BibTex RIS Cite

Nitrogen use efficiency of eleven triticale x Triticosecale Wittmack genotypes

Year 2017, Volume: 10 Issue: 2 , 26 - 31 , 15.08.2017
https://izlik.org/JA92FH95CT

Abstract

A field experiment with eleven triticale genotypes was conducted to assess the grain yield, biomass yield, protein content, total nitrogen N uptake and various indexes agronomic, physiological, agrophysiological, and apparent recovery efficiencies of N use efficiency NUE using different levels of N fertilizer 0, 40, 80 and 160 kg N ha-1 over two years. According to the results of this research, the grain yield and biomass yield were the highest with the N rate of 80 kg N ha-1. While grain protein content and the total N accumulation of triticale increased with the N application rates, the NUE indexes decreased with increasing N rates. The TVD25 line had the highest in grain yield 3765 kg ha-1 , biomass yield 19418 kg ha-1 , grain protein content 16.3% and total N uptake 178.8 kg ha-1 ; the Mikham cultivar was the highest in agronomic efficiency 14.6 kg kg-1 , agrophysiological efficiency 19.3 kg kg-1 and apparent recovery efficiency 70.4% and the Samur sortu cultivar was the highest in physiological efficiency 63.4 kg kg-1 based on the two-year-means. The low NUE index values were calculated from triticale genotypes having the highest yield and N accumulation. As a result, to reduce N losses from soil and increase the NUE indexes, N efficient genotypes in this study should be selected in breeding programs

References

  • Aynehband, A., Asadi, S., Rahnama A. (2012). Study of weed-crop competition by agronomic and physiological nitrogen use efficiency. Eur J. Exp. Biol., 2, 960-964.
  • Cameron, K. C., Di, H. J., Moir, J. M. (2013). Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. An Appl Biol., 162, 145-173.
  • Craswell, E. T., Godwin, D. C. (1984). The efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to cereals in different climates. In: Tinker, P.B., Lauchli, A. (Eds), Advances in Plant Nutrition, Volume I. Praeger Publishers, New York, p. 1-55.
  • Delogu, G., Cattivelli, L., Pecchioni, N., Defalcis, D., Maggiore, T., Stanca, A. M. (1998). Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron., 9, 11-20.
  • Fageria, K., Baligar, V. C. (2001). Lowland rice response to nitrogen fertilization. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 32, 1405-1429.
  • Gulmezoglu, N., Kinaci, E. (2005). Effect of sources and levels of nitrogen on nutritional quality of triticale grain. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75, 743-745.
  • Gulmezoglu, N., Aytac, Z. (2010). Response of grain and protein yields of triticale varieties at different levels of applied nitrogen fertilizer. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 5, 2563-2569.
  • Hirel, B., Le Gouis, J., Ney, B., Gallais, A. (2007). The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2369–2387.
  • Janusauskaite, D. (2013). Spring triticale yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by nitrogen rate and its splitting. Zemdirbyste, 100, 383–392.
  • Knapowski, T., Ralcewicz, M., Barczak, B., Kozera, W. (2009). Effect of nitrogen and zinc fertilizing on bread-making quality of spring triticale cultivated in Notec Valley. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 18, 227-233.
  • Kutlu, I., Gulmezoglu, N. (2017). Genotypic response on stability for yield and nitrogen use efficiency in triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) under different nitrogen regimes. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 10 (1), 84-91.
  • Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, T. J., Six, J., van Kessel, C. (2005). Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv. Agron., 87, 85-155.
  • Lewandowski, I., Kauter, D. (2003). The influence of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and combustion quality of whole grain crops for solid fuel use. Ind. Crop Prod., 17, 103–117.
  • Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J., Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Crop Sci. 74, 562–564.
  • Muchow, R. C. (1998). Nitrogen utilization efficiency in maize and grain sorghum. Field Crop Res., 56, 209–216.
  • Murphy, P. N. C., O’Connell, K., Watson, S., Watson, C. J., Humphreys, J. (2013). Seasonality of nitrogen uptake, apparent recovery of fertilizer nitrogen and background nitrogen supply in two Irish grassland soils. Irish J. Agr. Res., 52, 17–38.
  • Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Sayre, K. D., Pfeiffer, W. H. (1993). Differences in nitrogen recovery among CIMMYT’s bread wheats and complete and 2D (2R) substituted triticales. Triticale Topics, 11, 6.
  • Sobkowicz, P., Sniady, R. (2004). Nitrogen uptake and its efficiency in triticale (Triticosecale Witt) - field beans (Vicia faba var. minor L.) intercrop. Plant Soil Environ., 50, 500–506.
  • Varughese, G., Pfeiffer, W. H., Pena, R. J. (1996). Triticale: A successful alternative Crop (Part 2). Cereal Foods World, 41, 635–645.
  • Velasco, J. L., Rozas, H. S., Echeverría, H. E., Barbieri, P. A. (2012). Optimizing fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency by intensively managed spring wheat in humid regions: Effect of split application. Can. J. Plant Sci., 92, 847-856.
  • Zhao, S. P., Zhao, X. Q., Li, S. M., Shi, W. M. (2007). N-efficiency character of high-yield rice is not affected by soil nitrogen supply level. Acta Agr. Scand B-S P., 57, 97-104.

Onbir tritikale x Triticosecale Wittmack genotipinin azot kullanım etkinliği

Year 2017, Volume: 10 Issue: 2 , 26 - 31 , 15.08.2017
https://izlik.org/JA92FH95CT

Abstract

Uygulanan dört azot N dozunun 0, 40, 80 and 160 kg N ha-1 , onbir tritikale genotipinin tane verimi, biyolojik verim, protein içeriği, toplam N alımı ve N kullanım etkinlik NUE indekslerine agronomik, fizyolojik, agrofizyolojik, N değerlendirme ve N kullanım etkinliğine etkileri iki yıl tarla koşullarında araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, en yüksek tane ve biyolojik verimi, 80 kg N ha-1 doz uygulamasında olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tritikalenin tane protein içeriği ve toplam N alımı, uygulanan N dozlarıyla artarken, NUE indeksleri azalmıştır. TVD25 hattından en yüksek tane verimi 3765 kg ha-1 , biyolojik verim 19418 kg ha-1 , protein içeriği %16.3 ve toplam N alımı 178.8 kg ha-1 , Mikham çeşidinden en yüksek agronomik 14.6 kg kg-1 , agrofizyolojik 19.3 kg kg-1 ve N değerlendirme etkinliği %70.4 , Samur sortu çeşidinden ise en yüksek fizyolojik etkinlik 63.4 kg kg-1 elde edilmiştir. Yüksek verimli ve toplam N alımına sahip tritikale genotiplerinden, en düşük NUE değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, belirlenen N etkin tritikale genotipleri, topraktan N kayıplarını azaltmak ve NUE indekslerini artırmak için yapılacak ıslah programlarında kullanılmalıdır

References

  • Aynehband, A., Asadi, S., Rahnama A. (2012). Study of weed-crop competition by agronomic and physiological nitrogen use efficiency. Eur J. Exp. Biol., 2, 960-964.
  • Cameron, K. C., Di, H. J., Moir, J. M. (2013). Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. An Appl Biol., 162, 145-173.
  • Craswell, E. T., Godwin, D. C. (1984). The efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to cereals in different climates. In: Tinker, P.B., Lauchli, A. (Eds), Advances in Plant Nutrition, Volume I. Praeger Publishers, New York, p. 1-55.
  • Delogu, G., Cattivelli, L., Pecchioni, N., Defalcis, D., Maggiore, T., Stanca, A. M. (1998). Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron., 9, 11-20.
  • Fageria, K., Baligar, V. C. (2001). Lowland rice response to nitrogen fertilization. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 32, 1405-1429.
  • Gulmezoglu, N., Kinaci, E. (2005). Effect of sources and levels of nitrogen on nutritional quality of triticale grain. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 75, 743-745.
  • Gulmezoglu, N., Aytac, Z. (2010). Response of grain and protein yields of triticale varieties at different levels of applied nitrogen fertilizer. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 5, 2563-2569.
  • Hirel, B., Le Gouis, J., Ney, B., Gallais, A. (2007). The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2369–2387.
  • Janusauskaite, D. (2013). Spring triticale yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by nitrogen rate and its splitting. Zemdirbyste, 100, 383–392.
  • Knapowski, T., Ralcewicz, M., Barczak, B., Kozera, W. (2009). Effect of nitrogen and zinc fertilizing on bread-making quality of spring triticale cultivated in Notec Valley. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 18, 227-233.
  • Kutlu, I., Gulmezoglu, N. (2017). Genotypic response on stability for yield and nitrogen use efficiency in triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) under different nitrogen regimes. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 10 (1), 84-91.
  • Ladha, J. K., Pathak, H., Krupnik, T. J., Six, J., van Kessel, C. (2005). Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Adv. Agron., 87, 85-155.
  • Lewandowski, I., Kauter, D. (2003). The influence of nitrogen fertilizer on the yield and combustion quality of whole grain crops for solid fuel use. Ind. Crop Prod., 17, 103–117.
  • Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J., Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Crop Sci. 74, 562–564.
  • Muchow, R. C. (1998). Nitrogen utilization efficiency in maize and grain sorghum. Field Crop Res., 56, 209–216.
  • Murphy, P. N. C., O’Connell, K., Watson, S., Watson, C. J., Humphreys, J. (2013). Seasonality of nitrogen uptake, apparent recovery of fertilizer nitrogen and background nitrogen supply in two Irish grassland soils. Irish J. Agr. Res., 52, 17–38.
  • Ortiz-Monasterio, I., Sayre, K. D., Pfeiffer, W. H. (1993). Differences in nitrogen recovery among CIMMYT’s bread wheats and complete and 2D (2R) substituted triticales. Triticale Topics, 11, 6.
  • Sobkowicz, P., Sniady, R. (2004). Nitrogen uptake and its efficiency in triticale (Triticosecale Witt) - field beans (Vicia faba var. minor L.) intercrop. Plant Soil Environ., 50, 500–506.
  • Varughese, G., Pfeiffer, W. H., Pena, R. J. (1996). Triticale: A successful alternative Crop (Part 2). Cereal Foods World, 41, 635–645.
  • Velasco, J. L., Rozas, H. S., Echeverría, H. E., Barbieri, P. A. (2012). Optimizing fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency by intensively managed spring wheat in humid regions: Effect of split application. Can. J. Plant Sci., 92, 847-856.
  • Zhao, S. P., Zhao, X. Q., Li, S. M., Shi, W. M. (2007). N-efficiency character of high-yield rice is not affected by soil nitrogen supply level. Acta Agr. Scand B-S P., 57, 97-104.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

Nurdilek Gülmezoğlu This is me

Imren Kutlu This is me

Publication Date August 15, 2017
IZ https://izlik.org/JA92FH95CT
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gülmezoğlu, N., & Kutlu, I. (2017). Nitrogen use efficiency of eleven triticale x Triticosecale Wittmack genotypes. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 10(2), 26-31. https://izlik.org/JA92FH95CT

❖  Indexes
Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record, TR Dizin, Medical Reads (RRS), CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.

❖  Libraries
Aberystwyth University; All libraries; Bath University; Birmingham University; Cardiff University; City University London; CONSER (Not UK Holdings); Edinburgh University; Essex University;Eskisehir Technical University Library, Exeter University; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Feng Chia University Library; GAZİ Gazi University Library; Glasgow University; HEC-National Digital Library; Hull University; Imperial College London; Kaohsiung Medical University Library; ANKOS; Anadolu University Library; Lancaster University; Libros PDF; Liverpool University; London Metropolitan University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Manchester University; National Cheng Kung University Library; National ILAN University Library; Nottingham University; Open University; Oxford University; Queen Mary, University of London; Robert Gordon University; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sheffield Hallam University; Sheffield University; Shih Hsin University Library; Smithsonian Institution Libraries; Southampton University; Stirling University; Strathclyde University; Sussex University; The National Agricultural Library (NAL); The Ohio Library and Information NetWork; Trinity College Dublin; University of Washington Libraries; Vaughan Memorial Library; York University.

❖ Articles published in the journal “Biological Diversity and Conservation” are freely accessible. No article processing charge (APC) is charged.

❖ Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record
❖ This journal is a member of CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.
❖ For published articles and full details about the journal, please visit http://www.biodicon.com; https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/yayin/biodicon.


❖  Correspondence Address:: Prof. Ersin YÜCEL, Sazova Mahallesi, Ziraat Caddesi, No.277 F Blok, 26005 Tepebaşı-Eskişehir/Türkiye
E-mail: biodicon@gmail.com;
❖ Web Address: http://www.biodicon.com;  https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/biodicon
❖ Biological Diversity and Conservation
❖ ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online
Publication Start Date 2008
© Copyright by Biological Diversity and Conservation/Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma;  Available online at www.biodicon.com. All rights reserved.
. ❖ Publisher: ERSİN YÜCEL (https://www.ersinyucel.com.tr)
❖ This Journal is published three times a year. It is printed in Eskişehir, Türkiye.
❖ The authors are solely responsible for the articles published in this Journal .
Editör-in Chief  : Prof.Dr. Ersin YÜCEL, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7578