Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Entegre Havza Rehabilitasyonunda Ekonomik ve Sosyal Koşulların Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Saha Araştırması

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 196 - 204, 15.04.2019

Abstract



2000’li yıllardan
sonra yağış havzalarında doğal kaynaklarla birlikte sosyal ve ekonomik koşulların
da doğru yönetilmesi önem kazanmaya başlamıştır. Kırsal kesimde yaşayan
insanların sosyal ve ekonomik olanaklarının yüksek olması, aynı zamanda yağış
havzalarında doğal kaynaklar üzerindeki baskıyı da azaltacaktır. Bu noktadan
hareketle, bu çalışmada Denizli ili Karanfilli havzasında göç, eğitim durumu,
ulaşım-üstyapı ve altyapı olanakları, üretilen tarımsal ve hayvansal ürünler,
gelir kaynakları dağılımı gibi sosyal ve ekonomik olanaklar belirlenmiştir.
Havzada en önemli sorun göç ve insan gücü azlığıdır. Diğer yandan yem bitkileri
ve bal üretimi ile büyükbaş hayvan yetiştiriciliğinin havzada ekonomik gelir getirisi
hususunda öne çıktığı görülmektedir. 

References

  • Berhanu Y, Tesfa M, Bekele M. (2015). Assessment of Climate Variability Context and Local Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies in Halaba Special Woreda, Ethiopia, International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Protection, Volume 2(5), pp 84-93. Castro AJ, Vaughn CC, Julian JP, Garcia-Llorente M (2016). Social Demand for Ecosystem Services and Implications for Watershed Management, JAWRA, Volume 52 (1), pp. 209-221. DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12379 Cochran WG (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Copeland OL (1961). Watershed Management and Reservoir Life, Journal-American Water Works Association, Volume 53 (5), pp. 569-578.
  • Doruk İ, Bozdeveci A (2017). Denizli İlinin Kırsal Kesimlerinde Hayvansal Kaynaklı Atıklardan Biyogaz Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 7 (3), s 181-186. DOI: 10.21597/jist.2017.176.
  • Hibbard M, Senkyr L, Webb M (2015). Multifunctional Rural Regional Development: Evidence from the John Day Watershed in Oregon, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Volume 35 (1), pp. 51-62. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X14560572.
  • Kerr J (2002). Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India, World Development, Volume 30 (8) pp. 1387-1400. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00042-6.
  • Liu H, Benoit G, Liu T, Liu Y, Guo H (2015). An Integrated System Dynamics Model Developed for Managing Lake Water Quality at the Watershed Scale, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 155, pp. 11-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.046.
  • Partigöç NS (2018). Kentleşme Sürecinde Kırsal Alanların Mekansal Değişimi ve Dönüşümü: Denizli Kenti Örneği, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt 11 (1), ss. 89-98. DOI: 10.17671/gazibtd.347729.
  • Ouintas-Soriano C, Brandt JS, Running K, Baxter CV, Gibson DM, Narducci J, Castro AJ (2018). Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) analysis, Ecology and Society, Volume 23 (3): 3. DOI 10.5751/ES-10226-230303. Reddy VR, Saharawat YS, George B. (2017). Watershed Management in South Asia: A Synoptic Review, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 551, pp. 4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.043.
  • Rodriguez-Caballero E, Castro AJ, Chamizo S, Ouintas-Soriano C, Garcia-Llorente M, Canton Y, Weber B (2017). Ecosystem services provided by biocrusts: From ecosystem functions to social values, Journal of Arid Environments, In Press. DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.09.005.
  • Sanchez GM, Nejadhashemi AP, Zhang Z, Woznicki SA, Habron G, Marquart-Pyatt S, Shortridge A (2014). Development of A Socio-ecological Environmental Justice Model for Watershed-based Management, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 518, Part A, pp 162-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.014.
  • TUİK (2013). Seçilmiş Göstergelerle Denizli, Yayın No: 4198, ISSN 1307-0894,176 sayfa.
  • TUİK (2018a). İstatistiklerle Kadın, 2017, Haber Bülteni, Sayı 27594.
  • TUİK (2018b). Hayvansal Üretim İstatistikleri, 2017, Haber Bülteni, Sayı 27704.
  • URL 1 (2015). http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks.zul, Erişim Tarihi; 15.09.2016.
  • URL 2 (2016). http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp, Erişim Tarihi; 15.09.2016.
  • Yılmaz M (2015). Türkiye’de Kırsal Nüfusun Değişimi ve İllere Göre Dağılımı (1980-2012), Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, Sayı 33, ss. 161-188. DOI: 10.17295/dcd.71070.

A Field Study on Determining the Economic and Social Conditions in Integrated Watershed Rehabilitation

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 196 - 204, 15.04.2019

Abstract

After the 2000s,
the proper management of the social and economic conditions with the natural
resources in the watersheds began to gain importance. The high social and
economic conditions of the people living in rural areas will also reduce the
pressure on the natural resources in the watersheds. From this point of view,
in this study, social and economic opportunities such as migration, educational
status, transportation-superstructure and infrastructure facilities,
agricultural and animal products, distribution of income sources were
determined. The most important problem in the basin is the lack of migration
and manpower. On the other hand, it is observed that forage crops and honey
production and cattle breeding stand out in the economic income point of the
basin.


References

  • Berhanu Y, Tesfa M, Bekele M. (2015). Assessment of Climate Variability Context and Local Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies in Halaba Special Woreda, Ethiopia, International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Protection, Volume 2(5), pp 84-93. Castro AJ, Vaughn CC, Julian JP, Garcia-Llorente M (2016). Social Demand for Ecosystem Services and Implications for Watershed Management, JAWRA, Volume 52 (1), pp. 209-221. DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12379 Cochran WG (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3d ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Copeland OL (1961). Watershed Management and Reservoir Life, Journal-American Water Works Association, Volume 53 (5), pp. 569-578.
  • Doruk İ, Bozdeveci A (2017). Denizli İlinin Kırsal Kesimlerinde Hayvansal Kaynaklı Atıklardan Biyogaz Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 7 (3), s 181-186. DOI: 10.21597/jist.2017.176.
  • Hibbard M, Senkyr L, Webb M (2015). Multifunctional Rural Regional Development: Evidence from the John Day Watershed in Oregon, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Volume 35 (1), pp. 51-62. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X14560572.
  • Kerr J (2002). Watershed Development, Environmental Services, and Poverty Alleviation in India, World Development, Volume 30 (8) pp. 1387-1400. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00042-6.
  • Liu H, Benoit G, Liu T, Liu Y, Guo H (2015). An Integrated System Dynamics Model Developed for Managing Lake Water Quality at the Watershed Scale, Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 155, pp. 11-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.046.
  • Partigöç NS (2018). Kentleşme Sürecinde Kırsal Alanların Mekansal Değişimi ve Dönüşümü: Denizli Kenti Örneği, Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, Cilt 11 (1), ss. 89-98. DOI: 10.17671/gazibtd.347729.
  • Ouintas-Soriano C, Brandt JS, Running K, Baxter CV, Gibson DM, Narducci J, Castro AJ (2018). Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) analysis, Ecology and Society, Volume 23 (3): 3. DOI 10.5751/ES-10226-230303. Reddy VR, Saharawat YS, George B. (2017). Watershed Management in South Asia: A Synoptic Review, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 551, pp. 4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.043.
  • Rodriguez-Caballero E, Castro AJ, Chamizo S, Ouintas-Soriano C, Garcia-Llorente M, Canton Y, Weber B (2017). Ecosystem services provided by biocrusts: From ecosystem functions to social values, Journal of Arid Environments, In Press. DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.09.005.
  • Sanchez GM, Nejadhashemi AP, Zhang Z, Woznicki SA, Habron G, Marquart-Pyatt S, Shortridge A (2014). Development of A Socio-ecological Environmental Justice Model for Watershed-based Management, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 518, Part A, pp 162-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.014.
  • TUİK (2013). Seçilmiş Göstergelerle Denizli, Yayın No: 4198, ISSN 1307-0894,176 sayfa.
  • TUİK (2018a). İstatistiklerle Kadın, 2017, Haber Bülteni, Sayı 27594.
  • TUİK (2018b). Hayvansal Üretim İstatistikleri, 2017, Haber Bülteni, Sayı 27704.
  • URL 1 (2015). http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks.zul, Erişim Tarihi; 15.09.2016.
  • URL 2 (2016). http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp, Erişim Tarihi; 15.09.2016.
  • Yılmaz M (2015). Türkiye’de Kırsal Nüfusun Değişimi ve İllere Göre Dağılımı (1980-2012), Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, Sayı 33, ss. 161-188. DOI: 10.17295/dcd.71070.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Forest Industry Engineering
Journal Section Biodiversity, Environmental Management and Policy, Sustainable Forestry
Authors

Hüseyin Şensoy

Ahmet Şendağlı

Publication Date April 15, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 21 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Şensoy, H., & Şendağlı, A. (2019). Entegre Havza Rehabilitasyonunda Ekonomik ve Sosyal Koşulların Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Saha Araştırması. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 196-204. https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.466506


Bartin Orman Fakultesi Dergisi Editorship,

Bartin University, Faculty of Forestry, Dean Floor No:106, Agdaci District, 74100 Bartin-Turkey.

Fax: +90 (378) 223 5077, Fax: +90 (378) 223 5062,

E-mail: bofdergi@gmail.com