COVID-19 Sonrası Aşı Tereddütü ve Reddi Olan Ebeveynlerin Tutumları

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 673 - 681, 25.12.2024

Hülya Karataş , Abdullah Solmaz , Murat Bektaş , Filiz Solmaz , Fatma Bozdağ

https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1476237

Abstract

Aşı tereddütü, aşı hizmetinin varlığına veya belirli aşıların reddedilmesine rağmen aşının kabulünde gecikmedir. Bu araştırma, aşı tereddütü olan ve aşıyı reddeden ebeveynlerin COVID-19 sonrası aşıya yönelik tutumlarını ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu kesitsel araştırma, 2019 ve 2020 yıllarında yaşanan COVID-19 salgını sırasında aşıyla ilgili sağlık kayıtları aracılığıyla iletişime geçilen, çocuklarına aşı yaptırmayan veya çocuklarının aşılarını tamamlamayı reddeden 147 ebeveyn ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler Tanımlayıcı Özellikler Anket Formu ve Aşı Tereddütü Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Ebeveynlerin %71.4’ü bir ya da birkaç aşıdan sonra çocuklarına aşı yaptırmama kararı aldıklarını ifade ettiler. Araştırmada, ebeveynlerin %23.8'inin COVID-19 sonrasında aşıya yönelik tutumları olumlu yönde değişti. Ebeveynlerin anne veya baba olmasının, eğitim durumunun ve çocuk sayısının Aşı Tereddüt Ölçeği puanını anlamlı düzeyde etkilediği belirlenmiştir (p<0.05). Sonuç: Aşı tereddütü şu kişilerde daha yüksekti: eğitim düzeyi daha yüksek olan ebeveynler, daha az çocuğu olan ebeveynlerde ve birkaç aşıdan sonra çocuklarına karşı tereddüt yaşayan ebeveynlerde.

Keywords

Çocuk, COVID-19, Ebeveyn, Bağışıklama, Aşı Reddi.

Attitudes of Parents with Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal After COVID-19

Abstract

Objective: Vaccine hesitancy is a delay in vaccine acceptance despite the presence of vaccine service or rejection of specific vaccines. This study was conducted to determine the attitudes of parents with vaccine hesitancy and vaccine rejection toward vaccine after COVID-19 and the affecting factors. Materials and Methods: The present cross sectional study was conducted with 147 parents, who were contacted through vaccine-related health records, had not gotten their children vaccinated or refused to complete the vaccination of their children during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 and 2020. Data were collected using the Descriptive Characteristics Questionnaire and the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. Results: Of the parents, 71.4% stated that they had made the decision of not getting their children vaccinated after one vaccine or a few vaccines. In the study, attitudes toward vaccine had changed positively in 23.8% of the parents after COVID-19. It was determined that the parents’ being mother or father, educational status and number of children significantly affected the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale score (p<0.05). Conclusion: Vaccine hesitancy was higher among: parents with higher level of education, parents with fewer children and parents had experienced hesitancy for their children after a few vaccines.

Keywords

Child, COVID-19, Parent, Immunization, Vaccine Hesitancy.

References

• Agac, G., & Baki, B. (2016). Use Of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques İn The Health Sector: A Literature Review. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration, 19(3).
• Altan, S., Ediz, A., & Kağızman, M. A. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Wind Power Plants ın Balıkesir Province With The ENTROPY-Based MAUT Method. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University Faculty Of Economics And Administrative Sciences Journal, 23 (3), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.999774
• Aydın Yuksekdağ, F. (2019). Evaluation of occupational health and safety problems in a private hospital using the analytic hierarchy process method. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration, 22(2), 319-340.
• Bulut, A., Unal, E., & Sengul, H. (2020). Evaluation of occupational health and safety practices in a public hospital. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration, 23(1), 1-22.
• Caruso C C. (2014). Negative ımpacts of shiftwork andlong work hours. Rehabilitation Nursing Journal, 39(1), 16–25. (https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.107)
• Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2017). Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(2),187-202. (https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2016.1234363)
• Guner, H. (2005). Fuzzy AHP and its application to the supplier selection problem for a business, Pamukkale University Institute of Science, Industrial Engineering Department, Master Thesis.
• Gurer, A., & Gemlik, H. N. (2020). A Qualitative study on the problems experienced by healthcare workers in the field during the Covid-19 pandemic process and solution suggestions. Journal of Health Services and Education, 4(2), 45-52. (https://doi.org/10.29228/JOHSE.3)
• Gurer, A. (2018). Employee safety in health services. Journal of Health Services and Education, 2(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.26567/JOHSE.2018142107
• Ho, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, (186), 211-228.
• Law on Occupational Health and Safety. June (2012) T.R. Official Gazette, 28339. Access Address: (https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/).
• Workplace Hazard Class Notification on Occupational Health and Safety (2012). Access Address: (resmigazete.gov.tr)
• Joınt Commıssıon Internatıonal Accredıtatıon Standards For Hospıtals, (2011). January; 4th Edition, Effective (1), 193-195. Karaatlı, M. (2016). An ıntegrated approach with entropy-grey relational analysis methods: application in the tourism sector. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 63-77.
• Karagiannidis A., Papageorgiou A., Perkoulidis G., Sanida G. and Samaras P. (2010). A multi-criteria assessment of scenarios on thermal processing of ınfectious hospital wastes: a case study for central Macedonia. Waste Management 30(2), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.015
• Kocoglu, S. (2019). Risk Assessment in emergency services with ENTROPI-Based TOPSIS and MAUT methods: Samsun Province Example, Master Thesis, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Institute of Social Sciences, Bolu.
• Konuskan, O. and Uygun, O. (2014). Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MAUT) Method And Its Application. Academic Platform, 1403-1412.
• Kucukonder, H. and Demı̇rarslan, P. (2017). A Study on Comparison of PROMETHEE and MAUT Methods: The Black Sea Region Example”, Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8 (16), 203-228.
• Liu, C. (2010). Exploring digital capital measures of hospital service websites from the user's perspective. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 10(4), 333-342. Meydanlıoglu A. (2013). Health and safety of healthcare workers. Balıkesir Journal of Health Sciences, 2 (3), 192-199.
• Ozbek, A. (2017). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Problem Solving with Excel. Seçkin Publishing, Ankara.
• Ozkan, O. and Emiroglu, N. (2006). Occupational health and safety services for hospital health workers. Journal of Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing, (10), 43-50.
• Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process- what ıt ıs and how ıt ıs used. Mathl Modellin, 9 (3-5), 161-176.
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process”, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.
• Saaty, T.L., Niemira, M.P., (2006). A framework for making a better decision, Research Review, 13(1) Sacak, R., Gur, Ş., & Eren, T. (2019). AHP and DEMATEL analysis of applications of the internet of things in businesses with methods. Nevşehir Science and Technology Journal, 8(2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.565761
• Saygun A. (2017). Occupational health and safety problems of health workers in Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Public Health Special 3(3), 153-163.
• Solmaz, M. & Solmaz, T. (2017). Occupational health and safety in hospitals. Gumushane University Journal of Health Sciences, 6 (3), 147-156.
• Supciller, A. & Çapraz, O. (2011). Supplier selection application based on AHP-TOPSIS Method. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, (13), 1-22.
• Zhang, H., Gu, C., Gu, L. ve Zhang, Y. (2011) “The Evaluation of Tourism Destination Competitiveness By Topsıs & Information Entropy A Case In The Yangtze River Delta Of China” Tourism Management, 32: 443-451.
• Tsai H., Chang C. and Lin H. (2010). Fuzzy hierarchy sensitive with delphi method to evaluate hospital organization performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5533-5541.
• Tuzuner, v. & Özaslan, b. (2010). A Research on The Evaluation of Occupational Health and Safety Practices in hospitals. Journal Of Istanbul University Faculty of Business, 40 (2), 138-154.