Yazma Etkinliklerinin 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Başarılarına ve Geometriye Yönelik Öz-Yeterliklerine Etkisi

Year 2018, , 167 - 198, 31.12.2018

Emine Gaye Çontay Asuman Duatepe-paksu

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.506429

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yazma etkinliklerinin 8.
sınıf öğrencilerinin geometrik cisimlerin yüzey alanları ve hacimleri
konusundaki başarılarına ve geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarına etkisini
belirlemektir. Çalışma, Ege Bölgesinde bir devlet ortaokulunun 8. sınıfında
okuyan 40 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. 20 kişiden oluşan bir sınıf deney grubu,
diğer 20 kişiden oluşan sınıf kontrol grubu olarak belirlenmiştir. Kontrol
grubundan farklı olarak, deney grubu öğrencilerinin geometrik cisimlerin yüzey
alanları ve hacimleri konusunda yazma etkinlikleri yapmaları sağlanmıştır.

Çalışmada öğrencilerin erişileri
[(Geometrik Cisimlerin Yüzey Alanları Testi (GCYT) ve Geometrik Cisimlerin
Hacimleri Testi (GCHT)] ile, öğrencilerin geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlikleri
ise Cantürk-Günhan ve Başer (2007) tarafından geliştirilen “Geometriye İlişkin Öz-yeterlik İnancı Ölçeği”
ile ölçülmüştür. Her iki araç ön test ve son test olarak uygulanmıştır.
Çalışmanın verileri SPSS 16 paket programı kullanılarak Mann Whitney-U testi ve
İki Bağımlı Örneklem için Wilcoxon İşaret Sıralaması Testi ile analiz
edilmiştir. Çalışmada, geometrik cisimlerin yüzey alanları ve hacimleri
konusunda deney ve kontrol gruplarındaki öğrencilerin başarıları ve geometriye
yönelik öz-yeterlik inançları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olduğu
belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Yazma etkinlikleri, geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik, öğrenci başarısı, geometrik cisimlerin yüzey alanları ve hacimleri

The Effect of Journal Writing on Achievement and Geometry Self-Efficacy of 8th Grade Students

Abstract

The aim of this study
is to investigate the effects of journal writing on achievement of 8th grade
students on the surface area and volume of geometric solids and on geometry
self-efficacy. The study was carried out with 40 8th grade students at a public
school in Eagean Region. One group with 20 students was assigned as the
experimental group and the other 20 student-group was assigned as the control
group. Different from the control group Experimental group engaged in journal
writing activities on the surface area and volume of geometric solids.

In the study, two
achievement tests [Surface Area of Geometric Solids Test (SGST) and Volume of
Geometric Solids Test (VGST)] were used to measure the gain scores of students
and self-efficacy of students towards geometry was evaluated by self-efficacy
towards geometry scale which was developed by Cantürk-Günhan and Başer
(2007). The tools were administered as pre-test and post-test. The data of the study were analyzed by Mann Whiney-U
test and The Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test by using SPSS 16 packaged
software. The results of the study suggest that achievement of the students on
the surface area and volume of geometric solids and the self-efficacy of the
students towards geometry in each group differed significantly. 

Keywords

journal writing, self-efficacy towards geometry, student achievement, surface area and volume of geometric solids

References

• Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bosse, M. J., & Faulconer, J. (2010). Assesing understanding through reading and writing in mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 11(5), 1-22.
• Akkuş, R. & Hand, B. (2010). Examining teachers’ struggles as they attepmt to implement dialogical interaction as part of promoting mathematical reasoning within their classrooms, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 975-998.
• Atasoy, E. & Atasoy, Ş. (2006). Farklı yazma etkinliklerinin 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin düşünceleri ve davranışları üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesi, Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 1-18.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
• Bell, E. S. & Bell, R. N. (1985). Writing and mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 210-221.
• Biçer, A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Integrating writing into mathematics classroom to increase students’ problem solving skills, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 361-369.
• Birken, M. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. P. Connolly and T. Vilardi (Eds.), Using writing to asist learning in college mathematics classes, (pp. 33-47). New York, Teachers College Press.
• Bong, M. (1996, April). Perceived similarity among tasks and generalizability of academic self-efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, New York.
• Borasi, R. & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instruction, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 347-365.
• Cantürk-Günhan, B. & Başer, N. (2007). Geometriye yönelik öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 68-76.
• Chapman, K. P. (1996). Journals: Pathways to thinking in second-year algebra, Mathematics Teacher, 89(87), 588-590
• Countryman, J. (1992). Writing to learn mathematics. Strategies that work, Portsmouth, Heinemann.
• Connolly, P. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. P. Connolly and T. Vilardi (Eds.), Writing and the ecology of learning, (pp. 1-14). New York, Teachers College Press.
• Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 243-270.
• Davison, D. M & Pearce, D. L. (1990). Perspectives on writing activities in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 15-22
• Davison, D. M. & Pierce, D. L. (1988). Writing activities in junior high mathematics texts, School Science and Mathematics, 88(6), 493-499.
• Davison, D. M. & Pearce, D. L. (1988). Using writing activities to reinforce mathematics instruction, Arithmetic Teacher, 35(8), 42-45.
• Duckworth, K. , Fielding, G. & Shaughnessy, J. (1986). The relationship of high school teachers’ class testing practices to students’ feelings of efficacy and efforts to study, (Rep. No.143). Oregon University, National Institution of Education.
• Erdoğan, A., Baloğlu, M., & Kesici, Ş. (2011). Gender differences in geometry and mathematics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs in geometry. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 91-106.
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning, College Composition and Communication, 28 (2), 122-128.
• Genesee, F. & Upshur, J.A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. New York, Cambridge University Press. [Elektronic Version]. Internetten 1 Aralık 2011’de http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=PTktA31ppEYC&printsec=frontcover&vq=journals&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=journals&f=false adresinden alınmıştır.
• Gökbulut, Y. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının geometrik cisimler hakkındaki pedagojik alan bilgileri. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Gökkurt, B. (2014). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin geometrik cisimler konusuna ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
• Kasa, B. (2009). Yazma etkinliklerinin ilköğretim I. kademe öğrencilerinin matematik başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
• Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (1996). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. A first course for students of psychology and education. USA, West Publishing Company.
• Hackett, G. & Betz, N. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondance, Journal For Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261-273
• Hanlon, E. H. & Schneider, Y. (1999). Improving math proficiency through self-efficacy training, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
• Hasanoğlu Tektaş, A. (2002). Effects of math learning journals on mathematics achievement, attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics anxiety. Unpublished Master’s Dissertation, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul
• Hoffman, M. & Powell, A. (1989). Mathematical and commentary writing: vehicles for student reflection and empowerment, Mathematics Teacher, 126(3), 55-57.
• Huat, J. D. N. C. & Mei, Y. S. (2005, May). Using journal writing to understand primary three students’ perception of multiplication and division: Case studies, Paper presented at the International Conference on Education, Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
• Jurdak, M. & Zein, R. A. (1998). The effect of journal writing on achievement in and attitudes toward mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 412-419.
• Kaba, Y., Boğazlıyan, D. & Daymaz, B. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin geometriye yönelik tutumlari ve öz-yeterlikleri. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 52,335-350.
• Kasa, B. (2009). Yazma etkinliklerinin ilköğretim I. kademe öğrencilerinin matematik başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
• Keith, S. Z. (1992). Using writing to teach mathematics, A. Sterrett (Eds.), Writing for educational objectives in a calculus course, (pp.6-10). USA, Mathematical Association of America.
• Klishis, L. A. (2003). The impact of student discourse and journal writing on the mathematics achievement of fifth grade students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, West Virginia University, West Virginia.
• Koçak, M., Demir, Ö., Gökkurt, B., & Soylu, Y. (2016, Mayıs). Analysis of The Geometry and Mathematics-Oriented Self—Efficacy Beliefs of Secondary School Students in Terms of Three Variables. International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education konferansında sunulan sözlü bildiri, Elazığ.
• Louis, E. L. (2006). Study on children’ s reasoning about geometric solids in play and other contexts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, Arizona.
• Marwine, A. (1989). Writing to learn mathematics and science. P. Connolly and T. Vilardi (Eds.), Reflections on the uses of informal writing, (pp. 56-69). New York, Teachers College Press.
• Mayer, J. & Hillman, S. (1996). Assessing students’ thinking through writing, The Mathematics Teacher, 89, 428-432.
• McCabe, D. F. (1994, February). Writing (and talking) to learn: Integrating disciplinary content and skills development, Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Successfull College Teaching, Florida.
• McIntosh, M. E. (1991). No time for writing in your class?, Mathematics Teacher, 84, 423-433.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2009). T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı İlköğretim matematik dersi 6-8. sınıflar öğretim programı ve kılavuzu. T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, İnternetten 25 Kasım 2011 tarihinde http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program.aspx?islem=1&kno=33 adresinden alınmıştır.
• Mett, C. L. (1989). Writing in mathematics: Evidence of learning through writing. 62(7), 293-296.
• Miller, L. D. (1992). Benefits from using impromptu writing prompts in algebra classes, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(4), 329-340.
• Miller, L. D. (1991). Begin mathematics class with writing, Mathematics Teacher, 85(5), 34-35.
• Miller, L. D. & England, D. A. (1989). Writing to learn algebra, School Science and Mathematics, 89(4), 299-312.
• Nahrang, C. L. & Peterson, B. T. (1986). Using writing to learn mathematics, Mathematics Teacher, 79, 461-465.
• Özçelik, H. (2006). İlköğretimde çalışan öğretmenlerin bilgisayar özyeterlikleri: Balıkesir ili örneği. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
• Özkeleş Çağlayan, S. (2010). Lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin geometri dersine yönelik özyeterlik algısı ve tutumunun geometri dersi akademik başarısını yordama gücü. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Pajares, F. & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
• Pugalee, D. K. (2004). A Comparison of verbal and written descriptions of students’ problem solving processes, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 27-47.
• Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing mathematics and metacognition: Looking for connections through student’ s work in mathematica. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 236-245
• Pugalee, D. K. (1997). Connecting writing to the mathematics curriculum, Mathematics Teacher, 90(4), 308-310.
• Sample, C. R. (1998). Urban algebra I students’ perceptions of journal writing and its effects on achievement with integers and students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University Of Missisippi, Missisippi.
• Stack, R. V. (1998). The effects of journal writing on the geometric understanding of preservice elementary teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Dakota, South Dakota.
• Stehney, A. K. (1992). Using writing to teach mathematics. A. Sterett (Eds.)., Mathematicians write; mathematics students should, too, (pp. 3-5). USA, Mathematical Association of America.
• Stewart, C. & Chance, L. (1995). Making connections: Journal writing and the Professional teaching stand, Mathematics Teacher, 88(2), 92-95.
• Swinson, K. (1992). An investigation of the extent to which writing activities are used in mathematics classes, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(2), 38-49.
• Tekin-Sitrava, R., & IŞIKSAL-BOSTAN, M. (2014). " An Investigation into the Performance, Solution Strategies and Difficulties in Middle School Students' Calculation of the Volume of a Rectangular Prism". International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning.
• Trites, L. (2001). Journal Writing. J. Burton (Eds.)., Journals as self-evaluate, reflective classroom tools with advanced ESL graduate students, (pp. 71-83). Virginia, Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
• Tosmur, N. (2004). The effect of journal writing on first year engineering students’ achievement on integral. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Uğurel, I., Tekin, Ç. & Moralı, S. (2009). Matematik eğitimi literatüründen “yazma aktiviteleri” üzerine genel bir bakış, E-Journal of New World Science Academy, 4(2), 494-507.
• Uslu, H. (2009). Altıncı ve yedinci sınıf fen ve teknoloji ile matematik derslerinde günlüklerin kullanılmasına yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin belirlenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.
• Uzar, F. N. (2010). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin matematik dersine yönelik öz-yeterliğini besleyen kaynakların farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Üredi, I. & Üredi, L. (2005). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik başarısını yordama gücü, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 250-260.
• Van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Teaching developmentally, New York, Longman.
• Van de Walle, J. A.& Lovin, L. H. (2006). Teaching student-centered mathematics. Grades K-3, Boston, Pearson.
• Watson, M. (1980). Writing has a place in a mathematics class. Mathematics Teacher, 73, 518-519.
• Yılmaz, N. (2015). Cebir öğretiminde yazma etkinliklerini kullanmanın ortaokul 7. Sınıf öğrencilerinin başarılarına etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 357-376.