Fertilite Sağlığı Bilgi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 173 - 180, 14.07.2022

Adem Sümen , Gamze Teskereci

https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.987505

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma Fertilite Sağlığı Bilgi Ölçeği’nin (FSBÖ) Türk kültürüne uyarlayarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğini test etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma metodolojik tipte gerçekleştirilmiş olup araştırma kapsamına bir Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesinin hemşirelik bölümünde okuyan toplam 265 öğrenci alınmıştır. FSBÖ’nin psikometrik özelliklerini tespit etmek için kapsam geçerliği, yapı geçerliği, iç tutarlık güvenirliği ve madde analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: FSBÖ ölçeği 30 maddeden oluşmakta olup uygulanan açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucuna göre tek faktörlü yapısının varyansın %43.03’ünü açıkladığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca madde faktör yükleri de 0.328 ile 0.834 arasında sıralanmaktadır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucu ölçeğin uyum iyiliği değerleri χ2/sd=2.262, RMSEA=0.069, GFI=0.846, AGFI=0.801, CFI=0.923 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ölçeğin cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı 0.949 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda, FSBÖ’nün Türk toplumuna özgü kullanılabilmek üzere geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçek, fertilite sağlığı ilgili risk faktörleri hakkındaki bilgileri değerlendirmek için klinik uygulamada ve araştırmalarda kullanılabilir.

Keywords

Fertilite, Bilgi, Ölçek, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik, Psikometri

The Turkish Adaptation of Fertility Health Knowledge Survey: The Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted in order to test the validity and reliability of the Fertility Health Knowledge Survey (FHKS) by adapting it to Turkish culture. Materials and Methods: This methodological research was performed with a total of 265 students studying in the nursing department of a Health Sciences Faculty. The content validity, structure validity, internal consistency reliability and item analysis methods were used to determine the psychometric properties of FHKS. Results: The FSBS scale consists of 30 items and according to the results of the exploratory factor analysis, it was seen that its single factor structure explained 43.03% of the variance. In addition, item factor loads were found to range between 0.328 to 0.834. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale were calculated as χ2/sd=2.262, RMSEA=0.069, GFI=0.846, AGFI=0.801, CFI=0.923. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.949. Conclusion: As a result of the research, it has been determined that the FSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used specifically for Turkish society. The scale can be used in clinical practice and research to assess knowledge about fertility health-related risk factors.

Keywords

Fertility, Knowledge, Scale, Validity, Reliability, Psychometrics

References

• Bala, R., Singh, V., Rajender, S., & Singh, K. (2021). Environment, lifestyle, and female infertility. Reproductive Sciences, 28(3), 617-638.
• Barron, M. L., Lithgow, D., Wade, G., & Mueller-Luckey, G. (2020). Measuring Fertility Health Knowledge in University Students: Development and Testing of a Survey Tool. Journal of Nursing Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnm-d-18-00060
• Blake, D., Smith, D., Bargiacchi, A., France, M., & Gudex, G. (1997). Fertility awareness in women attending a fertility clinic. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(3), 350-352.
• Bunting, L., & Boivin, J. (2008). Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people. Human Reproduction, 23(8), 1858-1864.
• Bunting, L., Tsibulsky, I., & Boivin, J. (2013). Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International Fertility Decision-making Study. Human Reproduction, 28(2), 385-397.
• Chan, C. H. Y., Chan, T. H. Y., Peterson, B. D., Lampic, C., & Tam, M. Y. J. (2015). Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples. Human Reproduction, 30(2), 364-372.
• Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 196-205.
• Daniluk, J. C., Koert, E., & Cheung, A. (2012). Childless women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted human reproduction: identifying the gaps. Fertility and Sterility, 97(2), 420-426.
• Daniluk, J. C., & Koert, E. (2013). The other side of the fertility coin: a comparison of childless men’s and women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 99(3), 839-846.
• Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197.
• Delbaere, I., Verbiest, S., & Tydén, T. (2020). Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125(2), 167-174.
• Ekelin, M., Åkesson, C., Ångerud, M., & Kvist, L. J. (2012). Swedish high school students' knowledge and attitudes regarding fertility and family building. Reproductive Health, 9(1), 1-8.
• Emokpae, M. A., & Brown, S. I. (2021). Effects of lifestyle factors on fertility: practical recommendations for modification. Reproduction and Fertility, 2(1), R13-R26.
• Güngör, I., Rathfisch, G., Kizilkaya Beji, N., Yarar, M., & Karamanoglu, F. (2013). Risk‐taking behaviours and beliefs about fertility in university students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(23-24), 3418-3427.
• Hampton, K. D., Mazza, D., & Newton, J. M. (2013). Fertility‐awareness knowledge, attitudes, and practices of women seeking fertility assistance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(5), 1076-1084.
• Heywood, W., Pitts, M. K., Patrick, K., & Mitchell, A. (2016). Fertility knowledge and intentions to have children in a national study of Australian secondary school students. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 40(5), 462-467.
• International Test Commission (ITN). (2018). Guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134.
• Kumar, S., Thaker, R., Verma, V., Gor, M., Agarwal, R., & Mishra, V. (2018). Occupational, environmental exposure, and lifestyle factors: declining male reproductive health. Journal of Gynecology and Infertility, 1(1), 1-29.
• Küçükkaya, B., Süt, H. K., Koyunoğlu, Y., Meral, K. A. Y. A., & Yonğaç, C. (2018). Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Fertiliteyi Etkileyen Faktörlere İlişkin Bilgi ve Tutumları. Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi, 1(1), 52-64.
• Leisegang, K., & Dutta, S. (2021). Do lifestyle practices impede male fertility?. Andrologia, 53(1), e13595.
• Nouri, K., Huber, D., Walch, K., Promberger, R., Buerkle, B., Ott, J., & Tempfer, C. B. (2014). Fertility awareness among medical and non-medical students: a case-control study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 12(1), 1-9.
• Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 19(1), 12-21.
• Peterson, B. D., Pirritano, M., Tucker, L., & Lampic, C. (2012). Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Human Reproduction, 27(5), 1375-1382.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Reio Jr, T. G., & Shuck, B. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis: implications for theory, research, and practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(1), 12-25.
• Sharma, R., Biedenharn, K. R., Fedor, J. M., & Agarwal, A. (2013). Lifestyle factors and reproductive health: taking control of your fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 11(1), 1-15.
• Vassard, D., Lallemant, C., Nyboe Andersen, A., Macklon, N., & Schmidt, L. (2016). A population-based survey on family intentions and fertility awareness in women and men in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 121(4), 244-251.
• Virtala, A., Vilska, S., Huttunen, T., & Kunttu, K. (2011). Childbearing, the desire to have children, and awareness about the impact of age on female fertility among Finnish university students. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 16(2), 108-115.
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
• Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.