Comparative leaf and peduncle anatomy of four Turkish endemic Onobrychis Mill. taxa

Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 214 - 220, 15.08.2016

Mehmet Tekin Gülden Yılmaz

Abstract

In this study, leaf and peduncle anatomy of four Turkish endemic taxa of the genus Onobrychis from sect. Onobrychis, including Onobrychis quadrijuga, sect. Heliobrychis including Onobrychis argyrea subsp. argyrea, and sect. Hymenobrychis including Onobrychis tournefortii, and Onobrychis albiflora were investigated for the first time. Numerous quantitative and qualitative characters in the leaf and peduncle cross sections were determined and studied. Results showed that, for the leaves quantitative characteristics and for the peduncle qualitative characteristics are more distinctive between examined taxa. As the main, while in the leaf, mesophyll thickness, stomata and epidermis cells features, in the peduncle, especially, the contour of the peduncle and location of cavities in cross section, and density of papillae on hair surface were represented considerably variation between examined taxa

Keywords

anatomy , endemic , leaf , Onobrychis , peduncle , Turkey

Türkiye endemiği olan dört Onobrychis Mill. taksonunun karşılaştırmalı yaprak ve pedünkül anatomisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren Onobrychis cinsine dâhil olan, sect. Onobrychis’e ait O. quadrijuga, sect. Heliobrychis’e ait O. argyrea subsp. argyrea, sect. Hymenobrychis’e ait O. tournefortii ve O. albiflora taksonlarının yaprak ve pedünkül anatomisi ilk defa incelenmiştir. Yaprak ve pedünkül enine kesitleri üzerinden birçok nitel kalitatif ve nicel kantitatif karakterler tespit edilerek çalışılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre yapraklar için nicel, pedünkül için ise nitel karakterler, taksonlar arasındaki ayırt edici özellikler açısından önemlidir. Temel olarak, yapraktaki mezofil tabakası kalınlığı, stoma ve epidermis hücrelerinin özellikleri, pedünkülde ise özellikle enine kesit şekli, tüy yüzeyindeki papilla yoğunluğu, boşlukların konumları gibi özellikler incelenen taksonlar arasında dikkate değer şekilde varyasyon göstermektedir

Keywords

anatomi , endemik , Onobrychis , pedünkül , Türkiye , yaprak

References

• Aktoklu, E. 2001. Two new varieties and a new record in Onobrychis from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany. 25: 359-363.
• Amirabadizadeh, H., Jafari, A., Mahmoodzadeh, H. 2015. Comparative morphology, anatomy and palynological studies of perennial species of Onobrychis (Fabaceae) in northeast Iran. Nordic Journal of Botany. 33: 159-169.
• Ball, P.W. 1968. Onobrychis (Leguminosae). In: Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. (eds). Flora Europaea, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, UK: Cambridge, pp.187-191.
• Cavallarin, L., Antoniazzi, S., Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., 2005. Effects of wilting and mechanical conditioning on proteolysis in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) wilted herbage and silage. J. Sci. Food Agr. 85: 831-838.
• Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R., Tan, K. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement), vol. 10. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
• Duman, H., Vural, M. 1990. New taxa from south Anatolia I. Turkish Journal of Botany. 14: 45-48.
• Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Vural, M., Duman, H., Aytaç, Z., Adıgüzel, N. 2000. Red Data Book of Turkish Plants. Turkish Association for the Conservation of Nature, Ankara.
• Hedge, I.C. 1970. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. In: Davis, P.H. (eds.) Flora of Turkey, Vol. 3. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
• Hejazi, H., Mohsen, S., Nasab, M.Z. 2010. Cytotaxonomy of some Onobrychis (Fabaceae) species and populations in Iran. Caryologia. 63(1): 18-31.
• International Legume Database & Information Service (ILDIS). 2005. Legumes of the World. International Legume Database & Information Service. Genus Onobrychis. Version 10.01, November 2005. (Accessed: January 2016).
• Jensen, W.A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
• Karamian, R., Behjou, A.M., Ranjbar, M. 2012. Anatomical findings of Onobrychis sect. Heliobrychis (Fabaceae) in Iran and their taxonomic implications. Turkish Journal of Botany. 36: 27-37.
• Özaslan Parlak, A., Parlak, M. 2008. Effect of salinity in irrigation water on some plant development parameters of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) and soil salinity. Journal of Agricultural Science. 14: 320-325.
• Meidner, H., Mansifield, T.A. 1968. Physiology of Stomata. Mc. Graw Hill., London, pp.67-68.
• Pınar, N.M., Ekici, M., Aytaç, Z., Akan, H., Ceter, T., Alan, S. 2009. Pollen morphology of Astragalus L. sect. Onobrychoidei DC. (Fabaceae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany. 33: 291-303.
• Simpson, M.G. 2006. Plant Systematics. 1. Edition. Elsevier-Academic Press, New York.
• Tekin, M., Meriç, Ç. 2013. Morphological and anatomical investigations on endemic Hyacinthella acutiloba in Turkey Biological Diversity and Conservation. 6(1): 161-168.
• Tekin, M., Yılmaz, G. 2015. Comparative Root and Stem Anatomy of Four Rare Onobrychis Mill. (Fabaceae) Taxa Endemic in Turkey, Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 7(3): 308-312.
• Yıldırımlı, Ş. 2004. A new species and subspecies of Onobrychis, O. cigdemae and O. cigdemae subsp. gorkemii (Fabaceae) from Şırnak, Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi. 11: 1-10.
• Yılmaz, G. 2014. Seed micromorphology of Ornithogalum refractum and Ornithogalum fimbriatum (Hyacinthaceae) from Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 7(2): 110-114Yılmaz, G., Tekin, M. 2013. Anatomical and Palynological Studies on Chaerophyllum astrantiae and C. aureum in Turkey, Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 41(2): 355-360.
• Zhagoleva, E.P. 1976. Anatomy of Onobrychis cornuta (L.) Desv. sprout. Izv Akad Nauk Tadzh, SSR 2, pp. 25-32.
• Zhagoleva, E.P. 1980. Nodal anatomy of Onobrychis grandis (Fabaceae). Botanicheskii Zhurnal. 65(11): 1601-1604.
• Zohary, M. 1987. Onobrychis. In: Zohary M (ed) Flora Palaestina, Vol. 2, Academic Science Human, Jerusalem, pp.158–164.