Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme

Filiz Okumuş; Ali Timucin Atayoglu

doi:10.53445/batd.1758563

TR EN

Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme

Abstract

Bu makale, doğum hizmetlerinde yaşanan dönüşümün bilim felsefesi perspektifinden kuramsal olarak ele alınmasını amaçlamaktadır. Thomas S. Kuhn’un paradigma kuramı çerçevesinde geliştirilen çalışmada, doğumda hâkim olan biyomedikal yaklaşımın tarihsel gelişimi incelenmiş ve günümüzde bu paradigmada yaşanan sınırlılıklara dikkat çekilmiştir. Geleneksel teknokratik paradigma, doğumu tıbbi bir olay ve kadın bedenini kontrol edilmesi gereken bir nesne olarak konumlandırırken normal doğumdan uzaklaşma ve artan sezaryen oranları doğum hizmetlerinde bir kriz dönemine işaret etmekte ve yeni bir paradigma ihtiyacını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu derleme çalışmasında, doğum yardımına dair üç temel paradigma tanımlanarak karşılaştırılmıştır: teknokratik (biyomedikal), hümanistik (biyopsikososyal) ve natüralistik (biyopsikososyal-spiritüel) paradigma. Özellikle natüralistik paradigma içerisinde yer alan holistik ebelik yaklaşımı; doğumu yalnızca fizyolojik değil, aynı zamanda psikolojik, sosyal ve spiritüel bir deneyim olarak değerlendiren bütüncül bir bakış açısı sunmaktadır. Çalışma, doğum hizmetlerinde paradigmatik bir değişimin gerekliliğini vurgulamakta; sürekli ebe desteği, endikasyon temelli müdahale protokolleri, saygılı annelik bakımı ile geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp (GETAT) yaklaşımlarının doğum hizmetlerine entegrasyonu gibi öneriler sunmaktadır. Bu önerilerin tümü, doğumu yalnızca fizyolojik bir süreç olarak değil; aynı zamanda kadının duygusal, sosyal ve spiritüel gereksinimlerini de gözeten bir bakım deneyimi olarak ele alan holistik ebelik yaklaşımının temel ilkeleriyle örtüşmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, ebelik eğitiminin ve sağlık politikalarının holistik yaklaşım doğrultusunda yeniden yapılandırılması, doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimini destekleyecek stratejik bir adım niteliğindedir. Bununla birlikte, çalışmanın kuramsal bir derleme niteliğinde olması nedeniyle bazı yöntemsel sınırlılıkları bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, gelecekte holistik ebelik uygulamalarının etkililiğini değerlendirmek amacıyla çok merkezli, nitel ve karma yöntemli araştırmaların yürütülmesi önem arz etmektedir.

Keywords

Ebelik, holistik sağlık, maneviyat, hasta merkezli bakım, tamamlayıcı terapiler

Paradigm shift in maternity care: A theoretical review of the holistic midwifery approach

Abstract

This article aims to provide a theoretical analysis of the transformation in childbirth services from the perspective of the philosophy of science. Developed within the framework of Thomas S. Kuhn’s paradigm theory, the study examines the historical development of the dominant biomedical approach in childbirth and draws attention to its current limitations. While the traditional technocratic paradigm conceptualizes childbirth as a medical event and the female body as an object to be controlled, the increasing rates of cesarean sections and the decline in physiological birth indicate a period of crisis in childbirth services, highlighting the need for a new paradigm. In this review, three core paradigms related to childbirth assistance are identified and compared: the technocratic (biomedical), the humanistic (biopsychosocial), and the naturalistic (biopsychosocial-spiritual) paradigms. The holistic midwifery model, situated within the naturalistic paradigm, offers a comprehensive perspective that considers childbirth not only as a physiological event but also as a psychological, social, and spiritual experience. The study emphasizes the necessity of a paradigmatic shift in childbirth services and proposes recommendations such as continuous midwifery support, indication-based intervention protocols, respectful maternity care, and the integration of traditional and complementary medicine (TCM) approaches into birth services. All of these recommendations align with the fundamental principles of holistic midwifery, which frames childbirth as a care experience that attends not only to physiological but also to emotional, social, and spiritual needs of women. In this context, restructuring midwifery education and healthcare policies in line with the holistic approach constitutes a strategic step toward supporting a paradigm shift in childbirth services. However, due to the theoretical and narrative nature of this review, it is subject to certain methodological limitations. Therefore, future research should include multi-center, qualitative, and mixed-method studies to evaluate the effectiveness of holistic midwifery practices.

Keywords

Midwifery, holistic health, spirituality, patient-centered care, complementary therapies

References

Adams, M. S. (2024). The Anarchist and the Technocrat: Herbert Read, C. P. Snow, and the Future of Britain. Journal of British Studies, 63(2), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2023.110
‘Aini, Q. (2024). Application of the Conceptual Model of Holistic Midwifery Services to Pregnant Women in Independent Practicing Midwives in Purwakarta Regency. Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports, 5(1), 580-583. https://doi.org/10.37275/amcr.v5i1.474
Akın, Ö., & Erbil, N. (2023). Determination of fear of childbirth in pregnant women: A systematic review of randomized controlled studies. Karya Journal of Health Science, 4(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.52831/kjhs.1166887
Aktaş, S., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2016). Ebenin empatik iletişim becerisinin doğum eylemine ve doğum sonrası döneme etkisi. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 19, 38-45. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunihem/issue/27667/291652
Al-Gailani, S. (2017). ‘Drawing aside the curtain’: Natural childbirth on screen in 1950s Britain. The British Journal for the History of Science, 50(3), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087417000607
Al-Gailani, S. (2018). Hospital Birth. İçinde L. Kassell, N. Hopwood, & R. Flemming (Ed.), Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day (ss. 553-566). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107705647.046
Armstrong, D. (1986). The Problem of the Whole-Person in Holistic Medicine. Holistic Medicine, 1(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561828609038116
Avcı, N., & Kaya, G. (2021). The relationship of learned resourcefulness with self-leadership skills: A study with nurse and midwife students. Nurse Education Today, 107, 105125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105125
Avşar, M., & Ünalan, Ö. (2024). Anadolu Halk Hekimliğinde Kadının Yeri ve Kadın Ocaklar. Folklor Akademi Dergisi, 7(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.55666/folklor.1558134
AWHONN. (2022). Respectful Maternity Care Framework and Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 51(2), e3-e54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2022.01.001

Aydın, R., Kızılkaya, T., Hancıoğlu Aytaç, S., & Taşlar, N. (2020). COVID-19 Pandemisinde; gebelik, doğum ve doğum sonu dönemde kadınların sosyal destek gereksinimi ve ebelik yaklaşımları. Journal of Turkish Studies, 15(4), 679-690. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44489
Baran, G. K., Kızıltepe, K., & Ustun, Y. (2025). Ebe Polikliniği” Hizmet Modeli: Türkiye Başkentinden İyi Klinik Uygulama Örneği. Sağlık Profesyonelleri Araştırma Dergisi, 7(2), 110-129. https://doi.org/10.57224/jhpr.1625061
Borrell-Carrió, F., Suchman, A. L., & Epstein, R. M. (2004). The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 576-582. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.245
Buckley, S. J. (2015). Executive Summary of Hormonal Physiology of Childbearing: Evidence and Implications for Women, Babies, and Maternity Care. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 24(3), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.24.3.145
Bülez, A., Turfan, E. Ç., & Soğukpınar, N. (2019). Evaluation of the effect of hypnobirthing education during antenatal period on fear of childbirth. The European Research Journal, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.371102
Crowther, S. A., Hall, J., Balabanoff, D., Baranowska, B., Kay, L., Menage, D., & Fry, J. (2021). Spirituality and childbirth: An international virtual co-operative inquiry. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 34(2), e135-e145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.02.004
Davis, D., Kurz, E., Hooper, M.-E., Atchan, M., Spiller, S., Blackburn, J., Bushell, M., Lewis, V., Leung, M., Samarawickrema, I., & Knight-Agarwal, C. (2024). The holistic maternity care needs of women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review with thematic synthesis. Women and Birth: Journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 37(1), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.08.005
Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 75 Suppl 1, S5–S23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11742639/
de Souza, K. C. R., da Silva, T. P. R., Damasceno, A. K. C., Manzo, B. F., Souza, K. V., Filipe, M. M. L., Matozinhos, F. P. (2021). Coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions: an analysis based on the grade of membership. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 21(1), 618. PMID: 34503471; PMCID: PMC8431849. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04092-x
Demirci, A. D., Kochan, M., & Kabukcuoglu, K. (2023). Effect of antenatal education on childbirth self-efficacy: A systematic-review and meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 42(14), 11367-11377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02418-8
Dick-Read, G. (2006). Childbirth Without Fear. Pollinger in Print. https://cdn.bookey.app/files/pdf/book/en/childbirth-without-fear.pdf
Dişsiz, M., Demirgöz Bal, M., Karaçam Yılmaz, Z. D., Bayrı Bingöl, F., & Aşcı, Ö. (2025). Development and psychometric properties of the Respectful Maternity Care Scale (RMCS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 43(3), 602-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2270690
Drife, J. (2002). The start of life: A history of obstetrics. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 78(919), 311-315. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.919.311
Duberstein, Z. T., Brunner, J., Panisch, L. S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Irvine, C., Macri, J. A., Pressman, E., Thornburg, L. L., Poleshuck, E., Bell, K., Best, M., Barrett, E., Miller, R. K., & O’Connor, T. G. (2021). The Biopsychosocial Model and Perinatal Health Care: Determinants of Perinatal Care in a Community Sample. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 746803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.746803
Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(5), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.5.535
Erdemir, A. D. (2022). Hipokrat’ın tıp tarihindeki yeri ve bazı sonuçlar. Anadolu Tıbbı Dergisi, 1(1), 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/anadolutibbi/issue/73485/1208084
Esbjorn-Hargens, S. (2009). Integral Ecology: Uniting Multiple Perspectives on the Natural World. Integral Books.
Fontein-Kuipers, Y., de Groot, R., & van Staa, A. (2018). Woman-centered care 2.0: Bringing the concept into focus. European Journal of Midwifery, 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/91492
Gaskin, I. M. (2002). Spiritual Midwifery. Book Publishing Company.
Goldberg, L. (2002). Rethinking the birthing body: Cartesian dualism and perinatal nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(5), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02111.x
Goyal, M. R., & Chauhan, A. (2024). Holistic Approach of Nutrients and Traditional Natural Medicines for Human Health: A Review. Future Integrative Medicine, 3(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.14218/FIM.2023.00089
Gueguen, J., Huas, C., Orri, M., & Falissard, B. (2021). Hypnosis for labour and childbirth: A meta-integration of qualitative and quantitative studies. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 43, 101380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101380
Güneş, B. (2003). Paradigma kavramı ışığında bilimsel devrimlerin yapısı ve bilim savaşları: Cephelerdeki fizikçilerden Thomas S. Kuhn ve Alan D. Sokal. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26133/275257#article_cite
Hall, H. G., Griffiths, D. L., & McKenna, L. G. (2013). Holistic Pregnancy Care: Aligning Complementary and Alternative Medicine With Midwifery Practice. International Journal of Childbirth, 3(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.3.2.98
Hofmeyr, G. J., Vogel, J. P., Cuthbert, A., & Singata, M. (2017). Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3(3), CD006067. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006067.pub3
Ilgaz, S. (2025). Türkiye’de doğum şekline ilişkin stratejik plan ve hedeflerin gerçekleşme düzeyine ilişkin bir araştırma. İşletme Akademisi Dergisi, 6(2), 57-70. https://www.isakder.org/index.php/isakder/article/view/152
Kartal, Y. A., & Aksoy, T. (2021). Tarihten günümüze ebelik eğitimi ve mesleğine kısa bir bakış. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 30(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.738508
Kızılca Çakaloz, D., Demir, R., Çoban, A., & Taşpınar, A. (2023). Evaluation of Midwives’ Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care in Aydın, Turkey. Journal of Religion and Health, 62(5), 3285-3300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01457-6
Kitzinger, S. (2000). Some cultural perspectives of birth. British Journal of Midwifery, 8(12), 746-750. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2000.8.12.8037
Kleisiaris, C. F., Sfakianakis, C., & Papathanasiou, I. V. (2014). Health care practices in ancient Greece: The Hippocratic ideal. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 7, 6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4263393/
Kuhn, T. S. (1994). The structure of scientific revolutions (2. ed., enlarged, 21. print). Univ. of Chicago Press. https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/Stanford/CS477/papers/Kuhn-SSR-2ndEd.pdf
Levett, K. M., Smith, C. A., Bensoussan, A., & Dahlen, H. G. (2016). The Complementary Therapies for Labour and Birth Study making sense of labour and birth—Experiences of women, partners and midwives of a complementary medicine antenatal education course. Midwifery, 40, 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.011
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 416 pp., International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438-439.
Loudon, I. (1988). Maternal Mortality: 1880–1950. Some Regional and International Comparisons. Social History of Medicine, 1(2), 183-228. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/1.2.183
Martis, R., Emilia, O., Nurdiati, D. S., & Brown, J. (2017). Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2(2), CD008680. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn’s impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88(1), 90-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10111
McEwen, B. S., Nasca, C., & Gray, J. D. (2016). Stress Effects on Neuronal Structure: Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.171
McKinnon, K. (2020). Introduction: Assembling Birth. Içinde K. McKinnon (Ed.), Birthing Work: The Collective Labour of Childbirth (ss. 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0010-7_1
Najafi, T. F., Roudsari, R. L., & Ebrahimipour, H. (2017). A historical review of the concept of labor support in technocratic, humanistic and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Electronic Physician, 9(10), 5446-5451. https://doi.org/10.19082/5446
Ochichi, P. (2023). An application of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the field of social Development: A review of literature. Journal of Philosophy and Religion (JPR), 2(1), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.51317/jpr.v2i1.414
Orman, T. F. (2016). “Paradigm” as a Central Concept in Thomas Kuhn’s Thought. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(10). https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_10_October_2016/8.pdf
Özcan, E., & Akdemir, A. (2023). S-092 Bakımda gelişen bir paradigma: Saygılı annelik bakımı. Kadın Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi, 9(Özel Sayı 1), 56-61. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kashed/issue/77253/1299189
Parry, N. J., Catling, C., & Cummins, A. M. (2025). Giving a voice to early career midwives who desire to work in midwifery continuity of care: A co-designed approach. Women and Birth, 38(5), 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101958
Patterson, E. F. (1998). The philosophy and physics of holistic health care: Spiritual healing as a workable interpretation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27(2), 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00533.x
Prihantini, T. (2024). Analysis of the Implementation of Holistic-Based Midwifery Care in Primary Level Health Services at Plered Health Center, Purwakarta Regency, Indonesia. Archives of The Medicine and Case Reports, 5(1), 629-632. https://doi.org/10.37275/amcr.v5i1.484
Roberti di Sarsina, P., & Tassinari, M. (2015). Person-centred healthcare and medicine paradigm: İt’s time to clarify. The EPMA Journal, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13167-015-0033-3
Ross, L. (1995). The spiritual dimension: Its importance to patients’ health, well-being and quality of life and its implications for nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 32(5), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(95)00007-k
Saad, M., de Medeiros, R., & Mosini, A. C. (2017). Are We Ready for a True Biopsychosocial–Spiritual Model? The Many Meanings of “Spiritual”. Medicines, 4(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4040079
Sina, A. (2021). Yazıtlar ışığında Anadolulu kadın hekimler ve ebeler. Ankara Anadolu ve Rumeli Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.53838/ankarad.997809
Steffek, J. (2021). Technocratic internationalism. İçinde J. Steffek (Ed.), International Organization as Technocratic Utopia (ss. 15-36). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845573.003.0002
Stewardson, A., & Pittet, D. (2011). 150 years since “The etiology, concept, and prophylasix of childbed fever”. BMC Proceedings, 5(Suppl 6), O61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-O61
Şanlı, D., & Platin, N. (2015). Biyomedikal modelin hemşireliğe etkisi. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 897-908. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3224/1553
Şimşek, H. N., Demirci, H., & Bolsoy, N. (2018). Sosyal destek sistemleri ve ebelik. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 97-113. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/duzcesbed/issue/37762/338959
Toker, E., & Kömürcü, N. (2017). Effect of Turkish classical music on prenatal anxiety and satisfaction: A randomized controlled trial in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 30, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2016.11.005
Topdemir, H. G. (2002). Kuhn ve bilimsel devrimlerim yapısı üzerine bir değerlendirme. Felsefe Dünyası, 2(36). https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/felsefedunyasi/issue/63936/967650
Uçar, T., & Gölbaşı, Z. (2015). Nedenleri ve sonuçlarıyla doğum korkusu. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 54-58. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/annhealthscires/issue/65343/1006808
Uğurlu, M., & Döner, Ş. İ. (2024). Hydrotherapy During Labor and Birth in Water: A Review of Current Researches. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(3), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.52369/togusagbilderg.1430962
Üste, A. N., & Kaynak, H. (2022). Examining the effects of chronic pain on memory processes within the framework of the biopsychosocial model. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 249-260. https://doi.org/10.13114/MJH.2022.586
Van Denend, J., Ford, K., Berg, P., Edens, E. L., & Cooke, J. (2022). The Body, the Mind, and the Spirit: Including the Spiritual Domain in Mental Health Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(5), 3571-3588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-022-01609-2
Vermette, D., & Doolittle, B. (2022). What Educators Can Learn from the Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model of Patient Care: Time for Holistic Medical Education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(8), 2062-2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07491-8
WHO. (2018). WHO recommendations: İntrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215
Wilber, K. (2004). Her Şeyin Teorisi (N. Nirven, Çev.). Dharma Yayınları.
Yildiz, H. (2019). Pozitif Doğum Deneyimi İçin İntrapartum Bakım Modeli: Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Önerileri. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 98-105. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.546900
Youssef, A., Salsi, G., Cataneo, I., Pacella, G., Azzarone, C., Paganotto, M. C., Krsmanovic, J., Montaguti, E., Cariello, L., Bellussi, F., Rizzo, N., & Pilu, G. (2019). Fundal pressure in second stage of labor (Kristeller maneuver) is associated with increased risk of levator ani muscle avulsion. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 53(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19085

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (Other)

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Filiz Okumuş ^*
0000-0002-1855-9190
Türkiye

Ali Timucin Atayoglu
0000-0003-4568-4234
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2025

Submission Date

August 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53445/batd.1758563

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28UP27WB

APA

Okumuş, F., & Atayoglu, A. T. (2025). Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme. Journal of Integrative and Anatolian Medicine, 6(3), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.53445/batd.1758563

AMA

1.Okumuş F, Atayoglu AT. Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme. J. Integr. Anatol. Med. 2025;6(3):196-208. doi:10.53445/batd.1758563

Chicago

Okumuş, Filiz, and Ali Timucin Atayoglu. 2025. “Doğum Hizmetlerinde Paradigma Değişimi: Holistik Ebelik Yaklaşımı üzerine Kuramsal Bir Derleme”. Journal of Integrative and Anatolian Medicine 6 (3): 196-208. https://doi.org/10.53445/batd.1758563.

EndNote

Okumuş F, Atayoglu AT (December 1, 2025) Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme. Journal of Integrative and Anatolian Medicine 6 3 196–208.

IEEE

[1]F. Okumuş and A. T. Atayoglu, “Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme”, J. Integr. Anatol. Med., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 196–208, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.53445/batd.1758563.

ISNAD

Okumuş, Filiz - Atayoglu, Ali Timucin. “Doğum Hizmetlerinde Paradigma Değişimi: Holistik Ebelik Yaklaşımı üzerine Kuramsal Bir Derleme”. Journal of Integrative and Anatolian Medicine 6/3 (December 1, 2025): 196-208. https://doi.org/10.53445/batd.1758563.

JAMA

1.Okumuş F, Atayoglu AT. Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme. J. Integr. Anatol. Med. 2025;6:196–208.

MLA

Okumuş, Filiz, and Ali Timucin Atayoglu. “Doğum Hizmetlerinde Paradigma Değişimi: Holistik Ebelik Yaklaşımı üzerine Kuramsal Bir Derleme”. Journal of Integrative and Anatolian Medicine, vol. 6, no. 3, Dec. 2025, pp. 196-08, doi:10.53445/batd.1758563.

Vancouver

1.Filiz Okumuş, Ali Timucin Atayoglu. Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme. J. Integr. Anatol. Med. 2025 Dec. 1;6(3):196-208. doi:10.53445/batd.1758563

J. Integr. Anatol. Med. (Abbreviated Title)

◆◆◆

e-ISSN: 2687-6345

◆◆◆

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Doğum hizmetlerinde paradigma değişimi: Holistik ebelik yaklaşımı üzerine kuramsal bir derleme

Abstract

Keywords

Paradigm shift in maternity care: A theoretical review of the holistic midwifery approach

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

J. Integr. Anatol. Med. (Abbreviated Title)