used social media applications by adolescents are WhatsApp and Instagram, it has been observed that the level of Instagram addiction is below medium in the review. The level of basic psychological needs of adolescents is upper middle and there is a positive and significant relationship between Instagram addiction levels and basic psychological needs.
Conclusion: the results of the Instagram Addiction Scale of adolescents differ according to age and screen use time and the results of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale also differed according to the grade level.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Instagram APKs. APKMirror. https://apkmirror.com/apk/instagram/instagram-instagram/, 2021
  • 2. Statista. Instagram - Statistics & Facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/1882/instagram/, 2021.
  • 3. Omnicore. Instagram by the numbers 2019: Stats, demographics & Fun facts. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/instagramstatistics/, 2019
  • 4. Alhabash S, Ma M. (). A tale of four platforms: motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media+ Society 2017; 3(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305117691544
  • 5. Kemp S. Digital 2021: Turkey. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-turkey, 2021
  • 6. We Are Social. We are social Turkey 2021. https://wearesocial.com/digital-2021, 2021.
  • 7. Napoleoncat. Instagram users in Turkey. https://napoleoncat.com/stats/instagram-users-in-turkey/2021/05, 2021.
  • 8. Moqbel M, Kock N. Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction. Information & Management, 2018; 55(1): 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.001
  • 9. Kuss D, Griffiths M. Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017; 14(3): 311-328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311
  • 10. Serenko A, Turel O. Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of Facebook users. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 2015; 1(2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00002
  • 11. Brailovskaia J, Margraf J, Köllner V. Addicted to Facebook? Relationship between Facebook Addiction Disorder, duration of Facebook use and narcissism in an inpatient sample. Psychiatry Research 2019; 273: 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.016
  • 12. Iranmanesh M, Foroughi B, Nikbin D, Hyun SS. Shyness, self-esteem, and loneliness as causes of FA: The moderating effect of low self-control. Current Psycholog, 2019; 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00465-w
  • 13. Foroughi B, Iranmanesh M, Nikbin D, Hyun SS. Are depression and social anxiety the missing link between Facebook addiction and life satisfaction? The interactive effect of needs and self-regulation. Telematics and Informatics 2019; 43: 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101247
  • 14. Kircaburu, K, Griffiths MD. Instagram addiction and the Big Five of personality: The mediating role of self-liking. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2018; 7(1): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.15
  • 15. Al-Yafi K, El-Masri M, Tsai R. The effects of using social network sites on academic performance: the case of Qatar. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2018; 31(3): 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2017-0118
  • 16. Satici SA. Facebook addiction and subjective well-being: A study of the mediating role of shyness and loneliness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2019; 17(1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9862-8
  • 17. Blachnio A, Przepiorka A, Pantic I. Association between Facebook addiction, self-esteem and life satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 55: 701–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.026
  • 18. Dhir A, Tsai CC. Understanding the relationship between intensity and gratifications of Facebook use among adolescents and young adults. Telematics and Informatics, 2017; 34(4): 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.017
  • 19. Park N, Lee S. College students’ motivations for Facebook use and psychological outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2014; 58(4): 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966355
  • 20. Sun T, Zhong B, Zhang J. Uses and gratifications of Chinese online gamers. China Media Research 2006; 2(2): 58–63.
  • 21. Alhabash S, Chiang Y, Huang K. MAM & U&G in Taiwan: Differences in the uses and gratifications of Facebook as a function of motivational reactivity. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 35: 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.033
  • 22. Annamalai N, Foroughi B, Iranmanesh M, Buathong S. Needs and Facebook addiction: How important are psychological well-being and performance-approach goals? Current Psychology 2019; 39: 1942–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00516-2
  • 23. Sofiah S, Omar SZ, Bolong J, Osman MN. Facebook addiction among female university students. Revista De Administratie Publica Si Politici Sociale, 2011; 3(7): 95-110.
  • 24. Floros G, Siomos K. The relationship between optimal parenting, Internet addiction and motives for social networking in adolescence. Psychiatry Research 2013; 209(3): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.01.010
  • 25. Chen HT, Kim Y. Problematic use of social network sites: The interactive relationship between gratifications sought and privacy concerns. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013; 16(11): 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0608
  • 26. Kırcaburun K. Effects of gender and personality differences on twitter addiction among Turkish undergraduates. Journal of Education and Practice 2016; 7(24): 33-42.
  • 27. Cüceloğlu, D. İnsan ve davranışı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi, 1992.
  • 28. Kuzgun Y. Edwards kişisel tercih envanterinin Türkiye'de güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 1984; 17(1): 69-85.
  • 29. Choi SB, Lim MS. Effects of social and technology overload on psychological well-being in young South Korean adults: The mediatory role of social network service addiction. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 61: 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.032
  • 30. Huppert FA. Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well, 2009.
  • 31. Casale S, Lecchi S, Fioravanti G. The association between psychological wellbeing and problematic use of Internet communicative services among young people. The Journal of Psychology 2015; 149(5): 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.905432
  • 32. Büyüköztürk Ş, Özcan Akgün E, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F, Kılıç Çakmak E. Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, 2019.
  • 33. Kavaklı M, İnan E. Psychometric properties of the Turkish Version of Instagram Addiction Scale (IAS). Journal of Clinical Psychology Research 2021; 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5455/kpd.26024438m000037
  • 34. Kesici Ş, Üre Ö. Bozgeyikli H, Sünbül AM. Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği, VII. Ulusal PDR Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, Malatya, 2003.
  • 35. Graham M. Society and the Internet: How Networks of Information and Communication are Changing Our Lives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019.
  • 36. Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD. Sinatra, M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J. Behav. Addict, 2017; 6(2):178–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.023
  • 37. Griffiths M, Kuss DJ, Billieux J, Pontes HM. The evolution of Internet addiction: A global perspective. Addict. Behav 2016; 53: 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.001
  • 38. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. Uzaktan eğitim sürecinin detayları. http://www.meb.gov.tr/uzaktan-egitim-surecinin-detaylari/haber/21990/tr, 2020.
  • 39. Umaç EH, Aydın A. COVID-19 salgınında ergenlerin sağlığının korunması ve sürdürülmesi: Annelerin perspektifinden. Çocuk Dergisi 2021; 21(1): 68-73.
  • 40. Pietrobelli A, Pecoraro L, Ferruzzi A, Heo M, Faith M, Zoller T. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on lifestyle behaviors in children with obesity living in Verona, Italy: A longitudinal study. Obesity 2020; 28(8): 1382-1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22861
  • 41. Xiang M, Zhang Z, Kuwahara K. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents’ lifestyle behavior larger than expected. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2020; 63(4): 531-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.013
  • 42. Anderson EL, Steen E, Stavropoulos V. Internet use and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of longitu- dinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 2017; 22(4): 430-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1227716
  • 43. Chen JL, Kennedy C. Cultural variations in children's coping behavior, TV viewing and family functioning. International Nursing Review 2005; 52(3): 186-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2005.00419.x
  • 44. Üstündağ A. Çocuk ve ekran. Dijital medya ve çocuk gelişimi. Ankara: eğiten kitap, 2020.
  • 45. Courage ML, Setliff AE. When babies watch television: Attention-getting, attention-holding, and the implications for learning from video material. Dev Rev 2010; 30(2): 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.003
  • 46. Balcı Ş, Karaman SY. Social media usage, self-presentation, narcissism, and self-esteem as predictors of ınstagram addiction: An ıntercultural comparison. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 2020; 7(2): 1213-1239.
  • 47. Tay L, Diener E. Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011; 101(2): 354–365.
  • 48. Bulut Y. Tokat ilinden öğrenim görmekte olan lise öğrencilerinde duygusal ve davranışsal sorun prevalansı ve ilişkili faktörler. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, Tokat: Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Halk Sağlığı ABD, 2016.
  • 49. Doğan KA. Oyun bağımlılığı müdahale programının ergenlerin oyun bağımlılığı ve oyun motivasyonu ile duygusal davranışsal sorunlarına ve annelerinin düşüncelerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2019.
  • 50. Canoğulları Ö, Güçray SS. İnternet bağımlılık düzeyleri farklı ergenlerin cinsiyetlerine göre psikolojik ihtiyaçları, sosyal kaygıları ve anne baba tutum algılarının incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2014; 26(1): 42-57.
  • 51. Yurdagül C, Kircaburun K, Emirtekin E, Wang P, Griffiths MD. Psychopathological consequences related to problematic Instagram use among adolescents: The mediating role of body ımage dissatisfaction and moderating role of gender. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2019; 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00071-8.
Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Psikolojide Davranış-Kişilik Değerlendirmesi
Bölüm Araştırma
Yazarlar

Alev Üstündağ 0000-0001-5832-6810

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2022
Kabul Tarihi 29 Temmuz 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

AMA Üstündağ A. Ergenlerin Instagram Bağımlılık Düzeyleri ile Psikolojik İhtiyaçları Arasındaki İlişki. Bağımlılık Dergisi. Mart 2022;23(1):8-21. doi:10.51982/bagimli.955243

Bağımlılık Dergisi - Journal of Dependence