Course and Instructor Related Factors Affecting Willingness to Communicate in Online EFL Classes

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the course and instructor-related dynamics that affect students’ willingness to communicate in second language (L2 WTC) in online English language courses. Online learning processes involve many dynamics, including course content, teaching methods, instructor-student interaction, and the influence of classmates. This phenomenologically designed qualitative research, conducted in Türkiye, comparatively analyses the views of students and instructors on L2 WTC. Data were collected through two open-ended questionnaires administered separately to students and instructors. Six academicians (two female, four male) and 136 students (113 female, 55 male) participated in the study. The findings, analysed with MAXQDA software, reveal that students expect courses to be organized according to their interests and familiarity with a more interactive classroom environment and transparent communication. The study offers suggestions to improve online learning processes.

Keywords

• Online learning
• willingness to communicate (WTC)
• oral participation
• speaking practices

Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Kullanılan Çevrimiçi Derslerde İletişim Kurma İstekliliğini Etkileyen Ders ve Eğitmen Etkenleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğrencilerin çevrimiçi İngilizce dili ile yapılan derslerde ikinci dilde iletişim kurma isteklerini etkileyen ders ve eğitmenle ilgili dinamikleri araştırmaktır. Çevrimiçi dil süreçleri, ders içeriği, öğretim yöntemleri, eğitmen-öğrenci etkileşimi ve sınıf arkadaşlarının etkisi gibi birçok dinamiği içerir. Türkiye’de yürütülen fenomenolojik olarak tasarlanmış bu nitel araştırma, öğrenci ve eğitmenlerin ikinci dilde iletişim kurma istekliliği hakkındaki görüşlerini karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz etmektedir. Veriler, öğrencilere ve eğitmenlere ayrı ayrı uygulanan iki açık uçlu anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmaya 6 akademisyen (ikikadın, dört4 erkek) ve 136 öğrenci (113 kadın, 55 erkek) katılmıştır. MAXQDA yazılımı ile analiz edilen bulgular, ders içeriklerinin öğrencilerin ilgi ve aşinalıklarına göre düzenlenmesi ve eğitmenlerin daha şeffaf bir iletişim kurarak daha etkileşimli bir sınıf ortamı yaratmalarının gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, çevrimiçi dil öğrenme süreçlerinin iyileştirilmesi için öneriler sunmaktadır.

Keywords

• Çevrimiçi öğrenme
• konuşma istekliliği
• sözlü katılım
• konuşma uygulamaları

References

1. Accettone, S. L. W. (2021). Student perceptions of remote chemistry lecture delivery methods. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 3667-3679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00758
2. Afriana, A. (2022). Evaluation of education system during COVID-19 toward students’ psychology. eScience Humanity Journal, 2(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.37296/esci.v2i1.24
3. Akkoyunlu, B., & Bardakcı, S. (2020). Yükseköğretimde uzaktan eğitim ve kalite güvencesi sistemi. Yükseköğretim Kalite Kurulu Kalite Komisyonları Bilgi Portalı. https://yokak.gov.tr/Common/Docs/Site_Activity_Reports/EK2.pdf
4. Altunel, İ. (2021). Insights into EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in online English classes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study from Turkey. Language and Technology, 3(1), 13-20.
5. Alimorad, Z., & Farahmand, M. (2021). A case study on willingness to communicate in English in the Iranian tertiary educational context. TEFLin Journal, 32(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.15639/tEFLinjournal.v32i1/1-28
6. Amalia, S., Asib, A., & Marmanto, S. (2019). Indonesian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in the instructional context. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 4(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijEFL.v4i2.167
7. Ardiansyah, S. A., Wijayanto, A., & Asib, A. (2020). Dynamics of students’ willingness to communicate in English during an online discussion. International Journal of English Language Studies, 2(5), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2020.2.5.2
8. Bashosh, S., Nejad, M. A., Rastegar, M., & Marzban, A. (2013). The relationship between shyness, foreign language classroom anxiety, willingness to communicate, gender, and EFL proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2098-2106. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2098-2106

9. Bernard, R., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
10. Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10125/44462
11. Bozca, M., & Koban Koç, D. (2023). EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in speaking activities in online and face-to-face English lessons in Turkish context. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ö12, 515-529. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1330568
12. Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (COVID-19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 112-142. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/56247/773769
13. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
14. Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2017). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.016
15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
16. Cheung, S. K. S., & Wang, F. L. (2022). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in COVID-19: A case study of online learning in Hong Kong. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5
17. Ciptayani, P. I., Saptarini, N. G. A. P. H., Hidayat, R. A., & Dewi, K. C. (2020). Developing online learning application for programming language. Letters in Information Technology Education (LITE), 3(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.17977/um010v3i12020p023
18. Clement, R. W., Baker, S., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x03022002003
19. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). The post-digital in pandemic times: A comment on the COVID-19 crisis and its political epistemologies. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 547–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00119-2
20. Compton, L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831
21. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
22. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
23. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
24. Cung, B., Xu, D., & Eichhorn, S. (2018). Increasing interpersonal interactions in an online course: does increased instructor e-mail activity and a voluntary in-person meeting time facilitate student learning? Online Learning, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i3.1322
25. Demirbilek, N. (2022). Teachers’ and school administrators’ perceptions of emergency distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8335-8355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11528-0
26. Dereli, A. B. (2023a). MAXQDA: Yaratıcı veri analizi üzerine notlar. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.53495/e-kiad.1319405
27. Dereli, A. B. (2023). A discovery on qualitative data analysis: Making sense of data. In E. Taşdemir & A. B. Dereli (Eds.), Qualitative research in a communicative context: Patterns and data analysis (pp. 45-65). Palet Publishing.
28. Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237-274. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
29. Dewaele, J. M., & Pavelescu, L. M. (2021). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: a multiple case study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1675667
30. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
31. Dilmaç, S. (2020). Students’ opinions about the distance education to art and design courses in the pandemic process. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p113
32. Dolgunsöz, E. (2021). The effect of family characteristics on communication apprehension during online EFL courses in the COVID-19 remote education period. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (23), 911-923. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.953846
33. Everhard, C. J. (2015). Implementing a student peer-mentoring programme for self-access language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 300-312. https://doi.org/10.37237/060306
34. Fadzil, N. I. M., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2022). Online game-based learning enhance ESL learners’ vocabulary learning: benefits and challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v11-i4/15634
35. Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
36. Ghazali, N. E. (2021). Designing online class using discord based on community of inquiry framework. Asian Journal of Engineering Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/ajee2021.5n2.73
37. Giyoto, G., Prayitno, H. J., Inderasari, E., Santoso, T. J., Salam, A. A. N., & Alfisyahri, K. A. N. (2022). A lesson in pandemic autonomous learning conflicts of communicative methods in English curriculum 2013 along COVID-19 in Indonesia. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 3(4), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v3i4.578
38. Gören, S. Ç., Gök, F. S., Yalçın, M. T., Göregen, F., & Çalışkan, M. (2020). Küresel salgın sürecinde uzaktan eğitimin değerlendiriimesi: Ankara örneği. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.787145
39. Grant, S. (2022). The influence of contextual and motivational variables on willingness to communicate in fully online EFL programmes. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 12(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.305827
40. Hashemian, M., Mirzaei, A., & Alian, A. (2016). Interrelationship between action control variables and L2 learners’ dynamic changes of WTC. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning.
41. Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanović, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.002
42. Karahoca, D., Zaripova, Z. F., Bayanova, A. R., Чикилева, Л. С., Avdeeva, E. L., & Xu, B. (2022). During the COVID-19 pandemic, students’ opinions on distance education in department of engineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 12(2), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v12i2.29321
43. Keskin, M., & Özer Kaya, D. (2020). COVID-19 sürecinde öğrencilerin web tabanlı uzaktan eğitime yönelik geri bildirimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. İzmir Kâtip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 59-67. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ikcusbfd/issue/55773/754174
44. Khajavy, G. H, Ghonsooly, B., & Fatemi, A. H. (2016) Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. Tesol Quarterly 50(1): 154–180.
45. Kibuule, D., Lates, J., Ishola, A., Hango, E., Kalemeera, F., Knott, M. G., … & Mubita, M. (2021). Migration to online pharmacy education in namibia: successes, challenges and competence implications. Pharmacy Education, 20(2), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2020.202.174182
46. Knowles, C., D’Agostino, S. R., Kunze, M., Uitto, D. J., & Douglas, S. (2022). A systematic review of asynchronous online learning opportunities for paraeducators. The Journal of Special Education, 56(3), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221085306
47. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.
48. Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.002
49. Lee, S., & Hasegawa, T. (2014). Oceanic barriers promote language diversification in the Japanese islands. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(9), 1905-1912. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12442
50. Lee, I. C. J., Wong, P., Goh, S. P. L., & Cook, S. (2022). A synchronous hybrid team-based learning class: why and how to do it? Medical Science Educator, 32(3), 697-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01538-5
51. Lieber, L., Ibraj, K., Caspari Gnann, I., & Graulich, N. (2022). Students’ individual needs matter: a training to adaptively address students’ argumentation skills in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(7), 2754-2761. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00213
52. MacIntyre, P. D. (2020). Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6
53. MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3-26.
54. MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2010). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
55. MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clement, R. W., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a l2: a situational model of l2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
56. Maican, M., & Cocoradă, E. (2021). Online foreign language learning in higher education and its correlates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(2), 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020781
57. Majid, F. A. (2012). A study on the on-line language learning anxiety among adult learners. International Journal of E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijeeee.2012.v2.106
58. Manning, C., Morrison, B. R., & McIlroy, T. (2014). Moocs in language education and professional teacher development: possibilities and potential. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 294-308. https://doi.org/10.37237/050308
59. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
60. McKeithan, G. K., Rivera, M. O., Mann, L. E., & Mann, L. B. (2021). Strategies to promote meaningful student engagement in online settings. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 9(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v9i4.5135
61. Mystkowska Wiertelak, A. (2021) Fluctuations in willingness to communicate during a semester: A case study. The Language Learning Journal 49(1): 1–12.
62. Nematizadeh, S., & Cao, Y. (2023). Investigating willingness to communicate in synchronous group discussion tasks: One step closer towards authentic communication. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (0). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0092
63. Nifriza, I., & Yenti, D. (2021). Students’ barriers in learning English through online learning. Linguistic. English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 5(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v5i1.3013
64. Özkul, A.E. (2004) “Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitimde Neredeyiz?”, OYP-YUUP Uzaktan Eğitim Çalıştayı’nda Sunulan Bildiri, Mersin Üniversitesi, 2004.
65. Pardede, H. F., Adhi, P., Zilvan, V., Ramdan, A., & Krisnandi, D. (2023). Deep convolutional neural networks-based features for ındonesian large vocabulary speech recognition. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 12(2), 610. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v12.i2.pp610-617
66. Peng, J., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: a model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
67. Pichugin, V., Panfilov, A., & Волкова, Е. А. (2022). The effectiveness of online learning platforms in foreign language teaching. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(5), 1357-1372. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7861
68. Punyaporn, P., & Soontornwipast, K. (2022). An exploration of students’ willingness to communicate in Thai EFL online classroom. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (8). https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.5
69. Purnama, Y. (2021). Teacher’s obstacles in English online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i2.3618
70. Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38-57.
71. Roach, K. D. (1999). The influence of teaching assistant willingness to communicate and communication anxiety in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 47(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370132
72. Said, M. M., Rita, F., Sri Arfani, H. M., Basri, H., & Weda, S. (2021). EFL Students’ Willingness to Communicate in Online Learning at Higher Education in Indonesia. Multicultural Education, 7(5).
73. Sesriyani, L. (2020). The Indonesian students’ willingness to communicate in virtual class: a case study. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i2.1191
74. Sidgi, L. F. S., & Shaari, A. J. (2017). The effect of automatic speech recognition eyespeak software on Iraqi students’ English pronunciation: a pilot study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.48
75. Sunarwan, A., Madkur, A., & Putra, B. D. A. (2022). An exploration of barriers in learning to speak English in online setting amidst COVID-19 pandemic: a case of sophomore students in an indonesian islamic university. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v14i2.52829
76. Şengel, E., & Aktaş, N. (2022). REFLection of academicians in using blended learning. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i8.4402
77. Tabatabaei, O., & Jamshidifar, M. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and willingness to communicate among EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v2i1.4650
78. Talidong, K. J. B. & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6-7), 573 579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225
79. Terzi̇, B., Azizoğlu, F., & Özhan, F. (2021). Factors affecting attitudes of nursing students towards distance education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a web‐based cross‐sectional survey. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(4), 1765-1773. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12747
80. Tolmachev, O. M., Starodumov, L. L., Несова, Н., Kotovchikhina, N. D., & Magomedov, R. M. (2021). The policy of quality assurance of university e-education in Europe and Latin America. Revista Tempos E Espaços Em Educação, 14(33), e16108. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16108
81. Tsegay, S. M., Ashraf, M. A., Perveen, S., & Zegergish, M. Z. (2022). Online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: teachers’ experiences from a Chinese university. Sustainability, 14(1), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010568
82. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
83. Villar, L. M., & Alegre, O. M. (2008). Measuring faculty learning in curriculum and teaching competence online courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701365937
84. Vongsila, V., & Reinders, H. (2016). Making Asian learners talk: Encouraging willingness to communicate. RELC Journal, 47(3), 331-347.
85. Wang, W., Sabbaghi, P., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The study of the relationship between willingness to communicate and self-regulation with the mediating role of self-efficacy among English foreign language learners: structural equation modelling approach. Curr Psychol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04797-6
86. Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003) A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum 16(1), 18–38.
87. Yang, P. (2013). Discourse analysis of EFL college learners’ online social interaction and attitudes towards Facebook. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n6p64
88. Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: the Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136
89. Yavuz, M., Kayalı, B., & Tutal, Ö. (2021). Trend of distance education research in the COVID-19 period: A bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, 4(2), 256-279.
90. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
91. Yılmaz, F. (2021). Online language teaching and learning focusing on the pedagogical benefits. Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53103/cjlls.v1i1.9
92. Yu, H., Hong-mei, L., & Gou, X. (2011). The personality-based variables and their correlations underlying willingness to communicate. Asian Social Science, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n3p253
93. Yüce, E. (2022). The immediate reactions of EFL learners towards total digitalization at higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.939836
94. Zarei, N., & Hussin, S. (2014). Impact of learning management blog on students’ language learning and acquisition. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(03), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2014-1403-04n
95. Zarrinabadi, N., & Haidary, T. (2014). Willingness to communicate and identity styles of Iranian EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 2010–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.636
96. Zarrinabadi, N., Ketabi, S., & Abdi, R. (2014). Facilitating willingness to communicate in the second language classroom and beyond. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(5), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.918527
97. Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J. F. (2023). More than meets the ear: Individual differences in trait and state willingness to communicate as predictors of language learning performance in a Chinese EFL context. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 593-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820951931
98. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
99. Zhao, D., Jablonkai, R., & Sandoval-Hernandez, A. (2024). Enhancing willingness to communicate in English among Chinese students in the UK: the impact of MALL with Duolingo and HelloTalk. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0027