G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

Uğur Çiçek

doi:10.25229/beta.1625353

TR EN

G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2011-2023 yılları arasında 4 ayrı yıl baz alınarak (2011-2015-2019-2023) G7 ülkelerinin mali performansını ölçmek, sıralamak ve değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada Çok Kriterli Karar Verme tekniklerinden CRITIC esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu yöntem, karar alıcıların farklı kriterler arasında dengeli bir değerlendirme yapmalarına olanak sağlamaktadır. Mali performansın ölçülmesinde kullanılan kriterler; kamu gelirleri, kamu harcamaları ve kamu borçlarıdır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgular; tüm periyotlarda mali performansı en iyi ülkelerin sırasıyla Almanya ve Kanada, en kötü sonuçlara sahip ülkenin ise, tüm periyotlarda Japonya olduğunu göstermektedir. 3-4-5 ve 6. sıradaki ülkeler yıllara göre değişmektedir. Kriter ağırlıklarına göre en önemli değişim, Genel Kamu Gelirleri ve Cari Hesap Dengesi kriterlerinin artan ağırlıklarıdır.

Keywords

mali performans, maliye politikası, gri ilişkisel analiz

References

Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: an international comparison. Public Choice, 123, 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-7165-2
Allen, R., & Tommasi, D. (2001). Managing public expenditure: a reference book for transition countries. OECD Publishing.
Aydemir, E., & Şahin, Y. (2019). Evaluation of healthcare service quality factors using grey relational analysis in a dialysis center. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 9(4), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-01-2019-0001
Baležentis, А., Baležentis, T., & Misiūnas, A. (2012). An integrated assessment of lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 34-53. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.656151
Baydaş, M., & Elma, O. E. (2021). An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402257b
Belke, M. (2020). CRITIC ve MAIRCA yöntemleriyle G7 ülkelerinin makroekonomik performansının değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(Temmuz 2020 (Özel Ek)):120– 139.
Bergman, U. M., Hutchison, M. M., & Jensen, S. E. H. (2016). Promoting sustainable public finances in the European Union: The role of fiscal rules and government efficiency. European Journal of Political Economy, 42, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.01.001
Blanchard, O. (2019). Public debt and low interest rates. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1197-1229.
Bohn, H. (1998). The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949-963.
Černevičienė, J. and Kabašinskas, A. (2022). Review of multi-criteria decision-making methods in finance using explainable artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.827584

Çakır, E., & Akel, G. (2017). Evaluation of service quality of hotel and holiday reservation web sites in Turkey by integrated swara-grey relationship analysis method. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.395
Deng, J. L. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters.
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995), Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Erdoğan, H., H., & Kırbaç, G. (2021). Financial performance measurement of logistics companies based on entropy and waspas methods. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 13(2), 1093-1106. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1186
Ghadikolaei, A., S., & Esbouei, S., K. (2014). Integrating fuzzy ahp and fuzzy aras for evaluating financial performance. Boletim Da Sociedade Paranaense De Matemática, 32(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.5269/bspm.v32i2.21378
Ghorabaee, M. K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J., (2017). Supplier evaluation and selection using CRITIC–COPRAS framework. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 1073-1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314828
He, R. S., & Hwang, S. F. (2007). Damage detection by a hybrid real-parameter genetic algorithm under the assistance of grey relation analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20(7), 980-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2006.11.020
İç, Y., Çelik, B., Kavak, S., & Baki, B. (2020). Development of a multi-criteria decision-making model for comparing the performance of turkish commercial banks. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(2), 250-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-05-2020-0083
Javadin, S., R., S., Esbouei, S., K., & Rajabani, N. (2016). An integrated assessment of companies based on value based measures in fuzzy environment. Boletim Da Sociedade Paranaense De Matemática, 34(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.5269/bspm.v34i2.27025
Johnsen, A. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management?. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00445.x
Karaoğlan, S., & Şahin, S. (2018). Bı̇stxkmya işletmelerinin finansal performanslarının çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ı̇le ölçümü ve yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması. Ege Akademik Bakış (Ege Academic Review), 18(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2018135912
Kaya, H., & Belke, M. (2024). Assessing the fiscal performance of türkiye using a multi- criteria decision making approach. Theory and Applied Fiscal Policy Empirical and Theoretical Studies, Peterlang Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3726/b22634
Kazan, H., Ertok, M., & Çiftçi, C. (2015). Application of a hybrid method in the financial analysis of firm performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.482
Kopits, G., & Symansky, S. (1998). Fiscal policy rules. IMF Occasional Paper, 162.
Kou, G., Ergu, D., & Shang, J. (2014). Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: adapting hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.035
Kumar, S., & Gulati, R. (2010). Measuring efficiency, effectiveness and performance of Indian public sector banks. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011006112
Kuo, T., & Huang, G. (2008). The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002
Liu, D. (2011). E-commerce system security assessment based on grey relational analysis comprehensive evaluation. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 5(10), 279-284.
Mikesell, J. L., & Mullins, D. R. (2011). Reforms for improved efficiency in public budgeting and finance: Improvements, disappointments, and work‐in‐progress. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(4), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2011.00998.x
OECD. (2019). Government at a glance. OECD Publishing.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Ostry, J. D., Ghosh, A. R., & Kim, J. I. (2010). Fiscal space. IMF Staff Position Note, 10/11.
Örtlek, Z., Demirtaş, C., & Ilıkkan, Ö., M. (2023). Environmental performance: Evidence from level-2 regions. Fiscaoeconomia, 7(1), 406-443. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1160081
Özdemir, A. I., & Deste M. (2009). Multicriteria supplier selection by grey relational analysis: a case study in automotive industry. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 38(2), 147-156.
Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-578. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.573
Smith, P. C., & Street, A. (2005). Measuring the efficiency of public services: the limits of analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 168(2), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00355.x
Şahin, Y., & Aydemir, E. (2019). An AHP-Weighted grey relational analysis method to determine the technical characteristics' importance levels of the smartphone, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 225-238.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Springer US, 5-21.
Turhan, T. & Aydemir, E. (2021). A financial ratio analysis on bist information and technology index (xutek) using ahp-weighted grey relational analysis. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(6), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1011252
Türegün, N. (2022). Financial performance evaluation by multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Heliyon, 8(5), e09361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09361
Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,13(9),2263-2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021
Wang, T. C., & Lee, H. D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 8980-8985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035
Wu, H. Y., Tsai, A., & Wu, H. S. (2019). A hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis approach for environmental performance evaluation: an example of the tft-lcd manufacturers in Taiwan. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 18(3), 597-616.
Yang C. C., & Chen, B. S. (2006). Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), 926-941. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610688241
Yeh, C. H., Deng, H., & Chang, Y. H. (2000). Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(3), 459-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00315-X Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F., & Turskis, Z. (2007). Multi-Attribute assessment of road design solutions based on the COPRAS method. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 2(4), 195-203.
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.03
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 305-311.
Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi‐criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4-5), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.333

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Policy of Treasury, Public Economy

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Uğur Çiçek ^*
0000-0003-1357-2561
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

June 30, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

January 22, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 17, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 10 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1625353

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA62CR87UU

APA

Çiçek, U. (2025). G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 10(2), 727-752. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1625353

AMA

1.Çiçek U. G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Beta. 2025;10(2):727-752. doi:10.25229/beta.1625353

Chicago

Çiçek, Uğur. 2025. “G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10 (2): 727-52. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1625353.

EndNote

Çiçek U (June 1, 2025) G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10 2 727–752.

IEEE

[1]U. Çiçek, “G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”, Beta, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 727–752, June 2025, doi: 10.25229/beta.1625353.

ISNAD

Çiçek, Uğur. “G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis 10/2 (June 1, 2025): 727-752. https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.1625353.

JAMA

1.Çiçek U. G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Beta. 2025;10:727–752.

MLA

Çiçek, Uğur. “G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, vol. 10, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 727-52, doi:10.25229/beta.1625353.

Vancouver

1.Uğur Çiçek. G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Beta. 2025 Jun. 1;10(2):727-52. doi:10.25229/beta.1625353

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRvoKvjUr081z-KcdXLcXXPQTR9B7O8m0BOBg&s

The articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

G7 Ülkeleri Mali Performanslarının CRITIC Esaslı Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Keywords

Assessment of Financial Performances of G7 Countries with CRITIC Based Grey Relational Analysis Method

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite