Kazakistan’daki Televizyon Söyleminde Sosyal Bir Sorun Olarak “Mankurtizm” Kavramı

Year 2021, Issue: 99, 205 - 226, 27.10.2021

Yenlik Ormakhanova Aizhan Serikbayeva Zeynep Bazarbaeva

https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9909

Abstract

Bu ilmi çalışma, Kazakistan’daki günümüz televizyon söylemi araştırmasını ele almıştır ve iletişimsel-pragmatik yaklaşımı kullanarak, Kazakistan modern televizyonundaki “Mankurtizm’in” (insanlığın ortaya çıkışı) nedenlerini ortaya koymuştur. Yani bu makalenin yazarı, Kazakistan dilbilimcilerinin araştırmalarına atıfta bulunarak, dil dengesinin 50/50 olmasını göz önüne alarak, Kazakça yayın payının % 50 ve Rusça yayın payının de %50 olması gerektiğini vurgulanmıştır. Yazar yorumlama yöntemini kullanarak, Kazakistan medyasındaki “Talent-Show” ve “Review” programları üzerine, dilin
medya üzerindeki araştırma çerçevesindeki hataları analiz etmiştir. Ayrıca, deney metodu maksad edinerek “Mankurtizm’in” toplumdaki özel yerini belirleyerek “Kazakistan’da Ulusal Öz Belirleme” konulu sosyolojik bir araştırmanın sonuçları sunulmuştur.

Keywords

“Mankurtizm”, televizyon söylemi, sosyal problem, dil politikası, ulusal self – determinasyon, mass – medya

Concept of “Mankurtism” as a Social Problem in Television Discourse of Kazakhstan

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the case study of the television discourse in Kazakhstan. Using the communicative and pragmatic approach, the author studies the causes of the “mankurtism” occurrence on the Kazakhstani television. Referring to the research of Kazakh linguists, the author considers the issue related to the observance of the language balance 50/50, according to which the share of broadcasting in the Kazakh language shall account for 50 percent, and another share of 50 percent is reserved for the broadcasting in Russian. Using the method of interpretation, аs a part of the undertaken study, the mistakes concerning the language use in the media discourse, have been analyzed as exemplified by the Kazakhstani Talent Show and Review TV programs. Аs well as there have been given the data on the findings of a sociological survey on a topic titled the National Self-Determination in Kazakhstan. The method of the experiment is selected with the aim of identifying places of “mankurtism” in society.

Keywords

“Mankurtism”, television discourse, social problem, language policy, national self-determination, mass media

References

• Aitmatov, Chıngız. “White steamship.” Socio-political newspaper, vol. 66, no. 24, 2007, p. 6.
• Aitmatov, Chıngız. Collected works in three volumes. Moscow, 1983.
• Bazarbayeva, Zeynep. Kazakh intonation. Dyke-Press, 2008.
• Belger, Herald. “Tribune.” Republican political newspaper Sayasi-Kalam, vol. 13, no. 4, 2014, p. 2.
• Carol, Dyhouse. Glamour: Women, History, Feminism. Zed Books, 2010.
• Dobrosklonskaya, Тatiana. Media discourse as an object of linguistics and intercultural communication. Bulletin of Moscow University, 2006.
• Eldesov, Dastan. “When we are free from the shackles of the Soviet ideology.” Newspaper Kazak uni, vol. 40, no. 23, 2013, p. 8.
• Heidegger, Martin. Letter on Humanism / The Problem of Man in Western Philosophy. Moscow, 1988.
• Hegai, Marina. “We are terribly degraded mentally.” Newspaper Kazak uni, vol. 48, no. 10, 2013, pp. 4-5.
• Ishanova, Asima. “Postmodern era journalism.” Materials of the international conference Kazakhstan – 2050. Astana, 2014.
• Jeltuhina, Marina. The specifics of the speech effects of tropes in the language of the media. PhD Dissertation. Moscow, 2004.
• Jung, Schneider. Favorites. Мoscow, 1990.
• Kazakhstan Zona KZ. 21.09.2018. https://zonakz.net:8443/articles/5186?action=author&id=358.
• Kazhegeldin, Akezhan. The opposition of the Middle Ages. From the experience of political confrontation in Kazakhstan 1998-2002. Almaty, 2002.
• Krongauz, Maksim. Russian on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Moscow, 2008.
• Kul-Muhammed, Mukhtar (2004). “The basis of national existence.” Social and political newspaper Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, vol. 186, no. 13, 2004, p. 4.
• Makarov, Mikhail. Socio-deictic dimension of style//language communication: processes and units. Kalinin: Kalinin state University, 1988.
• Nazarbayev, Nursultan. Ideological consolidation of society as a condition of Kazakhstan’s progress. Almaty, 1993.
• Nomad. 03.11.2016. http://www.nomad.su/?a=3-201009270038.
• Petrovskaya, Elena. “Pathos.” New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 volumes. Moscow, 2010.
• Shahanov, Mukhtar. Marseillaise of mankurtism. Ruh-Dariya, 2008.
• Syzdik, Rabiga. Modern problems of Kazakh culture. Almaty, 2009.
• Teun A. van Dijk. Language. Knowledge. Communication: Collection of works. Moscow, 1989.
• Turkestan. 03.07.2015. http://www.turkystan.kz/page.php? Page¬_id=36&id=8691.
• Ualiuly, Nurgeldi, and Anar Fazylzhanova. “Types of social consciousness and linguistic unity.” Journal News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, vol. 14, no. 3, 2009, p. 244.