BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2013, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 284 - 313, 01.12.2013

Fethiye Karslı Alipaşa Ayas

https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed211

Abstract

– The aim of this study is to determine alternative conceptions of prospective science teachers about the concepts of “Evaporation and Boiling”, “Acid-Base Neutralization Reactions”, “Dissolution and Factors Affecting Solubility”, “Gas Laws”, “Factors Affecting Reaction Rate” and “Electrochemical Cells”. The sample of the study conducted according to a case study consisted of 97 third-year students enrolled in Department of Science Teaching Programme in Faculty of Education in Giresun University. As the data collection tool, twotier Chemistry Concept Tests (CCTs) developed by Karslı (2011) was used in this study. The results obtained from CCTs’ data indicated that the prospective science teachers have various alternative conceptions about the chemistry concepts also reported in the literature and not mentioned in the literature. Within this research, possible causes of the alternative concepts determined in this study discussed, and some recommendations are presented for the elimination of these alternative concepts

Keywords

Alternative conceptions prospective science teachers chemistry issues

References

  • Abdullah, A. & Scaife, J. (1997). Using interviews to assess children’s understanding of science concept. School Science Review, 78(285), 79-84.
  • Abraham, M.R., Gryzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, A.E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
  • Akgün, A. (2009). The relation between science student teachers’ misconceptions about solution, dissolution, difusion and their atitudes toward science with their achievement. Education and Science, 34(154), 26-36.
  • Ayas, A. & Demirbaş, A. (1997). Turkish secondary students’ conception of introductory chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 518-521.
  • Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Çalık, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165-184.
  • Bak, Z., Yaman, F. & Ayas, A. (2008). Identifying chemistry students’ understanding about gases through concept mapping, XXIII CESE Conference, July, Athens.
  • Bar, V. & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 363-382.
  • Birinci Konur, K. & Ayas, A. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının gazlarda sıcaklık-hacim-basınç ilişkisini anlama seviyeleri. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 128-142.
  • Blanco, A. & Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils’ views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: a cross-age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303-315.
  • Boz, Y. (2009). Turkish prospective chemistry teachers' alternative conceptions about acids and bases. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 109(4), 212-222.
  • Çakmakçı, G. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among turkish secondary and undergraduate students. PhD Thesis. The University of Leeds, UK.
  • Çakmakçı, G., Leach, J. & Donelly, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795-1815.
  • Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı). Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.
  • Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Kimyadaki bazı yaygın yanlış kavramalar. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 135-146.
  • Canpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T. & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ misconceptions of vaporization and vapor pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1237-1242.
  • Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teacher college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83, 511-526.
  • Chou, C. Y. (2002). Science teachers’ understanding of concepts in chemistry. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 12(2), 73-78.
  • Coştu, B. & Ayas, A. (2005). Evaporation in different liquids: secondary students’ conceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 75-97.
  • Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Niaz, M., Ünal, S. & Çalık, M. (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of boiling concept. Journal of Science Education Technology, 16, 524-536.
  • Coştu, B., Karataş, F.Ö. & Ayas, A. (2003). Kavram öğretiminde çalışma yapraklarının kullanılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 33-48.
  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005a). 7-10. sınıf öğrencilerinin seçilen çözelti kavramlariyla ilgili anlamalarının farklı karışımlar üzerinde incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 329-347.
  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005b). A cross-age study on the understanding of chemical solution and their components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30-41.
  • Çalık, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671-696.
  • Çalık, M. (2006). Bütünleştirici öğrenme kuramına göre lise 1 çözeltiler konusunda materyal geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ünal, S. (2006). Çözünme kavramıyla ilgili öğrenci kavramalarının tespiti: bir yaşlar arası karşılaştırma çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 309-322.
  • Çalık, M., Kolomuç, A. & Karagölge, Z. (2010). The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 422-433.
  • Demerouti, M., Kousathana, M. & Tsaparlis, G. (2004). Acid-base equilibria: part I, upper secondary students, misconceptions and difficulties. The Chemical Educator, 9, 122- 131.
  • Demircioğlu, G., Ayas, A. & Demircioğlu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 6(1), 36-51.
  • Demircioğlu, G., Özmen, H. & Ayas, A. (2004). Some concepts misconceptions encountered in chemistry: a research on acid and base. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 73-80.
  • Drechsler, M. & Van Driel, J. (2008). Experienced teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching acid–base chemistry. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 611-631.
  • Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, L.G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: a phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. & Gaskell, P.J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry, Science Education, 79(1), 1-17.
  • Fensham, P.J. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education, International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 346-356.
  • Finley, F.N., Stewart, J. & Yarroch, W.L. (1982). Teachers' perceptions of ımportant and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531-538.
  • Fishbane, P. M., Gasiorowicz, S. & Thornton, S. T. (2003). Temel fizik, Cilt II, Çeviri: C. Yalçın, Arkadaş Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Furio-Mas, C., Calatayud, L.M., Guisasola, J. & Furio-Gomez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and theories of acid base reactions presented? chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1337-1358.
  • Garnett, P. L. & Treagust D. F. (1992a). Conceptual Difficulties by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and Oxidation-Reduction Equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121-142.
  • Garnett, P.L. & Treagust, D.F. (1992b). Conceptua1 Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Ga1vanic) and Electrolytic Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099
  • Gonzalez, F.M. (1997). Diagnosis of Spanish Primary School Students’ Common Alternative Science Concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 68-74.
  • Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade–12 Students' Misconceptions Relating To Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
  • Hackling, M. W. & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of Chemical Equilibrium. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214.
  • Haidar, A. H. & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A Comparison of Applied and Theoretical Knowledge of Concept Based on the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
  • Hand, B.M. & Treagust, D.F. (1988). Application of a Conceptual Conflict Strategy to Enhance Student Learning of Acids and Bases. Research in Science Education, 18, 53-63.
  • Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1994), “First-Year University Students’ Understanding of Photosynthesis”, Their Study Strategies and Learning Context. The American Biology Teacher, 56(5), 274-279.
  • Hwang, B.T. & Hwang, H.W. (1990). A Study of Cognitive Development of the Concepts of Solution, Research Report, Taipei, Republic of China: National Science Council.
  • Kabapınar, F., Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2004). The Design and Evaluation of a Teaching-Learning Sequence Addressing the Solubility Concept with Turkish Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 635-652.
  • Kalın, B. & Arıkıl, G. (2010). Misconceptions Possessed by Undergraduate Students about the Topic “Solutions”. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 4(2), 177-206.
  • Karslı, F. (2011). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerini Geliştirmesinde ve Kavramsal Değişim Sağlamasında Zenginleştirilmiş Laboratuar Rehber Materyallerinin Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Karslı, F. & Çalık, M. (2012). Can Freshman Science Student Teachers’ Alternative Conceptions of ‘Electrochemical Cells’ Be Fully Diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(12), 485-491.
  • Kautz, C.H., Heron, P.R.L., Loverude, M.E. & McDermott, L.C. (2005). Student Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law, Part 1: A Macroscopic Perspective. American Journal of Physics, 73(11), 1055-1063.
  • Kolomuç, A. & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.
  • Kolomuç, A. (2009). 11.Sınıf Kimyasal Reaksiyonların Hızları Ünitesinin 5E Modeline Göre Animasyon Destekli Öğretimi. Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Koray, Ö., Akyaz, N. & Köksal, M.S. (2007). Lise Öğrencilerinin “Çözünürlük” Konusunda Günlük Yaşamla İlgili Olaylarda Gözlenen Kavram Yanılgıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 241-250.
  • Liew, C.W. & Treagust, D.F. (1998), “The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Diagnosing Students’ Understanding of Science and in Identifying Their Levels of Achievement”, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
  • Lin, H., Cheng, H. & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The Assessment of Students and Teachers' Understanding of Gas Laws. Journal of Chemistry Education, 77(2), 235-238.
  • Marek, E.A. (1986). They Misunderstand, But They’ll Pass. The Science Teacher, 32-35.
  • Maskill, R. & Cachapuz, A.F.C. (1989). Learning about The Chemistry Topic of Equilibrium: The Use of Word Association Tests to Detect Developing Conceptualizations, International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 57-69.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. & Krajcik, J.S. (1994). Influence of Levels of Information as Presented by Different Technologies on Students’ Understanding of Acid, Base, and pH Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1077-1096.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1994). Students Models of Matter in the Context of Acid–Base Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 495-499.
  • Nakiboğlu, C., Benlikaya, R. & Kalın, Ş. (2002). Kimya Öğretmen Adaylarının Kimyasal Kinetik ile İlgili Yanlış Kavramalarının Belirlenmesinde V-Diyagramının Kullanılması, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Eylül, Ankara.
  • Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A. & Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances, and Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Atomic Structure, Science Education, 86, 505-525.
  • Ogude, A.N. & Bradley, J.D. (1994). Ionic Conduction and Electrical Neutrality in Operating Electrochemical Cells, Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 29-34.
  • Osborne, R.J. & Cosgrove, M.M. (1983). Children’s Conceptions of the Changes of State of Water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825-838.
  • Özden, M. (2009). Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Solution Chemistry, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(2), 69-78.
  • Özkaya, A.R. (2002). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Prospective Teachers in Electrochemistry: Half-Cell Potential, Cell Potential, and Chemical and Electrochemical Equilibrium in Galvanic Cells, Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 735-738.
  • Paik, S.H., Kim, H.N., Cho, B.K. & Park, J.W. (2004). K-8th Grade Korean Students’ ‘Conceptions of Changes of State’ and ‘Conditions for Changes of State’. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 207-224.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students Understanding of Solutions Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Chemistry Education, 80(11), 1328-1332.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. (2002). Çözünürlük ile İlgili Kavramların Anlaşılmasında Kavramsal Değişim Yaklaşımının Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. (2007). Turkish Undergraduate Students’ Misconceptions on Acids and Bases. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 23-34.
  • Prieto, T., Blanco, A. & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The Ideas of 11 to 14-Year-Old Students About The Nature of Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463.
  • Ross, B.H.B. & Munby, H. (1991). Concept Mapping and Misconceptions: A Study of HighSchool Students' Understandings of Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11-23.
  • Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe T.J. (1999). An Ana1ysis of College Chemistry Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic and Concentration Cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(6), 853-860.
  • Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997). Students' Misconceptions in E1ectrochemistry: Current Flow in Electro1ytc Solutions and the Salt Bridge, Research. Science & Education, 7(74), 819-823.
  • Schmidt, H.J., Marohn, A. & Harrison, A.G. (2007). Factors That Prevent Learning in Electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 258-283.
  • Sheppard, K. (2006). High School Students' Understanding of Titrations and Related Acid-Base Phenomena. Chemisty Education: Research and Practice, 7, 32-45.
  • Smith, J.K. & Metz, P.A. (1996), “Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry Through Microscopic Representations”. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 233- 235.
  • Stavy, R. (1988). Children’s Conception of Gas. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 553-560.
  • Sun, Y.C. (2009). Using a Two-Tier Test in Examining Taiwan Graduate Students’ Perspectives on Paraphrasing Strategies. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 10, 399-408.
  • Şahin, Ç. & Çepni, S. (2011). “Yüzme- Batma, Kaldırma Kuvveti ve Basınç” Kavramları ile İlgili İki Aşamalı Kavramsal Yapılardaki Farklılaşmayı Belirleme Testi Geliştirilmesi, Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8(1), 79-110.
  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlilik. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Taştan, Ö., Yalçınkaya, E. & Boz, Y. (2010). Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Ideas About Reaction Mechanism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 47-60.
  • Tezcan, H. & Bilgin, E. (2004). Liselerde Çözünürlük Konusunun Öğretimde Laboratuvar Yönteminin ve Bazı Faktörlerin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkileri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 175-191.
  • Treagust, D.F. & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2007). The Taiwan National Science Concept Learning Study in an International Perspective. Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 391-403.
  • Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’ Misconceptions in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159- 169.
  • Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students’ Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 626-631.
  • Tytler, R. (2000). A Comparison of Year 1 and Year 6 Students’ Conceptions of Evaporation and Condensation: Dimensions of Conceptual Progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447- 467.
  • Uzuntiryaki, E. & Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of Conceptual Change Approach Accompanied With Concept Mapping on Understanding of Solution Concepts. Instructional Science, 33(3), 11-19.
  • Uzuntiryaki, E. (1998). Effect of Conceptual Change Approach Accompanied with Concept Mapping on Understanding of Solution. Doktora Tezi, O.D.T.Ü., Ankara.
  • Ünal, S. & Coştu, B. (2005). Problematic Issue for Students: Does It Sink or Float? Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6, 1, 3.
  • Valanides, N. (2000). Primary Students Teachers’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter and Its Transformations During Dissolving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249-262.
  • Varelas, M., Pappas, C.C. & Rife, A. (2006). Exploring the Role of Intertextuality in Concept Construction: Urban Second Graders Make Sense of Evaporation, Boiling and Condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 637-666.
  • White, R.T., & Gunstone, R.F. (1992). Probing understanding. London; New York: Falmer Press.
  • Yıldırım A. & Şimşek H. (2008) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7. Baskı) Ankara Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, A., Erdem, E. & Morgil, İ. (2002). Students' Misconceptions Concerning Electrochemistry. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 234-242.
  • Zoller, U. (1990). Students’ Misunderstandings and Misconceptions in College Freshman Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053-1065.

Fen Bilgisi Ögretmen Adaylarının Kimya Konularında Sahip Oldukları Alternatif Kavramlar

Year 2013, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 284 - 313, 01.12.2013

Fethiye Karslı Alipaşa Ayas

https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed211

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının “Buharlaşma ve Kaynama”, “Reaksiyon Hızına Etki Eden Faktörler”, “Asit-Baz Nötrleşme Reaksiyonları”, “Çözünme ve Çözünürlüğe Etki Eden Faktörler”, “Gaz Yasaları” ve “Elektrokimyasal Piller” konu başlıklarındaki kavramlarında sahip oldukları alternatif kavramlarını belirlemektir. Özel durum çalışmasına uygun olarak yürütülen bu araştırmanın örneklemi, Giresun Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Fen Bilgisi Öğretmenliği Programında öğrenim gören toplam 97 üçüncü sınıf öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Karslı (2011) tarafından geliştirilen iki aşamalı kimya kavram testi (KİKAT) kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının araştırma kapsamında ele alınan konularda literatürde rapor edilen alternatif kavramların yanı sıra literatürde rastlanmayan alternatif kavramlara da sahip oldukları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında tespit edilen alternatif kavramların olası nedenleri tartışılarak, bu alternatif kavramlarının giderilmesine yönelik bazı öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Anahtar Kavramlar: Alternatif kavramlar fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları kimya konuları

References

  • Abdullah, A. & Scaife, J. (1997). Using interviews to assess children’s understanding of science concept. School Science Review, 78(285), 79-84.
  • Abraham, M.R., Gryzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, A.E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
  • Akgün, A. (2009). The relation between science student teachers’ misconceptions about solution, dissolution, difusion and their atitudes toward science with their achievement. Education and Science, 34(154), 26-36.
  • Ayas, A. & Demirbaş, A. (1997). Turkish secondary students’ conception of introductory chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 518-521.
  • Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Çalık, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165-184.
  • Bak, Z., Yaman, F. & Ayas, A. (2008). Identifying chemistry students’ understanding about gases through concept mapping, XXIII CESE Conference, July, Athens.
  • Bar, V. & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 363-382.
  • Birinci Konur, K. & Ayas, A. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının gazlarda sıcaklık-hacim-basınç ilişkisini anlama seviyeleri. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(3), 128-142.
  • Blanco, A. & Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils’ views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: a cross-age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303-315.
  • Boz, Y. (2009). Turkish prospective chemistry teachers' alternative conceptions about acids and bases. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 109(4), 212-222.
  • Çakmakçı, G. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among turkish secondary and undergraduate students. PhD Thesis. The University of Leeds, UK.
  • Çakmakçı, G., Leach, J. & Donelly, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795-1815.
  • Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı). Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.
  • Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Kimyadaki bazı yaygın yanlış kavramalar. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 135-146.
  • Canpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T. & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ misconceptions of vaporization and vapor pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1237-1242.
  • Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teacher college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83, 511-526.
  • Chou, C. Y. (2002). Science teachers’ understanding of concepts in chemistry. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 12(2), 73-78.
  • Coştu, B. & Ayas, A. (2005). Evaporation in different liquids: secondary students’ conceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 75-97.
  • Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Niaz, M., Ünal, S. & Çalık, M. (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of boiling concept. Journal of Science Education Technology, 16, 524-536.
  • Coştu, B., Karataş, F.Ö. & Ayas, A. (2003). Kavram öğretiminde çalışma yapraklarının kullanılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 33-48.
  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005a). 7-10. sınıf öğrencilerinin seçilen çözelti kavramlariyla ilgili anlamalarının farklı karışımlar üzerinde incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 329-347.
  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005b). A cross-age study on the understanding of chemical solution and their components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30-41.
  • Çalık, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671-696.
  • Çalık, M. (2006). Bütünleştirici öğrenme kuramına göre lise 1 çözeltiler konusunda materyal geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Çalık, M., Ayas, A. & Ünal, S. (2006). Çözünme kavramıyla ilgili öğrenci kavramalarının tespiti: bir yaşlar arası karşılaştırma çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 309-322.
  • Çalık, M., Kolomuç, A. & Karagölge, Z. (2010). The effect of conceptual change pedagogy on students’ conceptions of rate of reaction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 422-433.
  • Demerouti, M., Kousathana, M. & Tsaparlis, G. (2004). Acid-base equilibria: part I, upper secondary students, misconceptions and difficulties. The Chemical Educator, 9, 122- 131.
  • Demircioğlu, G., Ayas, A. & Demircioğlu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 6(1), 36-51.
  • Demircioğlu, G., Özmen, H. & Ayas, A. (2004). Some concepts misconceptions encountered in chemistry: a research on acid and base. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 73-80.
  • Drechsler, M. & Van Driel, J. (2008). Experienced teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching acid–base chemistry. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 611-631.
  • Driver, R. & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. & Erickson, L.G. (1996). Chemistry students’ conception of solubility: a phenomenograpy. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201.
  • Ebenezer, J.V. & Gaskell, P.J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry, Science Education, 79(1), 1-17.
  • Fensham, P.J. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education, International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 346-356.
  • Finley, F.N., Stewart, J. & Yarroch, W.L. (1982). Teachers' perceptions of ımportant and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531-538.
  • Fishbane, P. M., Gasiorowicz, S. & Thornton, S. T. (2003). Temel fizik, Cilt II, Çeviri: C. Yalçın, Arkadaş Yayınevi, Ankara.
  • Furio-Mas, C., Calatayud, L.M., Guisasola, J. & Furio-Gomez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and theories of acid base reactions presented? chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1337-1358.
  • Garnett, P. L. & Treagust D. F. (1992a). Conceptual Difficulties by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electric Circuits and Oxidation-Reduction Equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121-142.
  • Garnett, P.L. & Treagust, D.F. (1992b). Conceptua1 Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Ga1vanic) and Electrolytic Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099
  • Gonzalez, F.M. (1997). Diagnosis of Spanish Primary School Students’ Common Alternative Science Concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 68-74.
  • Griffiths, A.K. & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade–12 Students' Misconceptions Relating To Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628.
  • Hackling, M. W. & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of Chemical Equilibrium. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214.
  • Haidar, A. H. & Abraham, M. R. (1991). A Comparison of Applied and Theoretical Knowledge of Concept Based on the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
  • Hand, B.M. & Treagust, D.F. (1988). Application of a Conceptual Conflict Strategy to Enhance Student Learning of Acids and Bases. Research in Science Education, 18, 53-63.
  • Hazel, E. & Prosser, M. (1994), “First-Year University Students’ Understanding of Photosynthesis”, Their Study Strategies and Learning Context. The American Biology Teacher, 56(5), 274-279.
  • Hwang, B.T. & Hwang, H.W. (1990). A Study of Cognitive Development of the Concepts of Solution, Research Report, Taipei, Republic of China: National Science Council.
  • Kabapınar, F., Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2004). The Design and Evaluation of a Teaching-Learning Sequence Addressing the Solubility Concept with Turkish Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 635-652.
  • Kalın, B. & Arıkıl, G. (2010). Misconceptions Possessed by Undergraduate Students about the Topic “Solutions”. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 4(2), 177-206.
  • Karslı, F. (2011). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerini Geliştirmesinde ve Kavramsal Değişim Sağlamasında Zenginleştirilmiş Laboratuar Rehber Materyallerinin Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
  • Karslı, F. & Çalık, M. (2012). Can Freshman Science Student Teachers’ Alternative Conceptions of ‘Electrochemical Cells’ Be Fully Diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 23(12), 485-491.
  • Kautz, C.H., Heron, P.R.L., Loverude, M.E. & McDermott, L.C. (2005). Student Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law, Part 1: A Macroscopic Perspective. American Journal of Physics, 73(11), 1055-1063.
  • Kolomuç, A. & Tekin, S. (2011). Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions Concerning Concept of Chemical Reaction Rate. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 3(2), 84-101.
  • Kolomuç, A. (2009). 11.Sınıf Kimyasal Reaksiyonların Hızları Ünitesinin 5E Modeline Göre Animasyon Destekli Öğretimi. Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Koray, Ö., Akyaz, N. & Köksal, M.S. (2007). Lise Öğrencilerinin “Çözünürlük” Konusunda Günlük Yaşamla İlgili Olaylarda Gözlenen Kavram Yanılgıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 241-250.
  • Liew, C.W. & Treagust, D.F. (1998), “The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Diagnosing Students’ Understanding of Science and in Identifying Their Levels of Achievement”, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
  • Lin, H., Cheng, H. & Lawrenz, F. (2000). The Assessment of Students and Teachers' Understanding of Gas Laws. Journal of Chemistry Education, 77(2), 235-238.
  • Marek, E.A. (1986). They Misunderstand, But They’ll Pass. The Science Teacher, 32-35.
  • Maskill, R. & Cachapuz, A.F.C. (1989). Learning about The Chemistry Topic of Equilibrium: The Use of Word Association Tests to Detect Developing Conceptualizations, International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 57-69.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. & Krajcik, J.S. (1994). Influence of Levels of Information as Presented by Different Technologies on Students’ Understanding of Acid, Base, and pH Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1077-1096.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry: Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1994). Students Models of Matter in the Context of Acid–Base Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 495-499.
  • Nakiboğlu, C., Benlikaya, R. & Kalın, Ş. (2002). Kimya Öğretmen Adaylarının Kimyasal Kinetik ile İlgili Yanlış Kavramalarının Belirlenmesinde V-Diyagramının Kullanılması, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Eylül, Ankara.
  • Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A. & Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, Contradictions, Resistances, and Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Atomic Structure, Science Education, 86, 505-525.
  • Ogude, A.N. & Bradley, J.D. (1994). Ionic Conduction and Electrical Neutrality in Operating Electrochemical Cells, Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 29-34.
  • Osborne, R.J. & Cosgrove, M.M. (1983). Children’s Conceptions of the Changes of State of Water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825-838.
  • Özden, M. (2009). Prospective Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Solution Chemistry, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(2), 69-78.
  • Özkaya, A.R. (2002). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Prospective Teachers in Electrochemistry: Half-Cell Potential, Cell Potential, and Chemical and Electrochemical Equilibrium in Galvanic Cells, Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 735-738.
  • Paik, S.H., Kim, H.N., Cho, B.K. & Park, J.W. (2004). K-8th Grade Korean Students’ ‘Conceptions of Changes of State’ and ‘Conditions for Changes of State’. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 207-224.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students Understanding of Solutions Chemistry Concepts. Journal of Chemistry Education, 80(11), 1328-1332.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. (2002). Çözünürlük ile İlgili Kavramların Anlaşılmasında Kavramsal Değişim Yaklaşımının Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  • Pınarbaşı, T. (2007). Turkish Undergraduate Students’ Misconceptions on Acids and Bases. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 23-34.
  • Prieto, T., Blanco, A. & Rodriguez, A. (1989). The Ideas of 11 to 14-Year-Old Students About The Nature of Solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463.
  • Ross, B.H.B. & Munby, H. (1991). Concept Mapping and Misconceptions: A Study of HighSchool Students' Understandings of Acids and Bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11-23.
  • Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe T.J. (1999). An Ana1ysis of College Chemistry Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry: Galvanic, Electrolytic and Concentration Cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(6), 853-860.
  • Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe, T.J. (1997). Students' Misconceptions in E1ectrochemistry: Current Flow in Electro1ytc Solutions and the Salt Bridge, Research. Science & Education, 7(74), 819-823.
  • Schmidt, H.J., Marohn, A. & Harrison, A.G. (2007). Factors That Prevent Learning in Electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 258-283.
  • Sheppard, K. (2006). High School Students' Understanding of Titrations and Related Acid-Base Phenomena. Chemisty Education: Research and Practice, 7, 32-45.
  • Smith, J.K. & Metz, P.A. (1996), “Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry Through Microscopic Representations”. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(3), 233- 235.
  • Stavy, R. (1988). Children’s Conception of Gas. International Journal of Science Education, 10(5), 553-560.
  • Sun, Y.C. (2009). Using a Two-Tier Test in Examining Taiwan Graduate Students’ Perspectives on Paraphrasing Strategies. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 10, 399-408.
  • Şahin, Ç. & Çepni, S. (2011). “Yüzme- Batma, Kaldırma Kuvveti ve Basınç” Kavramları ile İlgili İki Aşamalı Kavramsal Yapılardaki Farklılaşmayı Belirleme Testi Geliştirilmesi, Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 8(1), 79-110.
  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlilik. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Taştan, Ö., Yalçınkaya, E. & Boz, Y. (2010). Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Ideas About Reaction Mechanism. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 47-60.
  • Tezcan, H. & Bilgin, E. (2004). Liselerde Çözünürlük Konusunun Öğretimde Laboratuvar Yönteminin ve Bazı Faktörlerin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkileri. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 175-191.
  • Treagust, D.F. & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2007). The Taiwan National Science Concept Learning Study in an International Perspective. Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 391-403.
  • Treagust, D.F. (1988). Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students’ Misconceptions in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159- 169.
  • Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument and Assess Students’ Understanding in Chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 626-631.
  • Tytler, R. (2000). A Comparison of Year 1 and Year 6 Students’ Conceptions of Evaporation and Condensation: Dimensions of Conceptual Progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447- 467.
  • Uzuntiryaki, E. & Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of Conceptual Change Approach Accompanied With Concept Mapping on Understanding of Solution Concepts. Instructional Science, 33(3), 11-19.
  • Uzuntiryaki, E. (1998). Effect of Conceptual Change Approach Accompanied with Concept Mapping on Understanding of Solution. Doktora Tezi, O.D.T.Ü., Ankara.
  • Ünal, S. & Coştu, B. (2005). Problematic Issue for Students: Does It Sink or Float? Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6, 1, 3.
  • Valanides, N. (2000). Primary Students Teachers’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter and Its Transformations During Dissolving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249-262.
  • Varelas, M., Pappas, C.C. & Rife, A. (2006). Exploring the Role of Intertextuality in Concept Construction: Urban Second Graders Make Sense of Evaporation, Boiling and Condensation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 637-666.
  • White, R.T., & Gunstone, R.F. (1992). Probing understanding. London; New York: Falmer Press.
  • Yıldırım A. & Şimşek H. (2008) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7. Baskı) Ankara Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, A., Erdem, E. & Morgil, İ. (2002). Students' Misconceptions Concerning Electrochemistry. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 234-242.
  • Zoller, U. (1990). Students’ Misunderstandings and Misconceptions in College Freshman Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1053-1065.
There are 97 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Fethiye Karslı This is me

Alipaşa Ayas This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2013
Submission Date January 2, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karslı, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). Fen Bilgisi Ögretmen Adaylarının Kimya Konularında Sahip Oldukları Alternatif Kavramlar. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 284-313. https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed211