Örtü Altında Yetiştirilen Bazı Maviyemiş Çeşitlerinin Farklı Hasat Tarihlerinde Meyve Kalite ve Antioksidan Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Serik/Antalya bölgesinde saksıda ve topraksız tarım tekniği ile örtü altında yetiştirilmiş Ventura, Camellia ve Suziblue güney orjinli yüksek boylu maviyemiş çeşitlerinin iki farklı hasat döneminde meyve kalite ve antioksidan özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Meyve ağırlığı bakımından hasat dönemleri arasında önemli fark çıkmış ve ikinci hasat döneminde meyve ağırlığı (3,71 g) artmıştır. Meyve boyutları (boy ve en) bakımından çeşit, hasat dönemi ve çeşit × hasat dönemi faktörleri önemli bulunmuştur. İkinci hasat döneminde meyve boyutları artarken, Venture çeşidi en uzun (15.32 mm) Camellia çeşidi ise en geniş (20.55 mm) meyveleri vermiştir. L*, b*, SÇKM, TEA, pH, toplam fenolik, toplam flavonoid ve toplam antioksidan içerikleri bakımından çeşit, hasat tarihi ve çeşit × hasat dönemi faktörleri önemli çıkmıştır. L* değeri 19.82 (Ventura 1. hasat) ile 27.88 (Suziblue 2. hasat), a* değeri -0.22 (Suziblue 2. hasat) ile 0.38 (Suziblue 1. hasat), b* değeri -3.42 (Ventura 1. hasat) ile -1.08 (Camellia 2. hasat), SÇKM %5.96 (Camellia 2. hasat) ile %11.10 (Suziblue 1. hasat), pH 3.21 (Ventura 1. hasat) ile 4.21 (Suziblue 2. hasat), TEA %0.19 (Suziblue 2. hasat) ile %0. 60 (Suziblue 1. hasat), toplam fenolik madde 31.75 mg GAE/100 g (Camellia 1. hasat) ile 286.47 mg GAE/100 g (Camellia 2. hasat), toplam flavonoid 4.98 mg GAE/100 g (Suziblue 1. hasat) ile 44. 12 mg GAE/100 g (Camellia 2. hasat), toplam antioksidan kapasite %75.84 (Ventura 1. hasat) ile %98.74 (Suziblue 2. hasat) arasında değişmiştir. Sonuçta, Camellia en iri meyve ve en yüksek antioksidan özelliklere sahip çeşit olarak bulunmuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vaccinium corymbosum L.
• meyve kalitesi
• hasat dönemi
• antioksidan

Determination of Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Properties of Some Blueberry Cultivars at Different Harvest Dates Grown in Under Cover

Abstract

In this study, fruit quality and antioxidant properties of southern highbush blueberry cultivars Ventura, Camellia and Suziblue grown under cover with soilless culture technique in Serik/Antalya region were determined at two different harvest periods. There was a significant difference in berry weight between the harvest periods and the fruit weight (3.71 g) increased in the second harvest period. The factors of cultivar, harvest period, and cultivar × harvest period were found to be statistically significant in terms of berry size (length and width). Berry size increased in the second harvest period and Ventura cultivar gave the longest fruits (15.32 mm) and Camellia cultivar gave the widest fruits (20.55 mm). The factors of cultivar, harvest date, and cultivar × harvest date interaction was found to be statistically significant in terms of L*, b*, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acid (TA), pH, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and total antioxidant content. L* value ranged from 19.82 (Ventura, first harvest) to 27.88 (Suziblue, second harvest), a* value ranged from -0.22 (Suziblue, second harvest) to 0.38 (Suziblue first harvest), b* value ranged from -3.42 (Ventura, first harvest) to -1.08 (Camelia, second harvest), TSS ranged from 5.96% (Camelia second harvest) to 11.10% (Suziblue first harvest), pH ranged from 3.21 (Ventura, first harvest) to 4.21 (Suziblue, second harvest), TA ranged from 0.19%(Suziblue, second harvest) to 0.60% (Suziblue, first harvest), total phenolic content ranged from 31.75 mg GAE/100 g (Camellia, first harvest) to 286.47 mg GAE/100 g (Camelia, second harvest), total flavonoid content ranged from 4.98 mg GAE/100 g (Suziblue, first harvest) to 44.12 mg GAE/100 g (Camellia, second harvest), and total antioxidant capacity ranged from 75.84%(Ventura, first harvest) to 98.74% (Suziblue, second harvest). As a result, Camellia cultivar was found to be with the largest fruit and the highest antioxidant properties.

Keywords

• Vaccinium corymbosum L.
• fruit quality
• harvest time
• antioxidant capacity

References

1. FAO 2021. FAO (Dünya Tarım Örgütü). http://www.fao.org.
2. TÜİK 2022. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https:// data.tuik.gov.tr/bulten/ındex?p=bitkisel-uretim-ıstatistikleri-2022-45504.
3. Li, X., Liu, H., Lv, L., Yan, H., Yuan, Y. 2018. Antioxidant activity of blueberry anthocyanin extracts and their protective effects against acrylamide‐induced toxicity in HepG2 cells. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13568. 53(1):147-155.
4. Kuntz, S., Kunz, C., Rudloff, S. 2017. Inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell migration by plasma anthocyanins isolated from healthy volunteers receiving an anthocyanin-rich berry juice. European Journal of Nutrition 56:203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1070-3.
5. Prior, R.L., Cao, G., Martin, A., Sofic, E., McEven, J. et al. 1998. Antioxidant capacity as influenced by total phenolic and anthocyanin content, maturity and variety of Vaccinium species. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, doi:10.1021/jf980145d, 46(7):2686-2693.
6. Wu, X., Cao, G., Prior, R.L. 2002. Absorption and metabolism of anthocyanins in elderly women after consumption of elderberry or blueberry. Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.1093/jn/132.7.1865. 132(7):1865-1871.
7. Scalbert, A., Manach, C., Morand, C., Remesy, C., Jimenez, L. 2005. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, doi:10.1080/1040869059 096, 45:287-306.
8. Crawford, K., Mellentin, J. 2008. Successful superfruit strategy: how to build a superfruit business. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.

9. Basu, A., Du, M., Leyva, M.J., Sanchez, K., Betts N.M. et al. 2010. Blueberries decrease cardiovascular risk factors in obese men and women with metabolic syndrome. Journal of Nutrition, doi:10.3945/jn.110.124701, 140:1582-1587.
10. Carey, A.N., Gomes, S.M., Shukitt-Hale, B. 2014. Blueberry supplementation improves memory in middle-aged mice fed a high-fat diet. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62(18):3972-3978. doi:10.1021/jf404565s.
11. Singh, R. 2018. Current Alzheimer’s management with berries fruit therapy. Journal of Public Health and Nutrition 1(2):17-24.
12. Kalt, W., Cassidy, A., Howard, L.R., Krikorian, R., Stull, A.J., Tremblay, F., Zamora-Ros, R. 2020. Recent research on the health benefits of blueberries and their anthocyanins. Advances in Nutrition, https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz0 65, 11(2):224-236.
13. Kalt, W., Lawand, C., Ryan, D.A.J., McDonald, J.E., Donner, H., and Forney, C.F. 2003. Oxygen radical absorbing capacity, anthocyanin and phenolic content of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) during ripening and storage. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 128:917-923.
14. Remberg, S.F., Måge, F., Haffner, K., and Blomhoff, R. 2007. Highbush blueberries Vaccinium corymbosum L., raspberries Rubus idaeus L. and black currants Ribes nigrum L. - influence of cultivar on antioxidant activity and other quality parameters. Acta Hortic. 744, 259-266 http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2007. 744.27.
15. Milivojević, J., Maksimović, V., Dragišić Maksimović, J., Radivojević, D., Poledica, M., Ercişli, S. 2012. A comparison of major taste- and health-related compounds of Vaccinium berries. Turk. J. Biol. 36:738-745, 10.3906/biy-1206-39.
16. Singleton, V.L., Rossi, J.A. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3):144-158.
17. Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T., Jianming, W. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in Mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry 64(4):555-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)0010 2-2.
18. Kumaran, A., Karunakaran, R.J. 2007. In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. LWT-Food Science and Technology 40(2):344-352.
19. Çakır, M., Yıldırım, A., Çelik, C., Esen, M. 2021. Farklı bitki büyümeyi düzenleyici maddelerin Jeromine elma çeşidinde kalite ve biyokimyasal içerikleri üzerine etkisi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.9360 81. 36(3):478-487.
20. Ehlen Feldt, M.K., Martin, R.B., Jr. 2010. Seed set, berry weight, and yield interactions in the highbush blueberry cultivars (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) Bluecrop and Duke. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 64:162-172.
21. Milivojevic, J., Radivojevic, D., Nikolic, M., Dragisic Maksimovic, J. 2016. Changes in fruit quality of highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) during the ripening season. 3. Balkan Symposium on Fruit Growing 1139 p:657-664 https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2016.113 9.113.
22. Norberto, S., Silva, S., Meireles, M., Faria, A., Pintado, M., Calhau, C. 2013. Blueberry anthocyanins in health promotion: A metabolic overview. Journal of Functional Foods 5(4):1518-1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2013.08.015.
23. Gündüz, K., Özdemir, E. 2014. The effects of genotype and growing conditions on antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, organic acid and individual sugar of strawberry. Food Chemistry 155:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem. 2014.01.064.
24. Aliman, J., Michalak, I., Busatlic, E., Aliman, L., Kulina, M., Radovic, M., Hasanbegovic, J. 2020. Study of the physicochemical properties of highbush blueberry and wild bilberry fruit in central Bosnia. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 44(2):156-168. https://doi.org/10.3906 /tar-1902-36.
25. Demir, S., Başayiğit, L. 2022. Classification of some biochemical properties with J48 classification tree algorithms in hyperspectral data. Veri Bilimi 5(2):20-28.
26. Çelik, H., Seydioğlu, Y. 2019. Saksıda yetişen yüksek boylu maviyemişlerin fenolik safhaları ile bazı kalite özellikleri. Bahçe 48(Özel Sayı-1):141-148.
27. Quality characteristics and phenologival stages pot Grown highbush blueberries. https://www. researchgate.net/publication/336058536_seydioglu_y_celik_h_2019_saksida_yetisen_yuksek_boylu_maviyemislerin_fenolojik_safhalari_ile_bazi_kalite_ozellikleri_vi_ulusal_uzumsu_meyveler_semp_5-7_eylul_2019_samsun_poster_bildiri_ bildiri_ozetler.
28. Çelik, H. 2018. Yield and berry characteristics of pot grown blueberries. 2. International UNIDOKAP Black Sea Symposium on Biodiversity, Samsun, Turkey, 28-30 November 2018, Atatürk Congress Center Ondokuz Mayis University. Proceedings Book:304-309. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/329935578_yield_and_berry_characteristics_of_pot_grown_blueberries_in_samsun.
29. Çelik, H., Acar., E. 2021. Determination of phenological stages and change of yield potential according to harvest in blueberries grown in outdoors in pots and raised beds. 3. Balkan Agriculture Congress, Edirne, Turkey, 29 August-1 September, 2021. Oral Presentation. 3. Balkan Agriculture Congress Proceedings Book 803-819. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20220174140.
30. Çelik, H. 2009. Yield and berry characteristics of some northern highbush blueberries grown at different altitudes in Turkey. In the context of COST-Action 863, Proceedings of the Workshop on Berry production in changing climate conditions and cultivation systems. 29-31 October, Geisenhaim, Germany. (Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK TOGTAG 3252 tarafından desteklenmiştir). ISHS Acta Horticulturae, 838:63-67.
31. Çelik, H., Koca, İ., Ghellam, M. 2022. Determination of berry content, anthocyanin and antioxidant properties of some northern and southern highbush blueberry varieties grown in Samsun. 5. International Agricultural Congress (Online), 5-6 December,2022. Oral presentation, Abstract Book 39. https://utak.azimder.org.tr/ abstract-book/.