Araştırma Makalesi

A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special 20 Ekim 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Öz

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Baggeroer A. (1984), Acoustic telemetry – an overview, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 9, 229-235.
  2. Besceli B. (2021), Investigation and Implementation of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Syetems in Multipath Underwater Acoustic Channel Environments, Bachelor Degree Thesis, Nuh Naci Yazgan University – HARGEM, Kayseri, TURKEY, June 2021.
  3. Erdoğan M., Şenol H., Panayırcı E. and Uysal M. (2012), Sparse Underwater Acoustic Channel Estimation in Colored Gaussian Noise, IEEE 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2012, 1-4.
  4. Kaya A. and Yauchi T. (1989), An acoustic communication system for subsea robot, OCEANS’89, 765-770.
  5. Kuzlu M. (2010), Implementation of Underwater Communication with DSP, Ph.D. Thesis, Kocaeli University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, September 2010, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  6. Mahmutoğlu Y. (2013), Performance Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Channels with Decision Feedback Equalizer, Ms.C. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, May 2013, Trabzon, Turkey.
  7. Quazi A. and Konrad W. (1982), Underwater Acoustic Communications, IEEE Communication Magazine, 24-29.
  8. Stojanovic M. (2006), On the Relationship Between Capacity and Distance in an Underwater Acoustic Channel, First ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNeT’06), Los Angeles.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Yazılım Mühendisliği (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Ekim 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

3 Eylül 2021

Kabul Tarihi

16 Eylül 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special

Kaynak Göster

APA
Besceli, B., Güçlü, M. M., Polat, E., Devellioğlu, T., Moğol, T., Küçükusta, N. M., Tanrıkulu, E. F., & Özen, A. (2021). A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. Computer Science, IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807
AMA
1.Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, vd. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 2021;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special):27-34. doi:10.53070/bbd.990807
Chicago
Besceli, Burak, Mehmet Murat Güçlü, Efecan Polat, vd. 2021. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium (Special): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807.
EndNote
Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, Devellioğlu T, Moğol T, Küçükusta NM, Tanrıkulu EF, Özen A (01 Ekim 2021) A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Special 27–34.
IEEE
[1]B. Besceli vd., “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”, JCS, c. IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium, sy Special, ss. 27–34, Eki. 2021, doi: 10.53070/bbd.990807.
ISNAD
Besceli, Burak - Güçlü, Mehmet Murat - Polat, Efecan - Devellioğlu, Timurhan - Moğol, Taha - Küçükusta, Nuh Mehmet - Tanrıkulu, Enver Faruk - Özen, Ali. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science IDAP-2021 : 5TH INTERNATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM/Special (01 Ekim 2021): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807.
JAMA
1.Besceli B, Güçlü MM, Polat E, Devellioğlu T, Moğol T, Küçükusta NM, Tanrıkulu EF, Özen A. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 2021;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium:27–34.
MLA
Besceli, Burak, vd. “A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems”. Computer Science, c. IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium, sy Special, Ekim 2021, ss. 27-34, doi:10.53070/bbd.990807.
Vancouver
1.Burak Besceli, Mehmet Murat Güçlü, Efecan Polat, Timurhan Devellioğlu, Taha Moğol, Nuh Mehmet Küçükusta, Enver Faruk Tanrıkulu, Ali Özen. A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems. JCS. 01 Ekim 2021;IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium(Special):27-34. doi:10.53070/bbd.990807

Cited By

The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 88x31.png  is applied to all research papers published by JCS and

a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)     Logo_TM.png  is assigned for each published paper.