Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Foreign Policy and Critical Security: The US Foreign Policy Towards Israel

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 199 - 212, 27.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1453099

Abstract

Security is defined differently by classical and critical perspectives. The debate on security between classical and critical perspectives illustrates the inadequacy of the classical tradition. This article provides the approaches of classical and critical perspectives towards security and their shortcomings. The article argues that critical perspectives are much more effective than the classical approach regarding the understanding and resolution of security problems. It provides a critical reformulation of Foreign Policy (FP) which has been based on the classical approach. The article also examines the US FP towards Israel regarding the Arab-Israel wars and the US peace efforts, recommending that the US adopt an FP based on critical security for these issues.

References

  • Acharya, A. (1997). The Periphery as the Core: The Third World and Security Studies. Krause, K. and Williams, M. C. (eds). In Critical Security Studies (299-328), Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota.
  • Amara, J. (2009). US-Jordan bilateral relations. Looney, R. E. (ed.). In Handbook of US-Middle East Relations: Formative factors and regional perspectives (343-354), London: Routledge.
  • Anadolu Ajansı (2024, February 29). İsrail'in insani yardım bekleyen Filistinlilere yönelik saldırısında ölü sayısı 112'ye çıktı. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/israilin-insani-yardim-bekleyen-filistinlilere-yonelik-saldirisinda-olu-sayisi-112ye-cikti/3150611 (Accessed: 1 March 2024).
  • Armaoğlu, F. (2017). 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi: 1914-1995. 23rd Edition, İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
  • Ayoob, M. (1997). Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective. Krause, K. and Williams, M. C. (eds). In Critical Security Studies (121-146), Minneapolis: the University of Minnesota.
  • Bickerton, I. J. (2009). The Arab–Israeli Conflict: History. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Bilgin, P. (2002). Beyond statism in security studies? Human agency and security in the Middle East. Review of International Affairs, 2(1), 100–118.
  • Bilgin, P. (2008). Chapter 7: Critical Theory. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (89-102), New York: Routledge.
  • Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313-326.
  • Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brozus, L., & von Farkas, J. (2012). Chapter 3: Germany and R2P: Common but Differentiated Responsibility?. Brosig, M. (ed). In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action? The Role of Global Middle Powers (53-70), Johannesburg: The Hanns Seidel Foundation, Johannesburg: the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Tshwane (Pretoria): The Institute for Security Studies, and Johannesburg: The South African Institute of International Affairs.
  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 126-155.
  • Dobson, A. P. & Marsh, S. (2006). US Foreign Policy since 1945. 2nd Edition, London: Routledge.
  • Dunn, M. C. (2009). US relations with Egypt: an overview. Looney, R. E. (ed.). In Handbook of US-Middle East Relations: Formative factors and regional perspectives (281-293), London: Routledge.
  • Epstein, C. (2014). The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory, 6(2), 294–311.
  • Falkner, R. (2019). The Unavoidability of Justice -and Order- in International Climate Politics: From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(2), 270-278.
  • Hobson, J. M. (2002). What’s at stake in “bringing historical sociology back into international relations?” Transcending “chronofetishism” and “tempocentrism” in international relations. Hobden, S. and Hobson, J. M. (eds.). In Historical Sociology of International Relations (3-42), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hough, P. (2008). Understanding Global Security. 2nd Edition, New York: Routledge.
  • Hurd, I. (2008). Constructivism. Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (eds). In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (298-316), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelemen, R. D. & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427-456.
  • Kirshner, J. (2010). The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 53-75.
  • McDonald, M. (2008). Chapter 5: Constructivism. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (59-72), New York: Routledge.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2010). The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4), 381-396.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. & Thompson, K. W. (1997). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th Edition, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morton, A. D. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci, Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.
  • Navari, C. (2008). Chapter 3: Liberalism. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (29-43), New York: Routledge.
  • Oran, Z. K. & Karataş, D. (2023, 15 November). ABD Dışişleri Bakanı Antony Blinken, yeniden İsrail'e gidiyor. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/abd-disisleri-bakani-antony-blinken-yeniden-israile-gidiyor/3020773# (Accessed: 15 November 2023).
  • Quandt, W. B. (2005). Peace Process: American diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1967. 3rd Edition, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Sander, O. (2017). Siyasi Tarih: 1918-1994. 27th Edition, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Sawafta, A. and Al-Mughrabi, N. (2020, January 29). 'Slap of the century': Palestinians reject Trump Mideast plan. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-plan-reactions/slap-of-the-century-palestinians-reject-trump-mideast-plan-idUSKBN1ZR2BN (Accessed: 13 March 2023).
  • Schulze, K. E. (2017). The Arab–Israeli Conflict. 3rd Edition, London: Routledge.
  • Shapcott, R. (2010). International Ethics: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • The White House (2022, July 15). Remarks by President Biden and President Abbas of the Palestinian National Authority in Joint Press Statement | Bethlehem, West Bank. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/07/15/remarks-by-president-biden-and-president-abbas-of-the-palestinian-national-authority-in-joint-press-statement-bethlehem-west-bank/ (Accessed: 14 March 2023).
  • Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering World Politics, Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Tickner, J. A. & True, J. (2018). A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women’s Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 1-13.
  • UN (2006). Gaza Strip: Situation Report (7 August 2006) – OCHA report. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-197800/ (Accessed: 10 March 2023).
  • UN (2023). History of the Question of Palestine. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/unispal/history/ (Accessed: 10 March 2023).
  • US Department of State (2020). The Abraham Accords Declaration. Retrieved from https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-abraham-accords/index.html (Accessed: 14 March 2023).
  • Walt, S. M. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211-239.

Dış Politika ve Eleştirel Güvenlik: ABD’nin İsrail’e Yönelik Dış Politikası

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 199 - 212, 27.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1453099

Abstract

Güvenlik, klasik ve eleştirel perspektifler tarafından farklı tanımlanmıştır. Klasik ve eleştirel perspektiflerin güvenlik üzerine tartışmaları, klasik geleneğin yetersizliğini göstermiştir. Bu makale, klasik ve eleştirel perspektiflerin güvenlik kavramına yaklaşımlarını ve eksikliklerini ortaya koymaktadır. Makale, eleştirel perspektiflerin güvenlik sorunlarına anlama ve çözümünde klasik yaklaşıma göre daha etkili olduğunu iddia etmektedir. Çalışma, klasik yaklaşım temelli olan Dış Politikanın (DP) eleştirel yaklaşımdan yeniden formülleştirilmesini sunmaktadır. Çalışma, Arap-İsrail savaşları ve ABD’nin barış çabaları konularında ABD’nin İsrail’e yönelik DP’sini de incelerken ABD’ye bu konularda eleştirel güvenlik temelli DP’yi benimsemesini önermektedir.

References

  • Acharya, A. (1997). The Periphery as the Core: The Third World and Security Studies. Krause, K. and Williams, M. C. (eds). In Critical Security Studies (299-328), Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota.
  • Amara, J. (2009). US-Jordan bilateral relations. Looney, R. E. (ed.). In Handbook of US-Middle East Relations: Formative factors and regional perspectives (343-354), London: Routledge.
  • Anadolu Ajansı (2024, February 29). İsrail'in insani yardım bekleyen Filistinlilere yönelik saldırısında ölü sayısı 112'ye çıktı. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/israilin-insani-yardim-bekleyen-filistinlilere-yonelik-saldirisinda-olu-sayisi-112ye-cikti/3150611 (Accessed: 1 March 2024).
  • Armaoğlu, F. (2017). 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi: 1914-1995. 23rd Edition, İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
  • Ayoob, M. (1997). Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective. Krause, K. and Williams, M. C. (eds). In Critical Security Studies (121-146), Minneapolis: the University of Minnesota.
  • Bickerton, I. J. (2009). The Arab–Israeli Conflict: History. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Bilgin, P. (2002). Beyond statism in security studies? Human agency and security in the Middle East. Review of International Affairs, 2(1), 100–118.
  • Bilgin, P. (2008). Chapter 7: Critical Theory. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (89-102), New York: Routledge.
  • Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313-326.
  • Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brozus, L., & von Farkas, J. (2012). Chapter 3: Germany and R2P: Common but Differentiated Responsibility?. Brosig, M. (ed). In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action? The Role of Global Middle Powers (53-70), Johannesburg: The Hanns Seidel Foundation, Johannesburg: the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Tshwane (Pretoria): The Institute for Security Studies, and Johannesburg: The South African Institute of International Affairs.
  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 126-155.
  • Dobson, A. P. & Marsh, S. (2006). US Foreign Policy since 1945. 2nd Edition, London: Routledge.
  • Dunn, M. C. (2009). US relations with Egypt: an overview. Looney, R. E. (ed.). In Handbook of US-Middle East Relations: Formative factors and regional perspectives (281-293), London: Routledge.
  • Epstein, C. (2014). The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory, 6(2), 294–311.
  • Falkner, R. (2019). The Unavoidability of Justice -and Order- in International Climate Politics: From Kyoto to Paris and Beyond. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(2), 270-278.
  • Hobson, J. M. (2002). What’s at stake in “bringing historical sociology back into international relations?” Transcending “chronofetishism” and “tempocentrism” in international relations. Hobden, S. and Hobson, J. M. (eds.). In Historical Sociology of International Relations (3-42), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hough, P. (2008). Understanding Global Security. 2nd Edition, New York: Routledge.
  • Hurd, I. (2008). Constructivism. Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (eds). In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (298-316), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelemen, R. D. & Vogel, D. (2010). Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(4), 427-456.
  • Kirshner, J. (2010). The tragedy of offensive realism: Classical realism and the rise of China. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 53-75.
  • McDonald, M. (2008). Chapter 5: Constructivism. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (59-72), New York: Routledge.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2010). The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4), 381-396.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. & Thompson, K. W. (1997). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 6th Edition, Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morton, A. D. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci, Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.
  • Navari, C. (2008). Chapter 3: Liberalism. Williams, P. D. (ed). In Security Studies: An Introduction (29-43), New York: Routledge.
  • Oran, Z. K. & Karataş, D. (2023, 15 November). ABD Dışişleri Bakanı Antony Blinken, yeniden İsrail'e gidiyor. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/abd-disisleri-bakani-antony-blinken-yeniden-israile-gidiyor/3020773# (Accessed: 15 November 2023).
  • Quandt, W. B. (2005). Peace Process: American diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1967. 3rd Edition, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Sander, O. (2017). Siyasi Tarih: 1918-1994. 27th Edition, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Sawafta, A. and Al-Mughrabi, N. (2020, January 29). 'Slap of the century': Palestinians reject Trump Mideast plan. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-palestinians-plan-reactions/slap-of-the-century-palestinians-reject-trump-mideast-plan-idUSKBN1ZR2BN (Accessed: 13 March 2023).
  • Schulze, K. E. (2017). The Arab–Israeli Conflict. 3rd Edition, London: Routledge.
  • Shapcott, R. (2010). International Ethics: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • The White House (2022, July 15). Remarks by President Biden and President Abbas of the Palestinian National Authority in Joint Press Statement | Bethlehem, West Bank. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/07/15/remarks-by-president-biden-and-president-abbas-of-the-palestinian-national-authority-in-joint-press-statement-bethlehem-west-bank/ (Accessed: 14 March 2023).
  • Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering World Politics, Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Tickner, J. A. & True, J. (2018). A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women’s Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 1-13.
  • UN (2006). Gaza Strip: Situation Report (7 August 2006) – OCHA report. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-197800/ (Accessed: 10 March 2023).
  • UN (2023). History of the Question of Palestine. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/unispal/history/ (Accessed: 10 March 2023).
  • US Department of State (2020). The Abraham Accords Declaration. Retrieved from https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-abraham-accords/index.html (Accessed: 14 March 2023).
  • Walt, S. M. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211-239.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Public Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Fatih Yaşar 0000-0003-3885-6560

Early Pub Date June 25, 2024
Publication Date June 27, 2024
Submission Date March 14, 2024
Acceptance Date April 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yaşar, F. (2024). Foreign Policy and Critical Security: The US Foreign Policy Towards Israel. Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1453099


Creative Commons Lisansı