Tesettürlü Kadınlarda Öz Bakım ve Estetik Yönelimler

Year 2015, Issue: 75, 103 - 126, 01.12.2015

Fatma Zehra Fidan

Abstract

Modernite tarafından öngörülen bedensel güzellik kriterleri evrensel anlamda kabul görmüş, bu kriterlere ulaşma hedefiyle öz bakım pratikleri geliştirilmiştir. Son dönemlerde genel kabul gören estetik belirlenimler tesettürlü kadınlar tarafından da içselleştirilmiş, kadınların güzel olma/güzel görünme yönelimleri moderne göre şekillenmiştir. Tesettürlü kadınların güzellikle ilgili yönelimlerinin ve dinselliğin meydana getirdiği çelişkili repertuvarlar dinsel yorumlarla yumuşatılmış, ancak tam olarak çözüme ulaşmamıştır. Modern toplum dünyasında tesettürlü kadının güzel temsili ve dindar erkekleri günahlardan koruma sorumluluğu söz konusu çelişkileri yumuşatan en temel argümanlardır

Keywords

Modernite, tesettürlü kadın, güzellik, öz bakım, odak grup görüşmesi, içerik analizi

Self-Care and Aesthetic Orientations in Veiled Women

Abstract

The criteria for physical beauty predicted by modernity are accepted universally, and self-care practices have been developed to reach these criteria. Recently, the generally accepted aesthetic determinations have also been internalized by veiled women, and women’s orientations concerning beauty have been shaped based on modern ideas. The contradiction between veiled women’s beauty orientation and religious discourse has been softened through religious interpretations but it has not fully disappeared. The most essential arguments softening the existing contradictions in modern society are the representation of the veiled woman as a sign of beauty and her responsibility of protecting religious men from sin.

Keywords

Modernity, veiled woman, beauty, self-care, focus group interviews, content analysis

References

• Aksit, Belma (1992). “Medikal araştırmalarda etik sorunlar”. Türk Tabipler Birliği Sağlık Kongresi. 8–11 Mart 1992. Ankara.
• Baudrillard, Jean (2004). Tüketim Toplumu. Çev. Hazal Deliçaylı- Ferda Keskin. 2. Basım. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• ________. (2011). Simgesel Değiş Tokuş ve Ölüm. Çev. Oğuz Adanır. İstan- bul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yay.
• Bowling, Ann (2002). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services. Philadelphia, PA: McGraw- Hill House.
• Coward, Rosalind (1993). Kadınlık Arzuları. Çev. A. Türker. İstanbul: Renk Bas.
• Cussins, Anne Marie (2001). “The Role of Body Image in Women’s Mental Health”. Feminist Review (Women and Mental Health) 68: 105-114.
• Çokluk, Ömay (2011). Kuramsal Eğitimbilim 4 (1): 95- 107.
• Demez, Gönül (2009). Toplum Bilim (Beden Sosyolojisi Özel Sayısı): 9- 12.
• Dunkel,M. Trisha, Denise Davidson, Shaji Qurashi(2010). “Body satis- faction and pressure to be thin in younger and older Muslim and non-Muslim women: The role of Western and non-Western dress preferences”. Body Image 7: 56– 65.
• Eco, Umberto (2006). Güzelliğin Tarihi. Çev. Ali Cevat Akkoyunlu. İstan- bul: Doğan Kitap.
• Rando, Flavia (1991). “The Essential Representation of Women”. Feminist Art Criticism 50 (2): 48- 52.
• Fidan, Fatma Zehra (2015). Dindarlık Ve Modernlik Arasında Kadın. İstanbul: Opsiyon.
• Hargreaves, Jennifer and Patricia Vertinsky (2007). Physical culture, power, and the body. New York: Routledge.
• Hawort-Hoeppner, Susan (2000). The Critical Shapes of Body Image: The Role of Culture and Family in the Production of Eating Disorders. Journal of Marriage and Family 62 (1): 212-227.
• Hesse- Biber, Sharlene, Patricia Leavy, E. Courtney Quinn & Julia Zoino (2006). “The mass marketing of disordered eating and eating disor- ders: The social psychology of women, thinness and culture”. Wo- men’s Studies International Forum 29: 208–224.
• Işık, Emre (1998). Beden Ve Toplum Kuramı. İstanbul: Bağlam Yay.
• İnceoğlu, Yasemin ve Altan Kar (2010). Dişillik, Güzellik ve Şiddet sarmalın- da Kadın ve Bedeni. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay.
• Khan, Maulana Wahudiddin (1995). Women between Islam and Western so- ciety. New Delhi: A-Risala Books.
• Kim, Karen Hye-cheon (2007). “Religion, weight perception, and weight control behavior”. Eating Behaviors 8: 121–131.
• Kitzinger, Jenny (1994). “The methodology of focus groups: the importan- ce of interaction between research participants”. Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1): 103–121.
• Kitzinger, Jenny (1995). “Qualitative research: introducing focus groups”. British Medical Journal 311: 299- 302.
• Krueger, A. Richard (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide For Applied Research. London: SAGE.
• Lovejoy, Meg (2001). “Disturbances in the Social Body: Differences in Body Image and Eating Problems among African American and White Women”. Gender and Society 15 (2): 239- 261.
• Mazur, Allan (1986). “U.S. Trends in Feminine Beauty and Overadaptati- on”. The Journal of Sex Research 22 (3): 281-303.
• Morgan, L. David (1997). Focus grup as qualitative research. London: Sage.
• Nursi, Said (1996). Sözler. İstanbul: Envar Neşriyat.
• Pacteau, Francette (2005). Güzellik Semptomu. Çev. Banu Erol. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yay.
• Patton, Michael Quinn (2002). Qualitative research and evulation methods. 3. Baskı. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
• Polinska, Wioleta (2000). “Bodies under Siege: Eating Disorders and Self-Mutilation among Women”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 68 (3): 569- 589.
• Ruby, F. Tabassum (2006). “Listening to the voices of hijab”. Women’s Stu- dies International Forum 29: 54–66.
• Reece, Debra (1996). “Covering and communication: The symbolism of dress among Muslim women”. Howard Journal of Communication 7: 35–52.
• Wallace, A. Ruth; Wolf, Alison (2004). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları. Çev. Leyla Elburuz & Rami Ayas. İzmir: Punto Yay.