Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS

Year 2019, BEYKOZ AKADEMİ 2019 ÖZEL SAYI, 159 - 171, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171

Abstract

Environmental threats like the devastating impacts of climate change and scarcity of resources
require companies to operate in a more eco-friendly way and to take the necessary precautions
to preserve the environment. In this context, achieving the profit and market share targets and
eliminating their environmental risks and negative effects simultaneously pave the way for the
effective management of the supply chains. Green supply chain management (GSCM) aiming
at the integration of environmental thinking into supply chain management processes like
product design, material procurement and selection, production process, delivery of the final
product to the consumer, as well as the management of end-of-life is crucial to increase their
environmental efficiency. In this regard, The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) emerges as one
of the most important efforts to accelerate viable solutions for companies and their supply chains
against climate change. Within the scope of the project, the progress of Turkish firms’ actions
against climate change has been surveyed. Thus, the objective of the current study is to
determine the level of the green supply chain activities, and evaluate the adequacy of the current
efforts of the firms which responded to the CDP 2017 climate change survey in Turkey and are
listed in the industrial category in Istanbul Stock Exchange (BIST) 100. Content analysis will
be conducted to analyze the sustainability and/or annual reports of the firms based on the GSCM
theoretical framework of Islam et al. (2017). It is hoped that this study will serve as a road map
for firms in Turkey in both means of obtaining the gaps in their GSCM efforts and the activities
and operations needed to close those gaps.

References

  • Andiç, E., Yurt, Ö., & Baltacıoğlu, T. (2012). Green supply chains: Efforts and potential applications for the Turkish market. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58, 50- 68.
  • Büyüközkan, G. & Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi. Lojistik Dergisi, 8, 66- 73.
  • Chan, R.Y.K., Hongwei He, H. K. Chan & Wang, W.Y.C. (2012). Environmental Orientation and Corporate Performance: The Mediation Mechanism of Green Supply Chain Management and Moderating Effect of Competitive Intensity. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 621–630.
  • CDP Türkiye, (2012). En İyi Uygulamalar Kitapçığı. DOI: 10.5900/SU_SOM_WP.2012.18931. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A. & York, R. (2007). Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(1), 13-18.
  • Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M. & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance Measurement for Green Supply Chain Management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330-353.
  • Myers, N., & Kent, J. (2003). New consumers: the influence of affluence on the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(8), 4963-4968.
  • Rex, J., Lobo, A., & Leckie, C. (2015). Evaluating the drivers of sustainable behavioral intentions: An application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(3), 263-284.
  • Riedy, C. (2005) The eye of the storm: An integral perspective on sustainable development and climate change response. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia). Retrieved August 18, 2018 from: http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20350.
  • Shang, K., Lu, C. & Li, S. (2010). A Taxonomy Of Green Supply Chain Management Capability Among Electronics-Related Manufacturing Firms in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1218–1226.
  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-Of-The-Art Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.
  • Vachon, S. & Klassen, R.D. (2006). Green Project Partnership In The Supply Chain: The Case of The Package Printing Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (6-7), 661–671.
  • Van Hock, R.I. & Erasmus. (2000). From Reversed Logistics to Green Supply Chains. Logistics Solutions, 2, 28-33.
  • Van Hoek, R. I. (1999) From Reversed Logistics to Green Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4 (3), 129 – 135.
  • Zsidisin, G.A. & Hendrick, T.E. (1998). Purchasing’s Involvement in Environmental Issues: A Multi-Country Perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 7, 313–320.
  • Zhu, Q. & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships Between Operational Practices and Performance Among Early Adopters of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 265–289
Year 2019, BEYKOZ AKADEMİ 2019 ÖZEL SAYI, 159 - 171, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171

Abstract

References

  • Andiç, E., Yurt, Ö., & Baltacıoğlu, T. (2012). Green supply chains: Efforts and potential applications for the Turkish market. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 58, 50- 68.
  • Büyüközkan, G. & Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi. Lojistik Dergisi, 8, 66- 73.
  • Chan, R.Y.K., Hongwei He, H. K. Chan & Wang, W.Y.C. (2012). Environmental Orientation and Corporate Performance: The Mediation Mechanism of Green Supply Chain Management and Moderating Effect of Competitive Intensity. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 621–630.
  • CDP Türkiye, (2012). En İyi Uygulamalar Kitapçığı. DOI: 10.5900/SU_SOM_WP.2012.18931. Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A. & York, R. (2007). Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(1), 13-18.
  • Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M. & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance Measurement for Green Supply Chain Management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330-353.
  • Myers, N., & Kent, J. (2003). New consumers: the influence of affluence on the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(8), 4963-4968.
  • Rex, J., Lobo, A., & Leckie, C. (2015). Evaluating the drivers of sustainable behavioral intentions: An application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(3), 263-284.
  • Riedy, C. (2005) The eye of the storm: An integral perspective on sustainable development and climate change response. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia). Retrieved August 18, 2018 from: http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20350.
  • Shang, K., Lu, C. & Li, S. (2010). A Taxonomy Of Green Supply Chain Management Capability Among Electronics-Related Manufacturing Firms in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1218–1226.
  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green Supply-Chain Management: A State-Of-The-Art Literature Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.
  • Vachon, S. & Klassen, R.D. (2006). Green Project Partnership In The Supply Chain: The Case of The Package Printing Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (6-7), 661–671.
  • Van Hock, R.I. & Erasmus. (2000). From Reversed Logistics to Green Supply Chains. Logistics Solutions, 2, 28-33.
  • Van Hoek, R. I. (1999) From Reversed Logistics to Green Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4 (3), 129 – 135.
  • Zsidisin, G.A. & Hendrick, T.E. (1998). Purchasing’s Involvement in Environmental Issues: A Multi-Country Perspective. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 7, 313–320.
  • Zhu, Q. & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships Between Operational Practices and Performance Among Early Adopters of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 265–289
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Banu Demirel 0000-0002-2487-0313

Kevser Yılmaz 0000-0003-0415-8844

Publication Date October 1, 2019
Submission Date August 21, 2019
Acceptance Date October 2, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 BEYKOZ AKADEMİ 2019 ÖZEL SAYI

Cite

APA Demirel, B., & Yılmaz, K. (2019). THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi159-171. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171
AMA Demirel B, Yılmaz K. THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. Published online October 1, 2019:159-171. doi:10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171
Chicago Demirel, Banu, and Kevser Yılmaz. “THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, October (October 2019), 159-71. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171.
EndNote Demirel B, Yılmaz K (October 1, 2019) THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 159–171.
IEEE B. Demirel and K. Yılmaz, “THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS”, Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, pp. 159–171, October 2019, doi: 10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171.
ISNAD Demirel, Banu - Yılmaz, Kevser. “THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. October 2019. 159-171. https://doi.org/10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171.
JAMA Demirel B, Yılmaz K. THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2019;:159–171.
MLA Demirel, Banu and Kevser Yılmaz. “THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS”. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 2019, pp. 159-71, doi:10.14514/byk.m.26515393.2019.sp/159-171.
Vancouver Demirel B, Yılmaz K. THE EVALUATION OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT EFFORTS OF TURKISH FIRMS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2019:159-71.