Yonga Levha Üretiminde Motorlu Testere Talaşı Kullanımının Bazı Levha Özelliklerine Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmada motorlu testere ile ağaç kesiminde meydana gelen talaşların yonga levha üretimine uygunluğu ve levha özelliklerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Hammadde olarak sahil çamı, kayın ve dişbudak odunlarından elde edilen motorlu testere talaşı (MTT) ile endüstriyel odun yongaları (EY) kullanılmıştır. Deney levhaları üre formaldehit tutkalı ile 3 tabaklı olarak üretilmiştir. Elde edilen levhaların fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri standart yonga levha özellikleriyle karşılaştırılarak motorlu testere talaşının yonga levha üretimine uygunluğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre MTT yongaların yonga levha üretiminde kullanılabileceği ve fiziksel ve mekanik özelliklerin genel amaçlı kullanımlara uygun olduğu değerlendirilmiştir. Deney levhaların mekanik özelliklerinden en yüksek yüzeye dik çekme direnci (IB) 0,51 N/mm2 ile EY kontrol levha grubunda, en yüksek eğilme direnci (BS)12.84 N/mm2 olarak MTT kontrol grubu levhalarında elde edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Motorlu testere talaşı
• üre formaldehit tutkalı
• yonga levha
• fiziksel ve mekanik özellikler

Effect of Chainsaw Chips Use on Some Panel Properties in Particleboard Production

Abstract

In this study, the feasibility of using chainsaw dust in particleboard production was investigated. Chainsaw dust chips were used as raw material, obtained from the maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) , beech (Fagus orientalis) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior) woods. Test boards were produced with three layers with urea formaldehyde resin. The physical and mechanical properties of the boards produced were compared with standard particleboard values and the suitability of chainsaw dust for particleboard production was determined. The results indicate that the highest internal bond strength was observed in the industrial chip control group as 0.51 N/mm2 and the maximum bending strength was found in chainsaw control group as 12.84 N/mm2. When the test results are evaluated, using chainsaw chips were found suitable for the production of general purpose particleboard in terms of physical and mechanical properties.

Keywords

• Chainsaw dust
• urea formaldehyde glue
• particle board
• physical and mechanical properties

References

1. 1. Akgul, M., Camlibel, O. (2008). Manufacture of medium density fiberboard (MDF) panels from rhododendron (R. ponticum L.) biomass. Building and Environment, 43(4), 438-443.
2. 2. Alma, M. H., Kalaycioglu, H., Bektas, A., Tutus, A. (2005). Properties of cotton carpel-based particleboards. Industrial Crops and Products, 22(2), 141-149.
3. 3. Arslan, M. B. (2008). Surface Chemical Properties of Forest and Agriculture Residue Based Composites Investigated, Msc. Theses, Suleyman Demirel University, Graduate School of Applied and Naturel Sciences, (Turkish, Abstract in English), 91p.
4. 4. ASTM D1037 (2006). American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual book of ASTM standards. 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 1999.
5. 5. Bardak, S., Nemli, G., Sari, B., Baharoglu, M., Zekovic, E. (2010). Manufacture and properties of particleboard composite from waste sanding dusts. High Temperature Materials and Processes, 29(3), 159-168.
6. 6. Baskaran, M., Azmi, N. A. C. H., Hashim, R., Sulaiman, O. (2017). Properties of binderless particleboard and particleboard with addition of urea formaldehyde made from oil palm trunk waste. Journal of Physical Science, 28(3), 151-159.
7. 7. Cai, Z., Wu, Q., Lee, J. N., Hiziroglu, S. (2004). Influence of board density, mat construction, and chip type on performance of particleboard made from eastern redcedar. Forest Products Journal, 54(12), 226-232.
8. 8. Ciannamea, E. M., Stefani, P. M, Ruseckaite, R. A. (2010). Medium-density particleboards from modified rice husks and soybean protein concentrate-based adhesives. Bioresource Technology, 101(2), 818-825.

9. 9. Clausen, C. A. (2000). CCA removal from treated wood using a dual remediation process. Waste Management & Research, 18(5), 485-488.
10. 10. Çöpur, Y., Güler, C., Akgül, M., Taşçıoğlu, C. (2007). Some chemical properties of hazelnut husk and its suitability for particleboard production. Building and Environment, 42(7), 2568-2572.
11. 11. Dos Santos, M. F. N., Rosane Ap G, B., Bezerra, B. S., Varum, H. S. (2014). Comparative study of the life cycle assessment of particleboards made of residues from sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum spp.) and pine wood shavings (Pinus elliottii). Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 345-355.
12. 12. El-Mously, H. I., Megahed, M. M., Rakha, M. M. (1999). Investigation of the possibility of use of cotton stalks in particleboard manufacture. Sci. Bull. Fac. Eng. Ain Shams Univ. ISSN, 1110-1385.
13. 13. El-Mously, H., El-Morshedy, M. M., Megahed, M. M., El-Hai, Y. A. (1993). Evaluation of particleboard made of palm leaves midribs as compared with flax board. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Production Engineering and Design for Development, Cairo, Egypt (pp. 27-29).
14. 14. Eroğlu, H., İstek, A., Roy, T. K., Kibblewhite, R. P. (2000). Medium density fibreboard (MDF) manufacturing from wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.). Inpaper Int, 4, 11-14.
15. 15. Eroğlu, H., İstek, A., Usta, M. (2001). Buğday saplarından (Triticum aestivum L.) ve saman-odun karışımı liflerden orta yoğunlukta lif levha (MDF) üretimi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 305-311.
16. 16. Filiz, M., Usta, P., Şahin, H.T. (2011). Evaluation of some technical properties obtained from the participleboard with melamine urea formaldehyde glue, red pine and tea waste. Süleyman Demirel University, Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 15(2), 88-93.
17. 17. Fiorelli, J., Curtolo, D. D., Barrero, N. G., Savastano Jr., H., Pallone, E. M. A., Johnson, R. (2012). Particulate composite based on coconut fiber and castor oil polyurethane adhesive: An eco-efficient product, Industrial Crops and Products V. 40, p 69-75.
18. 18. Grigoriou, A., Passialis, C., Voulgaridis, E. (2000). Experimental particleboards from kenaf plantations grown in Greece. Holz als Roh – und Werkstoff , 58(5), 309-314.
19. 19. Güler, C., Büyüksarı, Ü. (2011). Effect of production parameters on the physical and mechanical properties of particleboards made from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) hull. BioResources, 6(4), 5027-5036.
20. 20. Güler, C., Özen, R. (2004). Some properties of particleboards made from cotton stalks (Gossypium hirsitum L.),” Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 62(1), 40-43.
21. 21. Güler, C., Bektas, I., Kalaycıoglu, H. (2006). The experimental particleboard manufacture from sunflower stalks (Helianthus annuus L.) and calabrian pine (Pinus brutia ten.). Forest Products Journal, 56(4), 56-60.
22. 22. Güler, C., İbiş, M. (2018). Yongalevha üretiminde hammadde kaynaklarının optimizasyonu ve teknolojik yönden incelenmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 6(4), 808-817.
23. 23. Güler, G., Beram, A. (2018). Investigation of physical, mechanical and surface roughness properties of particleboards produced from chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) stalks. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 20(2), 216-222.
24. 24. Güler, G., Yaşar, S. (2018). Investigation of some chemical properties of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) wood and its use in the particleboard production. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 20(2), 184-193.
25. 25. Güntekin, E., Karakus, B. (2008). Feasibility of using eggplant (Solanum melongena) stalks in the production of experimental particleboard. Industrial Crops and Products, 27(3), 354-358.
26. 26. Güntekin, E., Üner, B., Karakus, B. (2009). Chemical composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) stalk and suitability in the particleboard production. Journal of environmental biology, 30(5), 731-734.
27. 27. Guru, M., Tekeli, M., I, Bilici. (2006). Manufacturing of urea-formaldehyde-based composite particleboard from almond shell. Materials and Design 27(10), 1148-1151.
28. 28. Halvarsson, S., Edlund, H., Norgren, M. (2008). Properties of medium-density fibreboard (MDF) based on wheat straw and melamine modified urea formaldehyde (UMF) resin. Industrial crops and products, 28(1), 37-46.
29. 29. Hashim, R., Saari, N., Sulaiman, O., Sugimoto, T., Hiziroglu, S., Sato, M., Tanaka, R. (2010). Effect of particle geometry on the properties of binderless particleboard manufactured from oil palm trunk. Materials & Design, 31(9), 4251-4257.
30. 30. Hegazy, S.S. Aref, I.M. (2010). Suitability of some fast-growing trees and date palm fronds for particleboard production. Forest Products Journal, 60(7), 599-604.
31. 31. İstek, A. (1999). Buğday Saplarından (Triticum aestivum L.) Orta Yoğunlukta Lif Levha (MDF) Üretimi. Doktora Tezi, Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Bartın, 163 s.
32. 32. İstek A., Sıradag, H., (2013). The Effect of Density on Particleboard Properties, International Caucasian Forestry Symposium, 932-938, 24-26 October 2013, Artvin, Turkey.
33. 33. İstek, A., Gözalan, M., Ozlusoylu, İ. (2017a). The effects of surface coating and painting process on particleboard properties. Journal of Kastamonu Faculty of Forestry 17(4), 619-629.
34. 34. İstek, A., Ozlusoylu, İ., Kizilkaya, A. (2017b). Turkish wood based panels’sector analysis. Journal of Bartın Faculty of Forestry 19(1), 132-138.
35. 35. Iswanto, A. H., Azhar, I., Susilowati, A. (2014). Effect of resin type, pressing temperature and time on particleboard properties made from sorghum bagasse. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(2): 62-66.
36. 36. Juliana, A. H., Paridah, M. T., Rahim, S., Azowa, I. N., Anwar, U. M. K. (2012). Properties of particleboard made from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as function of particle geometry. Materials & Design, 34, 406-411.
37. 37. Kalaycioglu, H., Deniz, I., Hiziroglu, S. (2005). Some of the properties of particleboard made from paulownia. Journal of Wood Science, 51(4), 410-414.
38. 38. Khedari, J., Nankongnab, N., Hirunlabh, J., Teekasap, S. (2004). New low-cost insulation particleboards from mixture of durian peel and coconut coir. Building and environment, 39(1), 59-65.
39. 39. Kurt, R. (2020). Determining the priorities in utilization of forest residues as biomass: an A'wot analysis. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 14(2), 315-325.
40. 40. Laemlaksakul, V. (2010). Physical and mechanical properties of particleboard from bamboo waste. World academy of science, engineering and technology, 40, 507-511
41. 41. Lin, C. J., Hiziroglu, S., Kan, S. M., Lai, H. W. (2008). Manufacturing particleboard panels from betel palm (Areca catechu Linn.). Journal of materials processing technology, 197(1-3), 445-448.
42. 42. Maloney, T. (1993). Modem Particleboard and Dry-Process Fiberboard Manufacturing. Forest Products Society, Madison: WI.
43. 43. Marashdeh, M. W., Hashim, R., Bauk, S., & Sulaiman, O. (2011). Effect of particle size on the characterization of binderless particleboard made from Rhizophora spp. Mangrove wood for use as phantom material. BioResources, 6(4), 4028-4044.
44. 44. Meinlschmidt, P., Schirp, A., Dix, B., Thole, V., Brinker, N. (2008). Agricultural Residues with Light Parenchyma Cells and Expandable Filler Materials for The Production of Lightweight Particleboards, In Proceedings of the International Panel Products Symposium, 179-188, 24th-26th September, Finland.
45. 45. Mo, X., Cheng, E., Wang, D., Sun, X. S. (2003). Physical properties of medium density wheat straw particleboard using different adhesives. Industrial Crops and Products, 18(1), 47-53.
46. 46. Mohamed, T.E. R.A. Nasser, (2008). “Effect of mixing three lignocellulosic materials on some properties of particleboard bonded with urea formaldehyde adhesive,” J. Agric. Res. Kafer El-Sheikh Univ. 34(4), 1144-1163.
47. 47. Nasser, R. A. (2012). Physical and mechanical properties of three-layer particleboard manufactured from the tree pruning of seven wood species,” World Appl. Sci. J. 19(5), 741-753.
48. 48. Nazerian, M., Beyki, Z., Gargarii, R. M., Kool, F. (2016). The effect of some technological production variables on mechanical and physical properties of particleboard manufactured from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) stalks. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, 18(1), 167-178.
49. 49. Nemli, G., Kalaycioğlu, H. (1997). An Alternative Material in Particleboard Industry: Residues of Tea Factory, Proceedings of The XI World Forestry Congress, 49, Vol: 4, Antalya, Turkey.
50. 50. Nemli, G., Kırcı, H., Serdar, B., Ay, N. (2003). Suitability of kiwi prunings for particleboard manufacturing. Industrial Crops and Products, 17(1), 39-46.
51. 51. Nemli, G., Demirel, S., Gumuskaya, E., Aslan, M., Acar, C. (2009). Feasibility of incorporating waste grass clipping (Lolium pernne L.) in particleboard composites. Waste Management, 29(13), 1129-1131.
52. 52. Nemli, G., Kalaycioglu, H., Alp, T. (2001). Suitability of date palm (Phoenix dactyliferia) branches for particleboard production. Holz Roh-Werkstoff, 59(6), 411-412.
53. 53. Ntalos, G. A., Grigoriou, A. H. (2002). Characterization and utilisation of vine prunings as a substitute for particleboard production. Industrial Crops and Products, 16(1), 59-68.
54. 54. Ortuno, T. G., Rodríguez, J. A., García, M. T. F., García, M. F. V., García, C. E. F. (2011). “Evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of particleboard made from giant reed (Arundo donax L.),” BioResources, 6(1), 477-486.
55. 55. Pan, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhang, R., Jenkins, B. M. (2007). Physical properties of thin particleboard made from saline eucalyptus. Industrial Crops and Products, 26(2), 185-194.
56. 56. Papadopoulos, A. N., Hill, C. A. S., Gkaraveli, A., Ntalos, G. A., Karastergiou, S. P. (2004). Bamboo chips (Bambusa vulgaris) as an alternative lignocellulosic raw material for particleboard manufacture. Holz als Roh – und Werkstoff, 62(1), 36-39.
57. 57. Papadopoulos, A.N., R.B. Jamie and R.B. Hague, (2003). The potential for using flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Shiv as a lignocellulosic raw material for particleboard. Industrial Crops and Products, 17(2), 143-147.
58. 58. Tansey, P. (1995). Particleboard from rice straw. Xilon International, 8(83), 43-48.
59. 59. Topbaşlı, B., Sevinçli, Y. (2017). Lavanta sapı ve muz kabuğu kullanılarak üretilen yonga levhaların karşılaştırılması. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 7(1), 47-53.
60. 60. TS EN 310 (1999). Ahşap esaslı levhalar-Eğilme dayanımı ve eğilme elastikiyet modülünün tayini, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
61. 61. TS EN 312 (2012). Yonga levhalar – Özellikler, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
62. 62. TS EN 317 (1999). Yonga levhalar ve lif levhalar-Su içerisine daldırma işleminden sonra kalınlığına şişme tayini, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
63. 63. TS EN 319 (1999). Yonga levhalar ve lif levhalar-Levha yüzeyine dik çekme dayanımının tayini, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
64. 64. TS EN 322 (1999). Ahşap esaslı levhalar-Rutubet miktarının tayini, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
65. 65. TS EN 323 (1999). Ahşap esaslı levhalar-Birim hacim ağırlığının tayini, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
66. 66. TS EN 326 (1999). Ahşap esaslı levhalar-Numune alma kesme ve muayene bölüm 1:Deney numunelerinin seçimi, kesimi ve deney sonuçlarının gösterilmesi, Türkiye Standartlar Enstitüsü (TSE), Ankara.
67. 67. Valarelli, I. D. D., Battistelle, R. A., Bueno, M. A. P., Bezerra, B. S., Campos, C. I. D., Alves, M. C. D. S. (2014). Physical and mechanical properties of particleboard bamboo waste bonded with urea formaldehyde and castor oil based adhesive. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 19(1), 1-6.
68. 68. Xu, J., Han, G., Kawai, S. (2003). Development of binderless particleboard from kenaf core using steam-injection pressing. Journal of wood science, 49(4), 327-332.
69. 69. Xu, X., Yao, F., Wu, Q., Zhou, D. (2009). “The influence of wax-sizing on dimension stability and mechanical properties of bagasse particleboard,” Industrial crops and products 29(1), 80-85.
70. 70. Youngquist, J. A. (1999). Wood-based composites and panel products, Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 1999. General technical report FPL; GTR-113: Pages 10.1-10.31, 113.