Evaluation of Smart City Determinants by the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 94 - 102, 30.12.2024

Onur Derse

https://doi.org/10.47897/bilmes.1428708

Abstract

Studies on smart cities are increasing rapidly today. Smart cities are structures that offer solutions to urban challenges with technological, sustainable, economic, and social approaches and focus on creating a more livable environment. In this study, first of all, the main components of smart cities were examined, and then these main components were evaluated. Smart Governance, Smart Transportation and Mobility, Smart People, Smart Economy, Smart Energy, Smart Environment, and Smart Life are discussed as the main components of smart cities. The main determinants discussed aim to reveal the relationship of the components that affect and are affected by each other, and to reveal the degree of importance of each component. In the study, the Fuzzy DEMATEL method is used, considering the existence of uncertain and fuzzy situations for the components discussed. The effect graphs of the determinants examined by the fuzzy DEMATEL method were obtained and the factors for the development of smart cities were evaluated. When examined as a result of the study, it is obtained that the Smart Life, Smart Energy, Smart Economy, and Smart Governance criteria are in the group of influencing factors, and the Smart Environment, Smart Transportation and Mobility, and Smart People criteria are in the affected group. When the importance levels are examined, the criteria from high to low are listed as Smart Governance, Smart Life, Smart Energy, Smart People, Smart Economy, Smart Environment, and Smart Transportation and Mobility.

Keywords

Smart cities, smart city determinants, fuzzy DEMATEL

References

• [1] C. Yin, Z. Xiong, H. Chen, J. Wang, D. Cooper, and B. David, “A literature survey on smart cities,” Science China Information Sciences, v. 58, no 10, pp. 1-18. 2015.
• [2] A. Camero, and E. Alba, “Smart city and information technology: A review”, Cities, v. 93, pp. 84-94, 2019.
• [3] C. S. Lai, Y. Jia, Z. Dong, D. Wang, Y. Tao, Q. H. Lai, R. T. K. Wong, A. F. Zobaa, R. Wu, and L. L. Lai, “A review of technical standards for smart cities,” Clean Technologies, v. 2, no 3, pp. 290-310, 2020.
• [4] European Comission. Accessed date: 12 October 2022. Smart Cities. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/eu-regional-and-urban-development/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en.
• [5] M. Chong, A. Habib, N. Evangelopoulos, and H. W. Park, “Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions,” Government Information Quarterly, v. 35, no 4, pp. 682-692, 2018.
• [6] E. Ismagilova, L. Hughes, Y. K. Dwivedi, and K. R. Raman, “Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective”, International Journal of Information Management, v. 47, pp. 88-100, 2019.
• [7] S. Yaşar, Z. Poyraz, R. Yumuşak, and T. Eren, “ANP ve PROMETHEE yöntemleri ile akıllı şehir analizi: Ankara’da bir uygulama”, Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, v. 8, no 1, pp. 15-28, 2022.
• [8] T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. “2020-2023 Ulusal Akıllı Şehirler Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı”, Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2024. Link: https://www.akillisehirler.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/EylemPlani.pdf.
• [9] C. Benevolo, R. P. Dameri, and B. D’auria, “Smart mobility in smart city”, Empowering Organizations, Springer, Cham, pp. 13-28, 2016.
• [10] S. Alawadhi, A. Aldama-Nalda, H. Chourabi, J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. Leung, S. Mellouli, T. Nam, T. A. Pardo, H. J. Scholl, and S. Walker, “Building understanding of smart city initiatives. In International conference on electronic government”, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 40-53, 2012.
• [11] T. Bakıcı, E. Almirall, and J. Wareham, “A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona”, Journal Of The Knowledge Economy, v. 4, no 2, pp. 135-148, 2013.
• [12] I. F. Braga, F. A. Ferreira, J. J. Ferreira, R. J. Correia, L. F. Pereira, and P. F. Falcão, “A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants”, Technology in Society, v. 66, no 101687, 2021.
• [13] A. De Marco, and G. Mangano, “Evolutionary trends in smart city initiatives”, Sustainable Futures, v. 3, no 100052, 2021.
• [14] Y. Lim, J. Edelenbos, and A. Gianoli, “What is the impact of smart city development? Empirical evidence from a smart city impact index”, Urban Governance, v. 4, no 1, pp. 47-55, 2024.
• [15] C. A. Freire, F. A. Ferreira, E. G. Carayannis, and J. J. Ferreira, “Artificial intelligence and smart cities: A DEMATEL approach to adaptation challenges and initiatives”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021.
• [16] G. Koca, O. Egilmez, and O. Akcakaya, “Evaluation of the smart city: Applying the dematel technique”, Telematics and Informatics, v. 62, no 101625, 2021.
• [17] E. Göçmen, “Smart airport: Evaluation of performance standards and technologies for a smart logistics zone”, Transportation Research Record, v. 2675, no 7, pp. 480-490, 2021.
• [18] A. L. A. Vaz, F. A. Ferreira, L. F. Pereira, R. J. Correia, and A. Banaitis, “Strategic visualization: the (real) usefulness of cognitive mapping in smart city conceptualization”, Management Decision, v. 60, no 4, pp. 916-939, 2021.
• [19] T. Vanli, and T. Akan, “Mapping synergies and trade-offs between smart city dimensions: A network analysis”, Cities, v. 142, no 104527, 2023.
• [20] J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. Chen, and M. Gasco-Hernandez, “Smart city results and sustainability: current progress and emergent opportunities for future research”, Sustainability, v. 15, no 10, pp. 8082, 2023.
• [21] R. Giffinger, C. Fertner, H. Kramar, R. Kalasek, N. Pichler-Milanovic, and E. Meijers, “Smart cities – ranking of european medium-sized cities, research report”, Accessed date: 02.03.2024. Available: Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austri, https://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf
• [22] A. C. Cagliano, A. Carlin, G. Mangano, and C. Rafele, “Analyzing the diffusion of eco-friendly vans for urban freight distribution”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, v. 28, no 4, pp. 1218-1242, 2017.
• [23] E. Fontela, and A. Gabus, “The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 report”, Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center, 1976.
• [24] O. Derse, “DEMATEL tabanlı TOPSIS yöntemi ve küme kapsama modeli ile afet lojistiği için depo yeri seçimi: Ege bölgesi örneği”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, v. 25, no 4, pp. 702-713, 2022.
• [25] O. Derse, “CO2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) storage site selection using DEMATEL-based Grey Relational Analysis and evaluation of carbon emissions with the ARIMA method”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 30, no 6, pp. 14353-14364, 2023.
• [26] O. Derse, “Prioritizing solutions of green reverse logistics barriers with Fuzzy DEMATEL–FUCOM–SWARA methods”, Ecological Indicators, v. 165, no 112198, 2024.
• [27] W. W. Wu, and Y. T. Lee, “Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method”, Expert Systems with Applications, v. 32, no 2, pp. 499-507, 2007.
• [28] A. Organ, “Bulanık Dematel yöntemiyle makine seçimini etkileyen kriterlerin değerlendirilmesi,” Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, v. 22, no 1, pp. 157-172, 2013.
• [29] O. Öztürk, “Türkiye karayollarında trafik kazalarının nedeni ve bu kazaların analizi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü [Yüksek lisans tezi, Dn. BORAN K.], Ankara, page 106, 2009.
• [30] A. Baykasoğlu, V. Kaplanoğlu, Z. D. Durmuşoğlu, and C. Şahin, “Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, v. 40, no 3, pp. 899-907, 2013.
• [31] E. Aksakal, and M. Dağdeviren, “ANP ve DEMATEL yöntemleri ile personel seçimi problemine bütünleşik bir yaklaşım”, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, v. 25, no 4, 2010.
• [32] R. J. Lin, “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices”, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 40, pp. 32-39, 2013.