Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey

Number: 76 June 1, 2016
  • Mehmet Çınar
  • Sema Ay
EN TR

Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey

Abstract

One of the central hypotheses of neoclassical growth literature is the balanced growth hypothesis, which predicts that output, consumption and investment grow at the same rate. Empirically, this implies that consumption and investment must be cointegrated with output. This paper investigates these implications with respect to Turkey, using unit root tests and co-integration techniques. We find that the long-term growth path of Turkish economy is consistent with the balanced-growth hypothesis without a significant structural break

Keywords

References

  1. Aghion, Phillipe and Peter Howitt (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory (second printing). The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  2. Ando, Albert and Franco Modigliani (1963). “The ‘live cycle’ Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests”. American Economic Review (53): 55-84.
  3. Andrews, Donald W. K. (1991). “Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation”. Econometrica (59): 817–858.
  4. Andrews, Donald W. K. and J. Christopher Monahan (1992). “An Improved Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator”. Econometrica (60): 953–966.
  5. Attfield, Cliff and Jonathan R. W. Temple (2006). “Balanced Growth and the Great Ratios: New Evidence for the US and UK”. Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper No. 75. Available at http://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/cgbcr/dpcgbcr/dpcgbcr75. pdf. Accessed 26 November 2012.
  6. Baharumshah, Ahmad Zubaidi (2004). “Stock Prices and Long-Run Demand for Money: Evidence from Malaysia”. International Economic Journal (18): 389-407.
  7. Bai, Jushan and Pierre Perron (2003). “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models”. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18(1): 1-22.
  8. Bhargava, Alok (1986). “On the Theory of Testing for Unit Roots in Observed Time Series”. Review of Economic Studies 53(3): 369-384.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mehmet Çınar This is me
ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMETRICS

Sema Ay This is me
Uludağ University, Vocational School of Social Sciences

Publication Date

June 1, 2016

Submission Date

June 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Number: 76

APA
Çınar, M., & Ay, S. (2016). Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Bilig, 76, 205-226. https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK
AMA
1.Çınar M, Ay S. Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Bilig. 2016;(76):205-226. https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK
Chicago
Çınar, Mehmet, and Sema Ay. 2016. “Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey”. Bilig, nos. 76: 205-26. https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK.
EndNote
Çınar M, Ay S (June 1, 2016) Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Bilig 76 205–226.
IEEE
[1]M. Çınar and S. Ay, “Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey”, Bilig, no. 76, pp. 205–226, June 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK
ISNAD
Çınar, Mehmet - Ay, Sema. “Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey”. Bilig. 76 (June 1, 2016): 205-226. https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK.
JAMA
1.Çınar M, Ay S. Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Bilig. 2016;:205–226.
MLA
Çınar, Mehmet, and Sema Ay. “Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey”. Bilig, no. 76, June 2016, pp. 205-26, https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Çınar, Sema Ay. Validity of Balanced Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Bilig [Internet]. 2016 Jun. 1;(76):205-26. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA89NP34WK

Ahmet Yesevi University Board of Trustees