The survey of regeneration diversity in managed and unmanaged beech stands of north forests of Iran

Year 2016, Supplement 1, 68 - 74, 15.08.2016

Mir Mozaffar Fallahchaı

Abstract

In this study regeneration diversity from the aspects of evenness and richness were compared and examined in the managed and unmanaged Nave-Asalem forests in north of Iran. In order to perform this survey, two parcels managed and unmanaged ones- were chosen for the reason that they had identical species and physiography. A randomsystematic inventory was done with a 100 m× 100 m inventory network and 7R 700 m sample pieces. For analyzing the data, different indexes of tree species regeneration in each sample piece was computed, and for the examination of considerable difference, the differences among the indexes means were used in two parts of the t-test. The results revealed that among the diversity mean of Shannon-wiener, N Hiill and N Mc-Arthur indexes in managed and unmanaged stands a considerable difference in a 5% level exists. Also among Brillouins's diversity index mean in two stands was a considerable difference in the levels of 1% and 5%. In this case the most increases were observed in N Hiill index with the amount of 1.973 and N Mc-Arthur index with the amount of 2.127 in the managed stand

Keywords

diversity , regeneration , beech , richness , evenness

References

• Alijan Pour, A, Eshaghi Zad, J, Banj Shafii, A. 2004. Considering and comparing wooden plants in Arasbaran Managed and unmanaged areas, Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research.,17: 125-132.
• Ardakani, M, R. 2004. Ecology, Tehran University publication. 340pp.
• Battles, jj, Shlisky, A.j, Barrett, R.H., Heald, R.C., Dlaz, B.H. 2001.The effects of forest management an plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. For.Ecol. Manage., 146:211-222.
• Bihamta, M, R, Zareh Chahkouhi, M; A. 2008. Statistical principles in natural resources sciences. Tehran University publication., 300pp.
• Brashears, M.B., Fajvan, M.A., Schuler. T. M. 2004. An assessment of canopy stratification and tree species diversity following clear cutting in central Appalachian hardwoods. For. Sci.50:54-64.
• Crow, T.R., Buckley, D.S., Nauertz, E.A., Zasada, J. C. 2002. Effects of management on the composition and structure of Northern hardwood forests in upper Michigan. For. Sci.48:129-145.
• Dastangoo, D. 2004. Comparing the inventory methods of forest trees species diversity indexes (Nekah management plan - Zalemroud). Forestry Master thesis. Agriculture science University and Gorgan's natural resources., 87pp.
• Elliott, K.J., Swank, W.T. 1994. Changes in the Southern Appalachians.Vegetatio, 115:11-18.
• Ertekin, M., Kırdar, E., Ayan, S. 2015. The effects of exposure, elevation and tree age on seed characteristics of Fagus orientalis Lipsky. South-east Eur for 6 (1): 15-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15177/seefor.15-03.
• Fallahchai, M.M, Marvie Mohadjer, M. 2005. The ecological role of height above the sea level in Siyahkal forest tree species diversity in north of Iran. Iranian Journal natural resource', 58: 89-99.
• Krebs, C.J. 1989. Ecological Methodology.University of British Columbia, Harper collius publisher., 432pp.
• Nagaik, T., Kamitani, T. and Nakshizuka, T. 2005.Effects of different forest management systems on plant species diversity in a Fagus crenata forested landscape of central Japan. Pulished on the NRC research press, available on: http://cjfr.nrc.ca
• Onaindiia, M., Dominguez, I., Albizu, I,. Garbius, c. and Aezaga, I. 2004. Vegetation diversity and vertical structure as indicators of forest disturbance. For. Ecol. Manage., 195:341-354.
• Parthasarathy, N. 1999. Tree diversity and distribution in undisturbed and human – impacted sits of tropical wet everagreen forest in southern western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and conservation, 8:1365-1381.
• Pour Reza, M. 2004.The survey of forest quantitative and qualitative situation in managed and unmanaged areas in Darbadam, Kermanshah region. Masters thesis, Natural resources Department in Guilan University, 57pp.
• Qomi Ovili, A, Hosseini, S.M, Metaji, 1, Jalali, Gh. 2006.Considering the wooden species biodiversity and regeneration in two managed flora communities in Khairoud Kenar area of Noshahr, Environmental Journal.43: 101-106.
• Rodriguez, N., Armenteras, D., Rincon, M.H.A., Morales, M., Sva, S. 2004. Forest biodiversity indicators in the Colombia Andes. Institute de investigation de recursos biologios Alexander Von Humboldt Carrera Bogota, 7:20-35.
• Schuler, T.M., Gillespie, A.R. 2000. Temporal Patterns of woody species diversity in a Central Appalachian forest from 1856 to 1997. J.Torr. Bot. Soc. 127:149-161.
• Shannon, C.E. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. In: Shannon, C.E., wiener, W. (Ed.).The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois press, Urbana, 29-125p.
• Smith, F. 1996. Biological diversity, ecosystem stability and economic development. J. Ecological Economics, 16:191-203.
• Simpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity, Nature, 12:1-20.
• Singh, J.S. 2002. The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted review. Curr.sci.82: 499-500.
• Tabari Kouchak Sarai, M, Fayaz, P, Emadiyan, F, Espahboodi, K, Pour Majidiyan, M. 2003. The effect of hold mesuration on Fagetum sappling's survival, growth and freshness. Journal of Pajouhesh Va Sazandgi .3: 32-36.