The Importance of Creativity in Space Design

Abstract

When the act of design is evaluated in terms of cause and effect, it may be the reason for the emergence of architecture, interior architecture disciplines, or in other words, presence-existence. In fact, this action affects every point, to the visual effect that the smallest screw has on the point that it is placed rather than just the appearance of the structures, which we can consider as a shell. This process, which can fit into a very short sentence while talking about the definition, dominates and impacts the entire life cycle of individuals. The aim of this study is to present the importance of the concept of creativity in the design word, which includes concepts such as communication and art, on the basis of an applied interior architecture project, and to discuss what the concept of creativity gained by brings in by developing new ideas within the processes and the stages followed. While putting this action into practice avocationally, the formation phases and the results obtained have been evaluated with the help of both professional competence and professional drawing programs such as sketches and cad based programs.

Keywords

• Interior design
• creativity
• design
• space organization
• drawing techniques

References

1. [1] Bozdayı, M., 1992, “Geleneksel Anadolu Konutundaki Oda Kavramının Çağdaş Konut Tasarımında Modül Kavramı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi” Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sanatta Yeterlik/Doktora Tezi
2. [2] Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. (1995), “Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test”, MIS Quarterly, June, pp. 189-211.
3. [3] Eceoğlu (Erçetin), A., 2012, “Teknolojik Gelişmelerin Mimarlık Mesleğine Yansımaları Ve Simülasyon Programları'nın Mekan Tasarımına Etkisi”, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, Sanat ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Sayfa No: 89-92.
4. [4] Kear, M. (2000), Concept Analysis of Self-efficacy. Graduate Research in Nursing, available at: http://graduateresearch.com/Kear.htm
5. [5] Karsten, R. and Roth, M.R. (1998), “The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses”, Journal of Research on Technology Education, Vol. 31, pp. 14-24.
6. [6] Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. New Yrok: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
7. [7] Lawson, B. R. (2002). CAD and Creativity: Does the Computer Really Help? Leonardo, 35(3), 327-331
8. [8] Lev, E.L. (1997), “Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy: applications to oncology”, Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, Vol. 11, pp. 21-42.

9. [9] Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existance, Space and Architecture. Londra: Studio Vista.
10. [10] Rouquette, M. L., (1994), Yaratıcılık, İkinci Basım, Çeviren: Işın Gürbüz, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul
11. [11] Schunk, D.H. (1985), “Self-efficacy and classroom learning”, Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 22, pp. 208-23.
12. [12] Shih, T. Y., Sher, W. D. and Taylor, M. (2015) UNDERSTANDING CREATIVE DESIGN PROCESSES BY INTEGRATING SKETCHING AND CAD MODELLING DESIGN ENVIRONMENTS A Preliminary Protocol Result from Architectural Designers, Archnet-IJAR, Volume 9 - Issue 3 - November 2015 - (76-92) – Special Issue
13. [13] Topses, G. (2003) Gelişim ve Öğrenme Psikolojisi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, s 225- 227
14. [14] Yakın, B. (2012), TASARIM SÜRECİNDE GÖRSEL DÜŞÜNME VE GÖRSEL ANLATIM İLİŞKİSİNE ANALİTİK BİR YAKLAŞIM, Yüksek Lisans Tezi
15. [15] Yakın, B. (2015) Tasarım Sürecinde Eskiz ile Biçim-İçerik Sorgulama ve Çözümlemeleri: Bir Durum Analizi, Sanat Tasarım Dergisi 2015 HAZİRAN - Sayfa 121-137
16. [16] Yavuz, H. S., (1996), Yaratıcılık, Üçüncü Basım, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul