Abstract
This paper examines the benefits and the challenges of carrying out international and comparative research in
systems of higher education. The paper does not engage in a comparative or international study of higher
education. Rather, the paper addresses the reasons for doing such research, while also identifying the challenges
and obstacles. The paper first discusses the reasons for doing international and comparative research, with
particular emphasis on the importance of studying colleges and universities in the current context of
globalization. The discussion then moves to the challenges of studying and comparing higher education systems
in different countries. In analyzing the benefits and potential problems of doing international and comparative
research, the discussion seeks to address foundational questions facing the researcher. The paper concludes that
despite the daunting challenges, such research projects are essential for understanding the effects of current
globalization trends on higher education.
Keywords
References
- AAUP, Background Facts on Contingent Faculty, available at, http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issuesed/contingent/contingentfacts.htm Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994,
- Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 81.
- Crossley, Michael and Keith Watson (2003) Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context, and Difference, London: Routledge.
- Brucculeri, Guy (2004) “A Need to Refocus the Mandate of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank,” 17 W.R.L.S.I. 53.
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
- Duncan, Jr., John C. (1999) “The Indentured Servants of Academia: The Adjunct Faculty Dilemma and Their Limited Legal Remedies,” 74 Indiana Law Journal 513.
- Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1996) “Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research,” 82 Virginia Law Review 1663.
- Epstein, E. H. (1994) “Comparative and International Education: Overview and Historical Development,” in T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Education, Second Edition, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Goldberg, Debbie (Jul. 27, 1997) “Keeping College Faculties Accountable,” Washington Post, R4.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2002) “The Corporatization of the University: Distance Learning at the Cost of Academic Freedom?, 12 Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 73.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2005) “Confronting Privatization and Commercialization of Academic Research: An Analysis of Social Implications at the Local, National, and Global Levels,” 12 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 109.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2007a) “University Science Research Funding: Privatizing Policy and Practice,” in Science and the University (Paula E. Stephan and Ronald G. Ehrenberg eds.) Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2007b) “Faculty in the Corporate University: Professional Identity, Law, and Collective Action,” 16 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.
- McGill, Eugenia (2004) “Poverty and Social Analysis of Trade Agreements: A More Coherent Approach?,” 27 British Columbia International & Comparative Law Review 371
- Merle, Rena (Mar. 23, 1997) “Academic Tenure is Under Fire: Profs Worry for Freedom of Thought,” Times-Picayune, at A11.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva, 444 U.S. 672 (1980). Patent & Trademark Act Amendments, 35 U.S.C. Secs. 200-212, commonly known as the Bayh-Dole Act.
- Sell, Susan K. (2002) “TRIPS and the Access to Medicines Campaign,” 20 Wisconsin International Law Journal 481.
- Wallach, Lori, The Alphabet Soup of Globalization 4-5, available at http://www.citizen.org/documents/alphabetpdf.PDF
Abstract
This paper examines the benefits and the challenges of carrying out international and comparative research in systems of higher education. The paper does not engage in a comparative or international study of higher education. Rather, the paper addresses the reasons for doing such research, while also identifying the challenges and obstacles. The paper first discusses the reasons for doing international and comparative research, with particular emphasis on the importance of studying colleges and universities in the current context of globalization. The discussion then moves to the challenges of studying and comparing higher education systems in different countries. In analyzing the benefits and potential problems of doing international and comparative research, the discussion seeks to address foundational questions facing the researcher. The paper concludes that despite the daunting challenges, such research projects are essential for understanding the effects of current globalization trends on higher education.
References
- AAUP, Background Facts on Contingent Faculty, available at, http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issuesed/contingent/contingentfacts.htm Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994,
- Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 81.
- Crossley, Michael and Keith Watson (2003) Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context, and Difference, London: Routledge.
- Brucculeri, Guy (2004) “A Need to Refocus the Mandate of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank,” 17 W.R.L.S.I. 53.
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
- Duncan, Jr., John C. (1999) “The Indentured Servants of Academia: The Adjunct Faculty Dilemma and Their Limited Legal Remedies,” 74 Indiana Law Journal 513.
- Eisenberg, Rebecca S. (1996) “Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research,” 82 Virginia Law Review 1663.
- Epstein, E. H. (1994) “Comparative and International Education: Overview and Historical Development,” in T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Education, Second Edition, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Goldberg, Debbie (Jul. 27, 1997) “Keeping College Faculties Accountable,” Washington Post, R4.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2002) “The Corporatization of the University: Distance Learning at the Cost of Academic Freedom?, 12 Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 73.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2005) “Confronting Privatization and Commercialization of Academic Research: An Analysis of Social Implications at the Local, National, and Global Levels,” 12 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 109.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2007a) “University Science Research Funding: Privatizing Policy and Practice,” in Science and the University (Paula E. Stephan and Ronald G. Ehrenberg eds.) Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Lieberwitz, Risa L. (2007b) “Faculty in the Corporate University: Professional Identity, Law, and Collective Action,” 16 Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.
- McGill, Eugenia (2004) “Poverty and Social Analysis of Trade Agreements: A More Coherent Approach?,” 27 British Columbia International & Comparative Law Review 371
- Merle, Rena (Mar. 23, 1997) “Academic Tenure is Under Fire: Profs Worry for Freedom of Thought,” Times-Picayune, at A11.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva, 444 U.S. 672 (1980). Patent & Trademark Act Amendments, 35 U.S.C. Secs. 200-212, commonly known as the Bayh-Dole Act.
- Sell, Susan K. (2002) “TRIPS and the Access to Medicines Campaign,” 20 Wisconsin International Law Journal 481.
- Wallach, Lori, The Alphabet Soup of Globalization 4-5, available at http://www.citizen.org/documents/alphabetpdf.PDF
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2008 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2008 Volume: 3 Issue: 1 |