Tasarım Tabanlı Öğrenme ile Öğretmen Adaylarının Teknolojik Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin (TPACK) Geliştirilmesi: Fink Taksonomisi Temelli Bir Çalışma

Year 2023, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 174 - 210, 30.06.2023

Okan Durusoy , Aysen Karamete

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1262115

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, öğretim sürecinde tasarım tabanlı öğrenme (Learning by Design - LBD) çerçevesi kullanılarak öğretmen adaylarının teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgilerinin (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge -TPACK) geliştirilmesi amaçlamıştır. 19 öğretmen adayı, 12 haftalık bir öğretim ve veri toplama sürecine katılarak 10 farklı öğretim materyali oluşturmuştur. TPACK ve TPACK özgüven seviyeleri, ölçeklerden elde edilen nicel veriler ve görüşmelerden elde edilen nitel veriler kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. LBD-TPACK öğretim süreci sonunda elde edilen öğrenme çıktılarının anlamlı öğrenme çıktıları olup olmadığını belirlemek için görüşme verileri Fink Taksonomisi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, öğretmen adaylarının TPACK puanlarının ve TPACK özgüven puanlarının öğretim sürecinden sonra arttığını göstermiştir (α=0.05, p=0.00). Sonuçların nitel verilerle desteklendiği ve öğretmen adaylarının anlamlı öğrenme çıktılarına sahip oldukları görülmüştür. Gelecekteki benzer çalışmaların; TPACK gelişimine yönelik etkinliklerin öğretmen eğitimi faaliyetlerine etkin entegrasyonunu sağlamak adına farklı öğretmenlik alanları ve daha büyük çalışma grupları ile yürütülmeleri doğrultusunda önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Öğretmen yetiştirme, TPACK, tasarım tabanlı öğrenme, fink taksonomisi, öğretim materyali

Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through the Learning by Design Framework: A Fink Taxonomy-based Study

Abstract

This study aimed to develop Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through the use of the Learning by Design (LBD) framework in a teaching process for pre-service teachers. During a 12-week period that included both teaching and data collection, 19 pre-service teachers produced 10 unique instructional materials. TPACK levels and self-confidence were assessed using scales and qualitative data from interviews, with the Fink Taxonomy used to analyze the interviews and determine the significance of the LBD-TPACK teaching process in terms of learning outcomes. The results showed a significant increase in pre-service teachers’ TPACK scores and TPACK self-confidence scores after the teaching process (α=0.05, p=0.00). Qualitative data supported these findings, demonstrating that pre-service teachers had achieved significant learning outcomes by the end of the process. It is recommended that conducting comparable research across diverse teaching fields and larger sample sizes would lead to more robust and generalizable findings.

Keywords

Teacher training, TPACK, learning by design, fink taxonomy, instructional material

References

• Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
• Abell, S. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041.
• Agyei, D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers, through collabarative design teams. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547-564. https://www.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.827.
• Alayyar, G. (2011). Developing pre-service teacher competencies for ICT integration through design teams. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. University Library/University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036532341
• Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemprorary Research, 5(6), 68-72. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
• Artz, A., & Armour–Thomas, E. (1999). A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 211-235. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003871918392
• Aygün, B., Uzun, N., & Atasoy, E. (2016). The examination of teacher candidates’ level of proficiency in technopedagogical education. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 393-416. https://www.doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v7i2.132
• Bahçekapılı, T. (2011). Experiences from Collaboration between Information Technologies Teacher and Classroom Teacher Candidates Orientated by the Technology-Supported Instruction (Publication No. 276456) [Master’s thesis, Karadeniz Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=veR1mHu9yoWjwcVUjCEoPNXvApwMoc2jhUyttAn60CoyELNpDAEBWexS4T6pTLZS
• Baran, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian Journal of of Educational Technology, 3(32), 47-63. https://www.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Company.
• Byker, E. (2014). Needing TPACK without knowing it: Integrating educational technology in social studies. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9, 106-117. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2014-B0008.
• Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. (2012). The pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and their self-efficacy (Publication No. 317187) [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=RYan9_S-Z7Eir3xdWGXBiJ5xDhL4oqWu-zymnrZ16CqTmYJeNR8j2FwUk2-Wm7V4
• Cavin, R. M. (2007). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teachers through microteaching lesson study [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. Diginole: Florida State University's Digital Repository. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4017
• Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2010). Facilitating pre-service teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.4.63
• Chai, C., Koh, J., & Tsai, C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 31-51. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=2bc25418cd1c160ea3b8c76157f9222a4d2d9436#page=36
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Dikkartın Övez, F., & Akyüz, G. (2013). Modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge constructs of preservice elementary mathematics teachers. Education and Science, 38, 170. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2156
• Erdoğan, N. (2014). Pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge developmentin a computer-assisted mathematics instruction course (Publication No. 361942) [Master's thesis, Boğaziçi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=gyLHMouPes-CvnhRcjQsKauFU0uoNhPzfLLRePSy_G4AppC4ZHXsdl1KK6QckqXH
• Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier of in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30221207
• Figg, C. & Jaipal, K. (2009). Unpacking TPACK: TPK Characteristics Supporting Successful Implementation. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4069-4073). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31295/.
• Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses, revised and updated. Jossey-Bass.
• Fink, L. D. (2007). The power of course design to increase student engagement and learning. Peer Review, 9(1), 13-17. http://nur655sect2jan12teama.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/51066806/ThePowerofCourseDesigntoIncrease.pdf
• Golas, J. (2010). Effective teacher preparation programs: Bridging the gap between educational technology availability and its utilization. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 6(1), 16-18. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effective-teacher-preparation-programs-bridging/docview/208895918/se-2
• Graham, C., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St. Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends. Special Issue on TPACK, 53(5), 70-79. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
• Habowski, T., & Mouza, C. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of a secondary science teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 471-495. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114605/
• Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. https://pirun.ku.ac.th/~btun/papert/design.pdf
• Hur, J., Cullen, T., & Brush, T. (2010). Teaching for application: A model for assisting pre-service teachers with technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 161-182. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ896293
• Jang, S., & Chen, K. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y
• Johnson, L. (2012). The effect of design teams on pre-service teachers’ technology integration. [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. Syracuse University Libraries. https://surface.syr.edu/idde_etd/58
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 K-12 edition. The New Media Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559369.pdf
• Kafyulilo, A., Fisser , P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzania: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381-399. https://www.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1240
• Karataş, İ., Pişkin Tunç, M., Demiray, E., & Yılmaz, N. (2016). The development of pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics education. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(2), 512-533. https://www.doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2016.16.2-5000194940
• Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional Technologies and Material Development]. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2005.10784518
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch, 32(2), 131-152. https://www.doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In J. Colbert, K. Boyd, K. Clark, S. Guan, J. Harris, M. Kelly, & A. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 1-29). Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315759630
• Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://citejournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/v9i1general1.pdf
• Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book (pp. 2-7). Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. http://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Koehler_et_al_2013.pdf
• Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Bouck, E., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T., & Wolf, L. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st Century Teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 146-163. https://www.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2011.042646
• Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/14636/
• Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, & technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
• Koh, J., & Chai, C. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers and Education, 70, 222- 232. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017
• Koh, J., & Divaharan, H. (2011). Developing pre-service teachers' technology integration expertise through the TPACK-developing instructional model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35-58. https://www.doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.1.c
• Koh, J., & Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 233-247. https://www.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.97
• Kolodner, J. L., (2002). Facilitating the Learning of Design Practices: Lessons Learned from an Inquiry into Science Education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3). https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v39n3/kolodner.html
• Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S. & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547, https://www.doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
• Kurt, G., Mishra, P., & Kocoglu, Z. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge development of Turkish pre-service teachers of English. InSociety for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 5073-5077). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/48937/
• Larkin, K., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2012). TPACK and pre-service teacher mathematics education: Defining a signature pedagogy for mathematics education using ICT and based on the metaphor “mathematics is a language”. Computers in the Schools, 29(2-1), 207-226. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.651424
• Lee, C., & Kim, C. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437- 460. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8
• Lu, L. (2014). Learning by design: Technology preparation for "digital native" pre-service teachers. [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. Syracuse University Library. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/124
• Lu, L., Johnson, L., Tolley, L., Gilliard-Cook, T. & Lei, J. (2011). Learning by Design: TPACK in Action. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.). Proceedings of SITE 2011-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, USA (pp. 4388-4395). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/37022/.
• Maeng, J., Mulvey, B., Smetana, L., & Bell, R. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 838- 857. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.0068
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, USA. http://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Mishra_Koehler_AERA_2008.pdf
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for school? No way! Using the TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7), 14-18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ839143.pdf
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K., Newby, T., & Ertmer, P. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55, 1321-1335. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
• Öztürk, G., Karamete, A., & Çetin, G. (2020). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ cognitive flexibility levels and techno-pedagogical education competencies. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 40-53. https://www.doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.623668
• Öztürk, G., Karamete, A., Çetin, G., & Korkusuz, M. E. (2022). The web 2.0 workshop for the teacher candidates: A mixed method research. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 15(1), 38-51, https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.15.1.4
• Polly, D. (2011). Teachers’ learning while constructing technologybased instructional resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 950–961. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x
• Polly, D., & Orrill, C. (2016). Designing professional development to support teachers’ TPACK in elementary school mathematics. In M. Herring, M. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://www.doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328
• Rama, R. C. (2013). Incorporating Fink's significant learning experience model in the re-designing of the flagship accounting course. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 13(5), 116-124. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/GuttikondaRR_Web13_5_.pdf
• Robinson, C. (2009). Lessons on learning. Journal for Quality & Participation 32(1), 25-27. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/lessons-on-learning/docview/219151908/se-2
• Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
• Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
• Stanny, C. (2016). Reevaluating Bloom’s taxonomy: What measurable verbs can and cannot say about student learning. Education Sciences, 6(4), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6040037
• Timur, B., & Taşar, M. (2011). The adaptation of the technological pedagogical content knowledge confidence survey into Turkish. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 839-856. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/issue/24242/257006
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2011). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009