Conceptual Framework for a General Theory of Administrative Organizations

Year 2006, Volume: 1 Issue: 12, 149 - 168, 01.05.2006

Mehmet Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.11616/AbantSbe.187

Abstract

The opening speed of this scanned document may vary depending on your connection speed.

Keywords

-

Conceptual Framework for a General Theory of Administrative Organizations

Abstract

Makale basılı kopyadan tarandığı için açılması bağlantı hızınıza göre farklılık gösterebilir. Makaleyi bilgisayarınıza indirmeniz tavsiye edilir.

Keywords

Yönetsel davranış, motivasyon, teknoloji, teori, açık, sistem, çevre, zaman ve mekan

References

• Allport, F. H. (1933). Institutional Behavior. Chapel Hill, NC: University of
• North Carolina Press. Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and Organization. New York: Harper.
• Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the lndividnai and the Organization. New York.: Wiley.
• Ashby, W. Ross. (1958). “General. System Theory as a New Discipline,” General Systems, V. 2, pp. 347.
• Ashby, W. Ross. (1960). Design for a Brain. 2. Ed. Revised. London: Science.
• Bennis, W. (1959). “Leadership Theory and Administrative Behavior: The Problem of Authority,” Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 4, pp. 259—301.
• Bennis, W. G. (1966). Changing Organizations. New York: McGraw—11111 Book Co.
• Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. (1968). General system Theory. New York: George Brarilter.
• Bertalanffy, Ludwig V. (1956). “General System Theory,” General Systems, V. 1, pp. 140.
• Blake, R. R.. and Mouton, l. (1968). Corporate Excellence through Grid
• Organizational Development. Houston: Gulf Corporation. Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and Freedom. Chicago: Quadrangle.
• Boulding, K. F. (1956). “General System Theory: The Skeleton of Science,”
• General Systems, v. 1, pp. 11-17. Buckley, Walter. (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
• Burns, T. and Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
• Burns, Tom and Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
• Buterfield, D. A. (1968). An Integrative Approach to the Study of Leadership
• Effectiveness in Grganizations. Ann Arbor, Ml: Unpublished Dissertation, University of Michigan. Centers, R. and Bugental, D. E. (1966). “intrinsic and Extrinsic Job Motivations
• Among Different Segments of the Working Population,” Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 50, pp. 193—197. Coch, L. and J. R. P. French, Jr. (1948). “Overcoming Resistance to Change,”
• Human Relations, V. 1, n. 4, pp. 512-532. Dewey, J. and Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon.
• Dill, W. (1958). “Environment as an inşuence on Managerial Autonomy,”
• Ariministrative Quarterly, V. 2, pp. 409443.
• Durkheim, E. (1947). Bivision of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
• Emery, R. E. and Trist, E. L. (1965). “The Causal Texture of Organizational
• Environments,” Human Relations, V. 18. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern Grganizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
• Fiedler, E. F. (1967). A Theory of Leanership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hil].
• Friedlander, F. (1965). “Comparative Work Value Systems,” Personnel Psyehology, V. 18, pp. 1-20.
• Gulick, L. and Urwick, L (Eds) (1937). Papers on the Seienee at
• Administration. New York: institute of Public Administration. Haim, (1963). “Philosophy of Organizations,” in Bowennan, D. M. and Fillerup, F. M. (Eds...) Management: Qrganization and Planning, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Harvey, E. (1968). “Technology and the Structure of Organization,” American
• Sociologieal Review, V. 33, pp. 247—259. Herzberg, F., Mausner R. and Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.
• Kast F. E. and. Rosenzweig, l. E (1970). Crganization and Management. New York: McGraw-=Hill.
• Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. (1966). The Social E’syeholegy of Crganizations. New York: Wiley.
• Katz, D. and Kali-n, R. L. (1978). The Seeial Psyehoiogy of Qrganizatiens. 2. ed.
• Revised, New York: Wiley. Katzell, R. A. (1962). “Contrasting Systems of Work Organization,” American Psychologist, V. 17, pp. 102-108.
• Komhause, A. and Reid, 0. M. (1962). Mental Health of the industrial
• Workers: A Detroit Study. New York: Wiley. Laszlo, E. (1973). “System Philosophy and Human Value,” Behavioral Science, v. , pp. 250—259.
• Lawrence, P. R. and Lorseh, J. W. (1969). “Differentiation and Integration in
• Complex Organizations,” Organization and Environment Homewood. Lawrence, P. R. and Lorscli, J. W. (1967). “Differentiation and Integration in
• Complex Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, V. 12, pp. 1=14. . Leavitt, H. .1. (1951). “Some Effects of certain Communication Patterns on Group
• Performance,” Journal of Abnormal and Sociai Psychology, V. 46, pp. 38-50. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2006—1 (l2)
• Levinson, D. (1959). “Role Personality and Social Structure in the Organizational
• Setting,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Esychology, v. 58, pp. 170—181. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theorv in Social Science. New York: Harper.
• Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. and. White, R. K. (1939). “Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Social Climates,” Journal of Social Psychology, v. 10, pp. 27 l —99.
• Likert, R. (1958). “Effective Supervision: An Adaptive and Relative Process,”
• Personal Psychology, V. 11, pp. 317—352. Likert, R. (1961). New Patterns of Management. New York: MeGraw—Hiil.
• Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization. New York: McGraw—Hill.
• Maier, N. R. F. (1955). Principles of Human Relations. New York: Wiley.
• March, 1. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley&80ns.
• Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.
• Maslow, A. H. (1965). Eupsycllian Management. Homewood: Irwin—Dorsey.
• Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and Personality. 3. Edition. New York: Harper—Row.
• Massie, J. (1965). “Management Theory,” in March, .? . (Ed). The Handbook oi
• @rganizatlons. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., pp. 387—422. Mayo, E. (1933). The Human Problems or" industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw- HiliBook Co.
• Miles, R. E. (1965). “Human Relations or Human Resources,” Harvard Business Review, v. 43, pp. 148—166.
• Mill, R. E. (19653). “Human Relations or Human Resources,” Harvard Business Review, v. 34, pp. 148-163.
• Miller, J . .l . (1965b) “Living Systems: Basie Concepts,” Behavioral Science, v. 10, pp. 193=237.
• Miller, J. J. (19650). “Living Systems: Structure and Process,” Behavioral Science, v. 10, pp. 380-411.
• Miller, J. l. (1972). “Living Systems: The Organizations,” Behavioral Science, v. , pp. 1-182.
• Neff, W. S. (1968). Work and Human Behavior. New York: Atherton.
• Perrow, C. (1967). “A Framework for Comparative Organizational Analysis,”
• American Sociological Review, v. 32, pp. 194—208. Presthus, R. (1962). The Grgarıizatioüal Society. New York: Knopf.
• Pugh, D. S. (1966). “Modern Organization Theory,” Psyehoîogğeal Boâlerirı, pp, —251.
• Rice, A. K. (1968). The Enterprise end Its Environment. London: Tavistock.
• Rice, A. K. (1963). The Enterprise and 11s Environment, London: Tavistock Publications,
• Roethlisberger, F J. and Dickson, W. Managemerrr and Worker. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Scott, William G. (1961). “Organization Theory: An Overview and Appraisal”
• Academy of Managemem Journo1,pp. 7-26. Strother, G. B (1963). “Problems in the Development of a Social Science of
• Organization,” in Harold J. Leavitt (Ed.) "Ehe Social Scieriee of Organizations, ' Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice—Hall. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social Systems. New York: Free Press.
• Tannenbaum, A.. S. (1968). Control in Ürgenizaîion. NeW York: McGraw—Hill.
• Taylor, F. W. (1911). ScientiŞc Management. New York: Harper &; Row.
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Grgarıizariorr ân Action. New York: MeGraw—Hil1.
• Vroom, V. H. and Mann F. C. (1960). “Leader Authoritarianisrn and Employee
• Attitudes,” 1’ersona1 Psychology, V. 13, pp. 125440.
• Walter, Buckley. (1967). Sociology and Modern System Theory. Englewood
• Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Han, Weber, M, (1964). Organization. New Press.
• Whyte, W. R. (1948). Human Reîations in the Restaurant Industry. New York.: McGraw—Hill.
• Whyte, W. R. (1969). Organizarional Behavior. Homewood: Irwin and Dorsey.
• Whyîe, W. P. (1969). Organizaüonaâ Behavior: Theory and Application.
• Homewood: Irwin=Dorsey. Worthy, J. C. (1950). “Factors Inşuencing Employee Morale,” Harvard Business Review, v. 28.
• AİBÜ BASIMEVİ İŞLETNESİ _ 2006