Research Article

A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Volume: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Number: Special October 20, 2021
EN TR

A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Abstract

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

Keywords

References

  1. Baggeroer A. (1984), Acoustic telemetry – an overview, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 9, 229-235.
  2. Besceli B. (2021), Investigation and Implementation of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Syetems in Multipath Underwater Acoustic Channel Environments, Bachelor Degree Thesis, Nuh Naci Yazgan University – HARGEM, Kayseri, TURKEY, June 2021.
  3. Erdoğan M., Şenol H., Panayırcı E. and Uysal M. (2012), Sparse Underwater Acoustic Channel Estimation in Colored Gaussian Noise, IEEE 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2012, 1-4.
  4. Kaya A. and Yauchi T. (1989), An acoustic communication system for subsea robot, OCEANS’89, 765-770.
  5. Kuzlu M. (2010), Implementation of Underwater Communication with DSP, Ph.D. Thesis, Kocaeli University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, September 2010, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  6. Mahmutoğlu Y. (2013), Performance Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Channels with Decision Feedback Equalizer, Ms.C. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, May 2013, Trabzon, Turkey.
  7. Quazi A. and Konrad W. (1982), Underwater Acoustic Communications, IEEE Communication Magazine, 24-29.
  8. Stojanovic M. (2006), On the Relationship Between Capacity and Distance in an Underwater Acoustic Channel, First ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNeT’06), Los Angeles.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Software Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 20, 2021

Submission Date

September 3, 2021

Acceptance Date

September 16, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Number: Special

APA
Besceli, B., Güçlü, M. M., Polat, E., Devellioğlu, T., Moğol, T., Küçükusta, N. M., Tanrıkulu, E. F., & Özen, A. (2021). A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. Computer Science, IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807
AMA
1.Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, et al. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 2021;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special):27-34. doi:10.53070/bbd.990807
Chicago
Besceli, Burak, Mehmet Murat Güçlü, Efecan Polat, et al. 2021. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium (Special): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807.
EndNote
Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, Devellioğlu T, Moğol T, Küçükusta NM, Tanrıkulu EF, Özen A (October 1, 2021) A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Special 27–34.
IEEE
[1]B. Besceli et al., “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”, JCS, vol. IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium, no. Special, pp. 27–34, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.53070/bbd.990807.
ISNAD
Besceli, Burak - Güçlü, Mehmet Murat - Polat, Efecan - Devellioğlu, Timurhan - Moğol, Taha - Küçükusta, Nuh Mehmet - Tanrıkulu, Enver Faruk - Özen, Ali. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5TH INTERNATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM/Special (October 1, 2021): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807.
JAMA
1.Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, Devellioğlu T, Moğol T, Küçükusta NM, Tanrıkulu EF, Özen A. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 2021;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium:27–34.
MLA
Besceli, Burak, et al. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science, vol. IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium, no. Special, Oct. 2021, pp. 27-34, doi:10.53070/bbd.990807.
Vancouver
1.Burak Besceli, Mehmet Murat Güçlü, Efecan Polat, Timurhan Devellioğlu, Taha Moğol, Nuh Mehmet Küçükusta, Enver Faruk Tanrıkulu, Ali Özen. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 2021 Oct. 1;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special):27-34. doi:10.53070/bbd.990807

Cited By

The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 88x31.png is applied to all research papers published by JCS and

A Digital Object Identifier (DOI) Logo_TM.png is assigned for each published paper